AccScience Publishing / TD / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/TD025250051
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterizing breast cancer in Myanmar: Insights from receptor status and tumor staging

Shoon Mya Aye1* Wah Wah Myint Zu1
Show Less
1 Karuna Compassionate Care Center, Yangon, Myanmar
Tumor Discovery, 025250051 https://doi.org/10.36922/TD025250051
Received: 21 June 2025 | Revised: 11 July 2025 | Accepted: 22 July 2025 | Published online: 6 August 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Breast cancer is a significant global health challenge, with regional variations in its clinical and molecular characteristics. Understanding the interplay between tumor features and molecular subtypes in Myanmar is crucial for improving local breast cancer control strategies. This study investigates the relationship between tumor subtypes and tumor, node, and metastasis staging in a cohort of 184 biopsy-confirmed breast cancer patients diagnosed between January 2022 and December 2023. The mean age at diagnosis was 53 years, with 12% patients under 40. T2 was the most prevalent tumor stage, whereas N0 was the most common nodal status. M1 was identified in 22% of cases. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype showed significant associations with advanced T (p=0.002) and N (p=0.021) stages. In contrast, estrogen receptor-and progesterone receptor-positive tumors were more likely to be diagnosed at earlier stages (p<0.0001 and p=0.006, respectively). No statistically significant relationship was observed between receptor status and M stage or between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and component of tumor staging. These findings highlight the aggressive nature of TNBC and the more indolent course of hormone receptor–positive cancers within the studied population. The absence of a correlation between HER2 positivity and staging challenges existing global patterns and suggests population-specific dynamics that warrant further investigation. Overall, the study underscores the urgent need for improved early detection strategies and targeted therapies in Myanmar, particularly for patients with TNBC and those at risk of advanced-stage presentation.

Keywords
Breast cancer
Myanmar
Receptor status
Tumor staging
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010

 

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Cases and Deaths are Projected to Rise Globally; 2025. Available from: https://www.iarc.who.int/wp/content/ uploads/2025/02/pr361_e.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 20].

 

  1. Maajani K, Khodadost M, Fattahi A, Pirouzi A. Survival rates of patients with breast cancer in countries in the Eastern Mediterranean region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. East Mediterr Health J. 2020;26(2):219-232. doi: 10.26719/2020.26.2.219

 

  1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747-752. doi: 10.1038/35021093

 

  1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer Subtypes; 2025. Available from: https:// seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast-subtypes.html [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 20].

 

  1. Parise CA, Caggiano V. Breast cancer survival defined by the ER/PR/HER2 subtypes and a surrogate classification according to tumor grade and immunohistochemicalbiomarkers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:469251. doi: 10.1155/2014/469251

 

  1. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):783-792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101

 

  1. Jie H, Ma W, Huang C. Diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: A review. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025;17:265-274. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S516542

 

  1. Tariq K, Farhangi A, Rana F. TNBC vs non-TNBC: A retrospective review of differences in mean age, family history, smoking history, and stage at diagnosis. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2014;12(6):377-381.

 

  1. American Cancer Society. Stages of Breast Cancer; 2025. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/stages-of-breast-cancer.html [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 20].

 

  1. Metzger-Filho O, Sun Z, Viale G, et al. Patterns of recurrence and outcome according to breast cancer subtypes in lymph node-negative disease: Results from international breast cancer study group trials VIII and IX J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(25):3083-3090. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.1574

 

  1. Singhal S, Gardner K, Singhal SK, Send D. A set of molecular biomarkers as an indicator of cancer risk. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(Suppl 16):e12563. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.e12563

 

  1. Azizan N, Mat-Sari N, Su TT. Breast cancer survival in Southeast Asia: Meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1316520. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1316520

 

  1. Yip CH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Hartman M, et al. Ethnic differences in survival after breast cancer in South East Asia. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030995

 

  1. Shwe S, Thet Htoon P, Win T, Sin MP, Zan E, Htan YY. Factors causing delays and barriers to early diagnosis and treatment among women with breast cancer in Shwe Yaung Hnin si cancer foundation charity clinic, Yangon. JCO Glob Oncol. 2018;4(Suppl):59s. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.31200

 

  1. Singh D, Roy N, Das SM. Epidemiology, pattern of recurrence and survival in triple-negative breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2020;5(2):87-94. doi: 10.31557/APJCC.2020.5.2.87-94

 

  1. San TH, Fujisawa M, Fushimi S, et al. Molecular subtypes of breast cancers from Myanmar women: A study of 91 cases at two pathology centers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(6):1617-1621. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.6.1617

 

  1. Saxena N, Hartman M, Bhoo-Pathy N, et al. Breast cancer in South East Asia: Comparison of presentation and outcome between a middle income and a high income country. World J Surg. 2012;36:2838-2846. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1746-2

 

  1. Aye TT, Chan Y, Win H, Oo K, Mu KT. Pattern of metastasis in metastatic breast cancer patients attending medical oncology ward, Yangon general hospital. Myanmar Health Sci Res J. 2013;25(2):149-155.

 

  1. Kim HJ, Kim S, Freedman RA, Partridge AH. The impact of young age at diagnosis (age <40 years) on prognosis varies by breast cancer subtype: A U.S. SEER database analysis. Breast. 2022;61:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.006

 

  1. Maw MM, Thu ZZ, Aye KS, et al. Assessment of serum HER2/neu by using ELISA method in breast cancer patients, Yangon General Hospital, Myanmar. Myanmar Health Sci Res J. 2016;28(3):179-183.

 

  1. Dajsakdipon T, Pipatsakulroj W, Dejthevaporn T. Incidence and prognostic values in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low expression metastatic breast cancer in Southeast Asian population: A 10-year retrospective study. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024;10:e2400132. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00132

 

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2022: Myanmar Fact Sheet; 2025. Available from: https://gco. iarc.who.int [Last accessed on 2025 Jun 20].

 

  1. Min SK, Lee SK, Woo J, et al. Relation between tumor size and lymph node metastasis according to subtypes of breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2021;24(1):75-84. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e4

 

  1. Alcantara VS, Lim GH, Lim SH, Sultana R, Lee JA. Incidence and prognosis of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) among different races in Southeast Asia. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(5):523-537. doi: 10.1002/jso.24559

 

  1. Mon YY. Limitations in assessment of ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer patients: Yangon experience. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:e11078. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e11078

 

  1. Chintapally N, Englander K, Gallagher J, et al. Tumor characteristics associated with axillary nodal positivity in triple negative breast cancer. Diseases. 2023;11(3):118. doi: 10.3390/diseases11030118

 

  1. Zhu X, Ying X, Liu Y, et al. Stability and variability of molecular subtypes: Comparative analysis of primary andmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2024;21(9):784-798. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0009

 

  1. Lee YM, Oh MH, Go JH, Han K, Choi SY. Molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer: Understanding of subtype categories and clinical implication. Genes Genomics. 2020;42:1381-1387. doi: 10.1007/s13258-020-01014-7

 

  1. Lian J, Ma HX, Xu EW, Bu P, Yun KM, Xi YF. Subclassifying triple-negative breast cancers and its potential clinical utility. Virchows Arch. 2022;481:13-21. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03329-0

 

  1. Delahaye LJ, Drukker CA, Dreezen C, et al. A breast cancer gene signature for indolent disease. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164:461-466. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4262-0

 

  1. Lim YX, Lim ZL, Ho PJ, Li J. Breast cancer in Asia: Incidence, mortality, early detection, mammography programs, and risk-based screening initiatives. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(17):4218. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174218

 

  1. Kyaw O, Lwin AA, Htun MM, Myint SZ, Nyein MM, Aye KS. Role of immunofluorescence in detecting HER2/ neu status of breast carcinoma. Myanmar Health Sci Res J. 2020;32(2):166-172. doi: 10.34299/mhsrj.00998
Share
Back to top
Tumor Discovery, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9775 Print ISSN: 3060-8597, Published by AccScience Publishing