AccScience Publishing / BH / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/BH026090012
REVIEW ARTICLE

Expanding cardiac substrates in embolic stroke of undetermined source beyond atrial fibrillation

Osman Karaarslan1 Macit Kalçık2* Mehmet Mustafa Yılmaz2 Oğuzhan Çelik3 Abdullah Sarıhan4 Mehmet Murat Şahin1 Mucahit Yetim2 Muhammet Cihat Çelik1 Lütfü Bekar2 Yusuf Karavelioğlu2
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology, Hitit University Erol Olçok Education and Research Hospital, Corum, Türkiye
2 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Türkiye
3 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Türkiye
4 Department of Cardiology, Gediz State Hospital, Kütahya, Türkiye
Brain & Heart, 026090012 https://doi.org/10.36922/BH026090012
Received: 28 February 2026 | Revised: 9 April 2026 | Accepted: 13 April 2026 | Published online: 8 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) represents a significant proportion of ischemic strokes in which a definite etiology cannot be identified despite comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. Traditionally, occult atrial fibrillation has been considered the primary underlying mechanism; however, emerging evidence suggests that a broader spectrum of cardiac abnormalities may contribute to embolic risk. The concept of atrial cardiopathy has expanded the understanding of thromboembolic stroke beyond overt atrial fibrillation, highlighting the role of structural, functional, and electrophysiological alterations of the left atrium. In addition to atrial pathology, other potential cardiac sources—including left atrial appendage dysfunction, ventricular thrombus, valvular abnormalities, patent foramen ovale, and heart failure—have been implicated in ESUS. Advances in cardiac imaging, prolonged rhythm monitoring, and biomarker assessment have improved the detection of these covert substrates. Despite these developments, optimal strategies for risk stratification and secondary prevention remain uncertain, as recent trials of empiric anticoagulation in ESUS have yielded neutral results. This review summarizes current evidence on diverse cardiac mechanisms underlying ESUS, outlines diagnostic approaches for identifying occult embolic sources, and discusses implications for targeted management. A more individualized evaluation of cardiac substrates may refine therapeutic decisions and improve the prevention of recurrent stroke in this heterogeneous population.

Keywords
Embolic stroke of undetermined source
Atrial cardiopathy
Cardioembolic stroke
Left atrial appendage
Cryptogenic stroke
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/ HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
  2. Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2478-2486. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313600
  3. Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429-438. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7
  4. Kamel H, Okin PM, Longstreth WT Jr, Elkind MS, Soliman EZ. Atrial cardiopathy: a broadened concept of left atrial thromboembolism beyond atrial fibrillation. Future Cardiol. 2015;11(3):323-331. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.22
  5. Kamel H, Longstreth WT Jr, Tirschwell DL, et al. The AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In prevention After cryptogenic stroke randomized trial: Rationale and methods. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(2):207-214. doi: 10.1177/1747493018799981
  6. Ntaios G, Pearce LA, Veltkamp R, et al. Potential Embolic Sources and Outcomes in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the NAVIGATE-ESUS Trial. Stroke. 2020;51(6):1797-1804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028669
  7. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983-988. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.22.8.983
  8. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(2):755-759. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00887-X
  9. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):155-166. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60040-4
  10. Kurzawski J, Janion-Sadowska A, Sadowski M. Left atrial appendage function assessment and thrombus identification. IJC Heart Vasc. 2016;14:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.11.003
  11. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(4):961-969. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90644-0
  12. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach. Chest. 2010;137(2):263-272. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584
  13. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(12):857-867. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007
  14. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2467-2477. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1311376
  15. Brambatti M, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation. 2014;129(21):2094-2099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007825
  16. Van Gelder IC, Healey JS, Crijns HJGM, et al. Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(17):1339-1344. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx042
  17. Kamel H, Elkind MS, Bhave PD, et al. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and the risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2013;44(6):1550-1554. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001118
  18. Kamel H, Soliman EZ, Heckbert SR, et al. P-wave morphology and the risk of incident ischemic stroke in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2014;45(9):2786-2788. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.006364
  19. Goda T, Sugiyama Y, Ohara N, et al. P-Wave Terminal Force in Lead V1 Predicts Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(9):1912- 1915. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.031
  20. Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995;92(4):835-841. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.835
  21. Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, Donal E, Badano LP. Left Atrial Structure and Function, and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(15):1961- 1977. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059
  22. Kamel H, Bartz TM, Elkind MSV, et al. Atrial Cardiopathy and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study). Stroke. 2018;49(4):980-986. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.020059
  23. Folsom AR, Nambi V, Bell EJ, et al. Troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and incidence of stroke: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke. 2013;44(4):961-967. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.111.000173
  24. Hoit BD. Left atrial size and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(6):493-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.055
  25. Cameli M, Mandoli GE, Lisi E, et al. Left atrial, ventricular and atrio-ventricular strain in patients with subclinical heart dysfunction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;35(2):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1461-7
  26. Tabata T, Oki T, Fukuda N, et al. Influence of left atrial pressure on left atrial appendage flow velocity patterns in patients in sinus rhythm. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):857-864. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(96)90478-2
  27. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, et al. Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(6):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.032
  28. Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K, et al. Anatomical characteristics of the left atrial appendage in cardiogenic stroke with low CHADS2 scores. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(6):921-925. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.036
  29. Handke M, Harloff A, Olschewski M, Hetzel A, Geibel A. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2262-2268. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa071422
  30. Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Shah DJ, et al. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(2):148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.041
  31. Robinson AA, Jain A, Gentry M, McNamara RL. Left ventricular thrombi after STEMI in the primary PCI era: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:554-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.069
  32. Lip GYH, Ponikowski P, Andreotti F, et al. Thrombo-embolism and antithrombotic therapy for heart failure in sinus rhythm. A joint consensus document from the ESC Heart Failure Association and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(7):681-695. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs073
  33. Salem DN, Stein PD, Al-Ahmad A, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in valvular heart disease--native and prosthetic: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(3 Suppl):457S-482S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.457s
  34. Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-valve stenosis-From patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(8):744-756. doi: 10.1056/nejmra1313875
  35. Aziz F, Baciewicz FA Jr. Lambl’s excrescences: review and recommendations. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(3):366-368.
  36. Thuny F, Di Salvo G, Belliard O, et al. Risk of embolism and death in infective endocarditis: prognostic value of echocardiography: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation. 2005;112(1):69-75. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.493155
  37. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034-1048. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.778886
  38. Yuan K, Kasner SE. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018;3(2):84-91. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000173
  39. Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1740-1746. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa011503
  40. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Medical Therapy after Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(11):1022-1032. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057
  41. Kent DM, Saver JL, Ruthazer R, et al. Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE)-Estimated Attributable Fraction Correlates With the Benefit of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: An Analysis of 3 Trials. Stroke. 2020;51(10):3119- 3123. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029350
  42. Pullicino PM, Halperin JL, Thompson JL. Stroke in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Neurology. 2000;54(2):288. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.2.288
  43. Lip GYH, Gibbs CR. Anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm: a Cochrane systematic review. QJM. 2002;95(7):451-459. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.7.451
  44. Doehner W, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Lainscak M. Neurohormonal activation and inflammation in chronic cardiopulmonary disease: a brief systematic review. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(9-10):293-296. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1194-7
  45. Sgoifo A, Carnevali L, Alfonso Mde L, Amore M. Autonomic dysfunction and heart rate variability in depression. Stress. 2015;18(3):343-352. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2015.1045868
  46. Benarroch EE. The central autonomic network: functional organization, dysfunction, and perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(10):988-1001. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62272-1
  47. Reddin C, Murphy R, Hankey GJ, et al. Blood pressure variability in acute stroke: Risk factors and association with functional outcomes at 1 month. Eur J Neurol. 2024;31(8):e16314. doi: 10.1111/ene.16314
  48. Chen PS, Chen LS, Fishbein MC, Lin SF, Nattel S. Role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ Res. 2014;114(9):1500- 1515. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.114.303772
  49. Von Känel R, Dimsdale JE. Effects of sympathetic activation by adrenergic infusions on hemostasis in vivo. Eur J Haematol. 2000;65(6):357-369. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.065006357.x
  50. Thayer JF, Yamamoto SS, Brosschot JF. The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Int J Cardiol. 2010;141(2):122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.543
  51. Sessa F, Anna V, Messina G, et al. Heart rate variability as predictive factor for sudden cardiac death. Aging. 2018;10(2):166-177. doi: 10.18632/aging.101386
  52. Hillebrand S, Gast KB, de Mutsert R, et al. Heart rate variability and first cardiovascular event in populations without known cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression. Europace. 2013;15(5):742- 749. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus341
  53. Shen MJ, Zipes DP. Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res. 2014;114(6):1004- 1021. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.113.302549
  54. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Raczak G. Baroreflex sensitivity: measurement and clinical implications. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008;13(2):191-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2008.00219.x
  55. Kamel H, Elkind MS, Kronmal RA, et al. Atrial cardiopathy biomarkers and atrial fibrillation in the ARCADIA trial. Eur Stroke J. 2025;10(2):495-501. doi: 10.1177/23969873241276358
  56. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258
  57. Hart RG, Catanese L, Perera KS, Ntaios G, Connolly SJ. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. Stroke. 2017;48(4):867-872. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.016414
  58. Yaghi S, Song C, Gray WA, Furie KL, Elkind MS, Kamel H. Left Atrial Appendage Function and Stroke Risk. Stroke. 2015;46(12):3554-3559. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.011273
  59. Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD, et al. Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1906-1917. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1813959
  60. Geisler T, Poli S, Meisner C, et al. Apixaban for treatment of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ATTICUS randomized trial): Rationale and study design. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(9):985-990. doi: 10.1177/1747493016681019
  61. Aviv Y, Barnea R, Gurevitz C, et al. Coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Eur Stroke J. 2026;11(1):98-105. doi: 10.1093/esj/23969873251381912
  62. Cascio Rizzo A, Schwarz G, Bellavia S, et al. CTA-Based Plaque-RADS to Assess Etiologic Role of Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. Neurology. 2026;106(7):e214801. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214801
  63. Ntaios G. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(3):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.024
  64. Habibi M, Chrispin J, Spragg DD, et al. Utility of Cardiac MRI in Atrial Fibrillation Management. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2020;12(2):131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2020.02.006
  65. Sreedharan SE, Saikiran K, Chandralekha SC, et al. Clinical, Imaging, and Atrial Cardiopathy Markers in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes - Clues to a Cardioembolic Source. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025;28(4):568-573. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_772_24
  66. Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Lip GYH, et al. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation on Follow-Up: How Much Causality Is There? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(12):2975-2980. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.015
  67. Svendsen JH, Diederichsen SZ, Højberg S, et al. Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (The LOOP Study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10310):1507-1516. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01698-6
  68. Svennberg E, Friberg L, Frykman V, Al-Khalili F, Engdahl J, Rosenqvist M. Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): A multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10310):1498-1506. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01637-8
  69. Kirchhof P, Toennis T, Goette A, et al. Anticoagulation with Edoxaban in Patients with Atrial High-Rate Episodes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(13):1167-1179. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2303062
  70. Vlad LE, Roman R, Lungu AE, Cuciureanu DI. Serum biomarkers insights into occult atrial fibrillation related to embolic strokes of undetermined source: a narrative review. BMC Neurol. 2026;26(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12883-026-04722-x

71. Tantry US, Abanga R, Bliden K, Gurbel PA, Ashley WW. Exploring the future of ischemic stroke diagnosis and underrecognized etiologies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2026;26(3):255-264. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2026.2624518

Share
Back to top
Brain & Heart, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4139 Published by AccScience Publishing