AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.3734
ARTICLE

Transnational mobility, art markets, and the city: An analysis of the role of hypermobile creative professionals in the emergence of new artistic centers

Jeremie Molho1*
Show Less
1 Canada Excellence Chair in Migration and Integration, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Submitted: 22 May 2024 | Accepted: 11 November 2024 | Published: 9 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Re-globalization: Practices from the Art Market)
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The emergence of new regional art markets has increasingly challenged the traditional dominance of Western Europe and North America over the last two decades. Cities such as Dubai, Singapore, and Hong Kong have become significant hubs that house global auction houses and contemporary museums, and host major art events. This study examines how hypermobile creative professionals function in the growth of these emerging art centers. It purposes to elucidate how the transnational mobility of these professionals influences the geographical dynamics of the global art market. The study’s methodology entailed qualitative fieldwork conducted in Istanbul, Doha, Singapore, and Hong Kong, along with in-depth interviews with wide-ranging actors in the art worlds of these cities, including artists, curators, dealers, and collectors. The study’s findings reveal that these actors contribute to the construction of the reputations of these metropolises emerging as art hubs by voting with their feet for the next upcoming art center and actively engaging in the transformation of the local art markets. This study attracts attention to the ways in which the regulation of human mobility affects the journeys and practices of art professionals. In so doing, it proposes a novel lens through which to apprehend the ongoing disparities in the global art market and grasp how historical hegemonies persist amidst continuous calls for more expansive diversity and inclusivity in the art world.

Keywords
Human mobility
Art markets
Emerging art centers
Hypermobile professionals
Global art world
Istanbul
Doha
Hong Kong
Singapore
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interest.
References
  1. De Marchi N, Van Miegroet HJ. The history of art markets. In: Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture. Vol. 1. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2006. p. 69-122. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01003-9

 

  1. Petersen AR. Migration into Art: Transcultural Identities and Art-making in a Globalised World. Oxford: Manchester University Press; 2017. doi: 10.7765/9781526121912

 

  1. Kim DY. The Traveling Artist in the Italian Renaissance: Geography, Mobility, and Style. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2014.

 

  1. Salzberg R. The Renaissance on the Road: Mobility, Migration and Cultural Exchange. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2023. doi: 10.1017/9781108963886

 

  1. Alpers S. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1983.

 

  1. White HC, White CA. Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993.

 

  1. Higonnet PL. Paris: Capital of the World. United States: Harvard University Press; 2009.

 

  1. Joyeux-Prunel B. Les Avant-gardes Artistiques, 1918-1945: Une Histoire Transnationale. Paris: Gallimard; 2017.

 

  1. Guilbaut S. How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1983.

 

  1. Dossin C. The Rise and Fall of American Art, 1940s-1980s: A Geopolitics of Western Art Worlds. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315553450

 

  1. Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plan A. 2006;38(2):207-226. doi: 10.1068/a37268

 

  1. Cresswell T. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. England: Taylor and Francis; 2006.

 

  1. Urry J. Mobilities. United Kingdom: Polity Press; 2007.

 

  1. Beaverstock JV. The spatial mobility of corporate knowledge: Expatriation, global talent, and the world city. In: Mobilities of Knowledge. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 227-246. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44654-7_12

 

  1. Birtchnell T, Caletrío J. Elite Mobilities. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2013.

 

  1. Turculet G. Academics stuck in movement amidst precarity, hypermobility, and vulnerability. In: Academic Freedom and Precarity in the Global North. England, UK: Routledge; 2022. p. 149-168. doi: 10.4324/9781003256984

 

  1. Liao KAS. Mobile practices and the production of professionals on the move: Filipino highly skilled migrants in Singapore. Geoforum. 2019;106:214-222.doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.013

 

  1. Velthuis O, Baia Curioni S, editors. Cosmopolitan Canvases: The Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

 

  1. Zarobell J. New geographies of the biennial: Networks for the globalization of art. GeoJournal. 2022;87(4):2505-2523. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10384-8

 

  1. Sooudi OK. Japanese New York: Migrant Artists and Self-reinvention on the World Stage. United States: University of Hawaii Press; 2017.

 

  1. Zarobell J. Art and the Global Economy. United States: University of California Press; 2017.

 

  1. Jones CA. The Global Work of Art: World’s Fairs, Biennials, and the Aesthetics of Experience. Illinois, US: University of Chicago Press; 2020.

 

  1. Robertson I. Understanding Art Markets: Inside the World of art and Business. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2015.

 

  1. Molho J. Becoming Asia’s art market hub: Comparing Singapore and Hong Kong. Arts. 2021;10(2):28. doi: 10.3390/arts10020028

 

  1. Brandellero A. How art market actors experience market emergence in an unequal field: Placing Brazilian contemporary art in the global art market. Consum Mark Cult. 2022;25(6):525-545. doi: 10.1080/10253866.2022.2093196

 

  1. Adeyemi J. Contemporary Art from Nigeria in the Global Markets: Trending in the Margins. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.

 

  1. Duarte A, Pérez-Ibañez M. The Art Market and the Global South. Vol. 18. Netherlands: Brill; 2023. doi: 10.1163/9789004680432_002

 

  1. Duester E. (Up)rooted in mobile careers: Impacts of sustained geographic mobilities across Europe on contemporary visual artists from the Baltic States. Crossings J Migr Cult. 2023;14(2):161-175. doi: 10.1386/cjmc_00081_1

 

  1. Juneja M. Can Art History be Made Global? Meditations from the Periphery. Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co KG.; 2023.

 

  1. Dogramaci B, Mersmann B, editors. Handbook of Art and Global Migration: Theories, Practices, and Challenges. Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co KG; 2019.

 

  1. Abderrezak H. Ex-centric Migrations: Europe and the Maghreb in Mediterranean Cinema, Literature, and Music. United States: Indiana University Press; 2016.

 

  1. Winarnita M, Dirgantoro W, Wilding R. Close, not close: Migrant artists negotiating transnational mother-daughter intimacies. Emot Space Soc. 2019;31:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2019.02.005

 

  1. Isaakyan I. Temporariness management by elite migrant-artists. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2022;48(16):3860-3878. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2022.2028351

 

  1. Kobyshcha V. Moving through aesthetic space: Visual artists and migration. In: The Cultural Sociology of Art and Music: New Directions and New Discoveries. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 163-193. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-11420-5_7

 

  1. Brone S, Moghadam A. New markets and territories for art in the cities of the global South. Géogr Cult. 2016; 10(97). doi: 10.4000/gc.4531

 

  1. Sooudi OK. Making Mumbai’s Emerging Art World through Makeshift Practices. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 2016;39(1):149-166. doi: 10.1080/00856401.2016.1141480

 

  1. Molho J, Sagot-Duvauroux D. From Global to Local Creative Dynamics: The Location Patterns of Art Galleries. United States: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 43-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56497-5_3

 

  1. Molho J. The soft power of framing: Constructing Istanbul as a regional art centre. Eur J Turk Stud. 2015;(21). doi: 10.4000/ejts.5248

 

  1. Kharchenkova S. The market metaphors: Making sense of the emerging market for contemporary art in China. Poetics. 2018;71:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.06.001

 

  1. Buchholz L. The Global Rules of Art: The Emergence and Divisions of a Cultural World Economy. United States: Princeton University Press; 2022.

 

  1. Levitt P, Siliunas A. Cultures of cultural globalization: How national repertoires and political ideologies affect literary and artistic circulation. Cult Soc. 2023;18:332-353. doi: 10.1177/17499755221147653

 

  1. Stallabrass J. Contemporary Art: A Very SHORT Introduction. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2020.

 

  1. Boll D. Art and Its Market. Germany: Hatje Cantz Verlag; 2024.

 

  1. Smith MP, Favell A, editors. The Human face of Global Mobility: International Highly Skilled Migration in Europe, North America and the Asia-Pacific. United States: Transaction Publishers; 2006. doi: 10.4324/9781315132501

 

  1. Coslor E, Crawford B, Leyshon A. Collectors, investors, and speculators: Gatekeeper use of audience categories in the art market. Organ Stud. 2020;41(7):945-967. doi: 10.1177/0170840619883371

 

  1. Newbury SP. The Speculative City: Art, Real Estate, and the Making of Global Los Angeles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2021.

 

  1. Levitt P. Becoming a cultural destination of choice: Lessons on vernacularization from beirut and buenos aires. Int J Cult Policy. 2020;26(6):756-770. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1811251

 

  1. Mandel BR, Lambert PD. International arts/cultural management: Global perspectives on strategies, competencies, and education. J Arts Manage Law Soc. 2020;50(4-5):249-266. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2020.1771495

 

  1. Ithurbide C. Beyond Bombay art district: Reorganization of art production into a polycentric territory at metropolitan scale. Belgeo Rev Bel Géogr. 2014 ;(3 ). doi: 10.4000/belgeo.13199

 

  1. Fang L. Anthropological studies of urban art districts: The thinking behind the exploration of Dashanzi Art District. In: Alternative Art and Anthropology. England, UK: Routledge; 2020. p. 95-115. doi: 10.4324/9781003084433

 

  1. Oner AC, Grant RJ, Li H. Global arts world and the worlding of Wynwood, Miami, Florida. Int J Cultur Policy. 2024;30(4):447-467. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2023.2221297

 

  1. Miller-Davenport S. The cultural center of the world: Art, finance, and globalization in late twentieth-century New York. J Urban Hist. 2024;50(1):123-144. doi: 10.1177/009614422110648

 

  1. Zertuche Cantu AR. Factors Behind the Successful Positioning of Mexico City as an International Contemporary Art Center. MA Theses; 2022.

 

  1. Sooudi OK. Alternative spaces and artist agency in the art market. Arts. 2020;9(4):116.

 

  1. Milano R. Economic freedom and inequality in the art market: The case of the commercial gallery. Arts. 2020;9(4):126. doi: 10.3390/arts9040126

 

  1. Kompatsiaris P. Curators, words and values: The branding economies of curatorial statements in art biennials. J Cultl Econ. 2020;13(6):758-771. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2020.1716825

 

  1. Albritton A. Exhibitions and biennials in a global context. In: Art History in a Global Context: Methods, Themes, and Approaches. United States: John Wiley and Sons; 2020. p. 57-75.

 

  1. Mackay J. Art world fields and global hegemonies. Int Stud Q. 2022;66(3):sqac029. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqac029

 

  1. Martin A, O’Neill P. Location dynamics of commercial art galleries in Sydney. Aust Geogr. 2021;52(3):273-292. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2021.1958979

 

  1. Rojas F, De La Torre D. Art dealers as competitors and community builders: Understanding the overlapping social logics of the contemporary art world. Sociol Compass. 2023;17(10): e13125. doi: 10.1111/soc4.13125

 

  1. Moreno AP, Hochleitner K. The relationship between art fairs and the internationalization of the Brazilian contemporary art market. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2023;12(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20231202.11

 

  1. Quemin A. The market and museums: The increasing power of collectors and private galleries in the contemporary art world. J Vis Art Pract. 2020;19(3):211-224. doi: 10.1080/14702029.2020.1804705

 

  1. Betzler D, Camina R. Cultural entrepreneurship using the example of Uli Sigg as patron and mediator of contemporary Chinese art. J Arts Manage Law Soc. 2020;50(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2019.1659897

 

  1. Molho J. Globalization of the art market from below. The spread of art walks in Istanbul. Géogr Cult. 2016;97:15-38. doi: 10.4000/gc.4342

 

  1. Van Eersel M. Contemporary art biennials and development: The Istanbul experience. In: The Aesthetics of Development: Art, Culture and Social Transformation. Germany: Springer; 2017. p. 189-206. Available from: https://link.springer.com/ book/10.1057/978-1-349-95248-9 doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-95248-9_9

 

  1. Hou H. 10th Uluslararasi Istanbul Bienali. Imkansiz degil üstelik gerekli: Küresel savas çağunda iyimserlik. In: Hoffmann J, Pedrosa A, editors. İstanbul’u Hatırlamak. Istanbul: IKSV and Yapı Kredi Yayinlari; 2011.

 

  1. Polo JF. The Istanbul modern art museum: An urban regeneration project? Eur Plan Stud. 2015;23(8):1511-1528. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.819074

 

  1. Fındıklı B, Hasboyaci B. The Contemporary Istanbul Art Fair and the Internationalization of Art Market in Turkey. In: The Art Market and the Global South. Netherlands: Brill; 2023. P. 278-295. doi: 10.1163/9789004680432_015

 

  1. Mirgani S. Introduction: Art and Cultural Production in the GCC. In: Art and Cultural Production in the Gulf Cooperation Council. England, UK: Routledge; 2019. p. 1-11. doi: 10.4324/9781351142205

 

  1. Exell K, Rico T. Cultural Heritage in the Arabian Peninsula: Debates, Discourses and Practices. England, UK: Routledge; 2016.

 

  1. Exell K. Locating Qatar on the world stage: Museums, foreign expertise and the construction of Qatar’s contemporary identity. In: Representing the Nation. England, UK: Routledge; 2016. p. 43-58. doi: 10.4324/9781315691350

 

  1. Bereson R. Renaissance or regurgitation? Arts policy in Singapore 1957-2003. Asia Pac J Arts Cultur Manage. 2003;1(1):1-14.

 

  1. Kwok KW, Low KH. Cultural policy and the city-state: Singapore and the “New Asian renaissance.” In: Global Culture. England, UK: Routledge; 2016. p. 149-168. doi: 10.4324/9781315538792

 

  1. Kong L. Ambitions of a global city: Arts, culture and creative economy in post-crisis Singapore. In: Cultural Policy in East Asia. England, UK: Routledge; 2015. p. 19-34. doi: 10.4324/9781315773506

 

  1. Molho J. Hub cities and regional framing in a globalising art market: The construction of a Southeast Asian art scene in Singapore. In: The Art Market and the Global South. Netherlands: Brill; 2023. p. 57-73. doi: 10.1163/9789004680432_005

 

  1. Poposki Z, Leung IH. Hong Kong as a global art hub: Art ecology and sustainability of Asia’s art market centre. Arts. 2022;11(1):29. doi: 10.3390/arts11010029

 

  1. Harris J. Doing the business in the Hong Kong art world. In: The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Art in Global Asia. England, UK: Routledge; 2022. p. 140-153. doi: 10.4324/9781003285298

 

  1. Schultheis F, Single E, Köfeler R, Mazzurana T. Art Unlimited?: Dynamics and Paradoxes of a Globalizing Art World. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2016. doi: 10.14361/9783839432969

 

  1. Glick Schiller N, Salazar NB. Regimes of mobility across the globe. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2013;39(2):183-200. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing