AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU026090015
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sustainable building practices in contemporary Chinese urbanism: A low-carbon construction management perspective

Jianqiao Zhong1 Mohd Wira bin Mohd Shafiei1*
Show Less
1 Centre for Global Sustainability Studies, University Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 026090015 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU026090015
Received: 27 February 2026 | Revised: 9 April 2026 | Accepted: 17 April 2026 | Published online: 19 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

China’s transition toward a low-carbon economy has placed the building industry at the center of ecological modernization. This study examines sustainable building practices in contemporary Chinese urbanism through the lens of low-carbon construction management and ecological modernization theory (EMT). A dataset of 40 completed building projects across major Chinese provinces was analyzed to examine the interplay among technological innovation, managerial adaptation, and institutional incentives. The analyzed variables included operational energy performance, embodied carbon, renewable-energy integration, waste-reduction practices, certification level, managerial training, and policy support. The environmental and managerial determinants of the outcomes of the projects were assessed using descriptive and correlational analyses. The results indicate that the projects that combined prefabricated or hybrid construction systems, greater renewable-energy potential, and building information modeling had lower carbon intensity and greater reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. There was a positive correlation between managerial training and experience and the number of measures put in place to be sustainable, whereas policy incentives and green certifications were essential facilitators of modernization. On the other hand, cost sensitivity and skills shortages were still the main obstacles. From an EMT perspective, the findings suggest that China has followed a hybrid ecological modernization pathway characterized by the interaction of state guidance, technological diffusion, and managerial learning. By linking empirical evidence with EMT, the study demonstrates that innovation in construction management represents a key pathway for advancing the greening of China’s urban development paradigm. This study provides policy recommendations to enhance capacity building, institutional alignment, and technology transfer to promote a systemic low-carbon transition.

Keywords
Sustainable construction
Ecological modernization theory
Low-carbon management
Chinese urbanism
Building performance
Renewable energy
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References

Ai, X., Meng, Q., Chong, H. Y., Li, Z., & Hao, T. (2024). How can the policy combination promote the development of green buildings? —Analysis based on stage perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, 141887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141887

Bush, S. R., & Spaargaren, G. (2024). Ecological modernization theory. In C. Overdevest (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Sociology (pp. 183–188). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803921044.ch33

Cao, Y., Xu, C., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Aziz, N. M. (2022). A systematic review of green building development in China: Advantages, challenges and future directions. Sustainability, 14(19), 12293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912293

He, Q., Wu, Z., Li, S., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2023). Two decades of the evolution of China’s green building policy: Insights from text mining. Building Research & Information, 51(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2022.2142498

Hewa Welege, N. M., Pan, W., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2024). Stakeholder collaboration to mitigate constraints to delivering low-carbon buildings: insights from high-rise high-density cities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(11), 4439–4461. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-02-2022-0166

Hu, Q., Xue, J., Liu, R., Shen, G. Q., & Xiong, F. (2023). Green building policies in China: A policy review and analysis. Energy and Buildings, 278, 112641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112641

Hu, S., Jiang, Y., Yang, X., Pan, Y., Rong, X., Hao, B., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Yan, D. (2025). Ecological pathway to achieve carbon neutrality in China’s building sector. Engineering, 53, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.006

Hu, Y., & Lin, Y. (2022). Comparison of green building policies and regulations between central and local governments of China: Analysis based on text similarity. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1064852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1064852

Huang, Y., Li, M., Han, S., Hu, M., Sun, Y., & Liu, C. (2023). Research on carbon emission of prefabricated structure in China. Buildings, 13(5), 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051348

Huo, T., Ma, Y., Xu, L., Feng, W., & Cai, W. (2022). Carbon emissions in China’s urban residential building sector through 2060: A dynamic scenario simulation. Energy, 254, 124395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124395

Jiang, Y., Hu, T., Zhao, D., Liu, B., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Xu, Z. (2022). Decision model to optimize long-term subsidy strategy for green building promotion. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86, 104126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104126

Kong, F., & He, L. (2021). Impacts of supply-sided and demand-sided policies on innovation in green building technologies: A case study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126279

Li, B., Li, J., & Huang, S. (2025). Influencing factors of low-carbon renovation of public buildings from the perspective of stakeholders. Energy, 335, 137867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137867

Li, J., Zhang, Q., & Etienne, X. L. (2024). Optimal carbon emission reduction path of the building sector: Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 919, 170553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170553

Liu, J., Zhao S. H., Li Y. P., Sun Z. M. (2023). Development of an interval double-stochastic carbon-neutral electric power system planning model: A case study of Fujian province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 138877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138877

Liu, Y., Pedrycz, W., Deveci, M., & Chen, Z. S. (2024). BIM-based building performance assessment of green buildings: A case study from China. Applied Energy, 373, 123977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123977

Luo, L., Wang, Y. N., Liu, Y. C. (2022). Where is the pathway to sustainable urban development? Coupling coordination evaluation and configuration analysis between low-carbon development and eco-environment: A case study of the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 144, 109473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109473.

Ma, J., Li, X. T., & Liu, X. P. (2021). Spatial variation analysis of urban forest vegetation carbon storage and sequestration in built-up areas of Beijing based on i-Tree Eco and Kriging. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 66, 127413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127413

MOHURD. (2022). 14th Five-Year Plan for Building Energy Efficiency and Green Building Development. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Available from: https: / /www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai / fdzdgknr/ zfhcxjsbwj/202203/20220311_765109.html [Last accessed on April 29, 2026].

MOHURD & NDRC. (2022). Implementation Plan for Carbon Peaking in Urban and Rural Construction. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China and National Development and Reform Commission. Available from: https://climate-laws.org/ documents/implementation-plan-for-carbon-peaking-in-urban-and-rural-construction-notice-53-2022_a30a [Last accessed on April 29, 2026].

Niu, R., Fan, Y. Y., & Geng, L. Z. (2021). Adaptability of a temperature and humidity independent control air-conditioning system in green office buildings, Journal of Building Engineering, 42, 102432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102432

Qi, X. Z., Sun, L., & Hu, Z. J. (2023). An applied framework to assess sustainability awareness and corporate misconduct considering just transition, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 103, 107261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107261

Sindhu Pradeep, M., Rismanchi, B., & Ngo, T. (2025). Dynamic and Circular Life Cycle Sustainability Assessments (DC-LCSAs) for prefabricated buildings: A systematic review and conceptual model. Building and Environment, 284, 113396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113396

Wang, Q. (2022). Introduction to China Green Building Assessment Standard (3rd ed.). World Green Building Council. Available from: https://worldgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ Introduction-to-China-Green-Building-Assessment- Standard-3rd-Edition.pdf [Last accessed on April 29, 2026].

Wu, S. W., Yan, Y., Pan, J., & Wu, K. S. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of sustainable project management: Evidence from the construction industry in China. Buildings, 13(9), 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092216

Xia, Y., Yang, Z., Jiang, X., & Wang, H. (2024). The road to carbon neutrality in China’s building sector. iScience, 27(9), 110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110664

Yang, G., Guo, A., & Zhang, G. (2025). Research on Implementation Pathways for Near-Zero Carbon Emissions in High-Density Urban Districts. E3S Web of Conferences, 617, 02013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561702013

Yang, X., & Liu, K. (2024). Low-carbon construction in China’s construction industry from the perspective of evolutionary games. Buildings, 14(6), 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061593

You, K., Ren, H., Cai, W., Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2023). Modeling carbon emission trend in China’s building sector to year 2060. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 188, 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106679

Zhang, Z., Gao, Q., Shao, S., Zhang, Y., Bao, Y., & Zhao, L. (2024). Carbon emission scenarios of China’s construction industry using a system dynamics methodology—Based on life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140457

Zhao, S., Qu, X., & Zhao, X. (2025). The carbon emissions of prefabricated building in urban renewal: Assessment and emission reduction path. Energy and Buildings, 341, 115830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115830

Zhong, Z., & Gou, Z. (2023). Adopting cross-laminated timber in architectural design to reduce embodied carbon emission in China based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Building Research & Information, 51(7), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2212087

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing