AccScience Publishing / OR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/OR026280029
Cite this article
1
Download
35
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Research progress and application prospects of in vitro human skin models

Siying Li1 ,  Ruibao Chen1 ,  Yujie Wang1 ,  Ling Leng1*
Show Less
1 Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Lab, State Key Laboratory of Complex, Severe, and Rare Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing , China
Received: 10 July 2026 | Revised: 28 September 2026 | Accepted: 10 October 2026 | Published online: 23 October 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In vitro human skin models have evolved from reconstructed epidermal and full-thickness tissues to more diverse platforms that combine multicellular organization with increasingly precise control over tissue architecture and the culture microenvironment. This growing diversity increases the need for clear classification and fit-for-purpose evaluation. This review organizes current in vitro human skin models according to biological architecture, including reconstructed epidermal, dermal, full-thickness, and multilayered equivalents, spheroids, and skin organoids, and separately considers vascular, immune, neural, pigmentary, and microbial components as functional extensions. We further examine engineering strategies to construct, mature, and control these systems, including conventional tissue engineering, biomaterial design, three-dimensional bioprinting, microfluidic platforms, and stem-cell-based differentiation. For wound healing, toxicological testing, and disease modeling, we examine which functions each model reproduces, how reproducibly it performs, and how far it has progressed toward experimental, clinical, or regulatory validation. Future development should prioritize models that reproduce the biological functions required for a defined application while remaining experimentally controllable, reproducible, and appropriately validated for that context of use.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
In vitro skin models
Skin organoids
Tissue engineering
Three-dimensional bioprinting
Skin-on-a-chip
Wound healing
Toxicological evaluation
Disease modeling
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82572893), the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFA1108400, L.L.), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2023-I2M-3-002), and the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2025-PUMCH-C-016).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Moniz T, Costa Lima SA, Reis S. Human skin models: From healthy to disease-mimetic systems; characteristics and applications. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177(19):4314-4329. doi: 10.1111/bph.15184
  2. Moreci RS, Lechler T. Epidermal structure and differentiation. Curr Biol. 2020;30(4):R144-R149. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.004
  3. Bento-Lopes L, Cabaco LC, Charneca J, Neto MV, Seabra MC, Barral DC. Melanin’s Journey from Melanocytes to Keratinocytes: Uncovering the Molecular Mechanisms of Melanin Transfer and Processing. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11289. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411289
  4. Deckers J, Hammad H, Hoste E. Langerhans Cells: Sensing the Environment in Health and Disease. Front Immunol. 2018;9:93. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00093
  5. Galati A, Gallo RL, Cavagnero KJ. Multifaceted Roles of Dermal Fibroblasts in Skin Health and Disease. Dermatol Surg. 2025;51(9S):S5-S11. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004668
  6. Kabashima K, Honda T, Ginhoux F, Egawa G. The immunological anatomy of the skin. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(1):19-30. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0084-5
  7. Fluhr JW, Moore DJ, Lane ME, Lachmann N, Rawlings AV. Epidermal barrier function in dry, flaky and sensitive skin: A narrative review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(5):812-820. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19745
  8. Charkoudian N. Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: how it works, when it does not, and why. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(5):603-612. doi: 10.4065/78.5.603
  9. Lee SY, Jeon S, Park KY, Hong JY. Human-Relevant In Vitro Skin Models: From Regulatory-Validated Platforms to Emerging Technologies for Translational Dermatology. Exp Dermatol. 2026;35(7):e70312. doi: 10.1111/exd.70312
  10. Zeng D, Li S, Du F, et al. Advances in engineered organoid models of skin for biomedical research. Burns Trauma. 2025;13:tkaf016. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaf016
  11. Jia YY, Atwood SX. Diversity of human skin three-dimensional organotypic cultures. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2024;89:102275. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2024.102275
  12. Hofmann E, Schwarz A, Fink J, Kamolz LP, Kotzbeck P. Modelling the Complexity of Human Skin In Vitro. Biomedicines. 2023;11(3):794. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030794
  13. Ali N, Hosseini M, Vainio S, Taieb A, Cario-Andre M, Rezvani HR. Skin equivalents: skin from reconstructions as models to study skin development and diseases. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(2):391-403. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13886
  14. Wang D, Majid M, Chen J, Wu C, Chen Y, Ni F. Skin Organoids for Disease Modelling, Drug Screening and Regenerative Medicine: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Wound Repair Regen. 2026;34(1):e70117. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70117
  15. Quilez C, Bebiano LB, Jones E, et al. Targeting the Complexity of In Vitro Skin Models: A Review of Cutting-Edge Developments. J Invest Dermatol. 2024;144(12):2650-2670. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.04.032
  16. Green H, Kehinde O, Thomas J. Growth of cultured human epidermal cells into multiple epithelia suitable for grafting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76(11):5665-5668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5665
  17. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76(3):1274-1278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1274
  18. Prunieras M, Regnier M, Woodley D. Methods for cultivation of keratinocytes with an air-liquid interface. J Invest Dermatol. 1983;81(1 Suppl):28s–33s. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12540324
  19. Poumay Y, Dupont F, Marcoux S, Leclercq-Smekens M, Herin M, Coquette A. A simple reconstructed human epidermis: preparation of the culture model and utilization in in vitro studies. Arch Dermatol Res. 2004;296(5):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s00403-004-0507-y
  20. Ponec M, Weerheim A, Kempenaar J, et al. The formation of competent barrier lipids in reconstructed human epidermis requires the presence of vitamin C. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;109(3):348-355. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12336024
  21. Ponec M, Boelsma E, Weerheim A, Mulder A, Bouwstra J, Mommaas M. Lipid and ultrastructural characterization of reconstructed skin models. Int J Pharm. 2000;203(1-2):211-225. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00459-2
  22. Thakoersing VS, van Smeden J, Mulder AA, Vreeken RJ, El Ghalbzouri A, Bouwstra JA. Increased presence of monounsaturated fatty acids in the stratum corneum of human skin equivalents. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(1):59-67. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.262
  23. Mieremet A, Rietveld M, Absalah S, van Smeden J, Bouwstra JA, El Ghalbzouri A. Improved epidermal barrier formation in human skin models by chitosan modulated dermal matrices. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174478
  24. Bouwstra JA, Helder RWJ, El Ghalbzouri A. Human skin equivalents: Impaired barrier function in relation to the lipid and protein properties of the stratum corneum. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113802. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.012
  25. Netzlaff F, Kaca M, Bock U, et al. Permeability of the reconstructed human epidermis model Episkin in comparison to various human skin preparations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2007;66(1):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.08.012
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 431: In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method. Online. OECD Publishing. 2025. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/9789264264618-en
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 439: In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method. Online. OECD Publishing. 2025. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/9789264242845-en
  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Performance Standards for the Assessment of Proposed Similar or Modified In Vitro Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Methods for Skin Corrosion Testing as described in TG 431. Online. OECD Publishing. 2015. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/b7c3d922-en
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Performance Standards for the Assessment of Proposed Similar or Modified In Vitro Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Test Methods for Skin Irritation Testing as described in TG 439. Online. OECD Publishing. 2015. doi: 10.1787/745487b9-en
  30. Netzlaff F, Lehr CM, Wertz PW, Schaefer UF. The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: an evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity, and substance transport. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005;60(2):167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2005.03.004
  31. El Ghalbzouri A, Lamme E, Ponec M. Crucial role of fibroblasts in regulating epidermal morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2002;310(2):189-199. doi: 10.1007/s00441-002-0621-0
  32. Huet F, Severino-Freire M, Cheret J, et al. Reconstructed human epidermis for in vitro studies on atopic dermatitis: A review. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;89(3):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.11.015
  33. Lee DY, Lee JH, Yang JM, Lee ES, Park KH, Mun GH. A new dermal equivalent: the use of dermal fibroblast culture alone without exogenous materials. J Dermatol Sci. 2006;43(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2006.03.007
  34. El Ghalbzouri A, Commandeur S, Rietveld MH, Mulder AA, Willemze R. Replacement of animal-derived collagen matrix by human fibroblast-derived dermal matrix for human skin equivalent products. Biomaterials. 2009;30(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.002
  35. Haydont V, Neiveyans V, Perez P, et al. Fibroblasts from the Human Skin Dermo-Hypodermal Junction are Distinct from Dermal Papillary and Reticular Fibroblasts and from Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Exhibit a Specific Molecular Profile Related to Extracellular Matrix Organization and Modeling. Cells. 2020;9(2):368. doi: 10.3390/cells9020368
  36. Passariello R, Imparato G, Casale C, Urciuolo F, Netti PA. An immunocompetent bioengineered human dermal equivalent to recapitulate scar tissue formation in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2025;204:293-311. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.08.027
  37. Janson DG, Saintigny G, van Adrichem A, Mahe C, El Ghalbzouri A. Different gene expression patterns in human papillary and reticular fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(11):2565-2572. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.192
  38. Janson D, Rietveld M, Mahe C, Saintigny G, El Ghalbzouri A. Differential effect of extracellular matrix derived from papillary and reticular fibroblasts on epidermal development in vitro. Eur J Dermatol. 2017;27(3):237-246. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2017.2984
  39. Louis A, Mergen C, Rietveld MH, et al. Fibroblast-derived matrix human skin equivalents reveal distinct roles for papillary and reticular fibroblasts in human skin barrier integrity and aging. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):17668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-48648-3
  40. Janson D, Saintigny G, Mahe C, El Ghalbzouri A. Papillary fibroblasts differentiate into reticular fibroblasts after prolonged in vitro culture. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(1):48-53. doi: 10.1111/exd.12069
  41. Philippeos C, Telerman SB, Oules B, et al. Spatial and Single-Cell Transcriptional Profiling Identifies Functionally Distinct Human Dermal Fibroblast Subpopulations. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(4):811-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.01.016
  42. Tan SH, Chua DAC, Tang JRJ, Bonnard C, Leavesley D, Liang K. Design of hydrogel-based scaffolds for in vitro three-dimensional human skin model reconstruction. Acta Biomater. 2022;153:13-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.068
  43. Footner E, Firipis K, Liu E, et al. Layer-by-Layer Analysis of In Vitro Skin Models. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(11):5933-5952. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00283
  44. Kimura S, Sekiya S, Yamashiro S, Kikuchi T, Haga M, Shimizu T. The heterogeneity of dermal mesenchymal cells reproduced in skin equivalents regulates barrier function and elasticity. EMBO Rep. 2026;27(9):2319-2344. doi: 10.1038/s44319-026-00757-w
  45. Marionnet C, Pierrard C, Vioux-Chagnoleau C, Sok J, Asselineau D, Bernerd F. Interactions between fibroblasts and keratinocytes in morphogenesis of dermal epidermal junction in a model of reconstructed skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(5):971-979. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700230
  46. El Ghalbzouri A, Jonkman MF, Dijkman R, Ponec M. Basement membrane reconstruction in human skin equivalents is regulated by fibroblasts and/or exogenously activated keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23549.x
  47. Huber B, Link A, Linke K, Gehrke SA, Winnefeld M, Kluger PJ. Integration of Mature Adipocytes to Build-Up a Functional Three-Layered Full-Skin Equivalent. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016;22(8):756-764. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2016.0141
  48. Workman VL, Giblin AV, Green NH, MacNeil S, Hearnden V. Development of a tissue-engineered skin model with epidermal, dermal and hypodermal components. In Vitro Model. 2023;2(6):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s44164-023-00058-9
