AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU026060013
Cite this article
8
Download
328
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Authenticity in crisis: Structural tensions and challenges in the heritage preservation of Dongyang woodcarving

Xiaotian Guo1,2* Faridah Sahari1
Show Less
1 Department of Design Technology, Faculty of Applied and Creative Arts, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
2 Art Design College, Zhejiang Guangsha Vocational and Technical University of Construction, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 026060013 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU026060013
Received: 8 February 2026 | Revised: 2 June 2026 | Accepted: 3 July 2026 | Published online: 23 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Dongyang woodcarving (DYWC) is a form of Chinese intangible cultural heritage that is experiencing an authenticity crisis due to the pressures of industrialisation, commercialisation and spatial transformation. Although previous literature has explored heritage preservation and craft commodification, little attention has been given to how authenticity is constructed and how disjunctures emerge through the integrated semiotic, technical, and spatial aspects. To address this gap, the current study adopts a qualitative case study design, grounded in field observations, 16 semi-structured interviews, and NVivo-aided thematic analysis. The results identify three interrelated threats to authenticity: symbolic drift, aesthetic simplification through the market, and contextual displacement. These processes undermine the semiotic and cultural intelligibility of DYWC. The article is grounded in heritage authenticity theory and semiotic analysis, and it suggests a three-dimensional safeguarding framework including technical integrity, symbolic reinforcement, and contextual re-embedding. This framework presents a new, integrative methodology that goes beyond material preservation to the maintenance of the cultural logic of craft practices. The results enhance wider discussions on the topic of intangible heritage in showing that authenticity is a structurally negotiated concept and offer useful insights to policymakers and heritage professionals on how to address comparable challenges in culturally embedded craft traditions.

Keywords
Authenticity
Intangible cultural heritage
Symbolic drift
Semiotic heritage
Digital–analogue synergy
Ritual context
NVivo coding
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Bala, R. (2026). Digital Preservation of Traditional Knowledge: Safeguarding Indigenous Heritage through Modern Tools. International Journal of Applied and Behavioral Sciences, 03(01):87–93. https://doi.org/10.70388/ijabs250165

 

Banda, L. O. L., Banda, C. V., Banda, J. T., & Singini, T. (2024). Preserving Cultural Heritage: A Community-Centric Approach to Safeguarding the Khulubvi Traditional Temple Malawi. Heliyon, 10(18):e37610–e37610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37610

 

Bortolotto, C. (2020). Commercialization without over-commercialization: Normative Conundrums across Heritage Rationalities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(9):857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1858441

 

Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and Commoditization in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3):371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-x

 

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications.

 

Dai, N., Muthuveeran, A. A. S., Noor Azizi, M. A., Ma, L., Ma, Y., & Gao, Y. (2023). Research on the Protection of Architectural Woodcarvings in China from Building Homogeneity: A Synoptic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(9):247–261. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i9/18353

 

Ding, C., Ismail, N. A., Hussein, M. K., & Hussain, N. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Traditional Handicrafts Preservation Toward Sustainable Intangible Cultural Heritage. SAGE Open, 15(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251337837

 

Duxbury, N., Bakas, F. E., Vinagre de Castro, T., & Silva, S. (2020). Creative Tourism Development Models towards Sustainable and Regenerative Tourism. Sustainability, 13(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010002

 

Harrison, S. (2019). The Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in England: A Comparative Exploration [PhD Thesis]. Accessed June 12, 2026. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/ eprint/36760/1/Suzy%20Harrison%20-%202019.pdf

 

Jones, S. (2009). Experiencing Authenticity at Heritage Sites: Some Implications for Heritage Management and Conservation. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 11(2):133–147. https://doi.org/10.1179/175355210x12670102063661

 

Jones, S. (2010). Negotiating Authentic Objects and Authentic Selves. Journal of Material Culture, 15(2):181–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510364074

 

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production. Museum International, 56(1-2):52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x

 

Li, J. (2022). Grounded theory-based model of the influence of digital communication on handicraft intangible cultural heritage. Heritage Science, 10(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00760-z

 

Lian, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). The Evolution of Digital Cultural Heritage Research: Identifying Key Trends, Hotspots, and Challenges through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(16):7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167125

 

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13):1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

 

Momeni, M., & Hashemi, S. S. (2023). Identifying factors affecting the development of intangible cultural heritage by using thematic analysis method. International Journal of Tourism, Culture & Spirituality, 6(2):179–199. https://doi.org/10.22133/ijtcs.2024.444908.1160

 

Nakonieczna, E., & Szczepański, J. (2023). Authenticity of cultural heritage vis-à-vis heritage reproducibility and intangibility: from conservation philosophy to practice. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 30(2):220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2177642

 

Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (vols. 1–6). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

 

Pesce, D., & Franzè, C. (2025). When digital platforms meet tradition: Phygital innovation in the cultural heritage. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 77:101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101896

 

Połeć, W., & Murawska, D. (2021). The Social Constraints on the Preservation and Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts in a Developed Society. Sustainability, 14(1):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010120

 

Rawson, J. (1984). Chinese Ornament: The lotus and the dragon. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

Shi, W., & Song, J. (2018, December). Research on the modern inheritance of Chinese Dongyang woodcarving decoration art. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2018) (pp. 463–466). Paris, France: Atlantis Press.

 

Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M., Powroznik, P., & Lukasik, E. (2022). 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—literature review for selected databases. Heritage Science, 10(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00633-x

 

Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001

 

Su, X. (2011). Heritage Production and Urban Locational Policy in Lijiang, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6):1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01011.x

 

Sullivan, M., & Vainker, S. J. (2018). The arts of China. University Of California Press.

 

Tuyen, Q. D. (2023). Staging Culture, Selling Authenticity: The Commodification of the Cham Community’s Traditions. In: Heritage Conservation and Tourism Development at Cham Sacred Sites in Vietnam. Global Vietnam: Across Time, Space and Community. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3350-1_8

 

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. UNESCO. Accessed June 12, 2026. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

 

Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2):349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-7383(98)00103-0

 

Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2013). Framing theory: towards a critical imagination in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6):546–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.779295

 

Winter, T. (2013). Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6):532–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.720997

 

Yan, G., Yip, J., Keith, K. H. T., & Ni, J. (2025). Changes of identity and value perception in heritage crafts: a means-end chain study of Wangjiang Tiaohua. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2520438

 

Zhang, W. (2020). Decorative patterns of woodcarving in the Jiangsu and Zhejiang regions in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Ocean University of China Press. [In Chinese]

 

Zheng, Y., Wang, Z., Ren, P., Xu, J., & Tao, J. (2025). Impacts of Urbanization on the Protection of Built Heritage in Traditional Villages: A Case Study of 96 Traditional Villages in Guangzhou, China. Research Square preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5845462/v1

 

Zhu, P., Chi, X., Ryu, H. B., & Han, H. (2025). Experience economy and authenticity in the heritage tourism sector: A multiple-dimensional approach. Acta Psychologica, 257:105118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105118

 

Zhu, Q., & Rahman, R. (2025). Designing ethical souvenirs to sustain the cultural integrity of Dunhuang heritage. PLoS ONE, 20(12):e0338506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338506

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing