AccScience Publishing / IJPS / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/IJPS026160086
Cite this article
17
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

From policy expansion to hesitation: Young people’s fertility responses to China’s Three-Child Policy in urban and suburban Beijing

Ran Chen1* Nor Azizah Zainal Abidin1 Siti Syuhadah Mohamad1
Show Less
1 College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah , Malaysia
Received: 14 April 2026 | Revised: 5 June 2026 | Accepted: 11 June 2026 | Published online: 9 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

China’s fertility policies have shifted from restriction to encouragement, yet fertility decline has continued even after the 2021 Three-Child Policy and the roll-out of supportive measures. This creates a policy implementation problem. Relaxing birth limits has not been accompanied by sufficient and consistently accessible support to bring forth change in young adults’ fertility decisions. This study thus draws on semi-structured interviews with 15 young adults residing in Beijing’s urban core and suburban areas, all aged between 22 and 35 years. The aim is to examine how young adults interpret the Three-Child Policy and the related measures in terms of feasibility. This is because there is an existing gap, as previous studies focus on measuring fertility intentions without a proper focus on the interpretation of state fertility policies by young adults themselves. It was found that participants consider the Three-Child Policy to be permission rather than support. They cite uneven access to affordable childcare, adequate housing space, and enforceable workplace protections as the major constraints that hinder feasibility. Moreover, urban-core interviewees foreground high housing costs and limited living space, while the suburban participants emphasize long commutes and inefficient local services that increase time and care burdens. These interpretations are associated with postponement, conditional openness, or decisions to limit family size to one or two children. This study shows that policy expansion alone cannot change fertility behavior if there is not enough credible and accessible support available, which is usable for everyday life. Overall, the study offers a citizen-centered explanation for why policy expansion may produce limited behavioral change when implementation is experienced as slow, uneven, or inaccessible.

Keywords
Three-Child Policy
Fertility hesitation
Policy implementation
Young generation
Fertility inaction
Semi-structured interviews
Beijing
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References

Andrade, C., & Bould, S. (2012). Child-care burden and intentions to have a second child: effects of perceived justice in the division of child-care. International Review of Sociology, 22(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2012.657527

Andrews, D., & Cingano, F. (2014). Public policy and resource allocation: evidence from firms in OECD countries. Economic Policy, 29(78), 253–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12028.

Attané, I. (2022). China’s New Three-Child Policy: What Effects Can We Expect? Population & Sociétés, 596(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.596.0001

Aziz, M. (2023). Women’s double burden in the family between culture and discrimination. Potret Pemikiran, 27(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v27i2.2782

Cai, Y., & Liu, B. (2024). From birth control to pronatalism: Population policy and women’s reproductive rights in China since the 1980s. Jindal Global Law Review, 15(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-024-00248-w

China Daily & Xinhua. (2021). Measures to support third-child policy. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. https://en.nhc.gov.cn/2021-07/23/c_84210.htm.

DiPrete, T. A., Morgan, S. P., Engelhardt, H., & Pacalova, H. (2003). Do Cross-national differences in the costs of children generate Cross-National differences in fertility rates? Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5–6), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:popu.0000020961.89068.91

Dong, W.-H., Wang, X., Yuan, F., Wang, L., Gu, T.-M., Zhu, B.-Q., & Shao, J. (2024). Will a government subsidy increase couples’ further fertility intentions? A real-world study from a large-scale online survey in Eastern China. Human Reproduction Open, 2024(4), hoae055. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae055

Erčulj, V. I., & Žiberna, A. (2022). The role of online social support in patients undergoing infertility treatment – a comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant members. Health Communication, 37(14), 1724–1730. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1915517

Wang., F., Gu, B., & Cai, Y. (2016). The End of China’s One-Child Policy. Studies in Family Planning, 47(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2016.00052.x

Fu, W., Zhao, W., & Deng, F. (2025). Work-Family Conflict and Second-Child Fertility Intention in Chinese Dual-Earner Families: Moderated mediation model of parental burnout and grandparent support. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 34(3), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02972-2

Gauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Jing, W., Liu, J., Ma, Q., Zhang, S., Li, Y., & Liu, M. (2022). Fertility intentions to have a second or third child under China’s three-child policy: a national cross-sectional study. Human Reproduction, 37(8), 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac101

