AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO026020012
Submit to EJMO
Cite this article
4
Download
87
Views
Related Info Links
Google Scholar
More by Authors Links
Changpeng Xu
Yong Qi
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Tibial transverse transport promotes diabetic wound healing via angiogenic growth factors, anti-inflammatory response, and progenitor cell mobilization

Shuanji Ou1,2† ,  Xiaodong Wu1,3† ,  Jianping Wen1 ,  Jiabao Liu1 ,  Jiatao Lei1 ,  Tingyu He1 ,  Jiafu Xie1 ,  Rongshen Yang1 ,  Wei Zeng1 ,  Changliang Xia1,2 ,  Pengcheng Chen1,2 ,  Changpeng Xu1,2* ,  Yong Qi1,2*
Show Less
1 Department of Orthopedic, Orthopedic Center, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
2 Department of Orthopedic, Guangdong Traditional Medical and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Research Institute, The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
3 Department of Orthopedic, The First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
EJMO, 026020012 https://doi.org/10.36922/EJMO026020012
Received: 7 January 2026 | Revised: 6 February 2026 | Accepted: 13 February 2026 | Published online: 20 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
XML
Cite
Abstract

Introduction:  Tibial transverse transport (TTT), a technique derived from the Ilizarov method, has shown clinical efficacy in treating recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers by promoting angiogenesis. However, its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which TTT influences wound healing in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Thirty-six male Sprague–Dawley rats were induced to develop T2DM via a high-fat diet and low-dose streptozotocin. They were randomized into three groups: sham surgery, external fixator application without transport, and active TTT surgery. A full-thickness excisional wound was created on the dorsum of the right foot. Wound area was measured photographically on days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on days 9 and 15.

Results: The TTT group exhibited a significantly accelerated reduction in wound area from day 9 onwards compared to the sham and fixator groups (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, serum levels of VEGF, bFGF, PDGF, IL-10, and G-CSF were significantly elevated in the TTT group at both time points.

Conclusion: We established a T2DM rat model of TTT surgery. Our findings suggest that the TTT technique accelerates diabetic wound healing, potentially through a multifaceted mechanism involving enhanced serum levels of key angiogenic growth factors, promotion of an anti-inflammatory microenvironment (via IL-10), and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells (potentially via G-CSF).

Keywords
Tibial transverse transport
Diabetic foot ulcers
Rat model
Funding
This work was supported by the Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. B2024038), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2024A03J1132), and the Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University (No. 2024D002).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.
References
  1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119
  2. Lipsky BA, Senneville É, Abbas ZG, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3280. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3280
  3. van Netten JJ, Bus SA, Apelqvist J, et al. Definitions and criteria for diabetic foot disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3268. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3268
  4. Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1736-1743. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67700-8
  5. Mohsin F, Javaid S, Tariq M, Mustafa M. Molecular immunological mechanisms of impaired wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), current therapeutic strategies and future directions. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;139:112713. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112713
  6. Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review. JAMA. 2023;330(1):62-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578
  7. Castellino LM, Crisologo PA, Chhabra A, Öz OK. Diabetic Foot Infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2025;39(3):465-482. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2025.02.014
  8. Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, et al. Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36(suppl 1):e3266. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3266
  9. Sharma R, Sharma SK, Mudgal SK, Jelly P, Thakur K. Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcer, a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81886-1
  10. Chen Y, Wang X, Tao S, et al. Research advances in smart responsive-hydrogel dressings with potential clinical diabetic wound healing properties. Mil Med Res. 2023;10(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00473-9
  11. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(238):249-281. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198901000-00038
  12. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(239):263-285. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198902000-00029
  13. Matsuyama J, Ohnishi I, Kageyama T, Oshida H, Suwabe T, Nakamura K. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis in regenerating bone during transverse distraction: quantitative evaluation using a canine model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(433):243-250. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150562.24256.a4
  14. Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA. The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop. 2013;37(8):1533-1539. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1935-0
  15. Wei D, Zhou W, Huang J, Zhou X, Song H, Xiong L. Application of a customized 3D-printed osteotomy guide plate for tibial transverse transport. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22771. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73715-y
  16. Chen Y, Ding X, Zhu Y, et al. Effect of tibial cortex transverse transport in patients with recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective multicenter cohort study. J Orthop Translat. 2022;36:194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.002
  17. Ou S, Xu C, Yang Y, et al. Transverse Tibial Bone Transport Enhances Distraction Osteogenesis and Vascularization in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(9):2170-2179. doi: 10.1111/os.13416
  18. Hu XX, Xiu ZZ, Li GC, et al. Effectiveness of transverse tibial bone transport in treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;13:1095361. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1095361
  19. Tian W, Zhang L, Wang Y, et al. Tibial transverse transport promotes wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by stimulating endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and homing mediated neovascularization. Ann Med. 2024;56(1):2404186. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2404186
  20. Mukherjee S, Im SS. Impact of tibial transverse transport in tissue regeneration and wound healing with perspective on diabetic foot ulcers. World J Diabetes. 2024;15(5):810-813. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.810
  21. Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Kageyama T, Imai K, Nakamura K. Distraction osteogenesis promotes angiogenesis in the surrounding muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:223-229. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238795.82466.74
  22. Yang Y, Li Y, Pan Q, et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport accelerates wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis and immunomodulation. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(4):189-199. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.114.BJR-2021-0364.R1
  23. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(suppl 1):S15-S33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002
  24. Srinivasan K, Viswanad B, Asrat L, Kaul CL, Ramarao P. Combination of high-fat diet-fed and low-dose streptozotocin-treated rat: a model for type 2 diabetes and pharmacological screening. Pharmacol Res. 2005;52(4):313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2005.05.004
  25. Sun Y, Shi H, Yin S, et al. Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Exosomes Alleviate Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Reversing Peripheral Insulin Resistance and Relieving β-Cell Destruction. ACS Nano. 2018;12(8):7613-7628. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07643
  26. Dietrich I, Braga GA, de Melo FG, da Costa Silva Silva ACC. The Diabetic Foot as a Proxy for Cardiovascular Events and Mortality Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19(11):44. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0680-z
  27. Ou S, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport potentiates diabetic wound healing via activation of SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15894. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15894
  28. Liu J, Huang X, Su H, et al. Tibial Cortex Transverse Transport Facilitates Severe Diabetic Foot Wound Healing via HIF-1α-Induced Angiogenesis. J Inflamm Res. 2024;17:2681-2696. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S456590
  29. Kong L, Li Y, Deng Z, et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport regulates Orai1/STIM1-mediated NO release and improve the migration and proliferation of vessels via increasing osteopontin expression. J Orthop Translat. 2024;45:107-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.02.007
  30. Johnson KE, Wilgus TA. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiogenesis in the Regulation of Cutaneous Wound Repair. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014;3(10):647-661. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0517
  31. Tejedor S, Wågberg M, Correia C, et al. The Combination of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF-A) and Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 (FGF1) Modified mRNA Improves Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice: An Ex Vivo and In Vivo Investigation. Cells. 2024;13(5):414. doi: 10.3390/cells13050414
  32. Zubair M, Ahmad J. Role of growth factors and cytokines in diabetic foot ulcer healing: A detailed review. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2019;20(2):207-217. doi: 10.1007/s11154-019-09492-1
  33. Sogabe Y, Abe M, Yokoyama Y, Ishikawa O. Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates human keratinocyte motility by Rac activation. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(4):457-462. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00143.x
  34. Powers CJ, McLeskey SW, Wellstein A. Fibroblast growth factors, their receptors and signaling. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2000;7(3):165-197. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0070165
  35. Behm B, Babilas P, Landthaler M, Schreml S. Cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in wound healing. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(7):812-820. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04415.x
  36. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(5):585-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x
  37. Wu D, Liu R, Cen X, et al. Preclinical study of engineering MSCs promoting diabetic wound healing and other inflammatory diseases through M2 polarization. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04248-y
  38. Luo Z, Zheng S, Hu Z, et al. Ultrasound-responsive taurine lipid nanoparticles attenuate oxidative stress and promote macrophage polarization for diabetic wound healing. Free Radic Biol Med. 2025;233:302-316. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.04.007
  39. Ferrante CJ, Leibovich SJ. Regulation of Macrophage Polarization and Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012;1(1):10-16. doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0307
  40. Dong L, Song Y, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanical stretch induces osteogenesis through the alternative activation of macrophages. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(9):6376-6390. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30312
  41. Fadini GP, Albiero M, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, et al. Diabetes impairs stem cell and proangiogenic cell mobilization in humans. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):943-949. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1084
  42. Liu ZJ, Velazquez OC. Hyperoxia, endothelial progenitor cell mobilization, and diabetic wound healing. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10(11):1869-1882. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2121
Next article in this issue
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept