AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU025500096
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prioritizing adaptive reuse of industrial heritage in Nanchang, China: An analytic hierarchy process-based approach

Songqi Gui1 Mohd Jaki Bin Mamat1*
Show Less
1 School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 025500096 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU025500096
Received: 10 December 2025 | Revised: 12 February 2026 | Accepted: 12 February 2026 | Published online: 22 April 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Amid the uneven and fragmented regeneration of industrial heritage in Nanchang, China, decision-makers face challenges in prioritizing former industrial sites for adaptive reuse. These challenges arise from competing heritage, social, economic, and environmental objectives. To address this, an explicitly specified analytic hierarchy process-based framework is proposed. The decision structure is organized around seven criteria: historical value (HV), cultural value (CV), economic benefits (EE), development potential, accessibility (AC), social impact (SI), and ecological sustainability (ES). Expert pairwise comparisons are rigorously verified through consistency index and ratio (CI/CR) checks. These expert judgements are integrated with public preferences using a 70:30 weighting between experts and the public. The top three public rankings are converted into quantitative weights using the rank-reciprocal rule. Three candidate sites, Jiangfang 1953, Nanchang 699, and Zhangshulin, were evaluated using this framework. Jiangfang 1953 emerged as the top-ranked site, primarily driven by HV, CV, and SI, and further supported by strong ES performance. Nanchang 699 ranks second, largely due to its advantages in AC and EE. Zhangshulin excels in ES but demonstrates lower readiness for implementation. The robustness of these results is confirmed through CI/CR screening, one-at-a-time weight-sensitivity analyses (±5% and ±10%, with no rank reversals), and diagnostic comparisons between expert and public preferences. The framework clarifies trade-offs, validates weighting assumptions, and facilitates staged interventions and effective stakeholder communication. Beyond this case study, the approach is adaptable to any context where professional judgment and community preferences must be combined under explicitly defined, testable assumptions.

Keywords
Delphi method
Stakeholder preference fusion
Explicitly specified decision-making
Sensitivity analysis
Geographic information system corroboration
Industrial heritage
Adaptive reuse
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_11

 

Bouaziz, S., & Guechi, I. (2024). Assessing the reuse potential of industrial heritage using GIS–AHP: A case study of El Hamma’s industrial district, Algiers, Algeria. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 517–532. https://doi. org/10.11594/ijssr.05.02.13

 

Bottero, M., D’Alpaos, C., & Oppio, A. (2019). Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision-aiding approach. Sustainability, 11(3), 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11030785

 

Buckley, J. J. (1985). “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3):233–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165- 0114(85)90090-9

 

Claver, J., García-Domínguez, A., & Sebastián, M. A. (2020). Multicriteria decision tool for sustainable reuse of industrial heritage into its urban and social environment: Case studies. Sustainability, 12(18), 7430. https://doi.org/org/10.3390/ su12187430

 

Cucco, P., Maselli, G., Nesticò, A., & Ribera, F. (2023). An evaluation model for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in accordance with 2030 SDGs and European Quality Principles. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 59, 202–216. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.12.002

 

Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331–350. https://doi. org/10.1108/ss-11-2015-0052

 

Chen, X., Jiang, L., Cheng, B., Zhang, Y., & Shi, S. (2024). Evaluating urban industrial heritage value using industrial heritage matrix AHP models: A case study of Mawei Shipbuilding in Fuzhou City. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 99–118. https://doi. org/10.14246/irspsd.12.2_99

 

De Gregorio, S., De Vita, M., De Berardinis, P., Palmero, L., & Risdonne, A. (2020). Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage to enhance the local context. Sustainability, 12(21), 9059. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12219059

 

Duan, Y., Liu, J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Investigation and value characteristics of the industrial heritage of Jiangxi textile factories from the perspective of industrial archaeology. Jiangxi Science, 38(1), 124–129. [in Chinese]. https://doi. org/10.13990/j.issn1001-3679.2020.01.025

 

Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(6), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. culher.2013.12.007

 

Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0

 

Ge, W. C., & Dai, X. (2018). A historical investigation of Jiangxi’s “Third Front” construction. Journal of Nanchang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 49(3), 91-97. [in Chinese]

 

Gallou, E., & Fouseki, K. (2019). Applying social impact assessment principles in assessing the contribution of cultural heritage to social sustainability in rural landscapes. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 9(3), 352–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JCHMSD-05-2018-0037

 

He, H., Zheng, K., Huang, H., & Li, X. (2017). A comprehensive satisfaction evaluation after industrial heritage reuse: A case of Nanchang Creative Park. Urban Development Research, 24(2), 129–134. [in Chinese]

 

Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

 

Jones, C., & Munday, M. (2001). Blaenavon and United Nations World Heritage Site Status: Is Conservation of Industrial Heritage a Road to Local Economic Development? Regional Studies, 35(6), 585–590. https://doi. org/10.1080/00343400120065741

 

Langston, C., Wong, F. K. W., Hui, E. C. M., & Shen, L. Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709– 1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017

 

La Rosa, D. (2014). Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecological Indicators, 42, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2013.11.011

 

Li, G., Wu, S., Wen, W., & Li, S. (2023). Multi-dimensional protection and reuse of industrial heritage in the Jiangfang area of Nanchang. Architecture & Culture, (6), 104–107. [in Chinese]

 

Lian, W., & Dimitrijević, B. (2025). Analytic hierarchy process-based industrial heritage value evaluation method and reuse research in Shaanxi Province–A case study of Shaanxi Steel Factory. Sustainability, 17(9), 4125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su17094125

 

Liu, F., Zhao, Q., & Yang, Y. (2018). An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster–Shafer theory. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 210–220. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.011

 

Milošević, D. M., Milošević, M. R., & Simjanović, D. J. (2020). Implementation of Adjusted Fuzzy AHP Method in the Assessment for Reuse of Industrial Buildings. Mathematics, 8(10), 1697. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101697

 

Meng, F., Zhi, Y., & Pang, Y. (2023). Assessment of the Adaptive Reuse Potentiality of Industrial Heritage Based on Improved Entropy TOPSIS Method from the Perspective of Urban Regeneration. Sustainability, 15(9), 7735. https://doi. org/10.3390/su15097735

 

Mieg, H. A., & Oevermann, H. (Eds.). (2014). Industrial heritage sites in transformation: Clash of discourses (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797991

 

Mikhailov, L. (2003). “Deriving Priorities From Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison Judgements.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3):365–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165- 0114(02)00383-4

 

Nadkarni, R. R., & Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814

 

Nanchang Municipal Bureau of Natural Resources. (2020a, June 19). Industrial heritage protection and utilization plan for Jiangfang Textile Factory in Nanchang City [Unpublished governmental planning document].

 

Nanchang Municipal Bureau of Natural Resources. (2020b, September 25). Pre-approval public notice of the “Industrial heritage protection and utilization plan for Jiangfang Textile Factory in Nanchang City”. http://bnr.nc.gov.cn/ncszrzyj/ ghbzpqg g / 2 0 2 0 0 9 / 7 4 9 a fdf c 5 6 0 3 4 9 f a a 2 c 6 c 2 8 f99c0f366.shtml [Access on April 15, 2026]

 

Nanchang Municipal People’s Government. (2024, December 26). Li Hongjun inspects planning and construction of the former wind tunnel site. [in Chinese]. https://www.nc.gov. cn/ncszf/jrnc/202412/7a59a99f39414c9291b4103f458fc9ca. shtml. [Access on April 15, 2026]

 

Nesticò, A., & Somma, P. (2019). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria methods for the enhancement of historical buildings. Sustainability, 11(17), 4526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11174526

 

Nocca, F. (2017). The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: Multidimensional indicators as decision-making tool. Sustainability, 9(10), 1882. https://doi. org/10.3390/su9101882

 

Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132

 

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.

 

Shipley, R., Utz, S., & Parsons, M. (2006). Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(6), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600940181

 

Vafaie, F., Remøy, H., & Gruis, V. (2023). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings; a systematic literature review of success factors. Habitat International, 142, 102926. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102926

 

Xie, H. (2022). Research on the protection and reuse of industrial heritage in Jiangxi: A case of the Hongdu Machinery Plant site in Nanchang. Industry and Technology Forum, 21(24), 213–215. [in Chinese]

 

Yang, Y., Yu, B., Tai, H., Shen, L., Liu, F., & Wang, S. (2021). A methodology for weighting indicators of value assessment of historic building using AHP with experts’ priorities. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(5), 1814– 1829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1971529

 

Yung, E. H., & Chan, E. H. (2011). Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International, 36(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing