AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP026260183
Cite this article
3
Download
63
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interpretable application of machine learning techniques in the assessment of coastal water quality of Poyang Lake, China

Zhangtao Hu1 Rong Yi1* Xin Liu2,3,4* Chao Du1 Xinyue Di1 Qiang Huang2,3,4 Aimin Hao5 Yasushi Iseri5
Show Less
1 School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
2 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Guangxi Academy of Marine Sciences, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China
3 Beibu Gulf Marine Industry Research Institute, Fangchenggang, Guangxi, China
4 Guangxi Laboratory of Oceanography, Nanning, Guangxi, China
5 College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Received: 27 June 2026 | Revised: 21 July 2026 | Accepted: 28 July 2026 | Published online: 7 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Machine learning models (MLMs) have made substantial progress across diverse scientific domains owing to their strong predictive capabilities and effectiveness in extracting patterns from high-dimensional data. In lake environmental management, clarifying the relationships between environmental factors and water quality indicators (WQIs) is essential for improving assessment accuracy and operational efficiency. In this study, four MLMs (support vector regression [SVR], random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], and k-nearest neighbors [KNN]) were applied to identify the key environmental parameters influencing WQIs in the coastal zone of Poyang Lake, China, and to evaluate the predictive performance of each model. Model interpretability was enhanced using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method, which quantified the contributions of environmental variables to WQI variability. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chlorophyll-a (Chla) concentrations were used as representative WQIs. Among all models, XGBoost consistently exhibited the highest predictive accuracy. Electrical conductivity (EC), water temperature (T), dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), and pH were identified as the five most influential parameters. Specifically, EC, T, and DO were the dominant drivers of TN and Chla, accounting for 92.8% and 84.2% of the total SHAP contributions, respectively. Meanwhile, TP was primarily governed by ORP, pH, and T, with a combined contribution of 70.6%. XGBoost accurately reproduced the observed WQIs using environmental parameters as inputs. These findings demonstrate that interpretable MLMs can effectively reveal the environmental drivers of lake water quality and offer a robust framework for ecosystem monitoring and forecasting in freshwater environments.

Keywords
Machine learning models
SHapley Additive exPlanations
Environmental parameter
Water quality modeling
Ecological forecasting
Lake ecosystem
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Grant number 20212BAB213012), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Grant number 2025GXNSFAA069312), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 41907331).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Kawanabe H, Nishino M, Maehata M, eds. Lake Biwa: Interactions between Nature and People. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Nature; 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1783-1
  2. Yadav SC. Water Pollution: The Problems and Solutions. Sci Insights. 2024;44(2):1245-1251. doi: 10.15354/si.24.re905
  3. Sheng Y, Chen F, Sheng G, Fu J. Water quality remediation in a heavily polluted tidal river in Guangzhou, South China. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 2012;15(2):219-226. doi: 10.1080/14634988.2012.687674
  4. Zhu DT, Cheng XJ, Li WH, Niu FJ, Wen JH. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of water quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Lijiang River, China and their responses to environmental factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):8089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138089
  5. Cohen J. Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(6, pt 1):426-443. doi: 10.1037/h0026714
  6. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933;24(6):417-441. doi: 10.1037/h0071325
  7. Tang ZH, Cao YH, Jiang QF. Spatial and temporal changes of water environmental factors and water quality assessment in coastal waters of Jiangsu Province. J Sea Res. 2025;204:102570. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2025.102570
  8. Heneash AM, Alprol AE, El-Naggar HA, et al. Multivariate analysis of plankton variability and water pollution in two highly dynamic sites, southeastern Mediterranean (Egyptian coast). Arab J Geosci. 2022;15(4):330. doi: 10.1007/s12517-022-09595-1
  9. Jakovljević OS, Popović SS, Živić IM, et al. Epilithic diatoms in environmental bioindication and trout farm's effects on ecological quality assessment of rivers. Ecol Indic. 2021;128:107847. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107847
  10. Mu M, Gao LM, Zhang HQ, et al. Effects of land use on water quality at different spatial scales in the middle reaches of Huaihe River. J Freshw Ecol. 2023;38(1):2176373. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2023.2176373
  11. Li BD, Chen KQ, Liu XB, Liu C, Wang SY. Evolution Characteristics of Water Quality in Plain Reservoirs and Its Relationship with the Economic Development Response: A Case Study of Daheiting Reservoir in Northern China. Water. 2023;15(18):3229. doi: 10.3390/w15183229
  12. Mebarkia A, Boufekane A. Human activity impact on surface water quality in semi-arid regions: a case study of Aïnzeda lake (North-East Algeria). Water Supply. 2020;20(5):1726-1744. doi: 10.2166/ws.2020.083
  13. Sugihara G, May R, Ye H, et al. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science. 2012;338(6106):496-500. doi: 10.1126/science.1227079
  14. Liu X, Dur G, Ban S, Sakai Y, Ohmae S, Morita T. Planktivorous fish predation masks anthropogenic disturbances on decadal trends in zooplankton biomass and body size structure in Lake Biwa, Japan. Limnol Oceanogr. 2020;65(3):667-682. doi: 10.1002/lno.11336
  15. Chang CW, Miki T, Ye H, et al. Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1140. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28761-3
  16. Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science. 2015;349(6245):255-260. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8415
  17. Sarker IH. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):160. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x
  18. Thanh NN, Chotpantarat S, Ngu NH, Thunyawatcharakul P, Kaewdum N. Integrating machine learning models with cross-validation and bootstrapping for evaluating groundwater quality in Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Environ Res. 2024;252:118952. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118952
  19. Uddin MG, Nash S, Rahman A, Olbert AI. Performance analysis of the water quality index model for predicting water state using machine learning techniques. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2023;169:808-828. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.073
  20. Irwan D, Ibrahim SL, Latif SD, et al. River water quality monitoring using machine learning with multiple possible in-situ scenarios. Environ Sustain Indic. 2025;26:100620. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2025.100620
  21. Kruk M. SHAP-NET, a network based on Shapley values as a new tool to improve the explainability of the XGBoost-SHAP model for the problem of water quality. Environ Model Softw. 2025;188:106403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106403
  22. Chen C, Chen Q, Yao S, et al. Combining physical-based model and machine learning to forecast chlorophyll-a concentration in freshwater lakes. Sci Total Environ. 2024;907:168097. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168097
  23. Huang HJ, Wang W, Lv JP, et al. Relationship between chlorophyll a and environmental factors in lakes based on the random forest algorithm. Water. 2022;14(19):3128. doi: 10.3390/w14193128
  24. Isah AS, Bao PQ, Gaurav S, et al. Implementation of data intelligence models coupled with ensemble machine learning for prediction of water quality index. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(33):41524-41539. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09689-x
  25. Shapley LS. A Value for n-Person Games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW, eds. Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28). Volume II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1953:307-318. doi: 10.1515/9781400881970-018
  26. Li ZQ. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2022;96:101845. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845
  27. Makumbura RK, Mampitiya L, Rathnayake N, et al. Advancing water quality assessment and prediction using machine learning models, coupled with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques like SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpreting the black-box nature. Results Eng. 2024;23:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102831
  28. Talukdar S, Bera S, Naikoo MW, et al. Optimisation and interpretation of machine and deep learning models for improved water quality management in Lake Loktak. J Environ Manage. 2024;351:119866. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119866
  29. Wang YY, Yu XB, Zhang L, Lei GC. Seasonal variability in baseline δ15N and usage as a nutrient indicator in Lake Poyang, China. J Freshw Ecol. 2013;28(3):365-373. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2013.763296
  30. Liang Y, Liu XZ, Xiao HY, Gao XF, Li WH, Xiong J. Impact of high water level fluctuations on stable isotopic signature of POM and source identification in a floodplain lake—Bang Lake (Poyang Lake). Environ Earth Sci. 2016;75(3):255. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4847-z
  31. Yu X, Hawley-Howard J, Pitt AL, Wang J-J, Baldwin RF, Chow AT. Water quality of small seasonal wetlands in the Piedmont ecoregion, South Carolina, USA: effects of land use and hydrological connectivity. Water Res. 2015;73:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.007
  32. Wu ZS, Cai YJ, Zhang L, Chen YW. Spatial and temporal heterogeneities in water quality and their potential drivers in Lake Poyang (China) from 2009 to 2015. Limnologica. 2018;69:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2017.12.001
  33. Tian MM, Mao JQ, Wang K, Xu DD. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity of ecological water level in Poyang Lake, China. Ecol Inform. 2024;82:102694. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102694
  34. Wang ZT, Sun FH, Sang YW, Wu FC. Drivers analysis and future scenario-based predictions of nutrient loads in key lakes and reservoirs of the Yangtze River Catchment. J Environ Manage. 2025;374:124078. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124078
  35. Fang N, You QH, Liu L, et al. Evaluation of eutrophication in Poyang Lake wetland during autumn based on the cloud model [in Chinese]. Acta Ecol Sin. 2019;39(17):1-8. doi: 10.5846/stxb201808221790
  36. Liu YB, Liu J, Yin XJ, et al. Human activities and ecosystem health: A historical analysis of Poyang Lake. Ecol Indic. 2024;166:112446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112446
  37. Tan YB, Hu N, Huang MT, Xiao YT, Shan J, Li DJ. Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Correlation Analysis of Human Activity Intensity and Resource Carrying Capacity in the Region around Poyang Lake, China, from 2010 to 2020. Land. 2023;12(12):2139. doi: 10.3390/land12122139
  38. Yao Z, Wang Z, Huang J, Xu N, Cui X, Wu T. Interpretable prediction, classification and regulation of water quality: A case study of Poyang Lake, China. Sci Total Environ. 2024;951:175407. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175407
  39. Smith VH, Schindler DW. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(4):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.009
  40. Wetzel RG. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2001.
  41. Yi R, Song P, Liu X, Maruo M, Ban S. Differences in dissolved phosphate in shallow-lake waters as determined by spectrophotometry and ion chromatography. Limnology. 2020;21(3):329-339. doi: 10.1007/s10201-019-00574-2
  42. Xu H, Paerl HW, Qin B, Zhu G, Gaoa G. Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs control phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Limnol Oceanogr. 2010;55(1):420-432. doi: 10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0420
  43. TEZUKA Y. Seasonal variations of dominant phytoplankton, chlorophyll a and nutrient levels in the pelagic regions of Lake Biwa. Jpn J Limnol. 1984;45(1):26-37. doi: 10.3739/rikusui.45.26
  44. McQuatters-Gollop A, Raitsos DE, Edwards M, et al. A long‐term chlorophyll dataset reveals regime shift in North Sea phytoplankton biomass unconnected to nutrient levels. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52(2):635-648. doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0635
  45. Liu X, Yi R, Ohashi M, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of orthophosphate in a large mesotrophic lake and implications for phytoplankton productivity. Inland Waters. 2025;15(1):1-37. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2025.2449763
  46. Drucker H, Burges CJ, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V. Support vector regression machines. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9. 1996:155-161.
  47. Raheja H, Goel A, Pal M. Analysis and prediction of groundwater quality using machine learning algorithm for irrigation purposes. Environ Earth Sci. 2025;84(7):180. doi: 10.1007/s12665-025-12173-9
  48. Basak D, Pal S, Patranabis DC. Support vector regression. Neural Inf Process Lett Rev. 2007;11(10):203-224.
  49. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
  50. He S, Wu J, Wang D, He X. Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution and evaluating its main impact factors using random forest. Chemosphere. 2022;290:133388. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133388
  51. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM; 2016:785-794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785
  52. Dhaliwal SS, Nahid A-A, Abbas R. Effective intrusion detection system using XGBoost. Information. 2018;9(7):149. doi: 10.3390/info9070149
  53. Niazkar M, Menapace A, Brentan B, et al. Applications of XGBoost in water resources engineering: A systematic literature review (Dec 2018–May 2023). Environ Model Softw. 2024;174:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105971
  54. Ding F, Hao SL, Zhang WJ, et al. Using multiple machine learning algorithms to optimize the water quality index model and their applicability. Ecol Indic. 2025;172:113299. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113299
  55. Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1967;13(1):21-27. doi: 10.1109/tit.1967.1053964
  56. Fix E. Discriminatory Analysis: Nonparametric Discrimination, Consistency Properties. Volume 1. San Antonio, TX: USAF School of Aviation Medicine; 1985.
  57. Dhanabal S, Chandramathi S. A review of various k-nearest neighbor query processing techniques. Int J Comput Appl. 2011;31(7):14-22.
  58. Zhang ZH. Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(11):218. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.37
  59. Danielsson P-E. Euclidean distance mapping. Comput Graph Image Process. 1980;14(3):227-248. doi: 10.1016/0146-664x(80)90054-4
  60. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967;27(2 pt 1):209-220.
  61. Cheng YX, Ding S, Shao Z, et al. Persistence of dissolved organic matter in sediments influenced by environmental factors: Implication for nutrition and carbon cycle. J Environ Manage. 2024;363:121387. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121387
  62. Zhang HY, Li N, Song JX, et al. Influence of land use on spatial distribution of primary productivity in aquatic environment in the Weihe River Basin, China. J Arid Land. 2025;17(3):304-323. doi: 10.1007/s40333-025-0095-6
  63. Moneera A, Maram A, Azizah A, et al. Click through Rate Effectiveness Prediction on Mobile Ads Using Extreme Gradient Boosting. Comput Mater Contin. 2021;66(2):1681-1696. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2020.013466
  64. Eun Choi J, Won Shin J, Wan Shin D. Vector SHAP Values for Machine Learning Time Series Forecasting. J Forecast. 2025;44(2):635-645. doi: 10.1002/for.3220
  65. Sharma A, Verbeke WJMI. Improving Diagnosis of Depression With XGBOOST Machine Learning Model and a Large Biomarkers Dutch Dataset (n = 11,081). Front Big Data. 2020;3:15. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2020.00015
  66. Zhang WG, Wu CZ, Zhong HY, Li YQ, Wang L. Prediction of undrained shear strength using extreme gradient boosting and random forest based on Bayesian optimization. Geosci Front. 2021;12(1):469-477. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.007
  67. Lundberg S, Lee SI. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
  68. Shah FU, Khan AU, Khan AW, Ullah B, Khan MR, Javed I. Comparative analysis of ensemble learning algorithms in water quality prediction. J Hydroinform. 2024;26(12):3041-3059. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2024.071
  69. Das BK, Paul S, Mandal B, et al. Integrating machine learning models for optimizing ecosystem health assessments through prediction of nitrate–N concentrations in the lower stretch of Ganga River, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2025;32(8):4670-4689. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-35999-z
  70. Fei C, Cao X, Zang D, et al. Machine learning techniques for real-time UV-Vis spectral analysis to monitor dissolved nutrients in surface water. In: Kitayama K-i, Jalali B, eds. Proceedings Volume 11703: AI and Optical Data Sciences II. Bellingham, WA: SPIE; 2021:46. doi: 10.1117/12.2577050
  71. Niazkar M, Piraei R, Goodarzi MR, Abedi MJ. Comparative Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Quality Prediction Using Various Parameters. Environ Process. 2025;12(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40710-025-00751-9
  72. Fadiran AO, Dlamini SC, Mavuso. A comparative study of the phosphate levels in some surface and ground water bodies of Swaziland. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop. 2008;22(2):197-206. doi: 10.4314/bcse.v22i2.61286
  73. Liu X, Dur G, Ban S, Sakai Y, Ohmae S, Morita T. Quasi‐decadal periodicities in growth and production of the copepod Eodiaptomus japonicus in Lake Biwa, Japan, related to the Arctic Oscillation. Limnol Oceanogr. 2021;66(10):3783-3795. doi: 10.1002/lno.11918
  74. Dur G, Liu X, Sakai Y, Hsieh C-h, Ban S, Souissi S. Disrupted seasonal cycle of the warm-adapted and main zooplankter of Lake Biwa, Japan. J Great Lakes Res. 2022;48(5):1206-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2022.06.001
  75. Rammohan B, Partheeban P, Ranganathan R, Balaraman S. Groundwater Quality Prediction and Analysis Using Machine Learning Models and Geospatial Technology. Sustainability. 2024;16(22):9848. doi: 10.3390/su16229848
  76. Zou M, Jiang W-G, Qin Q-H, Liu Y-C, Li M-L. Optimized XGBoost model with small dataset for predicting relative density of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials. 2022;15(15):5298. doi: 10.3390/ma15155298
  77. Zhu W, Shen S, Zhang Z. Improved multiclassification of schizophrenia based on xgboost and information fusion for small datasets. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022(1):1581958. doi: 10.1155/2022/1581958
  78. Luan SL, Pan HX, Shen RQ, et al. High Resolution Water Quality Dataset of Chinese Lakes and Reservoirs from 2000 to 2023. Sci Data. 2025;12(1):572. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04915-y
  79. Sani Z, Katshiatshia HM, Tshimanga RM, Basamba TA, Odume ON. Relationship between land use and water quality in a tropical urban catchment of the Congo Basin: A case study of N'Djili River catchment. Water Pract Technol. 2024;19(4):1272-1289. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2024.080
  80. Boström B, Andersen JM, Fleischer S, Jansson M. Exchange of phosphorus across the sediment-water interface. Hydrobiologia. 1988;170(1):229-244. doi: 10.1007/BF00024907
  81. Yu YS, Ding P, Bian HY, Wei JS, Zhang H. Water quality parameters inversion based on multispectral remote sensing. J Water Process Eng. 2025;73:107707. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107707
  82. Bradter U, Altringham JD, Kunin WE, Thom TJ, O'Connell J, Benton TG. Variable ranking and selection with random forest for unbalanced data. Environ Data Sci. 2022;1:e30. doi: 10.1017/eds.2022.34
  83. Huang YP, Wang C, Wang YH, et al. Application of machine learning models in groundwater quality assessment and prediction: progress and challenges. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2024;18(3):29. doi: 10.1007/s11783-024-1789-2
  84. Tepetidis N, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, Dimitriadis P. Investigating the performance of the informer model for streamflow forecasting. Water. 2024;16(20):2882. doi: 10.3390/w16202882
  85. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. 2017;30.
  86. Akinnigbagbe AE, Popoola SO, Oyatola OO, Oghenede EK, Nubi OA. Spatiotemporal patterns of water quality, nutrient dynamics and chlorophyll a concentrations in Five Cowries Creek from 2022 to 2024. Discover Water. 2025;5(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s43832-025-00257-3
  87. Tavakoli M, Bayati S. Seasonal assessment of surface and groundwater quality, heavy metals, and water quality indices (case study: Dehloran watershed, Ilam, Iran). Appl Water Sci. 2026;16(3):86. doi: 10.1007/s13201-026-02781-6
  88. Kumar V, Shekhar S, Arora NK. Integrated geostatistical and multiple linear regression modeling for assessment of groundwater quality parameters in the Burhi Gandak Basin. Int J River Basin Manage. 2026:1-29. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2026.2626838
  89. Li Y, Zhang Q, Cai Y, et al. Hydrodynamic investigation of surface hydrological connectivity and its effects on the water quality of seasonal lakes: Insights from a complex floodplain setting (Poyang Lake, China). Sci Total Environ. 2019;660:245-259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.015
  90. Yamazaki Y, Muneoka T, Wakou S, Kimura M, Tsuji O. Evaluation of the Ion Components for the Estimation of Total Nitrogen Concentration in River Water based on Electrical Conductivity. Int J Environ Rural Dev. 2014;5(1):160-164. doi: 10.32115/ijerd.5.1_160
  91. Liang Y, Xiao HY, Liu XZ, et al. Variation in sources of inorganic nitrogen under different hydrological conditions in a floodplain lake: a case study of Bang Lake (Poyang Lake, Jiangxi Province, China). Inland Waters. 2018;8(2):176-185. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2018.1457854
  92. Wang JL, Fu ZS, Qiao HX, Liu FX. Assessment of eutrophication and water quality in the estuarine area of Lake Wuli, Lake Taihu, China. Sci Total Environ. 2019;650(pt 1):1392-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.137
  93. De Matos Valerio A, Montanari JL, Kampel M, Ward ND, Richey JE, Cunha AC. Chlorophyll-a dynamics in the lower Amazon River: insights from in situ and hyperspectral remote sensing using OCI-PACE. Int J Remote Sens. 2026;47(1):124-149. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2025.2596811
  94. Çelekli A, Zariç ÖE. Ecological Assessments of Seven Lakes in Antalya River Basin: Application of Phytoplankton Indices and Multimetric Approach. Ecohydrology. 2026;19(1):e70174. doi: 10.1002/eco.70174
  95. Sun LF, Qiao YC, Song LQ, Peng YJ, Hu BQ. Responses of N2O production and associated functional genes to increasing temperature and moisture in surface and subsurface soils of a temperate forest. Pedobiologia. 2025;108:151020. doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2025.151020
  96. Luo ZX, Qiu ZZ, Wei QS, Du Laing G, Zhao YL, Yan CZ. Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in relation to nitrification along simulated dissolved oxygen gradient in sediment–water interface of the Jiulong river estuarine wetland, China. Environ Earth Sci. 2014;72(7):2225-2237. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3128-6
  97. Duan ZZ, Gao W, Cheng GW, Zhang Y, Chang XX. Warming surface and Lake heatwaves as key drivers to harmful algal Blooms: A case study of Lake Dianchi, China. J Hydrol. 2024;632:130971. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130971
  98. Klose K, Cooper SD, Leydecker AD, Kreitler J. Relationships among catchment land use and concentrations of nutrients, algae, and dissolved oxygen in a southern California river. Freshw Sci. 2012;31(3):908-927. doi: 10.1899/11-155.1
  99. Romanowicz R, Petersen W. Statistical Modeling of Algae Concentrations in the Elbe River in the Years 1985—2001 Using Observations of Daily Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature, and pH. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol. 2003;31(4-5):319-333. doi: 10.1002/aheh.200300499
  100. Li B, Yang GS, Wan RR, Xu LG. Chlorophyll a variations and responses to environmental stressors along hydrological connectivity gradients: Insights from a large floodplain lake. Environ Pollut. 2022;307:119566. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119566
  101. Legendre P, Fortin MJ. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(5):831-844. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02866.x
  102. Yi CY, Li JF, Zhang CR, Pan F, Zhou CF. In Situ Monitoring of a Eutrophicated Pond Revealed Complex Dynamics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Triggered by Decomposition of Floating-Leaved Macrophytes. Water. 2021;13(13):1751. doi: 10.3390/w13131751
  103. House W. Factors influencing the measurement of equilibrium phosphate concentrations in river sediments. Water Res. 2000;34(4):1187-1200. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00249-3
  104. Koski-Vahala J, Hartikainen H, Tallberg P. Phosphorus mobilization from various sediment pools in response to increased pH and silicate concentration. J Environ Qual. 2001;30(2):546-552. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.302546x
  105. Liikanen A, Murtoniemi T, Tanskanen H, Väisänen T, Martikainen PJ. Effects of temperature and oxygenavailability on greenhouse gas and nutrient dynamics in sediment of a eutrophic mid-boreal lake. Biogeochemistry. 2002;59(3):269-286. doi: 10.1023/a:1016015526712
  106. Kankaala P. The relative importance of algae and bacteria as food for Daphnia longispina (Cladocera) in a polyhumic lake. Freshw Biol. 1988;19(3):285-296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1988.tb00351.x
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing