AccScience Publishing / AC / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ac.2881
ARTICLE

 Legal analysis of the risks in art exhibition contracts from the perspective of international law

Chen Zhou*
Show Less
1 Department of Arts Administration, School of Arts Administration and Education, Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing, China
Submitted: 4 February 2024 | Accepted: 24 June 2024 | Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Re-globalization: Practices from the Art Market)
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

International art exhibitions can lead to disputes between multiple parties due to their transnational and complex nature, unlike domestic art exhibitions. The “Kiefer” Chinese painting exhibition triggered a series of controversies that should not be overlooked. Professionals in the art industry should reflect on these controversies to gain insights and promote the development of the field. This article focuses on the “Kiefer” incident to discuss the major risk points in the international art exhibition process. The article is divided into three parts. The first part concerns the selection and application of the law, where parties must carefully consider which laws and international rules to apply. The second part addresses the nature of the contract and liability, examining how the applicable law affects the legal nature of the contract and the obligations of the parties involved. The third part deals with unauthorized disposition and judicial seizure, focusing on issues of good faith acquisition when a party receiving artwork illegally disposes of it without the owner’s permission, as well as the problem of judicial seizure and immunity from judicial seizure of artworks (including cultural relics) involved in litigation.

Keywords
Conflict of laws
Applicable law
Jurisdiction of courts
Immunity from judicial seizure
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
References
  1. Shuangyuan L, Fuyong O, editors. Private International Law. China: Peking University Press; 2022. p. 5, 456.

 

  1. Lu B. Theoretical changes in the application of foreign public law. Wuhan Univ J Int Law. 2008;2:124-125.

 

  1. Qisheng H. Civil and commercial matters in international rules--disputes over scope and methods of interpretation. Peking Univ Law Rev. 2018;19(2):4.

 

  1. Collins L, editor. Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Law. 14th ed. United Kingdom: Sweet & Maxwell; 2006. p. 1562.

 

  1. Houchun Z. Research on the Conflict of Real Property Law. Hunan: Central South University Press; 2014. p. 89-105.

 

  1. Tao D. Principles of International Private Law. China: Fudan University Press; 2018. p. 34, 48, 64, 69-70, 322-323.

 

  1. Ruting Q. A close examination of the choice of law clause in bill of lading. Chin J Maritime Law. 2013;24(3):44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7659.2013.03.006

 

  1. Zhenjie H. Comparative Study on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of International Contract Disputes. China: China Legal Publishing House; 2014. p. 59-60.

 

  1. von Mehren AT. In: Jing L, Jin H, editor. Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law a Comparative Study. Beijing: Law Press; 2015. p. 179-184.

 

  1. Lixin Y. Law of Obligation. Haidian: Renmin University Press; 2022. p. 385, 397.

 

  1. Yongjun L, editor. Law of Obligation. China: Peking University Press; 2016. p. 142, 194, 196, 201.

 

  1. Jianyuan C, editor. Contract Law. Beijing: Law Press; 2021. p. 311, 332.

 

  1. Maorong H. The Second Part of Specific Provisions of Obligation Law--The Obligation of Services. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press; 2020. p. 35, 111, 113-115, 131-133.

 

  1. Jinglin D, Chen L. Dieter Medicus, Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil. Beijing: Law Press; 2007. p. 167, 222, 228-229.

 

  1. Allan Farnsworth E. In: Yunsong G, Chunyan D, editors. Contracts. 3rd ed. China: China University of Political Science and Law Press; 2004. p. 45, 50-51, 196-206, 779.

 

  1. Liming W. Specific Provisions of Contract Law. China: Peking University Press; 2023. p. 235.

 

  1. Zejian W. Principles of the Obligation Law. China: Peking University Press; 2013. p. 150-151.

 

  1. Shiyuan H. General Theory of Contract Law. Beijing: Law Press; 2018. p. 186-187.

 

  1. Qingyu Z, editor. Comments and Annotations on the Chinese Civil Code--Selected Articles. Vol. 2. China: China Democracy and Legal System Press; 2021. p. 102, 104.

 

  1. Jinglin D, Chen L. Dieter Medicus, Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil. Beijing: Law Press; 2004. p. 95-97.

 

  1. Jianyuan C. Real Right: Norms and Doctrine. Vol. 1. China: Tsinghua University Press; 2021. p. 361-362.

 

  1. Zejian W. The Real Right of Civil Law. China: Peking University Press; 2023. p. 481, 662, 695-696.

 

  1. Weixing S, Hongliang W. Baur/Stürner, Sachenrecht Ⅱ. Beijing: Law Press; 2006. p. 396-397, 418-419.

 

  1. Sprankling JG. Understanding Property Law. China: Peking University Press; 2009. p. 77-78.

 

  1. Qi P. Interpretation of the Uniform Commercial Code of the United States. Beijing: Law Press; 2020. p. 104, 620-622.

 

  1. Yongjun L, editor. Chinese Civil Law (Volume II, Real Right). China: China Democracy and Legal System Press; 2022. p. 302, 361, 387-388.

 

  1. Zejian W. Civil Law: Theories and Case Studies. Vol. 1. China: Peking University Press; 2009. p. 110-111.

 

  1. Kaixiang L. The system of commercial lien from a comparative law perspective. J Jinan Univ. 2015;8:2-3 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5072.2015.08.001

 

  1. Wolf M. In: Yue W, Daxue L, editors. Sachenrecht. Beijing: Law Press; 2004. p. 350.

 

  1. Siyu Z. American Chattel Security Transaction System and Case Law--Based on Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code: Chattel Security Law. Beijing: Law Press; 2015. p. 4.

 

  1. Yujun G, editor. Research on Cultural Heritage Protection Issues from the Perspective of International and Comparative Law. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press; 2011.p. 447, 453.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing