AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU026020006
Cite this article
1
Download
46
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Biomimicry-informed deconstruction of the cognitive system for Sino–Western hybrid architecture: A case study of Lushan UNESCO Global Geopark

Lyuxin Xiong1,2 ,  Tanot Unjah1* ,  Mazlan Mohd Tahir3
Show Less
1 Geopark Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor , Malaysia
2 Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Smart Agriculture and Engineering, Nanchang Business College of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi , China
3 Built Environment Department, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor , Malaysia
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 026020006 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU026020006
Received: 9 January 2026 | Revised: 9 April 2026 | Accepted: 10 April 2026 | Published online: 5 November 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Sino–Western hybrid architecture serves as a medium for cross-cultural exchange; however, its preservation faces two major challenges: unclear conservation standards and differing perceptions of cultural value. The hybrid architectural forms at Lushan developed in response to local terrain and climate, but the difficulty in defining authenticity for such buildings complicates conservation efforts. This study examines the villa cluster in Guling town, Lushan, employing biomimicry not as a design methodology but as an analytical framework to evaluate hybrid heritage through characteristics of environmental adaptation. Based on a literature review, field surveys of 45 villas, and interviews with 15 participants, including residents, heritage managers, and scholars, the study analyzes environmental adaptation, hybrid architectural styles, typological classification, and preservation challenges. The investigation reveals that, despite differing cultural origins, both Chinese and Western building traditions in Guling town developed similar responses to mountainous conditions, suggesting that environmental adaptation provides common ground for heritage evaluation that transcends cultural boundaries. Accordingly, a four-dimensional preservation framework is proposed that integrates function and culture, coordinates ecology and heritage, links landscape and narrative, and incorporates community participation. The framework addresses the methodological challenge of evaluating buildings rooted in multiple cultural traditions without privileging either lineage. Limitations of the study include its qualitative approach and focus on a single site. Nevertheless, the findings offer insights for conserving comparable hybrid architecture in other mountainous areas and point toward future research on developing quantitative indicators of environmental adaptation.

Keywords
Sino–Western hybrid architecture
Biomimicry
Mountainous environment
Cultural heritage
Lushan UNESCO Global Geopark
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Abdulwahab, N. A., Hassan, D. K., & Ezzedin, M. (2025). Establishing a framework for designing narrative cultural landscape. Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, 20(74), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.21608/auej.2024.326596.1717

 

Agnantopoulou, E., Barboutis, I., & Kamperidou, V. (2023). Wood utilization in windmill mechanisms on Sikinos Island (Greece). Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9216. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169216

 

AlAli, M., Mattar, Y., Alzaim, M. A., & Beheiry, S. (2023). Applications of biomimicry in architecture, construction and civil engineering. Biomimetics, 8(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020202

 

Allen, C. A. (2025). Situating systemic social oppression as collective trauma: An interdisciplinary analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000887

 

Arda, T., Bayrak, O. C., & Uzar, M. (2025). Analyzing coastal vulnerability using analytic hierarchy process and best–worst method: A case study of the Marmara gulf region. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 50(3), 1851–1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09128-w

 

Au Yong, H. N., Kalhoro, M., Morrison, C., Hanna, D., & Rehman, H. M. (2025). Community-driven sustainability practices in cultural heritage tourism: A qualitative study. Quality & Quantity, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02444-9

 

Boito, C., & Birignani, C. (2009). Restoration in architecture: First dialogue. Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation History, Theory, and Criticism, 6(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/fta.0.0026

 

Cai, Z., Fang, C., Zhang, Q., & Chen, F. (2021). Joint development of cultural heritage protection and tourism: The case of Mount Lushan cultural landscape heritage site. Heritage Science, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00558-5

 

Catherine, S., Ramasundaram, G., Nimmagadda, M. R., & Suresh, N. V. (2025). Roots, routes, and identity: How culture shapes heritage travel. In Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques and Statistics in Marketing (pp. 343-352). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9122-8.ch015

 

Chang, Q. (2019). Architectural models and their contexts in China’s 20th-century architectural heritage: An overview. Built Heritage, 3(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545715

 

Coomans, T. (2014). Indigenizing Catholic architecture in China: From Western-Gothic to Sino-Christian design, 1900–1940. In Catholicism in China, 1900-Present: The Development of the Chinese Church (pp. 125-144). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353658_8

 

Cua, A. S. (2002). On the ethical significance of the Ti–Yong distinction. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 29(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.00075

 

Dananjaya, A. G. (2025). Integrating modern Sundanese architecture in mountain villa design and planning for tourism. Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture, 7(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.9744/acesa.v7i1.14465

 

Dicks, H. (2016). The philosophy of biomimicry. Philosophy & Technology, 29(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0210-2

 

Eflova, M., Garina, K., Maximova, O., & Mayakovskaya, A. (2025). The role of historic sites in shaping intercultural education: A case study. Revista Conrado, 21(103), e4450.

 

Fan, C. (2014). Jiyu lüyou tiyan de Lushan bieshu lüyou ziyuan kaifa yanjiu. [A study on the development of Lushan villa tourism resources based on tourism experience]. Industrial and Technology Forum, 13(24), 29–31.

 

Flick, U., Small, M. L., & Calarco, J. (2025). For qualitative literacy: How to assess the effectiveness of data collection in field research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Quality. (pp. 225-236). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529674354.n15

 

Gravari-Barbas, M., Guinand, S., Lu, Y., & Shen, C. (2024). Museographic narrating of dissonant heritage in Tianjin’s former international concessions. Built Heritage, 8(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00158-9

 

Hebbert, M. (2016). Figure-ground: History and practice of a planning technique. Town Planning Review, 87(6), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.44

 

Huang, H., Xie, Y. Q., Chen, J. J., Liang, S., & Chen, Z. J. (2024). Bioclimatic design strategy of vernacular architecture in the south-east of China: A case study in Fujian, China. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 19, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctad079

 

Jia, B., & Bin syed abu bakar, S.A. (2025). Exploring the integration of Chinese traditional elements in visual communication and its influence on cultural identity and public perception: A review. Peta International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.59088/pij.v4i3.79

 

Jiang, J., Zhou, T., Han, Y., & Ikebe, K. (2022). Urban heritage conservation and modern urban development from the perspective of the historic urban landscape approach: A case study of Suzhou. Land, 11(8), 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081251

 

Kim, A. A., & Luchkova, V. I. (2016). Sino-western style of architecture. Urban Construction and Architecture, 6(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.17673/Vestnik.2016.01.12

 

Knapp, R. G. (2024). China’s vernacular architectural heritage and historic preservation. Built Heritage, 8(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00121-0

 

Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Study on the genetic variation mechanism and restoration of the water village landscape in Southern Jiangsu. Journal of South Architecture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33142/jsa.v2i1.15475

 

Liang, W., Ahmad, Y., & Mohidin, H. H. B. (2023). The development of the concept of architectural heritage conservation and its inspiration. Built Heritage, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00103-2

 

Liu, Y., Du, X., Bai, Y., Chen, Q., & Liu, D. (2025). Multiple Bayesian models approach to assessing drivers of cultural heritage spatial distribution illustrated Lushan County in China. npj Heritage Science, 13(1), 409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01941-2

 

Lurie-Luke, E. (2014). Product and technology innovation: What can biomimicry inspire?. Biotechnology Advances, 32(8), 1494–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.002

 

Metwally, W. M. (2025). Biomimicry and green architecture: Nature-inspired innovations for sustainable buildings. Sustainability, 17(16), 7223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167223

 

Nakonieczna, E., & Szczepański, J. (2024). Authenticity of cultural heritage vis-à-vis heritage reproducibility and intangibility: From conservation philosophy to practice. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 30(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2177642

 

Peng, H., Lou, H., Yang, Y., He, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, E., & Zhang, M. (2026). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of human-air-ground coupling relationships at fine scale. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 35(1), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/197055

 

Privitera, A. G., Fontana, F., & Geronazzo, M. (2025). The role of audio in immersive storytelling: A systematic review in cultural heritage. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 84(16), 16105–16143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19288-4

 

Rana, M. (2024). Overview of data warehouse architecture, big data and green computing. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 5(4), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.22

 

Rao, R. (2014). Biomimicry in architecture. International Journal of Advanced Research in Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering and Developing, 1(3), 101–107.

 

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229

 

Shen, P., Li, Y., Gao, X., Chen, S., Cui, X., Zhang, Y., ... & Wang, M. (2025). Climate adaptability of building passive strategies to changing future urban climate: A review. Nexus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100061

 

Spector, T. (2011). Architecture and the ethics of authenticity. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(4), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.45.4.0023

 

Susilawati, A., Al-Obaidi, A. S. M., Abduh, A., Irwansyah, F. S., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2025). How to do research methodology: From literature review, bibliometric, step-by-step research stages, to practical examples in science and engineering education. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v10i1.78637

 

Tung, K. W. (2018). Chikan’s arcade buildings: The hybrid and civil architecture of Lingnan. Architecture and Culture, 6(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2018.1501214

 

Verbrugghe, N., Rubinacci, E., & Khan, A. Z. (2023). Biomimicry in architecture: A review of definitions, case studies, and design methods. Biomimetics, 8(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010107

 

Wamane, G. V. (2025). A “new deal” for a sustainable future: Enhancing circular economy by employing ESG principles and biomimicry for efficiency. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 36(4), 930–947. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2022-0189

 

Wang, H. (2025). Synergetic development of rural revitalization and ecotourism: A case study of Jingning County. International Journal of Management Science Research, 8(2), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr.2025.08(02).03

 

Wang, J., Zhou, M., & Du, X. (2024). From finance to legacy: Exploring Bank of China’s modern buildings as serial cultural heritage. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 6(2), 2166. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.2166

 

Wani, M. D., Dada, Z. A., Bhat, W. A., & Shah, S. A. (2025). Community-driven ecotourism in the trans Himalayan region: A sustainable model for cultural and environmental preservation. Community Development, 56(4), 560–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2025.2451358

 

Xiong, L., Mohd Tahir, M., Anak Unjah, T., & Xu, C. (2025). Tracing biomimicry from the ancient Chinese wisdom: A case study at Lushan UNESCO Global Geopark. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2455030

 

Xu, Q., Taylor, K., & Han, F. (2021). Recognising values of China’s scenic and historic interest areas as world heritage cultural landscapes: Lushan case study. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1764610

 

Xu, S., & Zhou, Y. (2025). AI-enabled cultural feature recognition and cross-cultural comparison in historic architecture. Academia Nexus Journal, 4(2).

 

Yang, Y., & Liu, X. (1995). Lushan bieshu qun ji qi jianzhu tese [The villa complex of Mount Lu and its architectural features]. Journal of Tai¡¯an Teachers College, (3), 280–283.

 

Yin, L., Yang, D., Cui, Y., Tang, Z., & Bai, J. (2025). Research on the construction of Sino-Western fusion Catholic churches in China: A case study of a Catholic Church in Anqing. Buildings, 15(6), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060947

 

Zhang, H., Wang, F., Guo, F., Cai, J., & Dong, J. (2023). Urban built heritage protection and realistic dilemmas: The development process, protection system, and critical thinking of historic districts in Dalian. Built Heritage, 7(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00106-z

 

Zhang, Y., & Dong, W. (2021). Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 15(5), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1645237

 

Zhao, Y., Wu, H., Fan, Y., Jin, H., Wang, Y., & Lu, L. (2024). Integrated study on the conservation of ecocultural heritage in the Tiantai Mountain area, China. Heritage Science, 12(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01398-9

 

Zhou, Z., Xu, Y., Ouyang, C., Gui, M., Jiang, W., Zhou, C., Ma, K., Zhang, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Climate adaptability research of vernacular dwellings in Jiangxi based on numerical simulation—An example from Nanfeng County. Buildings, 14(7), 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072211

 

Zou, L. R., & Li, X. Q. (2014). On strict protection and the sustainable use of modern historical building in Mount Lu. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 638, 2241–2244. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.638-640.2241

 

Zou, L., & Zhong, Y. (2009). Lushan xiandai jianzhu de baohu yu zai liyong. [Preservation and reuse of modern architecture in Lushan]. Anhui Agricultural Science, 37(33), 16718–16720. https://doi.org/10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2009.33.025

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing