AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 5 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-2008-5_4_08
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Vegetation Structure and Species Distribution Pattern of Mangrove Species in Bhitarkanika Ecosystem, Orissa, India

V.P. Upadhyay1* P.K. Mishra1 J.R. Sahu2
Show Less
1 Ministry of Environment and Forests, Eastern Regional Office A/3 Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751023, India
2 Govt. College, Bhadrak, Orissa, India
AJWEP 2008, 5(3), 69–76; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2008-5_4_08
Submitted: 20 June 2006 | Accepted: 29 June 2007 | Published: 1 January 2008
© 2008 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

 Indian east coast in West Bengal, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and the Andaman and Nicobar islands supports various types of mangrove formations such as deltaic, estuarine, backwater and sheltered, insular bay types. The present study is an effort to collect ecological information on zonation of mangrove species based on phytosociological methods at four forest sites in Mangrove Ecosystems of Orissa coast. A total of 16 species were recorded at Thakurdia site, 20 tree species at Dangmal site, 24 tree species at the Bhitarkanika forest site and 17 tree species at Kakranasi forest site. The Bhitarkanika site has the highest number of species among all the four study sites. This block along with Dangmal is in the core area of the Bhitarkanika wildlife sanctuary. Availability of fresh water through Bhitarkanika (Maipura) and Brahmani rivers and saline water from sea help wide range of niches for different species to occur and, thus, species diversity is the highest in this mangrove ecosystem. A clear zonation pattern so characteristically reported by authors from different mangrove forests of world is absent in the study area. The mangrove species in study area occur as ‘ecological mosaics’ scattered over the forest blocks. Such mosaic formations could be linked to the very dynamic nature of the forest blocks in the study area with ecological functions such as tidal inundation, seed/propagule dispersal etc. operating equally throughout the area. Rhizophora and Kandelia species which are characteristic of the riverbank vegetation were seen deep inside the forest blocks, thus adapting to different type of niches. The riverbank-like niche is provided by innumerable creeks that criss cross the forest blocks and thus favouring these species that grow on the banks. Based on these habitat types a new classification of mangrove forest types of Bhitarkanika forest ecosystem has been proposed through present study.

Keywords
Bhitarkanika sanctuary
coastal ecosystem
mangroves
species
zonation
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Amarasinghe, M.D. and S. Balasubramaniam (1992). Net primary productivity of two mangrove forest stands on the north western coast of Sri Lanka. Hydrobiologia, 247: 37-47.

Balachandra, L. (1988). A comprehensive account of the mangrove vegetation of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Forester, 114(11): 741-751.

Banerjee, L.K. and T.A. Rao (1990). Mangroves of Orissa Coast and their ecology. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India. 118 p.

Blasco, F. and M. Aizpuru (2002). Mangroves along the coastal stretch of Bay of Bengal: Present status. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 31(1): 9- 20.

Blasco, F. and M. Aizpuru (1997). Classification and evolution of the mangroves of India. Tropical Ecology, 38(2): 357- 374.

Blasco, F. (1975). The mangroves of India (translated by Ms. K. Thanikaimoni). Institut Francais De Pondicherry, Tran. Sect. Sci. Tech. 15, 75 p.

Bunt, J.S. and E.D. Bunt (1999). Complexity and variety of zonal pattern in the mangroves of the Hinchinbrook area, Northeastern Australia. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 3: 165-176.

Bunt, J.S. and T. Stieglitz (1999). Indicators of mangrove zonality: The Normanby river, N.E. Australia. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 3: 177-184.

Chadha, S. and C.S. Kar (1999). Bhitarkanika: Myth and Reality. Natraj Publishers, Dehradun, 368 p.

Cintron, G. and Y.S. Novelli (1984). Methods for studying mangrove structure. In: The mangrove ecosystem: Research methods (Samuel C. Snedaker and Jane G. Snedaker, editors), UNESCO. 251 p.

Curtis, S.J. (1933). Working plan for the Sunderbans division(1931-1951), Forest Department, Bengal.

Ellison, Aaron M. and E.J. Farnsworth (2001). Mangrove Communities. In: Marine community ecology (M.D. Bertness, S. Gaines and M.E. Hay, Eds), Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 423-442.

Ellison, Aaron M., Mukherjee, B.B. and A. Karim (2000). Testing patterns of zonation in mangroves: Scale dependence and environmental correlates in the Sunderbans of Bangladesh. Journal of Ecology, 88: 813- 824.

IUCN (2005). Early observations of Tsunami effect on Mangroves and coastal forests. IUCN statement from IUCN Forest conservation programme, Gland, Switezerland, 4 p.

Kenneally, K.F. (1982). Mangroves of Western Australia. In: Mangrove ecosystems in Australia—Structure, function and management (B.F. Clough, ed.), Australian Institute of Marine Sciences, Australia, pp. 95-110.

Kershaw, K.A. (1973). Quantitative and Dynamic Plant ecology (Second edition). Edward Arnold, London.

Kumaran, K.P., Shindikar, N.-M. and R.B. Limaye (2004). Mangrove associated lignite beds of Malvan, Konkan: Evidence for higher sea level during the late tertiary(Neogene) along west coast of India. Curr. Sci., 86: 335-
340.

Mishra, P.K., Upadhyay, V.P. and J.R. Sahu (2005). Species diversity in Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, Orissa, India. Lyonia, 8: 73-87.

Misra, R. (1968). Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.

Quereshi, I.M. (1957). Botanical, silviculture features of mangrove forests of Bombay state. In: Proceedings of the mangrove symposium, Calcutta, India, pp. 20-26.

Rao, T.A., Sastry, A.R.K. and P.G. Shanware (1972). Analysis of the basic patterns of an estuarine shore in the vicinity of the Coringa Bay, Andhra Pradesh, India. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (B), 75: 40-50.

Sarma, A.L.N., Rao, D.G., Nanda, U.K. and P.K. Pattanaik(1997). Ecological status study and survey of benthic macro, meio and icthyofauna of Bhitarkanika mangrove estuaries of Mahanadi river system. MOEF Final Project Report, Regional College of Education, Bhubaneswar, India, 258 p.

Selvam, V. (2003). Environmental classification of mangrove wetlands of India. Current Science, 84(6): 757-765.

Smith, T.J. III (1992). Forest structure. In: Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems (A.I. Robertson and D.M. Alongi, Eds),

American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp. 101-136.

Snedaker, S.C. and J.G. Snedaker (1984). The mangrove ecosystem: Research methods. UNESCO, Paris.

Snedaker, S.C. (1982). Mangrove species zonation: Why? In: Contribution to the ecology of halophytes (D.N. Sen and K.S. Rajpurohit, Eds), Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 111-125.

Thom, B.G. (1984). Mangrove Ecosystem: Research Methods(S.C. Snedaker and J.G. Snedaker, Eds), UNESCO, Paris, pp. 3-17.

Untawale, A.G. (1984). Mangroves of India—Present status and multiple use practices. National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, India.

Upadhyay, V.P., Ranjan, R. and J.S. Singh (2002). Human mangrove conflicts: The way out. Current Science, 83: 1328-1336.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing