Employees’ attitudes toward family-friendly policies: An analysis through the lens of social exchange theory
Amidst declining birth rates, policymakers are urging businesses to implement family-friendly measures. This article presents an analysis of the Russian experience in integrating business into demographic policy and birth rate support systems. The mixed-methods research followed an explanatory sequential design. In the first phase, we identified components of Russian working-age employees’ attitudes toward corporate family-friendly measures (factor analysis) and developed profiles of workers with differing attitudes toward these measures (cluster analysis). In the second phase, we elucidated the mechanisms underlying these types and addressed how subjective perceptions of family-friendly policies either trigger or fail to trigger the social exchange process. Data sources included a survey of 2,520 working-age respondents (Phase 1) and 60 semi-structured interviews (Phase 2), conducted in three major Russian regions (North-West, Urals, and Siberia). We identified three perception models. The “Ideal Beneficiaries” cluster (31.3%) exhibited strong trust in employer family-friendly programs, viewing them as natural and fair support for parental responsibilities; this cluster also demonstrated the highest reproductive intentions. The “Pragmatic Skeptics” cluster (42.7%) held ambivalent attitudes—while questioning the appropriateness of business-supported programs, they acknowledged their potential to facilitate reproductive decisions. The “Indifferent” cluster (26.0%) neither endorsed nor responded to employer-implemented measures. We translated these findings into practical recommendations to help employers design differentiated family-friendly policies that target the specific stage at which social exchange breaks down for each perception type, thereby increasing the likelihood of achieving desired reproductive and organizational outcomes.
Bächmann, A.-C., Frodermann, C., & Müller, D. (2020). Does the firm make the difference? The influence of organizational family-friendly arrangements on the duration of employment interruptions after childbirth. European Sociological Review, 36(5), 798–813. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa016
Bae, K. B., & Skaggs, S. (2019). The impact of gender diversity on performance: The moderating role of industry, alliance network, and family-friendly policies – Evidence from Korea. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(6), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.45
Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 1123–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311413922
Bagirova, A. P. (2025). Corporate demography: Balancing the interests of the state, business and the population in the Russian regions. Economy of Regions, 21(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-4-13
Bagirova A. P., Vavilova A. S., & Blednova N. D. (2024). Corporate Demographic Policy as a Tool for Implementing the Strategic Interests of the State, Business and Employees. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 17(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.8
Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y
Blau, P. M. (1986). Exchange and Power in Social Life (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
Blom, R., & Aarntzen, L. (2026). What hinders employees’ access to and use of family-friendly policies: A systematic review of motivations, opportunities, and abilities. Community, Work & Family, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2026.2625440
Blom, R., Jaspers, E., Knies, E., & van der Lippe, T. (2025). Family-friendly policies and workplace supports: A meta-analysis of their effects on career, job, and work-family outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 157, 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104091
Cao, E., Jiang, J., Duan, Y., & Peng, H. (2022). A data-driven expectation prediction framework based on social exchange theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 783116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783116
Cheng, K., Zhu, Q., & Lin, Y. (2022). Family-supportive supervisor behavior, felt obligation, and unethical pro-family behavior: The moderating role of positive reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(2), 162–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04765-9
Chernenko, I. M., & Semenova, I. I. (2026). Adult learning and labour market outcomes: the moderating role of varieties of Russian state-led regional economies between 2013 and 2023. Regional Statistics, 16(2), 235-278. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS160202
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018). The new era workplace relationships: Is social exchange theory still relevant? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 456–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.5
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Efendiev, A. G., Balabanova, E. S., & Gogoleva, A. S. (2014). Social Exchange Concept as a Methodological Framework for Employment Relations Analysis (HSE Working Papers WP BRP 18/MAN/2014). National Research University Higher School of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/18man2014.html
Federal Agency on Technical Regulation and Metrology. (2025). National Standard of the Russian Federation GOST R 72119-2025: Support measures ¡°Corporate Demographic Standard.¡± Rules for formulating corporate programs and employer assessment methodology (forming CPD rating). Russian Institute for Standardization. https://szn.krasnodar.ru/upload/iblock/eca/z8etk3l21a2w4zh1objhq3i4zmo0xb3j/GOST-R-72119_2025.-Natsionalnyy-standart-Rossiyskoy-Federatsi.pdf
Gao, B., & Zhang, X. (2026). Enterprise performance and talent innovation training in new enterprises based on social exchange theory and organizational psychology. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 4126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34250-6
Garavan, T., Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M., & Ullah, I. (2026). Family-friendly HRM practices and early-career doctors well-being: The sequential mediating roles of psychological climate of care and work-family enrichment. Human Resource Management Journal, 36(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70032
Gould-Williams, J., & Davies, F. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes: An analysis of public sector workers. Public Management Review, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903042000339392
Government of the Russian Federation. (2025). Strategy for implementing family and demographic policy and supporting large families in the Russian Federation until 2036 (Order No. 615-r).
http://static.government.ru/media/files/r10o4FJgcqMhYx2bGAJRxMNNS2m7pmN4.pdf
Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01757.x
Han, T. Y., & Bi, J. W. (2024). Exploring the asymmetric relationships between satisfaction factors and overall employee satisfaction in the airline industry. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(14), 2325–2344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2228973
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hong, Y.-H., Ford, M. T., & Jong, J. (2024). Employee benefit availability, use, and subjective evaluation: A meta-analysis of relationships with perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(12), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001202
Josipovič, D. (2024). Depopulation and deep aging: The former Yugoslav and Western Balkans space between the second demographic transition and emigration. Stanovnistvo, 62(S1), S57–S84. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.615
Kalabikhina, I., & Kuznetsova, P. (2025). Parity transition in Russia. Demographic Review, 12(2), 108–131. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v12i2.27497
Kishenin, P., Zinina, A., & Maksimova, T. (2024). The intensity of fertility decline is increasing worldwide: Is a low fertility trap increasingly likely? Demographic Review, 11(4), 4–43. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v11i4.24288
Kundi, Y. M., Hamid, Z., Ghani, B., & Kaiser, U. (2025). From family to fortune: The dual impact of family-friendly policies and ethical work climate on employee career success. Career Development International, 30(3), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2024-0147
Li, Z. D., & Zhang, B. (2023). Family-friendly policy evolution: A bibliometric study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01784-x
Madison, K., Eva, N., De Cieri, H., & Goh, Z. (2025). Social exchange theory in leadership research: A problematizing review. The Leadership Quarterly, 36(6), 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101924
Magnavita, N., Chiorri, C., Chirico, F., & Meraglia, I. (2025). Individual work attitudes and work ability. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(4), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15040053
Memili, E., Patel, P. C., Holt, D. T., & Swab, R. G. (2023). Family-friendly work practices in family firms: A study investigating job satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 164, 114023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114023
Ogorodov, A. S., Saranchuk, S. Y., & Chevtaeva, N. G. (2017). Corporate professional unity under the unstable labor market in the industrial region. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 17(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2017-17-1-83-95
Park, H.-J., & Choi, H.-M. (2023). The impact of family-friendly policies on firm performance. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 19(6), 237–250. [In Korean] https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.6.202312.237
Pátkai Bende, A., & Huszár, B. E. (2026). Leadership in family-friendly organizations: How policies shape managerial decisions. Journal of Management Development, 45(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-07-2025-0389
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556339
Phuong Anh, D. V., Tuyen, B. Q., & Nguyen, P. M. (2026). Extending social exchange theory to investigate employee innovative work behaviors in Vietnamese manufacturing firms. Procedia Computer Science, 277, 1194–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.02.159
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Podvoisky, G. L. (2025). Transformation of social and labor relations in Russia. Social and Labor Research, 59(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2025-59-2-82-90
Potapova, Y., & Klimukhina, V. (2024). The structure and factors of organizational commitment formation: A theoretical model. Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 117–146. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2024-14-3-117-146
Qu, H., & Zhao, X. R. (2012). Employees’ work-family conflict moderating life and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 65, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.010
Quade, M. J., Wan, M., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2021). Beyond the bottom line: Don’t forget to consider the role of the family. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2167–2196. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211030546
Rajâa, O., & Mekkaoui, A. (2025). Revealing the impact of social exchange theory on financial performance: A systematic review of the mediating role of human resource performance. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2475983. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2475983
Rašević, M., & Petrović, M. (1997). Case studies in population policy concerning demographic problems in Serbia. Stanovnistvo, 35(1–2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.577
Raziq, M., Raziq, M. M., Moazzam, M., & Shamout, M. D. (2025). Leadership styles, knowledge sharing (attitudes and behaviors) and project success: Insights from theory of reasoned action and social exchange theory. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 74(8), 2815–2836. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2023-0575
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Russian News Agency TASS. (2026, March 10). 42 Russian regions adopt laws on responsible business development. https://tass.ru/ekonomika/26710785
Russian Trilateral Commission for the Regulation of Social and Labour Relations. (2024, November 29). Recommendations of the Russian Trilateral Commission on social and labor relations on corporate social policy measures for employees with family responsibilities (Protocol No. 9pr). [English translation of Russian title] https://base.garant.ru/411110916/
Shehawy, Y. M. (2022). Current workplace issues and behaviours in tourism and hospitality: Moderating role of empowering leadership. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(10), 1627–1648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1928612
Soboleva, I., & Chernykh, E. (2025). Work-related well-being: A concept and methodological approaches to measurement. Issues of Economic Theory, 29(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_4_7_19
Valmori, A., Reverberi, E., & Manzi, C. (2025). One size does not fit all: Nurturing identity needs and job satisfaction through employee benefits across gender and age. PLOS One, 20(12), e0336808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336808
Vyas, L., Cheung, F., Ngo, H. Y., & Chou, K. L. (2022). Family-friendly policies: Extrapolating a pathway towards better work attitudes and work behaviors in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912575
Yakovleva, N. G., & Barashkova, O. V. (2025). Labor transformation: Genesis of a new social system? (сomments on a discussion). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, (8), 53–64. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601025080057
Zangieva, I. K., & Rotmistrov, A. N. (2018). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: a comparative study. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (3), 29–46. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.3.02