AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 6 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2022.34002
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Molecular Profile of Cutaneous Melanoma

Natalia N. Mazurenk1 Irina V. Tsyganova1 Irina N. Mikhailova2 Olga A. Anurova3 Lev V. Demidov2 Anna A. Lushnikova1
Show Less
1 Oncogenomics Laboratory, Carcinogenesis Institute, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
2 Department of Oncodermatology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
3 Department of Pathology, N.N.Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Submitted: 9 February 2022 | Accepted: 7 March 2022 | Published: 10 March 2022
© 2022 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: Сutаnеоus mеlаnоmа (CM) is characterized bу molecular heterogeneity. The aim of the study was to clarify clinical and pathological characteristics associated with gene mutations in the MAPK signaling pathway in Russian CM patients.

Methods: BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and PDGFRA mutations were evaluated in tumor DNA from 214 CM patients with Sanger sequencing of PCR products.

Results: Analysis of 173 non-acral CM revealed somatic mutations in BRAF (61.3%), NRAS (15.0%), KIT (1.1%), PDGFRA (1.1%), while 41 metastatic melanomas with unknown primary sites demonstrated a lower frequency of BRAF (46.3%) and NRAS (12.2%) mutations. The spectrum of BRAF and NRAS mutations differs among CM specimens, depending on tumor location and UV exposure. BRAFV600E was found in 90.4% of BRAF+ melanomas, that is, 52.8% of all CM cases, among them in 70% of patients aged under 30 years. KIT exon 11 mutations (p.V559A and p.Q556_W557del) were detected in CM, affecting the skin areas exposed to UV insolation (lower lip and shoulder). Somatic PDGFRA mutations (p.R558C and p.S847L) were found in patients with metastatic nodular CM of shin and back. Substitution c.2472C>T PDGFRA (silent mutation p.V824V or functional synonymous SNP rs2228230:C>T) was detected in CM cases with low expression of immunohistochemical diagnostic markers (poorly differentiated CM). 

Conclusion: Molecular genetic study has revealed the prevalence of BRAF, NRAS and KIT (italics) gene mutations which were associated with primary non-acral CM location, whereas PDGFRA (italics) alterations were detected in a few metastatic poorly differentiated CM cases.

Keywords
Cutaneous melanoma
BRAF
NRAS
KIT
and PDGFRA mutations
PDGFRA SNP rs2228230 gene polymorphism
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7–30.
2. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002;417:949–54.
3. Hodis E, Watson IR, Kryukov GV, Arold ST, Imielinski M, Theurillat JP, et al. A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma. Cell 2012;150:251–63.
4. Jakob JA, Bassett RL Jr, Ng CS, Curry JL, Joseph RW, Alvarado GC, et al. NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer 2012;118:4014–23.
5. Long GV, Trefzer U, Davies MA, Kefford RF, Ascierto PA, Chapman PB, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:1087–95.
6. Griewank KG, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Flaherty KT, Schadendorf D, Murali R. Genetic alterations and personalized medicine in melanoma: progress and future prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:djt435.
7. Moscow Research Oncological Institute. The state of oncology assistance to the population of Russia in 2019. In: Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO, editors. ISBN 978-5-85502-255-1. Moscow; 2020. Available at: https:// glavonco.ru/cancer_register/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%89%D1%8C%202019.pdf. Accessed Mar 1, 2022.
8. Mazurenko NN, Tsyganova IV, Lushnikova AA, Ponkratova DA, Anurova OA, Cheremushkin EA, et al. Spectrum of oncogene mutations is different in melanoma subtypes. Mol Biol (Mosk) 2015;49:1022–9.
9. Siroy AE, Boland GM, Milton DR. Beyond BRAFV600: clinical mutation panel testing by next generation sequencing in advanced melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2015;135:508–15.
10. Lyle M, Haydu LE, Menzies AM, Thompson JF, Saw RP, Spillane AJ, et al. The molecular profile of metastatic melanoma in Australia. Pathology 2016;48:188–93.
11. Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, et al. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:809–19.
12. Bowyer SE, Rao AD, Lyle M, Sandhu S, Long GV, McArthur GA, et al. Activity of trametinib in K601E and L597Q BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2014;24:504–8.
13. Fedorenko IV, Gibney GT, Smalley KS. NRAS mutant melanoma: biological behavior and future strategies for therapeutic management. Oncogene 2013;32:3009–18.
14. Mikhailova IN, Anurova OA, Lushnikova AA, Tsyganova IV, Senderovich AS, Kondratieva TT, et al. Phenotypic plasticity of metastatic melanoma. Siberian J Oncol 2019;18:86–94.
15. Agaimy A, Specht K, Stoehr R, Lorey T, Märkl B, Niedobitek G, et al. Metastatic malignant melanoma with complete loss of differentiation markers (undifferentiated/dedifferentiated melanoma): analysis of 14 patients emphasizing phenotypic plasticity and the value of molecular testing as surrogate diagnostic marker. Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:181–91. 
16. Massi D, Mihic-Probst D, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Mandalá M. Dedifferentiated melanomas: Morpho-phenotypic profile, genetic reprogramming and clinical implication. Cancer Treat Rev 2020;88:102060.
17. Bai X, Kong Y, Chi Z, Sheng X, Cui C, Wang X, et al. MAPK pathway and TERT promoter gene mutation pattern and its prognostic value in melanoma patients: a retrospective study of 2,793 cases. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:6120–7.
18. Randic T, Kozar I, Margue C, Utikal J, Kreis S. NRAS mutant melanoma: Towards better therapies. Cancer Treat Rev 2021;99:102238.
19. Heldin CH, Lennartsson J. Structural and functional properties of platelet-derived growth factor and stem cell factor receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5:a009100. 
20. Raica M, Cimpean AM. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)/ PDGF receptors (PDGFR) axis as target for antitumor and antiangiogenic therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2010;3:572–99. 
21. Curtin JA, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Absence of PDGFRA mutations in primary melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:488–9.
22. Terada T. Low incidence of KIT gene mutations and no PDGFRA gene mutations in primary cutaneous melanoma: an immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of Japanese cases. Int J Clin Oncol 2010;15:453–6.
23. Dai J, Kong Y, Si L, Chi Z, Cui C, Sheng X, et al. Large-scale analysis of PDGFRA mutations in melanomas and evaluation of their sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and crenolanib. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:6935–42.
24. National Cancer Institute. The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal (TCGA), 2013. Available at: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/. Accessed Mar 1, 2022.
25. Dai J, Yang L, Xu T, Si L, Cui C, Sheng X, et al. A functional synonymous variant in PDGFRA is associated with better survival in acral melanoma. J Cancer 2020;11:2945–56.

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing