AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU025410080
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Place attachment and mechanisms of community public-space renewal: A mixed-methods empirical study of Chengdu’s Shaocheng historic district

Yong-Zhen Zhai1 Ismar M. S. Usman1* Mazlan Mohd Tahir1 Azreena Abu Bakar1 Edward Syarif2
Show Less
1 Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Hasanuddin University, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 025410080 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU025410080
Received: 9 October 2025 | Revised: 11 December 2025 | Accepted: 12 December 2025 | Published online: 15 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Understanding how emotional attachment translates into tangible outcomes of urban renewal constitutes a critical theoretical gap. This study constructs and validates a place attachment-driven framework explicating community participation’s mediating role in converting emotions into collective action. Using mixed-methods design and publicly available data (n = 407) from three cases in Chengdu’s Shaocheng district (tourism-oriented, community-led, public–private partnership) spanning 2015–2024, structural equation modeling reveals place attachment influences renewal outcomes through dual pathways: community participation mediation (β = 0.30, p < 0.001, 51.7% of total effect) and direct emotional identification (β = 0.28, p < 0.001). Renewal model type significantly moderates this mechanism; community-led models show a mediation proportion of 71.4 percent, whereas tourism-oriented models show 26.2 percent. Tourism-oriented renewal excels in physical space quality (4.38 points) but shows a decline in social cohesion (−0.73 points), indicating a gentrification risk. Public–private partnerships achieve the greatest overall improvement (+0.97 points) and show the most balanced performance across cultural-identity indicators (4.35 points). A multidimensional assessment across 12 indicators shows tourism models lead in physical space, while community-led models excel in social interaction (4.48 points). This study extends place attachment theory from individual psychology to collective action, challenging universal renewal model assumptions and proposing context-based selection frameworks. Institutionalized participation mechanisms emerge as key safeguards against gentrification, providing evidence-based guidance for sustainable urban renewal.

Keywords
Place attachment
Urban renewal
Community participation
Renewal model
Gentrification
Residents’ emotions
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References

Askarizad, R., Lamíquiz Daudén, P. J., & Garau, C. (2024). The application of space syntax to enhance sociability in public urban spaces: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(7), 227. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijgi13070227

Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., Kaboli, A., & Alahi, A. (2024). Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 19, 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330

Blanco, I. (2009). Does a ‘Barcelona model’really exist? Periods, territories and actors in the process of urban transformation. Local government studies, 35(3), 355-369. https://doi. org/10.1080/03003930902854289

Boley, B. B., Strzelecka, M., Yeager, E. P., Ribeiro, M. A., Aleshinloye, K. D., Woosnam, K. M., & Mimbs, B. P. (2021). Measuring place attachment with the abbreviated place attachment scale (APAS). Journal of environmental psychology, 74, 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101577

Bray, D. (2005). Social space and governance in urban China: The danwei system from origins to reform. Stanford University Press.

Cheng, H., Su, L., & Li, Z. (2024). How does the neighbourhood environment influence migrants’ subjective well‐being in urban China? Population, Space and Place, 30(1), e2704. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2704

Cheng, X., Zhong, W., & Li, D. (2021). Urban neighborhood self-governance and community attachment: Evidence from southwest China. Cities, 112, 103128. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103128

Cheshmehzangi, A., Chen, W., Mangi, E., & Heath, T. (2023). Practical challenges of urban regeneration in China. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 913500. https://doi. org/10.3389/frsc.2023.913500

dos Santos Figueiredo, Y. D., Prim, M. A., & Dandolini, G. A. (2022). Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy, 113, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

El-Bardisy, N. (2024). Urban culture as a challenge of enhancing social interaction in public spaces. Discover Cities, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-024-00010-y

Falanga, R. (2022). Understanding place attachment through the lens of urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon. Cities, 122, 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103590

George, T. S. (2009). Living Cities in Japan: Citizens’ Movements, Machizukuri and Local Environments. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 35(1), 228-231. https://doi.org/10.1353/ jjs.0.0083

Haluza, D., Meyer, I., Strüver, A., & Exner, A. (2024). Introducing a Scale for Measuring Attachment to Urban Green. Urban Science, 8(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020062

Huang, L., Zheng, W., Hong, J., Liu, Y., & Liu, G. (2020). Paths and strategies for sustainable urban renewal at the neighbourhood level: A framework for decision-making. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102074. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102074

Hui, E. C.-m., Chen, T., Lang, W., & Ou, Y. (2021). Urban community regeneration and community vitality revitalization through participatory planning in China. Cities, 110, 103072. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103072

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods.

Kamani Fard, A., & Paydar, M. (2024). Place Attachment and Related Aspects in the Urban Setting. Urban Science, 8(3), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8030135

Li, X., Zhang, F., Hui, E. C.-m., & Lang, W. (2020). Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities, 102, 102743. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743

Liao, Z., & Liu, M. (2023). Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: a literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1115648. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648

Lu, T., Kam, Y. C., Chang, J., & Mao, S. (2023). Neighbourhood attachment, city attachment or beyond? Residential mobility and scales of place attachment in Shanghai, China. Population, Space and Place, 29(7), e2687. https://doi. org/10.1002/psp.2687

Manzo, L., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203757765

Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: A systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(2), 155-212. https://doi. org/10.1007/s42413-023-00200-1

Ramos‐Vidal, I., & de la Ossa, E. D. (2024). A systematic review to determine the role of public space and urban design on sense of community. International Social Science Journal, 74(252), 633-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12454

Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2010.04.004

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness (Vol. 67). Pion London.

Samavati, S., Desmet, P. M., & Ranjbar, E. (2025). Happy urban public spaces: a systematic review of the key factors affecting citizen happiness in public environments. Cities & health, 9(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2024.2310 217

Sarkar, S., Cottineau-Mugadza, C., & Wolf, L. J. (2024). Spatial inequalities and cities: A review. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(7), 1391-1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231225605

Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2009.09.006

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. U of Minnesota Press.

Wächter, L. (2024). Beyond permanent residences: Measuring place attachment in tempo-local housing arrangements. Urban Science, 8(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ urbansci8040173

Wang, M., Zhang, F., & Wu, F. (2024). “Micro-regeneration”: Toward small-scale, heritage-oriented, and participatory redevelopment in China. J Urban Aff, 46(10), 1953-1970. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2139711

Wang, Y., Wu, F., & Zhang, F. (2025). Participatory micro-regeneration: governing urban redevelopment in Qinghe, Beijing. Urban Geogr, 46(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1080 /02723638.2024.2349449

Wu, F. (2015). Planning for growth: Urban and regional planning in China. Routledge.

Xia, J., Zhao, Z., Chen, L., & Sun, Y. (2024). How urban renewal affects the sustainable development of public spaces: trends, challenges, and opportunities. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1482169. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fenvs.2024.1482169

Xie, F., Liu, G., & Zhuang, T. (2021). A comprehensive review of urban regeneration governance for developing appropriate governance arrangements. Land, 10(5), 545. https://doi. org/10.3390/land10050545

Xie, H., Zheng, S., Zhai, Y., Yuan, J., & Li, Q. (2024). Unveiling urban regeneration risks in China: a social perspective. Sustainability, 16(4), 1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su16041671

Xing, Z., Zhao, R., & Guo, W. (2024). From traditional to digital contexts: new characteristics of the public’s spatial perception of urban streets in the age of technology. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi. org/10.1057/s41599-024-02810-0

Xu, W. (2024). New methods for old questions: Predicting historical urban renewal areas in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(7), 1689- 1705. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241227947

Yang, J., Yang, L., & Ma, H. (2022). Community participation strategy for sustainable urban regeneration in Xiamen, China. Land, 11(5), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land11050600

Zahnow, R. (2024). Place type or place function: What matters for place attachment? American journal of community psychology, 73(3-4), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ajcp.12729

Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., & Liang, Y. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Accessibility on Place Attachment in Urban Public Open Spaces: A Case Study of Jiamusi City, China. Buildings, 14(4), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040957

Zhu, J. (2023). Micro-regeneration in Shanghai and the public-isation of space. Habitat International, 132, 102741. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102741

Zhu, Y., & Ye, C. (2022). Urban renewal without gentrification: toward dual goals of neighborhood revitalization and community preservation? Urban Geography, 45(2), 201-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2100176

Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Biljecki, F. (2025). Understanding the user perspective on urban public spaces: A systematic review and opportunities for machine learning. Cities, 156, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105535

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing