AccScience Publishing / EER / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/eer.4996
Submit to EER
Cite this article
18
Download
261
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integrating actual land cover data and landscape zone map to assess terrestrial ecosystems in Armenia

Elena Bukvareva1* ,  Armen Grigoryan1 ,  Maxim Dubinin2 ,  Eduard Kazakov2
Show Less
1 Biodiversity Conservation Center (BCC), Jrvezh, Kotayk region, Armenia
2 NextGIS OÜ, Tallinn, Harju County, Estonia
EER, 4996 https://doi.org/10.36922/eer.4996
Submitted: 29 September 2024 | Revised: 13 February 2025 | Accepted: 25 February 2025 | Published: 11 March 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Ecosystem mapping and accounting are essential for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services maintenance. In this study, we tested a simple geographic information system approach by overlaying Armenia’s landscape zones with land cover data from the Environmental Systems Research Institute and the European Space Agency. This analysis resulted in maps of 20 combinations of woody and non-woody land cover classes across 10 landscape zones, which we term landscape-land cover classes (LLCCs) and use as proxies for natural ecosystems. The LLCC-based method employed in this study accounts for the landscape and geographic specificity of terrestrial ecosystems, providing data on the extent of LLCCs within ecosystem accounting areas (EAAs), identifying rare LLCCs, and tracking changes in their extent following updates to land cover data. We found this approach applicable for assessing the extent and changes of LLCCs whose area exceeds the margin of error in land cover identification. In addition, it provides a useful framework for developing a prototype of ecosystem accounting in EAAs lacking regularly updated ecosystem maps.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Ecosystem mapping
Ecosystem extent accounting
Rare ecosystems
Funding
Funding allocation from the Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Germany. The principal organization is the Leibniz IOER, Dresden, Germany, with a service contract effective from June 1, 2024, according to Section 631 and the following sections of the German Civil Code.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. IPBES. In: Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT, editors. IGlobal Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat; 2019. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3831673

 

  1. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal; 2020. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/gbo5 [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Visconti P, Elias V, Sousa Pinto I, et al. Chapter 3: Status, trends and future dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystems underpinning nature’s contributions to people. In: Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando A, Mader A, editors. The IPBES Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Europe and Central Asia. Secretariat of the IPBES; 2018. p. 187-382. Available from: https://zenodo.org/records/3237429 [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Arneth А, Shin YJ, Leadley P, et al. Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(49):30882-30891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009584117

 

  1. Shin YJ, Arneth A, Chowdhury RR, Midgley GF, Alkemade JRM. Chapter 4: Plausible futures of nature, its contributions to people and their good quality of life. In: Brondizio ES, Settele J, Diaz S, Ngo HT, editors. Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat; 2019. p. 600-675. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3832074

 

  1. Assis JC, Hohlenwerger C, Metzger JP, Rhodes JR. Linking landscape structure and ecosystem service flow. Ecosyst Serv. 2023;62:101535. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101535

 

  1. Brose U, Hillebrand H. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371(1694):20150267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0267

 

  1. Lamy T, Liss KN, Gonzalez A, Bennett EM. Landscape structure affects the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Environ Res Lett. 2016;11(12):124017. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124017

 

  1. Lucie L, Aude E, Elodie F, Sébastien R, Benjamin C, Maube B. Landscape structure influences grassland productivity through plant functional diver-sity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;357:108650. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108650

 

  1. Martin EA, Dainese M, Clough Y, et al. The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: New pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(7):1083-1094. doi: 10.1111/ele.13265

 

  1. Oehri J, Schmid B, Schaepman-Strub G, Niklaus PA. Terrestrial land-cover type richness is positively linked to landscape-level functioning. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14002-7

 

  1. Schippers P, van der Heide CM, Koelewijn HP, et al. Landscape diversity enhances the resilience of populations, ecosystems and local economy in rural areas. Landsc Ecol. 2015;30(2):193-202. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0136-6

 

  1. Hautier Y, Isbell F, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Harpole WS, Lind EM. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2(1):50-56. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0

 

  1. Mori AS, Isbell F, Seidl R. β-diversity, community assembly, and ecosystem functioning. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33(7):549-564. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.012

 

  1. Zoeller KC, Gurney G, Cumming GS. The influence of landscape context on the production of cultural ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol. 2022;37(3):883-894. doi: 10.1007/s10980-022-01412-0

 

  1. Van der Plas F, Manning P, Soliveres S, et al. Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape-scale forest multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(13):3557-3562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517903113

 

  1. Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(22):12765-12770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2235465100

 

  1. Olden JD. Biotic homogenization: A new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J Biogeogr. 2006;33(12):2027-2039. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x

 

  1. United Nations. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). United Nations; 2021. Available from: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Keith DA, Ferrer-Paris JR, Nicholson E, Kingsford RT, editors. IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive Profiles for Biomes and Ecosystem Functional Groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2020. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en

 

  1. European Environment Agency. Mapping Europe’s Ecosystems (MAES). Available from: https://www.eea. europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/mapping-europes-ecosystems [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. European Environment Agency. Ecosystem Types of Europe - Version 3.1. Available from: https://www.eea.europa. eu/data-and-maps/data/ecosystem-types-of-europe-1/ ecosystem-types-of-europe [Last accessed on 20241 Jun 04].

 

  1. Petersen JE, Desaulty D, Ivits E, Mancosu E, Milego R, King S. Ecosystem Extent Accounts 2000-2018-A European Analysis. EEA Technical Report Produced as Part of the EU Project on Integrated Natural Capital Accounting (KIP IN-CA); 2021.

 

  1. Petersen JE, Mancosu E, King S. Ecosystem extent accounts for Europe. Ecosyst Serv. 2022;57:101457. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101457

 

  1. European Environment Agency. Ecosystem Extent Accounts. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/ecosystem-extent-accounts [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. European Environment Agency. Underpinning European Policy on Nature Conservation. Revision of the EUNIS Habitat Classification, EEA Briefing No 2/2017. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/underpinning-european-policy-on-nature-conservation/underpinning-european-policy-on-nature-conservation-1 [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. European Environment Agency. Mapping Europe’s Ecosystems. Briefing No 19/2018. European Environment Agency; 2019. Available from: https://www.eea.europa. eu/publications/mapping-europe-s-ecosystems [Last accessedon 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Bland LM, Keith DA, Miller RM, Murray JN, Rodríguez JP, editors. Guidelines for the Application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2015. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.RLE.1.en

 

  1. IUCN. An Introduction to the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: The Categories and Criteria for Assessing Risks to Ecosystems. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2016. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.RLE.2.en

 

  1. European Commission. Directorate General for the Environment. European Red List of Habitats Part 2. Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats. Available from: https:// www.eea.europa.eu/en/datahub/datahubitem-view/ de2276d8-e295-4cd7-89c9-88812065db87 [last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Bukvareva, EN, Aleynikov AA, Klimanova OA, Titova LA, Sviridova TV, Shcherbakov AV. Territorial assessment and prioritization for biodiversity conservation using the example of the center of European Russia. Contemp Probl Ecol. 2023;16:921-938. doi: 10.1134/S1995425523070028

 

  1. TEEB-Russia Project. Available from: https://teeb. biodiversity.ru/en [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Fayvush G, editor. Biodiversity of Armenia. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-34332-2

 

  1. Fayvush GM, Aleksanyan AS. Habitats of Armenia. National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Institute of Botany; 2016. Available from: https://ace.aua.am/ files/2019/05/2016-fayvush-habitats-of-armenia.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Ziroyan AN. On the classification of vegetation of Armenia. Curr Probl Humanit Nat Sci. 2017; 4(1):41-49.

 

  1. Fifth National Report of the Republic of Armenia to the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2014. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/am/am-nr-05-en.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Biodiversity Hotspots. Available from: https://www. conservation.org/priorities/biodiversity-hotspots [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. BCC Armenia. Ecosystem Accounting in Armenia: Setting the Scene. Available from: https://biodiversity-armenia.am/ en [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 28].

 

  1. BCC Armenia. Preliminary Review of Available Data for Ecosystem Accounting of Terrestrial Ecosystems of Armenia. Available from: https://biodiversity-armenia.am/en/seea-ea/ ongoing-projects/preliminary-data-analysis [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 28].

 

  1. Interactive Forest Atlas of Armenia. Available from: https:// forestatlas.am [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 04].

 

  1. BCC Armenia. Testing of Available Land Cover data for the Territory of Armenia. Available from: https:// biodiversity-armenia.am/en/seea-ea/ongoing-projects/ project-tasks/testing-of-available-landcovers-for-the-territory-of-armenia [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 28].

 

  1. Statistical Committee Republic of Armenia (ARMSTAT). Regional Statistics Handbooks. Available from: https:// armstat.am/en/?nid=651 [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 25].

 

  1. QGIS Association. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. Available from: https://www.qgis.org [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 25].

 

  1. BCC Armenia. Extent of Natural Landscapes. Available from: https://biodiversity-armenia.am/en/seea-ea/ongoing-projects/preliminary-results-on-ea/extent-of-landscapes [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 28].

 

  1. BCC Armenia. Extent of LLCCs. Available from: https:// biodiversity-armenia.am/en/seea-ea/ongoing-projects/ preliminary-results-on-ea/extent-of-llccs [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 28].

 

  1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services - An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications Office; 2013. doi: 10.2779/12398

 

  1. Grizzetti B, Teller A, Maes J, et al. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services - An Analytical Framework for Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Condition in EU. European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment; 2018. doi: 10.2779/055584

 

  1. Weiss M, Banko G. Ecosystem Type Map v3.1 - Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems. ETC/BD Report to the EEA; 2018. Available from: https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-bd/ products/etc-bd-reports/ecosystem_mapping_v3_1/@@ download/file/ecosystem_mapping_v3_1.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. EUNIS. EUNIS Habitat Type Hierarchical View. Available from: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats-code-browser-revised.jsp [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].

 

  1. Chytrý M, Tichý L, Hennekens SM, et al. EUNIS habitat classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats. Appl Veg Sci. 2020;23(4):648-675. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12519

 

  1. Fayvush G, Tamanyan K, Kalashyan M, Vitek E. “Biodiversity Hotspots” in Armenia. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien Ser B. 2013;115:11-20.

 

  1. Barsegjan AM. The new botanical maps of Armenia. Geobot Mapping. 1979;32:32-38. doi: 10.31111/geobotmap/1979.32

 

  1. Ecoserve. BioFact Forest Cover of Armenia. Available from: https://biodivers-southcaucasus.org/uploads/files/ giz%20(2014)%20biofact%20forest%20cover%20of%20 armenia%20eng.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 04].
Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept