Active–passive multichannel analysis of surface waves integration for reconnaissance-scale characterization of shallow limestone bedrock in northern Vietnam
Reliable bedrock-depth information is essential for foundation design and seismic site characterization, yet borehole-only investigations provide sparse coverage and active-source surface-wave surveys may lack the low-frequency energy needed to resolve deeper interfaces. This study evaluates co-located active and roadside-passive multichannel analysis of surface waves at three sites in Quang Hanh Ward, Quang Ninh Province, northern Vietnam. Twenty-four 4.5 Hz geophones were deployed at 3 m spacing; active records were generated with a 10 kg sledgehammer, and 32 s passive records were recorded using traffic noise. Normalized frequency-phase-velocity images were combined and inverted to preferred one-dimensional shear-wave velocity (VS) profiles. Depth-averaged velocities and successive 5 m velocity ratios were compared with two boreholes and Standard Penetration Test data. The combined dispersion information extended from approximately 3 Hz to site-dependent upper limits of about 15–20 Hz and was interpreted to a depth of 50 m. The preferred models show a low-velocity surficial unit (VS = 164–364 m/s) over a high-velocity unit assigned to fractured limestone (approximately 1,500–2,300 m/s). The principal transition occurs at 10–15 m at Site 1 and 15–20 m at Sites 2 and 3, overlapping borehole evidence that places limestone at approximately 14–16 m. VS30 values of 513, 591, and 451 m/s place all three sites in Site Class C under the American Society of Civil Engineers 7-22/International Building Code 2024 and Ground Type B under Eurocode 8. The field example indicates that active–passive integration can extend usable bandwidth while retaining shallow resolution. Because only three lines and two non-blind boreholes were available and inversion uncertainty was not quantified, the proposed velocity-ratio minimum should be treated as a site-specific screening indicator rather than a generally validated bedrock estimator.
- Kundu P, Raman D, Pain A, Das J, Sundaram R, Gupta S. Seismic site characterization and development of SPT(N) to shear wave velocity correlation of Noida city. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):12368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94502-3
- Thakur H, Anbazhagan P. Geology, geomorphology and Vs30 based site classification of the Himalayan region using a stacked model. Eng Geol. 2025;355:108229. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108229
- Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics. 1999;64(3):800-808. doi: 10.1190/1.1444590
- Albesher ZI, Alotaibi A, Aljabbab A. Identifying subsurface weak zones in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using multichannel analysis of surface wave technique. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2025;37:4562025. doi: 10.25259/jksus_456_2025
- Kuang X, Pan Y, Zhang Z, Yuan S. Automatic picking of multimodal Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves from multicomponent data with an energy-density-based clustering method. Geophys J Int. 2025;243(1):ggaf323. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaf323
- Yang XH, Han P, Zhuang J, et al. Identification of higher-mode numbers in dispersion curves for Rayleigh wave inversion. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2025;63:1-13. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2025.3589016
- Sgattoni G, Morelli C, Lattanzi G, et al. Geophysical investigation and 3D modeling of bedrock morphology in an urban sediment-filled basin: the case of Bolzano (Northern Italy). Pure Appl Geophys. 2024;181(6):1871-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00024-024-03512-1
- Nguyen NNK, Le CVA, Vu TM, et al. Determination of shear wave velocity using multichannel analysis of surface wave in M’Drak District, Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng. 2025;20(11):1896-1900. doi: 10.1002/tee.70089
- Chang YH, Tsai CC, Ge L, Park D. Novel method to estimate horizontal variability of shear wave velocity through multichannel analysis of surface waves. Eng Geol. 2024;343:107799. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107799
- Ólafsdóttir EÁ, Bessason B, Erlingsson S, Kaynia AM. A tool for processing and inversion of MASW data and a study of inter-session variability of MASW. Geotech Test J. 2024;47(5):1006-1025. doi: 10.1520/gtj20230380
- Park CB, Miller RD, Ryden N, Xia J, Ivanov J. Combined use of active and passive surface waves. J Environ Eng Geophys. 2005;10(3):323-334. doi: 10.2113/JEEG10.3.323
- Park CB, Miller RD. Roadside passive multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). J Environ Eng Geophys. 2008;13(1):1-11. doi: 10.2113/JEEG13.1.1
- Cheng F, Xia J, Luo Y, et al. Multichannel analysis of passive surface waves based on crosscorrelations. Geophysics. 2016;81(5):EN57-EN66. doi: 10.1190/GEO2015-0505.1
- Baglari D, Dey A, Taipodia J. A state-of-the-art review of passive MASW survey for subsurface profiling. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2018;3(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s41062-018-0171-2
- Dal Moro G. MASW? A critical perspective on problems and opportunities in surface-wave analysis from active and passive data (with few legal considerations). Phys Chem Earth. 2023;130:103369. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2023.103369
- Aimar M, Foti S. Near-field effects on the in situ estimation of shear-wave velocity and damping ratio from MASW tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2026;152(1):06025007. doi: 10.1061/jggefk.gteng-14297
- Adhikari R, Macciotta R, McClymont A, Farrugia J, Deisman N, Hughes S. Managing uncertainties in active MASW: a practical guide for geotechnical engineers. Geotech Geol Eng. 2025;43(7):381. doi: 10.1007/s10706-025-03342-5
- Zhao Y, Dutta U, Yang ZJ. Joint inversion of MASW and ambient noise HVSR data for estimating shear wave velocity in warm permafrost sites. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2025;239:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2025.104623
- Ai H, Song X, Zhang X, et al. Transdimensional joint inversion of surface wave, refraction, and resistivity data using modified barnacles mating optimizer for near-surface investigations. J Appl Geophys. 2025;241:105863. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105863
- Akın Ö, Sayıl N. Soil characterization in landslide-prone areas using ground shear strain based on active and passive source surface wave methods. Pure Appl Geophys. 2025;182(4):1579-1600. doi: 10.1007/s00024-025-03696-0
- Mukherjee S, Bhaumik M, Naskar T. Modified S-transform based high-resolution dispersion imaging method for multi-channel surface wave data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2025;192:109284. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109284
- Liu F, Deng B, Su R, Bai L, Ouyang W. DispFormer: a pretrained transformer incorporating physical constraints for dispersion curve inversion. J Geophys Res Mach Learn Comput. 2025;2(3):e2025JH000648. doi: 10.1029/2025jh000648
- Wang XH, Cao ZJ, Wu T, Du W, Li DQ. Probabilistic inversion of shear wave velocity profile based on the dispersion curve from multichannel analysis of surface waves and inequality constraints on layer thicknesses. Eng Geol. 2025;352:108063. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108063
- Berti S, Aleardi M, Stucchi E. A probabilistic full waveform inversion of surface waves. Geophys Prospect. 2024;72(9):3448-3473. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13595
- Aimar M, Foti S, Cox BR. Novel techniques for in situ estimation of shear-wave velocity and damping ratio through MASW testing – I: a beamforming procedure for extracting Rayleigh-wave phase velocity and phase attenuation. Geophys J Int. 2024;237(1):506-524. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggae051
- Vishwakarma P, Bora SS, Prashant A. Variability in receivers responses of MASW test on undulated grounds: a numerical perspective. J Appl Geophys. 2024;226:105410. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105410
- Vishwakarma P, Bora SS, Prashant A. Analysis of shear wave velocity estimation using MASW on sloping grounds. Acta Geophys. 2024;73(1):359-378. doi: 10.1007/s11600-024-01382-8
- Hong Y, Xia J, Zhang H, et al. Azimuth correction for passive surface wave dispersion based on polarization analysis. Geophys J Int. 2024;238(3):1638-1650. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggae232
- Abbas HA, Al-Jeznawi D, Al-Janabi MAQ, Bernardo LFA, Jacinto MASC. Exploring shear wave velocity–NSPT correlations for geotechnical site characterization: a review. CivilEng. 2024;5(1):119-135. doi: 10.3390/civileng5010006
- Sambath M, Chandrasekaran SS, Maithani S, Ganapathy GP. Seismic site characterization of Coimbatore City, Tamil Nadu, India using the multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) test and correlations between shear-wave velocity and SPT-N. J Appl Geophys. 2025;232:105575. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105575
- Nguyen NNK. Deriving geotechnical parameters for foundation design in Ea Trang, Vietnam, through combined seismic methods. Econ Environ Geol. 2025;58(4):351-359. doi: 10.9719/EEG.2025.58.4.351
- Karslı H, Babacan AE, Akın Ö. Subsurface characterization by active and passive source geophysical methods after the 06 February 2023 earthquakes in Turkey. Nat Hazards. 2024;120(6):5257-5286. doi: 10.1007/s11069-024-06422-6
- Abdelbaset M, Mohamed A, Sawires R, Omran AAA, Thabet M. Passive and active seismics to identify geotechnical site characterization at industrial zone, Aswan, Egypt. J Appl Geophys. 2025;243:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105948
- Philley PD, Taipodia J, Pana T, Anshu AK. Enhancing subsurface imaging: optimization of data acquisition and processing parameters in passive roadside MASW surveys. Disaster Adv. 2024;17(10):54-65. doi: 10.25303/1710da054065
- Moon SW, Hayashi K, Ku T. Estimating spatial variations in bedrock depth and weathering degree in decomposed granite from surface waves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2017;143(7):04017020. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001679
- Yang XH, Zhou Y, Han P, Feng X, Chen X. Near-surface Rayleigh wave dispersion curve inversion algorithms: a comprehensive comparison. Surv Geophys. 2024;45(3):773-818. doi: 10.1007/s10712-024-09826-y
- Anshu AK, Taipodia J, Kumar SS, Dey A. Seismic site classification of Itanagar city, India, considering spatial variation of shear wave velocity obtained using extensive active MASW survey. J Appl Geophys. 2025;243:105981. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105981
- Mazanec M, Valenta J, Málek J. Does VS30 reflect seismic amplification? Observations from the West Bohemia Seismic Network. Nat Hazards. 2024;120(13):12181-12202. doi: 10.1007/s11069-024-06679-x
- Shi Z, Wang C. Joint inversion of ERT and ambient noise surface wave data with DPC-guided fuzzy c-means clustering for near-surface imaging. Geophys J Int. 2024;238(3):1334-1352. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggae227
- International Code Council. 2024 International Building Code. Washington (DC): International Code Council; 2023. https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2024V2.0
- European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN 1998-1:2004. European Committee for Standardization; 2004. Accessed August 10, 2026. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EN-Eurocodes/eurocode-8-design-structures-earthquake-resistance
- Abdelrahman K. Shear wave velocity structure at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, derived from MASW and microtremor arrays. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):11497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90894-4
- Vantassel JP, Cox BR, Hubbard PG, Yust M. Extracting high-resolution, multi-mode surface wave dispersion data from distributed acoustic sensing measurements using the multichannel analysis of surface waves. J Appl Geophys. 2022;205:104776. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104776
- Vishwakarma P, Prashant A. Hard sandwiched soil layer detection using higher mode in active MASW test. Geotech Geol Eng. 2024;42(7):5519-5538. doi: 10.1007/s10706-024-02843-z