Keiser, L. R., & Meier, K. J. (1996). Policy design, bureaucratic incentives, and public management: the case of child support enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), 337–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024316

Koreh, M., & Mandelkern, R. (2024). Trade-offs of government credibility institutions: market credibility vs. social credibility. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(11), 3539–3560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2243295

Kumlin, S., Nemčok, M., & Van Hootegem, A. (2024). Welfare state evaluations, normative expectations, and political trust: longitudinal evidence from Germany and Norway. Public Management Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2297292

Kwete, X., Knaul, F.M., Essue, B.M., & Langer, A. (2021). Gender equity, caregiving, and the 1-2-3-child policy in China. The Lancet, 398(10304), 953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01753-0

Lan, Z., Wu, X., Xing, X., & Qian, Y. (2025). Factors influencing the fertility intentions among women of childbearing age in China. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105640

Lei, H., Ma, J., Chen, X., & Ding, Z. (2025). Fertility policy, fertility intentions, and fertility transition: A quasi-natural experiment based on the “Universal Two-Child” Policy. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.12.008

Li, Z., Fan, J., Xing, Y., Peng, G., & Zhang, X. (2024). The impact of work-family conflict on Chinese women’s fertility intention: the role of fertility attitude, income class, and child-rearing burden. BMC Women’s Health, 24(1), 557. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03401-8

Lin, Y., Zhang, B., Hu, M., Yao, Q., Jiang, M., & Zhu, C. (2024). The effect of gradually lifting the two-child policy on demographic changes in China. Health Policy and Planning, 39(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae008

Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013). The impact of family policies on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9295-4

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in Semi-Structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 2333393615597674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592704000623

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (Februrary 28, 2025). Statistical Communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2024 National Economic and Social Development. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202502/t20250228_1958822.html.

Ning, N., Tang, J., Huang, Y., Tan, X., Lin, Q., & Sun, M. (2022). Fertility Intention to Have a Third Child in China following the Three-Child Policy: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215412

Reuters. (January 19, 2026). China’s population drops for fourth year as fewer babies born. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/chinas-population-falls-fourth-straight-year-2026-01-19/

Spéder, Z., Murinkó, L., & Oláh, L. S. (2020). Cash support vs. tax incentives: The differential impact of policy interventions on third births in contemporary Hungary. Population Studies, 74(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2019.1694165

Theiss, M., & Szelewa, D. (2025). Institutional Sources of Citizens’ Trust in the Welfare State: A Literature Review. Social Policy and Society, 24(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746425101000

Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2025). National will in the context of low fertility: exploring the Chinese childcare policies after the implementation of three-child policy. Policy Studies, 46(4), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2024.2339889

Weber, R. B., Grobe, D., & Davis, E. E. (2014). Does policy matter? The effect of increasing child care subsidy policy generosity on program outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.010

Xinhua (July 20, 2021). China releases decision on third-child policy, supporting measures. The State Council: The People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latestreleases/202107/20/content_WS60f6c308c6d0df57f98dd491.html.

Xinhua (March 5, 2022). China improves supporting measures for three-child policy. The State Council of The People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/premier/news/202203/05/content_WS6222c5a0c6d09c94e48a5fd0.html.

Xinhua (October 28, 2024). China unveils new policy measures to boost birth support. The State Council of The People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latestreleases/202410/28/content_WS671f6db9c6d0868f4e8ec5dc.html.

Zhang, J. (2017). The evolution of China’s One-Child policy and its effects on family outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.141

Zhang, M., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2024). From one-child policy to three-children initiative: a feminist critique of the population planning policies in China. Communication, Culture and Critique, 17(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcae014

Zhang, W., & Wong, L. P. (2025). Fertility intentions in the era of the new three-child policy in China: a cross-sectional survey of married adults of reproductive age. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1674687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1674687

Zhang, Y., & Goza, F. W. (2006). Who will care for the elderly in China? A review of the problems caused by China’s one-child policy and their potential solutions. Journal of Aging Studies, 20(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2005.07.002

 

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Population Studies, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8606 Print ISSN: 2424-8150, Published by AccScience Publishing