AccScience Publishing / BH / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/BH026100015
Cite this article
4
Download
139
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Proportional pulse pressure as a non-invasive predictor of cardiac index in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A pilot study

Abdullah Özçelik1 Fethullah Kayan2* Ahmet Soylu3
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Mardin, Turkey
2 Department of Cardiology, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Diyarbakır, Turkey
3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Brain & Heart, 026100015 https://doi.org/10.36922/BH026100015
Received: 8 March 2026 | Revised: 22 May 2026 | Accepted: 29 May 2026 | Published online: 2 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

The primary objective of this pilot study is to examine the correlation between proportional pulse pressure (PPP) and cardiac index (CI) in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) heart failure, and to assess the usability of PPP as a non-invasive, practical biomarker for predicting hemodynamic profiles. We enrolled 100 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) from our cardiology clinic. Blood pressure was measured manually using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and CI was assessed via transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were stratified by CI (<2.2 L/min/m2 vs. ≥2.2 L/min/m2), and PPP was calculated as pulse pressure divided by systolic blood pressure. The mean age was 67 years (77% male). PPP values were significantly diminished among patients with low CI (p < 0.001), while correlation analysis indicated a strong positive relationship between PPP and CI (r = 0.584, p < 0.001). A PPP threshold of ≥25.85% identified CI ≥ 2.2 L/min/m2 with 84% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity.PPP, readily derived from routine blood pressure measurements, strongly correlates with CI in patients with HFrEF. It can serve as a non-invasive hemodynamic assessment modality in primary care settings or healthcare facilities with limited resources where echocardiography is unavailable.

Keywords
Pulse pressure
Heart failure
Proportional pulse pressure
Cardiac index
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
  1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). 2016;69(12):1167. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.005
  2. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Hole DJ, et al. More “malignant” than cancer? Five-year survival following a first admission for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001;3(3):315-322. doi: 10.1016/S1388-9842(00)00141-0
  3. Stewart S, Ekman I, Ekman T, et al. Population impact of heart failure and the most common forms of cancer: a study of 1,162,309 hospital cases in Sweden (1988 to 2004). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(6):573-580. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957571
  4. Jhund PS, MacIntyre K, Simpson CR, et al. Long-term trends in first hospitalization for heart failure and subsequent survival between 1986 and 2003: a population study of 5.1 million people. Circulation. 2009;119(4):515-523. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812172
  5. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368
  6. Stevenson LW, Perloff JK. Stevenson LW. The limited reliability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. JAMA. 1989;261(6):884. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420060100040
  7. Petrie CJ, Voors AA, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Low pulse pressure is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in non-ischaemic, but not in ischaemic advanced heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2009;131(3):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.10.023
  8. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(15):e1-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.013
  9. Goldberg RJ, Farmer C, Spencer FA, et al. Use of nonpharmacologic treatment approach in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2006;110(3):348-353. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.07.026
  10. Watanabe H, Ohtsuka S, Kakihama M, et al. Coronary circulation in dogs with experimental decrease in aortic compliance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(6):1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90330-4
  11. Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Pulse pressure: a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(4):975-984. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01108-1
  12. Zhong L, Wei M, Zhou X, et al. Low admission pulse pressure and increased in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026;13:1747168. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1747168
  13. Aronson D, Burger AJ. Relation between pulse pressure and survival in patients with decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(6):785-788. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.011
  14. Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, et al. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1737-7
  15. Tchorz KM, Chandra MS, Markert RJ, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic measurements from invasive and noninvasive monitoring during early resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(4):852-860. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824b1764
  16. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
  17. Beghini A, Sammartino AM, Papp Z, et al. 2024 update in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2025;12(1):8-42. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14857
  18. Rame JE, Dries DL, Drazner MH, et al. The prognostic value of the physical examination in patients with chronic heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2003;9(3):170-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2003.01341.x
  19. Olbers J, Gille A, Ljungman P, Rosenqvist M, Östergren J, Witt N. High beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm. Blood Press. 2018;27(5):249-255. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2018.1436400
  20. Patel HN, Miyoshi T, Addetia K, et al. Normal values of cardiac output and stroke volume according to measurement technique, age, sex, and ethnicity: results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021;34(10):1077-1085.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.05.012
  21. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.06.004
  22. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans. Circulation. 2005;111(5):697-716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6
  23. Ayuela Azcarate JM, Clau Terre F, Ochagavia A, Vicho Pereira R. Papel de la ecocardiografía en la monitorización hemodinámica de los pacientes críticos [The role of echocardiography in hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients]. Med Intensiva. 2012;36(3):220-232. [In Spanish] doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.025
  24. Ahmed SN, Syed FM, Porembka DT. Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic parameters. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(Suppl):S323-S329. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000270242.03536.D3
  25. Harada T, Sorimachi H, Obokata M, et al. Echocardiographic diastolic function grading in HFpEF: testing the updated 2025 ASE criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026;87(10):1261- 1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.024
  26. Yazdani B, Kleber ME, Yücel G, et al. Association of double product and pulse pressure with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the LURIC study. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22(12):2332-2342. doi: 10.1111/jch.14067
  27. Namasivayam M, Lau ES, Zern EK, et al. Exercise Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2022;10(4):278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.012
  28. Yildiran T, Koc M, Bozkurt A, et al. Low pulse pressure as a predictor of death in patients with mild to advanced heart failure. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(3):284-290.
  29. Jackson CE, Castagno D, Maggioni AP, et al. Differing prognostic value of pulse pressure in patients with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: results from the MAGGIC individual patient meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(18):1106-1114. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu490
  30. Qiu W, Xiao X, Cai A, et al. Pulse pressure and all-cause mortality in ischaemic heart failure patients: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):2689–2697. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2128208
  31. Petrie CJ, Damman K, Jhund PS, et al. Low pulse pressure as a poor-man’s indicator of a low cardiac index in patients with severe cardiac dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014;15(4):315-321. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328365b51e
  32. Laskey WK, Wu J, Schulte PJ, et al. Association of arterial pulse pressure with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.09.012
  33. Bonapace S, Rossi A, Laroche C, et al. Brachial pulse pressure in acute heart failure. Results of the Heart Failure Registry. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6(6):1167-1177. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12537
  34. Shah N, Qian M, Di Tullio MR, et al. Pulse pressure and prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49(6):e13092. doi: 10.1111/eci.13092
  35. Kothai G, Janani A, Malathy AR, Suthakaran PK. Evaluation of pulse pressure and proportional pulse pressure as predictors of severity among patients having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Ann Afr Med. 2020;19(3):188- 190. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_43_19
  36. Petrie CJ, Ponikowski P, Metra M, et al. Proportional pulse pressure relates to cardiac index in stabilized acute heart failure patients. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;40(7):637-643. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2017.1416121
  37. Cesaro A, Pastori D, Acerbo V, et al. Reduction of New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Treated with Semaglutide: An updated systematic review and meta regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf257
Share
Back to top
Brain & Heart, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4139 Published by AccScience Publishing