AccScience Publishing / ARNM / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/ARNM025290036
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Strategies to minimize X-ray exposure and enhance dosimetric quality in pediatric nephroblastoma

Fatna Assaoui1,2,3*
Show Less
1 Laboratory of Health Sciences and Techniques, Environment and Care, Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques, Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Rabat, Morocco
2 Medical Physics Section, Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
3 Department of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Received: 20 July 2025 | Revised: 2 September 2025 | Accepted: 23 September 2025 | Published online: 28 October 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Pediatric nephroblastoma is a rare kidney cancer occurring in children. This study investigates the impact of kidney shielding using a multileaf collimator compared with individual block techniques on dose–volume histograms (DVHs) of organs at risk (OARs) and on planning target volume (PTV) coverage during whole-abdominal irradiation with 6 MV beams in children with nephroblastoma. A computed tomography scan was performed in the supine position for five children with nephroblastoma. Treatment plans for both techniques—the conformal block technique (CFBT) and the conventional block technique (CVBT)—were created using the three-dimensional treatment planning system XIO version 4.8. Plans were compared based on dose conformity, homogeneity, and DVHs of OARs. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test. The mean PTV conformity and homogeneity indices were 0.99 and 1.13 for CFBT, and 0.95 and 1.08 for CVBT, respectively. CFBT demonstrated superior target coverage, achieving 95% of the prescribed dose on 99.2% of the PTV compared to 95.0% for CVBT, which showed greater dose heterogeneity due to conventional kidney shielding and underdosing of adjacent abdominal regions. The average mean dose to the healthy kidney was 11.65 Gy (11.27–12.05) for CFBT and 11.44 Gy (11.09–11.75) for CVBT, with no significant differences in other OARs (p>0.05). CFBT represents an important advancement in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for children in developing countries, providing improved PTV homogeneity, enhanced treatment quality assurance, and a reduced potential for human error compared to CVBT. After the initial 10.5 Gy, the abdominal cavity was treated uniformly with CFBT.

Keywords
X-ray exposure
Nephroblastoma
Dose homogeneity
Dose volume histograms of organs at risk
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
  1. Kaatsch P. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.02.003

 

  1. Sun M, Thuret R, Abdollah F, et al. Age-adjusted incidence, mortality, and survival rates of stage-specific renal cell carcinoma in North America: A trend analysis. Eur Urol. 2011;59:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.002

 

  1. Green DM. The treatment of stages I-IV favorable histology Wilms’ tumor. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(8):1366-1372. doi: 10.1200/jco.2004.08.008

 

  1. Dome JS, Cotton CA, Perlman EJ, et al. Treatment of anaplastic histology wilms’ tumor: Results from the fifth national wilms’ tumor study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(15):2352-2358. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.7852

 

  1. Tournade MF, Com-Nougue C, De Kraker J, et al. Optimal duration of preoperative therapy in unilateral and nonmetastatic Wilms’ tumor in children older than 6 months: Results of the ninth international society of pediatric oncology wilms’ tumor trial and study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):488-500. doi: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.488

 

  1. Lemerle J, Voute PA, Tournade MF, et al. Effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy in Wilms’ tumor: Results of an international society of paediatric oncology (SIOP) clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1(10):604-609. doi: 10.1200/jco.1983.1.10.604

 

  1. Tournade MF, Com-Nougue C, Voute PA, et al. Results of the sixth international society of pediatric oncology wilms’ tumor trial and study: A risk-adapted therapeutic approach in Wilms’ tumor. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(6):1014-1023. doi: 10.1200/jco.1993.11.6.1014

 

  1. Geyer JR, Sposto R, Jennings M, et al. Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: A report from the Children’s Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):762-7631. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.09.095

 

  1. Grill J, Le Deley MC, Gambarelli D, et al. Postoperative chemotherapy without irradiation for ependymoma in children under 5 years of age: A multicenter trial of the French society of pediatric oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(5):1288-1296. doi: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1288

 

  1. Grundy RG, Wilne SA, Weston CL, et al. Primary postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy for intracranial ependymoma in children: The UKCCSG/SIOP prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(8):696-705. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70208-5

 

  1. Tai BC, Grundy RG, Machin D. On the importance of accounting for competing risks in pediatric cancer trials designed to delay or avoid radiotherapy: I. Basic concepts and first analyses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(5):1493-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.035

 

  1. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004

 

  1. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:735-740. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8

 

  1. Feuvret L, Noel J, Mazeronn JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: A review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(2):333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.028

 

  1. Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: Final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(2):291-298. doi: 1016/s0360-3016(99)00507-6.

 

  1. Paulino AC, Ferenci MS, Chiang KY, et al. Comparison of conventional to intensity modulated radiation therapy for abdominal neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(7):739-744. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20456

 

  1. Sterzing F, Stoiber EM, Nill S, et al. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of children and adolescents--a single institution’s experience and a review of the literature. Radiat Oncol. 2009;4:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-717x-4-37

 

  1. Armstrong GT, Liu Q, Yasui Y, et al. Late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: A summary from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27: 2328-2338. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.21.1425

 

  1. Hall EJ. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.058

 

  1. Bhatti P, Veiga LH, Ronckers CM, et al. Risk of second primary thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for a childhood cancer in a large cohort study: An update from the childhood cancer survivor study. Radiat Res. 2010;174:741-752. doi: 10.1667/RR2240.1

 

  1. Dowson LA, En Haken RK, Lawrence TS. Partial irradiation of the liver. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2001;11(3):240-246. doi: 10.1053/srao.2001.23485

 

  1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 1296-1305. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa04103

 

  1. Siva S, Pham D, Gill S, Corcoran NM, Foroudi F. A systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy ablation for primary renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2012;110:E737-E743. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11550.x

 

  1. Cheng-Hsiang Lo, Wen-Yen Huang, Hsing-Lung Chao, et al. Novel application of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using CyberKnife® for early-stage renal cell carcinoma in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: Initial clinical experiences. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:355-360. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2129

 

  1. Mascarin M, Giugliano FM, Coassin E, et al. Helical tomotherapy in children and adolescents: Dosimetric comparisons, opportunities and issues. Cancers (Basel). 201;3:3972-3990. doi: 10.3390/cancers3043972

 

  1. Paulino AC, Wen BC, Brown CK, et al. Late effects in children treated with radiation therapy for Wilms’ tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46:1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00534-9

 

  1. Rochet N, Sterzing F, Jensen A, et al. Helical tomotherapy as a new treatment technique for whole abdominal irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008;184:145-149. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1772-z

 

  1. Plowman PN, Cooke K, Walsh N. Indications for tomotherapy/intensity-modulated radiation therapy in paediatric radiotherapy: Extracranial disease. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:872-880. doi: 10.1259/bjr/14878999

 

  1. Newhauser WD, Durante M. Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:438-448. doi: 10.1038/nrc3069

 

  1. Beneyton V, Niederst C, Vigneron C, et al. Comparison of the dosimetries of 3-dimentions radiotherapy (3D-RT) with linear accelerator and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with helical tomotherapy in children irradiated for neuroblastoma. BMC Med Phys. 2012;12:2. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-12-2

 

  1. Shaffer R, Vollans E, Vellani R, et al. A radiotherapy planning study of RapidArc, intensity modulated radiotherapy, three-dimentional conformal radiotherapy, and parallel opposed beams in the treatment of pediatric retroperitoneal tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(1):16-23. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22649

 

  1. Dome JS, Graf N, Geller JI, et al. Advances in Wilms tumor treatment and biology: Progress through international collaboration. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):2999-3007. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.1888

 

  1. Constine LS, Ronckers CM, Hua CH, et al. Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC): An international collaborative review of late effects from radiation therapy for childhood cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;115(2):381-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.037

 

  1. Merchant, TE, Farr, JB, Sabin, ND, et al. Late effects of abdominal and pelvic radiotherapy in childhood cancer survivors: Dose-volume considerations. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022;69:e29645.

 

  1. Teh BS, Amos RA, Paulino AC, et al. Radiation-induced bowel injury in pediatric oncology: Evidence and clinical considerations. Pediatr Radiat Oncol Rev. 2021;10(1):45-56.
Share
Back to top
Advances in Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine, Electronic ISSN: 2972-4392 Print ISSN: 3060-8554, Published by AccScience Publishing