AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 6 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2022.18855
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Analysis of Bloodstream Infections and Their Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern (Pre- and Post-COVID Lockdown in an Indian Cancer Hospital): A Record-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Vinod K. Raman1 Somorat Bhattacharjee2 Shobha Ganeshan3 Radheshyam Naik4
Show Less
1 Department of Preventive Oncology, Healthcare Global Enterprise Ltd., KR Road, Bangalore, India
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Head Medical Services, Healthcare Global, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Head of Dept., Healthcare Global, India
4 Department of Medical Oncology, Group Medical Advisor, Healthcare Global, Bangalore, India
Submitted: 3 August 2021 | Accepted: 27 January 2022 | Published: 9 March 2022
© 2022 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: In cancer centers, various factors influence the type of organism causing bloodstream infection (BSI). Our premise includes the indirect benefits of hand hygiene of healthcare personnel, masking, and distancing practices during lockdown/post-lockdown period on the type of BSI among cancer patients and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns.

Methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted from November 2020 to July 2021, among cancer patients admitted to Healthcare Global cancer center. Blood culture reports of patients presenting with symptoms of BSI were retrieved and analyzed in the Department of Preventive Oncology, Healthcare Global. Our data were stratified from pre-lockdown (November 2019 to March 24, 2020) and lockdown/post-lockdown (March 25, 2020, to Jul 2020) periods. 

Results: The proportion of culture positives during the pre-lockdown (Nov 2019 to March 24, 2020) and post-lockdown period (March 25, 2020, to July 2020) are 21.7% and 21.1%, respectively. However, this small difference did not show a significant association with the difference in hand hygiene during the two periods (<80% and ≥80%). In our study, Escherichia coli (23.8%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (10.9 %), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%) were the most common BSI during the pre-lockdown period. A similar analysis during the post-lockdown period shows a higher prevalence of E. coli (20.7%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (12.1%), and K. pneumoniae (15.5%). In our study, the isolates showed a greater proportion of resistance (>50%) to Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, Tigecycline, and Cephalosporin group of drugs. 

Conclusion: During COVID times, some of the preventive interventions which were implemented for reducing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 could contribute to the reduction of BSI in the hospital setting. For the management of BSI, it is imperative to initiate appropriate antimicrobial treatment at an early stage. It is imperative for customizing the antimicrobial stewardship strategies as per the geographic location.

Keywords
Catheter-related infections
blood culture
medical oncology
bacteremia
COVID-19
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1. Pandey S, Raza S, Bhatta CP. The aetiology of the bloodstream infections in the patients who presented to a tertiary care teaching hospital in kathmandu, Nepal. J Clin Diagn Res  2013;7:638–41.
2. Bharadwaj R, Kapila K. Blood stream infections. BioMed Research International 2014;2014:515273.
3. Mudshingkar SS, Palewar M, Dohe V, Bharadwaj RS. Blood stream infections: Changing trends in etiology and susceptibility pattern. IJID 2016;45:106.
4. Bhat S, Muthunatarajan S, Mulki SS, Bhat KA, Kotian KH. Bacterial infection among cancer patients: Analysis of Isolates and Antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Int J Microbiol 2021;2021:8883700.
5. Cataldo MA, Tetaj N, Selleri M, Marchioni L, Capone A, Caraffa E, et al; INMICOVID-19 Co-infection Group. Incidence of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in COVID-19 patients in intensive care: An alarming "collateral effect". J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020;23:290–1.
6. Ruiz-Giardin JM, Ochoa Chamorro I, Velázquez Ríos L, Jaqueti Aroca J, García Arata MI, SanMartín López JV, et al. Blood stream infections associated with central and peripheral venous catheters. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:841. 
7. Gasperini B, Cherubini A, Lucarelli M, Espinosa E, Prospero E. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in geriatric hospitalized patients before and after the COVID-19 outbreak: results from a retrospective observational study in two geriatric wards. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10:95.
8. Giacobbe DR, Battaglini D, Ball L, Brunetti I, Bruzzone B, Codda G, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest 2020;50:e13319.
9. WHO. Observation form. Avaialble at: https://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Observation_Form.doc. Accessed Feb 17, 2021.
10. Timsit JF, Ruppe E, Barbier F, Tabah A, Bassetti M. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:266–84. 
11. Leal HF, Azevedo J, Silva GEO, Amorim AML, de Roma LRC, Arraes ACP, et al. Bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological features. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:609. 
12. Pelfrene E, Botgros R, Cavaleri M. Antimicrobial multidrug resistance in the era of Covid-19: a forgotten plight? Antimicrobial resistance & infection control 2021;10(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13756-021-00893-z.
13. NIH COVID-19 treatment guidelines. Available at: covid19treatment guidelines.nih.gov, last accessed on 20th Oct 2021.

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing