Beyond the census: Satellite and tax data for ranking South African municipalities
This study comprehensively analyzes South Africa’s municipal rankings by employing unconventional data sources – specifically, satellite-derived and administrative tax data – to supplement traditional census counts. In light of recent controversies surrounding the accuracy of the 2022 Census data, we assessed the viability of alternative data sources in ensuring equitable and accurate municipal funding. We utilized data from South Africa’s 2022 Census, Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s LandScan 2022, Google Earth Engine’s nightlight database, the South African Revenue Service – National Treasury (SARS-NT) spatial tax panel, and the Regional Explorer database to calculate rank-size distributions and Spearman rank correlations across 213 municipalities. Results indicate exceptionally high concordance between census data and satellite-derived population estimates (Spearman’s ρ = 0.98), underscoring the robustness of satellite data in capturing demographic distributions. In addition, formal economic activity, as represented by SARS-NT establishment data, exhibits significant concentration, with metropolitan municipalities accounting for 67% of formal firms. Our findings also reveal that the population distribution among municipalities aligns closely with Zipf’s rank-size rule, with modest deviations indicating slight primacy in larger metropolitan areas. This analysis advocates for integrating satellite-derived growth factors into fiscal allocation models and establishing real-time economic monitoring using satellite night lights. These measures promise to enhance intergovernmental transfer responsiveness, equity, and accuracy, directly reinforcing sustainable urban development and governance that supports Sustainable Development Goal 11. The study further recommends annual recalibration of municipal population data using satellite-based adjustments to address funding disparities and mitigate migration-induced inequities in fiscal distribution.
Bezuidenhout, C., Malindi, K., & Rankin, N. (2021). A Report and Strategy for Spatialised Economic Activity Data. (Technical Report. City Support Programme. National Treasury: Pretoria).
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Van Marrewijk, C., & Van Den Berg, M. (1999). The return of Zipf: Towards a further understanding of the rank‐size distribution. Journal of Regional Science, 39(1):183-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00129
Calka, B., & Bielecka, E. (2019). Reliability analysis of LandScan gridded population data. The case study of Poland. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(5):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050222
Capello, R. (2004). Beyond optimal city size: Theory and evidence reconsidered. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 266:57-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(04)66003-2
Coetzee, C. (2012). Data resources “available” for local economic assessment in South Africa. Skills at Work: Theory and Practice Journal, 5(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3267.2007
Coetzee, C.E., & Kleynhans, E.P.J. (2021). Estimating economic activity of South African provinces using satellite technology: An econometric panel data application. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 23(21):100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100564
Dobson, J.E., Bright, E.A., Coleman, P.R., Durfee, R.C., & Worley, B.A. (2000). LandScan: A global population database for estimating at-risk populations. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(7):849-857. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482264678-24
Franke, J., & Gailhofer, P. (2021). Data governance and regulation for sustainable smart cities. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3:763788. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.763788
Gauthier, T. D. (2001), Detecting trends using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Environmental Forensics, 2(4):359- 362. https://doi.org/10.1080/713848278
Giesen, K., & Südekum, J. (2011). Zipf ’s law for cities in the regions and the country. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(4):667-686. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq019
González-Val, R. (2012). Zipf ’s Law: Main issues in empirical work. Région et Développement, 36:147-164.
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202(3):18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Henderson, J.V. (1995). Innovation and agglomeration: Two parables suggested by city-size distributions: Comment. Japan and the World Economy, 7(4):391-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-1425(95)00022-4
Joffe, H. (2024). Operation Vulindlela Looks to Fix Local Government in Second Phase. Available from: https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/economy/2024-06-26-operation-vulindlela-looks-to-fix-local-government-in-second-phase [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 30].
Kahn, T. (2024). Scientists Slam Stats SA’s 2022 Census as “Work of Fiction”. Available from: https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2024-07-11-scientists-slam-stats-sas-2022- census-as-work-of-fiction [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 30].
Kendall, M.G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1-2):81-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332226
Kleynhans, E.P., & Coetzee, C.E. (2022a). The rank-size distribution of cities in South Africa. GeoJournal, 87(2): 4775-4790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10527-x
Kleynhans, E.P., & Coetzee, C.E. (2022b). Temporal Disaggregation of gross domestic product data with night-time lights data for South Africa. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 17(4):233-259. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2022/v17n4a11
Kleynhans, E.P.J., & Coetzee, C.E. (2025). Insights from a population grid of South Africa: An applied spatial satellite data analysis. International Journal of Population Studies, 11(2):30-42. https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3297
Manioudis, M., & Meramveliotakis, G. (2022). Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: A return to the classical political economy. New Political Economy, 27(5):866-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2038114
National Treasury. (2024). Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement 2024: Chapter 4 - Expenditure Priorities. Pretoria: Government Printer. Available from: https://www.treasury. gov.za/documents/mtbps/2024/mtbps/FullMTBPS.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 13].
National Treasury. (2025). Budget Review 2025: Chapter 6 - Division of Revenue and Spending by Provinces and Municipalities. Pretoria: Government Printer. Available from: https://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20 budget/2025/review/fullbr.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 13].
Naudé, W.A., & Krugell, W.F. (2003). Are South African cities too small? Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 20(3):175-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00011-8
Nell, A. (2024). Spatial Tax Panel - Overview [Earlier Version Presented to the City Economic Development Managers’ Forum, 11 April 2023]. Government Technical Advisory Centre Public Economics Conference, Pretoria. Available from: https://www.gtac.gov.za/wp-content/ uploads/2024/09/spatial-tax-panel-by-andrew-nell-from-sead-sa.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 24].
NT-CSP (National Treasury - Cities Support Programme). (2012). About the CSP. Available from: https://csp.treasury. gov.za [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 08].
ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). (2023). Landscan Global 2022. Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.48690/1529167
Reggiani, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Did zipf anticipate socio-economic spatial networks? University of Bologna: Quaderni-Working Paper DSE. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2016979
Rosen, K.T., & Resnick, M.F. (1980). The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(2):165-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90043-1
Ryan-Mosley, T., Winick, E., & Kakaes, K. (2019). The Number of Satellites Orbiting Earth Could Quintuple in the Next Decade. MIT Technology Review. Available from: https:// www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/26/755/satellite-constellations-orbiting-earth-quintuple/ [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 09].
SAG (South African Government). (2024). South Africa Yearbook 2022/2023. Available from: https://www.gcis.gov. za/resources/south-africa-yearbook-202223 [Last accessed on 2025 May 14].
Stats SA (Statistics South Africa). (2023). MEDIA RELEASE: Census 2022 Population Count Results 10 October 2023. Available from: https://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=16716 [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 08].
Todes, A., & Turok, I. (2018). Spatial inequalities and policies in South Africa: Place-based or people-centred? Progress in Planning, 123:1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2017.03.001
Turok, I. (2021). Urbanization, Agglomeration, and Economic Development in South Africa. In: Oxford Handbook of the South African Economy. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192894199.013.28
Turok, I., & Visagie, J. (2025). Striking disparities in employment across South Africa: Evidence from a new spatial database. Development Southern Africa, 42(3):383-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2456252
Veneri, P. (2016). City size distribution across the OECD: Does the definition of cities matter? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 59:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.05.007
Von Fintel, D. (2023). Monitoring South Africa’s Metropolitan Economies: A Survey of the Data Landscape. (Discussion Document 13. Economic Research Southern Africa). Available from: https://econrsa.org/ download/27409/?tmstv=1684419483 [Last accessed on 2024 May 25].
Wang, Y., & Sun, B. (2024). The types of city size distributions and their evolution. Cities, 150(1):105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105045