AccScience Publishing / AC / Volume 1 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/ac.1793
Submit to AC
Cite this article
56
Download
812
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Limitations and possibilities of digital restoration techniques using generative AI tools: Reconstituting Antoine François Callet’s Achilles Dragging Hector’s Body Past the Walls of Troy

Charles O’Brien1 ,  James Hutson2* ,  Trent Olsen2 ,  Jeremiah Ratican3
Show Less
1 Department of Art, Art History, and Design, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
2 Department of Art History and Visual Culture, College of Arts and Humanities, Lindenwood University, Saint Charles, Missouri, USA
3 Department of Art, Media, and Production, College of Arts and Humanities, Lindenwood University, Saint Charles, Missouri, USA
AC 2023, 1(2), 1793 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1793
Submitted: 11 September 2023 | Accepted: 1 November 2023 | Published: 8 November 2023
© 2023 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Digital restoration offers new avenues for conserving historical artworks, yet presents unique challenges. This research delves into the balance between traditional restoration methods and the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, using Antoine François Callet’s portrayal of Achilles Dragging Hector’s Body Past the Walls of Troy as a case study. The application of Easy Diffusion and Stable Diffusion 2.1 technologies provides insights into AI-driven restoration methods such as inpainting and colorization. Results indicate that while AI can streamline the restoration process, repeated inpainting can compromise the painting’s color quality and detailed features. Furthermore, the AI approach occasionally introduces unintended visual discrepancies, especially with repeated application. With evolving restoration tools, adaptability remains crucial. Integrating both AI and traditional techniques seems promising, though it is essential to maintain the artwork’s inherent authenticity. This study offers valuable perspectives for art historians, conservators, and AI developers, enriching discussions about the potential and pitfalls of AI in art restoration.

Keywords
Digital restoration
Generative artificial intelligence
Stable diffusion
Inpainting techniques
Synergistic techniques
Art restoration
Funding
None.
References
  1. Tzortzaki D, 2001, Museums and virtual reality: Using the CAVE to simulate the past. Digit Creat, 12: 247–251.

 

  1. Gabellone F, 2022, Digital Twin: A new perspective for cultural heritage management and fruition. Acta IMEKO, 11: 7.

 

  1. Hutson J, Olsen T, 2021, Digital humanities and virtual reality: A review of theories and best practices for art history. Int J Technol Educ, 4: 491–500. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.150

 

  1. Stanco F, Battiato S, Gallo G, 2011, Digital imaging for cultural heritage preservation. In Analysis, Restoration, and Reconstruction of Ancient Artworks. United Kingdom: Routledge.

 

  1. Brennan M, Christiansen L, 2018, Virtual Materiality: A Virtual Reality Framework for the Analysis and Visualization of Cultural Heritage 3D Models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress and Expo Digital Heritage.

 

  1. Lei Z, Zhou H, Hu W, et al., 2021, Toward a web-based digital twin thermal power plant. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 18: 1716–1725.

 

  1. Ni Z, Liu Y, Karlsson M, et al., 2022, Enabling preventive conservation of historic buildings through cloud-based digital twins: A case study in the city theatre, Norrköping. IEEE Access, 10: 90924–90939.

 

  1. Baduge SK, Thilakarathna S, Perera JS, et al., 2022, Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications. Autom Constr, 141: 104440.

 

  1. Kurtha H, Balzanb L, 2022, Process analytical technologies for precise, timely and representative elemental and moisture measurement for conveyed flows. TOS Forum, 2022: 143.

 

  1. Barrile V, Bernardo E, Fotia A, et al., 2022, A combined study of cultural heritage in archaeological museums: 3D survey and mixed reality. Heritage, 5: 1330–1349.

 

  1. Hutson J, Olsen T, 2022a, Virtual reality and learning: A case study of experiential pedagogy in art history. J Intell Learn Syst Appl, 14: 120925.

 

  1. Roussou M, 2001, Immersive Interactive Virtual Reality in the Museum. Foundation of the Hellenic World. In: Procedings of TiLE, p. 254.

 

  1. Loscos C, Tecchia F, Frisoli A, et al., 2004, The Museum of Pure Form: Touching Real Statues in an immersive Virtual Museum. In: 5th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, pp. 271–279.

 

  1. Carrozzino M, Bergamasco M, 2010, Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J Cult Herit, 11: 452–458.

 

  1. Hutson J, Olsen T, 2022b, Virtual reality and art history: A case study of digital humanities and immersive learning environments. J Higher Educ Theory Pract, 22: 49–64. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2

 

  1. Christou C, 2010, Virtual reality in education. In: Tzanavari A, Tsapatsoulis N, editors. Affective, Interactive and Cognitive Methods for e-Learning Design: Creating an Optimal Educational Experience. Hershey: IGI Global, p. 228–243.

 

  1. Boel C, Rotsaert T, Schellens T, et al., 2021, Six Years After Google Cardboard: What has Happened in the Classroom? A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on the use of Immersive Virtual Reality in Secondary Education. In: 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. IATED, pp. 7504–7513.

 

  1. Favro D, 2006, In the Eye of the Beholder: VR Models and Academia. In: Haselberger L, Humphrey J, editors. Imaging Ancient Rome: Documentation, Visualization, Imagination: Proceedings of the Third Williams Symposium on Classical Architecture. Portsmouth, RI, p. 321–334.

 

  1. Clini P, Ruggieri L, Angeloni R, et al., 2018, Interactive immersive virtual museum: digital documentation for interaction. In: ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium Towards Photogrammetry, p. 251–257.

 

  1. Bevilacqua MG, Russo M, Giordano A, et al., 2022, 3D Reconstruction, Digital Twinning, and Virtual Reality: Architectural Heritage Applications. In: 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, p. 92–96.

 

  1. Tan J, Leng J, Zeng X, et al., 2022, Digital twin for Xiegong’s architectural archaeological research: A case study of Xuanluo Hall, Sichuan, China. Buildings, 12: 1053.

 

  1. Kim J, Lee BK, 2021, Research on the possibility of restoring cultural assets of artificial intelligence through the application of artificial neural networks to roof tile (Wadang). J Korea Soc Comput Inform, 26: 19–26.

 

  1. Li J, 2021, Application of artificial intelligence in cultural heritage protection. J Phys Conf Ser, 1881: 032007.

 

  1. D’Orazio M, Bernardini G, Di Giuseppe E, 2023, Predict the priority of end-users’ maintenance requests and the required technical staff through LSTM and Bi-LSTM recurrent neural networks. Facilities, 41: 38–51.

 

  1. Moreno M, Prieto AJ, Ortiz R, et al., 2023, Preventive conservation and restoration monitoring of heritage buildings based on fuzzy logic. Int J Arch Heritage, 17: 1153–1170.

 

  1. Bordoni L, Ardissono L, Barceló JA, et al., 2013, The contribution of AI to enhance understanding of Cultural Heritage. Intelligenza Artificiale, 7: 101–112.

 

  1. Ranaldi, L., Zanzotto, F.M. Discover AI Knowledge to Preserve Cultural Heritage. Preprints 2021, 2021090062. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202109.0062.v1

 

  1. Yu X, Shan W, Ding H, et al., 2021, Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Amusement Space Design from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. In: 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Design (ICID). IEEE, p. 203–207.

 

  1. Oncu AI, Deger F, Hardeberg JY, 2012, Evaluation of Digital Inpainting Quality in the Context of Artwork Restoration. In: Computer Vision-ECCV 2012. Workshops and Demonstrations: Florence, Italy Proceedings, Part I 12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 561–570.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
Arts & Communication, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4090 Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept