Analysing the Effectiveness of Municipal Wastewater Sludge, Bagasse Ash, Rice Husk Ash and Plastic Waste Powder for Manufacturing Bricks
Indian cities’ rapid industrialisation and urbanisation have created a requirement for massive infrastructure growth. As a result, numerous homes have been built on a big scale. As one of the most important building materials, bricks must be produced in large quantities using resources including in-situ clay, energy, and water. The concern about the sustainability of expansion is raised by the rapid exploitation of such resources, which also leads to environmental imbalance. Numerous thousands of tonnes of waste are produced as a result of the rapid growth, which creates problems with not only disposing off the waste but also with the availability of landfill spaces in urban areas. This project aims to conduct an experimental analysis of the potential use of bagasse ash, rice husk ash, plastic waste powder, and municipal wastewater sludge as clay substitutes in brickmaking. Testing the efficacy of these materials revealed that the bagasse ash brick with plastic waste powder demonstrated a significant increase in compressive strength and less water absorption when compared to a conventional brick. According to the test results, the average compressive strength of the bagasse ash brick created using plastic waste powder is 9.81 N/mm2 and 9.03 N/mm2 , respectively, which is higher than the standard necessary construction brick according to our Indian requirements. These bricks can be utilised as first- and second-class bricks. These bricks can be used in both load-bearing and non-load-bearing structures because the average water absorption, according to specifications, was not more than 20%. This process for producing building materials encourages the use of waste resources in construction.
Aishwarya Lakshmi, A., Amalraj, S. and G. Venkatesan (2023). Granules as precursors in the working of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor: A review on the impacts of granulation. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 20(4): 41-45.
Algamal, Y., Khalil, N.M. and Q.M. Saleem (2018). Usage of the sludge from water treatment plant in brick-making industry. Journal of Chemical Technology & Metallurgy, 53(3): 505-510.
Alam, P., Singh, D. and S. Kumar (2022). Incinerated municipal solid waste bottom ash bricks: A sustainable and cost-efficient building material. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49: 1566-1572.
Amsayazhi, P. and K.R. Mohan (2018). Use of sludge waste as ingredient in making of brick. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.12): 419-422.
Aneke, F.I. and C. Shabangu (2021). Green-efficient masonry bricks produced from scrap plastic waste and foundry sand. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 14: e00515.
Babu, S.G. and S. Krishnaiah (2018). Manufacturing of ecofriendly brick: A critical review. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 8(2): 24-32.
Chauhan, S.S., Singh, J.K., Singh, H., Mavi, S., Singh, V. and M.I. Khan (2021). An overview on recycling plastic wastes in bricks. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47: 4067-4073.
Chen, R.S., Salleh, M.N., Ab Ghani, M.H., Ahmad, S. and S. Gan (2015). Biocomposites based on rice husk flour and recycled polymer blend: Effects of interfacial modification and high fibre loading. BioResources, 10(4): 6872-6885.
Dar, A.R., Verma, S.K., Ashish, D.K. and M.A. Dar (2014). Investigation on the properties of nonconventional bricks. i-Manager’s Journal on Structural Engineering, 3(4): 26.
Dhanjode, C. and A. Nag (2022). Utilization of landfill waste in brick manufacturing: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62(12): 6628-6633.
Federico, L.M., Chidiac, S.E. and R.G. Drysdale (2005, June). The use of waste material in the manufacturing of clay brick. In: Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Banff, Alta (pp. 8-12).
Hamzah, A.F. and R.M. Alkhafaj (2022). An investigation of manufacturing technique and characterization of lowdensity polyethylene waste base bricks. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61: 724-733.
Hossain, T., Sarker, S.K. and B.C. Basak (2011). Utilization potential of rice husk ash as a construction material in rural areas. Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 39(2): 175-188.
Hwang, C.L. and T.P. Huynh (2015). Investigation into the use of unground rice husk ash to produce ecofriendly construction bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 93: 335-341.
Issa, E., Arul Murugan, C., Kannan, N. and G. Venkatesan (2020). Measurement of secure power meter with smart IOT application. Journal of Green Engineering, 10(12): 12962-12972.
Kumar, S., Sangwan, P., Dhankhar, R.M.V. and S. Bidra (2013). Utilization of rice husk and their ash: A review. Res. J. Chem. Env. Sci, 1(5): 126-129.
Sutas, J., Mana, A. and L.J.P.E. Pitak (2012). Effect of rice husk and rice husk ash to properties of bricks. Procedia Engineering, 32: 1061-1067.
Sutcu, M., Alptekin, H., Erdogmus, E., Er, Y. and O. Gencel (2015). Characteristics of fired clay bricks with waste marble powder addition as building materials. Construction and Building Materials, 82: 1-8.
Venkatesan, G., Subramani, T., Joyal Isac, S. and G. Sindhu (2022a). Groundwater potential mapping and natural remediation through artificial recharge structures in Vellore District, Tamil Nadu, India using geospatial techniques. Desalination and Water Treatment, 254(1): 229-237.
Venkatesan, G., Arul Murugan, C., Joyal Isac, S. and G. Jerome Nithin Gladson (2022b). Experimental investigation on a load-carrying capacity of hollow and composite pile materials in layered soil. Materials Today,
65(9): 3951-3958.
Venkatesan, G., Joyal Isac, S., Jerome Nithin Gladson, G. and S. Amala (2022c). Demarcation of non-carcinogenic risk zones based on the intake of contaminated groundwater in an industrial area of southern India using geospatial techniques. Desalination and Water Treatment, 274(1): 140-149.
Venkatesan, G., Kalpana, M., Sakthivel, S., Guruchandran, K. and W. Mathew (2023) A combined approach for the treatment of textile dye bath effluent using CO2 gas. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 20(2): 59-65.