  49. Jager J, Vahav I, Thon M, et al. Reconstructed Human Skin with Hypodermis Shows Essential Role of Adipose Tissue in Skin Metabolism. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024;21(3):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00621-1
  50. Avelino TM, Harb SV, Adamoski D, et al. Unveiling the impact of hypodermis on gene expression for advancing bioprinted full-thickness 3D skin models. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1437. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07106-4
  51. Kruglikov IL, Zhang Z, Scherer PE. Skin aging: Dermal adipocytes metabolically reprogram dermal fibroblasts. Bioessays. 2022;44(1):e2100207. doi: 10.1002/bies.202100207
  52. Feng X, Li GY, Ramier A, Eltony AM, Yun SH. In vivo stiffness measurement of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis using broadband Rayleigh-wave optical coherence elastography. Acta Biomater. 2022;146:295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.030
  53. Gibbs S, Murli S, De Boer G, Mulder A, Mommaas AM, Ponec M. Melanosome capping of keratinocytes in pigmented reconstructed epidermis--effect of ultraviolet radiation and 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine on melanogenesis. Pigment Cell Res. 2000;13(6):458-466. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2000.130608.x
  54. Rimal R, Muduli S, Desai P, et al. Vascularized 3D Human Skin Models in the Forefront of Dermatological Research. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(9):e2303351. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202303351
  55. Pang Y, Liu B, Jiang J, et al. Recent advances in immunocompetent human skin-on-chip models: Construction strategies and biomedical applications. Bioact Mater. 2026;64:94-134. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.030
  56. Scheurer J, Sauer B, Focken J, et al. Histological and functional characterization of 3D human skin models mimicking the inflammatory skin diseases psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Dis Model Mech. 2024;17(1):dmm050541. doi: 10.1242/dmm.050541
  57. Tripetchr T, Dubau M, Hedtrich S, Kleuser B. A hair-follicle reconstructed in vitro immunocompetent skin model for prediction of the sensitizing potential of chemicals. Arch Toxicol. 2025;99(10):4131-4144. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04130-z
  58. Hindle SA, Bachas Brook H, Chrysanthou A, Chambers ES, Caley MP, Connelly JT. Replicating Dynamic Immune Responses at Single-Cell Resolution within a Microfluidic Human Skin Equivalent. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(10):e2415717. doi: 10.1002/advs.202415717
  59. Attiogbe E, Larochelle S, Chaib Y, et al. An in vitro autologous, vascularized, and immunocompetent Tissue Engineered Skin model obtained by the self-assembled approach. Acta Biomater. 2023;168:361-371. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.06.045
  60. Griffoni C, Neidhart B, Yang K, et al. In vitro skin culture media influence the viability and inflammatory response of primary macrophages. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86486-7
  61. Vidal SEL, Tamamoto KA, Nguyen H, Abbott RD, Cairns DM, Kaplan DL. 3D biomaterial matrix to support long term, full thickness, immuno-competent human skin equivalents with nervous system components. Biomaterials. 2019;198:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.044
  62. Genin E, Guerber L, Aymard E, et al. Skin innervation and its in vitro modeling. Front Cell Neurosci. 2026;20:1904623. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2026.1904623
  63. Freer M, Darling N, Goncalves K, Mills KJ, Przyborski S. Development of a mammalian neurosensory full-thickness skin equivalent and its application to screen sensitizing stimuli. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;8(3):e10484. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10484
  64. Malheiro A, Thon M, Lourenco AF, et al. A Humanized In Vitro Model of Innervated Skin for Transdermal Analgesic Testing. Macromol Biosci. 2023;23(1):e2200387. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202200387
  65. Pepin R, Ringuet J, Beaudet MJ, et al. Sensory neurons increase keratinocyte proliferation through CGRP release in a tissue engineered in vitro model of innervation in psoriasis. Acta Biomater. 2024;182:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.021
  66. Guo Z, Tong CK, Jackow J, et al. Engineering human skin model innervated with itch sensory neuron-like cells differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022;7(1):e10247. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10247
  67. Park J, Kim J, Cho S, Shin W. In vitro platforms for reconstructing skin-microbiome interactions. Trends Biotechnol. 2026;44(10):2926-2940. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2026.02.006
  68. Kissner MS, Rosin A, Sprenger H, et al. Elucidating the Impact of Bacterial Composition and Diversity on Skin Homeostasis Using a Human 3D In Vitro Skin Model. Microorganisms. 2026;14(8):1722. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14081722
  69. Vitry G, Angdisen J, Sawant MA, et al. Using a full thickness bioengineered human skin equivalent as a model for radiation biology research. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):34702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17153-4
  70. Maloney AL, Crawford T, Hurlbut J, et al. A multi-strain human skin microbiome model provides a testbed for disease modeling. Front Microbiomes. 2025;4:1473292. doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2025.1473292
  71. Nuwayhid R, Ngoc-Huyen N, Lippmann N, et al. Synergistic tissue destruction by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in a 3D human skin biofilm equivalent. Biofilm. 2026;11:100361. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2026.100361
  72. Ngari C, Poulet V, Percoco G, Peno-Mazzarino L, Seyer D. Early skin colonization by Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus reveals environment-dependent synergistic effects. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1677214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1677214
  73. Mieremet A, Rietveld M, van Leijden B, et al. Advancing human skin models by integrating skin microbes for next-generation research. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):13182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-44005-6
  74. Bi O, Caballero-Lima D, Sikkink S, et al. Do Melanocytes Have a Role in Controlling Epidermal Bacterial Colonisation and the Skin Microbiome? Exp Dermatol. 2025;34(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/exd.70071
  75. Pupovac A, Senturk B, Griffoni C, Maniura-Weber K, Rottmar M, McArthur SL. Toward Immunocompetent 3D Skin Models. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(12):e1701405. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701405
  76. Ebner-Peking P, Krisch L, Wolf M, et al. Self-assembly of differentiated progenitor cells facilitates spheroid human skin organoid formation and planar skin regeneration. Theranostics. 2021;11(17):8430-8447. doi: 10.7150/thno.59661
  77. Chen Z, Kalhori D, Rakhshani F, et al. Hydrodynamically generated multilayer skin spheroids enable in vitro screening of biologically active ingredients and toxicity tests. Sci Adv. 2025;11(19):eadu1251. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu1251
  78. Xie J, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Zheng K, Geng H, Wu Y. The Bioengineering of Microspheric Skin Organoids and Their Application in Drug Screening. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(22):e2416863. doi: 10.1002/advs.202416863
  79. Kageyama T, Shimizu A, Anakama R, et al. Reprogramming of three-dimensional microenvironments for in vitro hair follicle induction. Sci Adv. 2022;8(42):eadd4603. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add4603
  80. Pusceddu T, Ardondi L, Cavaleri MP, et al. From sebocytes to skin engineering human sebaceous organoids within a reconstructed dermal matrix. Front Toxicol. 2026;8:1874806. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2026.1874806
  81. Sun X, Xiang J, Chen R, et al. Sweat Gland Organoids Originating from Reprogrammed Epidermal Keratinocytes Functionally Recapitulated Damaged Skin. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(22):e2103079. doi: 10.1002/advs.202103079
  82. Lee J, Rabbani CC, Gao H, et al. Hair-bearing human skin generated entirely from pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2020;582(7812):399-404. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2352-3
  83. Gopee NH, Winheim E, Olabi B, et al. A prenatal skin atlas reveals immune regulation of human skin morphogenesis. Nature. 2024;635(8039):679-689. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08002-x
  84. Lee J, van der Valk WH, Serdy SA, et al. Generation and characterization of hair-bearing skin organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2022;17(5):1266-1305. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00681-y
  85. Jung SY, You HJ, Kim MJ, Ko G, Lee S, Kang KS. Wnt-activating human skin organoid model of atopic dermatitis induced by Staphylococcus aureus and its protective effects by Cutibacterium acnes. iScience. 2022;25(10):105150. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105150
  86. Quilez C, Jeon EY, Pappalardo A, Pathak P, Abaci HE. Efficient Generation of Skin Organoids from Pluripotent Cells via Defined Extracellular Matrix Cues and Morphogen Gradients in a Spindle-Shaped Microfluidic Device. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(20):e2400405. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400405
  87. Lavigne EG, Cavagnino A, Steinschneider R, Breton L, Baraibar MA, Jager S. Oxidative damage prevention in human skin and sensory neurons by a salicylic acid derivative. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;181:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.029
  88. Regnier M, Staquet MJ, Schmitt D, Schmidt R. Integration of Langerhans cells into a pigmented reconstructed human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;109(4):510-512. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12336627
  89. Bechetoille N, Vachon H, Gaydon A, et al. A new organotypic model containing dermal-type macrophages. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(12):1035-1037. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01383.x
  90. Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Buttle DJ, Nakatsuji T. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science. 1981;211(4486):1052-1054. doi: 10.1126/science.7008197
  91. Ackermann K, Borgia SL, Korting HC, Mewes KR, Schafer-Korting M. The Phenion full-thickness skin model for percutaneous absorption testing. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23(2):105-112. doi: 10.1159/000265681
  92. Kim BS, Gao G, Kim JY, Cho DW. 3D Cell Printing of Perfusable Vascularized Human Skin Equivalent Composed of Epidermis, Dermis, and Hypodermis for Better Structural Recapitulation of Native Skin. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(7):e1801019. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801019
  93. Gaviria Agudelo C, Karchalla L, Chandler Z, McNutt P. A Vascularized, Adipose-Containing Human Skin Equivalent Enables Long-Term Culture and Models Orthopoxvirus-Mediated Immune Suppression. J Funct Biomater. 2026;17(8):374. doi: 10.3390/jfb17080374
  94. Priya S, Siew K, Sawadkar P, et al. Bioengineering vascularised composite skin equivalents via Living Assembly through Templated Tissue Integration and Construct Engineering (LATTICE). Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2026;21(1):e2696679. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2026.2696679
  95. Higgins CA, Chen JC, Cerise JE, Jahoda CA, Christiano AM. Microenvironmental reprogramming by three-dimensional culture enables dermal papilla cells to induce de novo human hair-follicle growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(49):19679-19688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309970110
  96. Martin BA, Viegas J, Dalmolin LF, et al. Development of a Sensory Neuron-Integrated Skin Spheroid Model for the Evaluation of Neuropeptide-Based Topical Delivery Systems. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(6):3503-3522. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00141
  97. Klaka P, Grudl S, Banowski B, et al. A novel organotypic 3D sweat gland model with physiological functionality. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182752
  98. Oules B, Philippeos C, Segal J, et al. Contribution of GATA6 to homeostasis of the human upper pilosebaceous unit and acne pathogenesis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18784-z
  99. Wei Z, Liu X, Ooka M, et al. Two-Dimensional Cellular and Three-Dimensional Bio-Printed Skin Models to Screen Topical-Use Compounds for Irritation Potential. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:109. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00109
  100. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 428: Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method. Online. OECD Publishing. 2004. Accessed September 20, 2026, doi: 10.1787/9789264071087-en
  101. Kocsis D, Kichou H, Dome K, et al. Structural and Functional Analysis of Excised Skins and Human Reconstructed Epidermis with Confocal Raman Spectroscopy and in Microfluidic Diffusion Chambers. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(8):1689. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081689
  102. Dijkhoff IM, Petracca B, Prieux R, Valacchi G, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Eeman M. Cultivating a Three-dimensional Reconstructed Human Epidermis at a Large Scale. J Vis Exp. 2021;(171):e61802. doi: 10.3791/61802
  103. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 498: In Vitro Phototoxicity: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Phototoxicity Test Method. Online. OECD Publishing. 2026. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/7b2f9ea0-en
  104. Flasza M, Kemp P, Shering D, et al. Development and manufacture of an investigational human living dermal equivalent (ICX-SKN). Regen Med. 2007;2(6):903-918. doi: 10.2217/17460751.2.6.903
  105. Reisinger K, Blatz V, Brinkmann J, et al. Validation of the 3D Skin Comet assay using full thickness skin models: Transferability and reproducibility. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2018;827:27-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.01.003
  106. Lenzi E, Vertti-Quintero N, Husson J, et al. Spherical Skin Model: Stratified Co-Culture of Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes on Spherical Beads Toward Compound Screening. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026;15(13):e03250. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202503250
  107. Motter Catarino C, Cigaran Schuck D, Dechiario L, Karande P. Incorporation of hair follicles in 3D bioprinted models of human skin. Sci Adv. 2023;9(41):eadg0297. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0297
  108. Sun J, Ahmed I, Brown J, Khosrotehrani K, Shafiee A. The empowering influence of air-liquid interface culture on skin organoid hair follicle development. Burns Trauma. 2025;13:tkae070. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae070
  109. Metallo CM, Ji L, de Pablo JJ, Palecek SP. Retinoic acid and bone morphogenetic protein signaling synergize to efficiently direct epithelial differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(2):372-380. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0501
  110. Guenou H, Nissan X, Larcher F, et al. Human embryonic stem-cell derivatives for full reconstruction of the pluristratified epidermis: a preclinical study. Lancet. 2009;374(9703):1745-1753. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61496-3
  111. Metallo CM, Azarin SM, Moses LE, Ji L, de Pablo JJ, Palecek SP. Human embryonic stem cell-derived keratinocytes exhibit an epidermal transcription program and undergo epithelial morphogenesis in engineered tissue constructs. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(1):213-223. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0325
  112. Itoh M, Kiuru M, Cairo MS, Christiano AM. Generation of keratinocytes from normal and recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(21):8797-8802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100332108
  113. Sah SK, Kanaujiya JK, Chen IP, Reichenberger EJ. Generation of Keratinocytes from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Under Defined Culture Conditions. Cell Reprogram. 2021;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1089/cell.2020.0046
  114. Nissan X, Larribere L, Saidani M, et al. Functional melanocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells engraft into pluristratified epidermis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(36):14861-14866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019070108
  115. Gledhill K, Guo Z, Umegaki-Arao N, Higgins CA, Itoh M, Christiano AM. Melanin Transfer in Human 3D Skin Equivalents Generated Exclusively from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136713
  116. Veraitch O, Mabuchi Y, Matsuzaki Y, et al. Induction of hair follicle dermal papilla cell properties in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived multipotent LNGFR(+)THY-1(+) mesenchymal cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42777. doi: 10.1038/srep42777
  117. Kim Y, Park N, Rim YA, et al. Establishment of a complex skin structure via layered co-culture of keratinocytes and fibroblasts derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0958-2
  118. Gnedeva K, Vorotelyak E, Cimadamore F, et al. Derivation of hair-inducing cell from human pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(1):e0116892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116892
  119. Itoh M, Umegaki-Arao N, Guo Z, Liu L, Higgins CA, Christiano AM. Generation of 3D skin equivalents fully reconstituted from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077673
  120. Trottier V, Marceau-Fortier G, Germain L, Vincent C, Fradette J. IFATS collection: Using human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells for the production of new skin substitutes. Stem Cells. 2008;26(10):2713-2723. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0031
  121. Sheikholeslam M, Wright MEE, Jeschke MG, Amini-Nik S. Biomaterials for Skin Substitutes. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(5):1700897. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700897
  122. Lotz C, Schmid FF, Oechsle E, Monaghan MG, Walles H, Groeber-Becker F. Cross-linked Collagen Hydrogel Matrix Resisting Contraction To Facilitate Full-Thickness Skin Equivalents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(24):20417-20425. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04017
  123. Li X, Wang C, Xiong Q, et al. A photocurable and thermocurable composite hydrogel and the application in a contraction resistant full-thickness skin model. Biofabrication. 2025;17(1):015043. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad905e
  124. Girardeau-Hubert S, Lynch B, Zuttion F, et al. Impact of microstructure on cell behavior and tissue mechanics in collagen and dermal decellularized extra-cellular matrices. Acta Biomater. 2022;143:100-114. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.035
  125. Blackstone BN, Malara MM, Baumann ME, McFarland KL, Supp DM, Powell HM. Fractional CO(2) laser micropatterning of cell-seeded electrospun collagen scaffolds enables rete ridge formation in 3D engineered skin. Acta Biomater. 2020;102:287-297. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.051
  126. Connon CJ, Gouveia RM. Autogenous Biofabrication of Nativelike, Scaffold-Free Human Skin Equivalents Using a Smart, Enzyme-Degradable Tissue Templating Coating. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2(2):838-847. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.8b00685
  127. Thangavel P, Saravanakumar I, Sundaram MK, Rathinam B, Muthuvijayan V. Preparation and characterization of a jelly fig (Ficus awkeotsang Makino) polysaccharide-based bioactive 3D scaffold for improved vascularization and skin tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;259(Pt 1):129199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129199
  128. Hajipour FP, Feyzbakhsh A, Maleknia L, Ahanian I. Electrospun scaffold with bioactive polyurethane shell infused with propolis and starch-hyaluronic acid core: An advanced therapeutic platform for skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;288:138745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138745
  129. Ganguly K, Jin H, Dutta SD, Patel DK, Patil TV, Lim KT. Magnetic field-assisted aligned patterning in an alginate-silk fibroin/nanocellulose composite for guided wound healing. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;287:119321. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119321
  130. Xu J, Fang H, Zheng S, et al. A biological functional hybrid scaffold based on decellularized extracellular matrix/gelatin/chitosan with high biocompatibility and antibacterial activity for skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:840-849. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.162
  131. Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Reinforced Granular Hydrogels Scaffolds with Tunable Physicochemical Properties for Advanced Skin Tissue Engineering. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(21):e2415634. doi: 10.1002/advs.202415634
  132. Fartasch M, Ponec M. Improved barrier structure formation in air-exposed human keratinocyte culture systems. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102(3):366-374. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12371797
  133. Lee DY, Yang JM, Park KH. A dermal equivalent developed from fibroblast culture alone: effect of EGF and insulin. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(6):936-939. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00310.x
  134. Wu WS, Chen LR, Chen KH. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): Molecular Mechanisms, Actions and Clinical Applications in Human Body. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(21):10804. doi: 10.3390/ijms262110804
  135. Qiu M, He Y, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Shi X, Yang J. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Based on Simple and Efficient Integrated Preparation Precises Quantitatively for Skin Wound Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(17):9340. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179340
  136. do Amaral R, Zayed NMA, Pascu EI, et al. Functionalising Collagen-Based Scaffolds With Platelet-Rich Plasma for Enhanced Skin Wound Healing Potential. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:371. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00371
  137. Zhang J, Wehrle E, Rubert M, Muller R. 3D Bioprinting of Human Tissues: Biofabrication, Bioinks, and Bioreactors. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):3971. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083971
  138. Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al. 3D bioprinting for skin tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12:20417314211028574. doi: 10.1177/20417314211028574
  139. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):773-785. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2958
  140. Kim BS, Lee JS, Gao G, Cho DW. Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. Biofabrication. 2017;9(2):025034. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8
  141. Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, et al. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication. 2018;11(1):013001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52
  142. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, Dokmeci MR. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(5):915-946. doi: 10.1039/c7bm00765e
  143. Tripathi S, Dash M, Chakraborty R, et al. Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications. Biomater Sci. 2024;13(1):93-129. doi: 10.1039/d4bm01192a
  144. Wei L, Li Z, Li J, et al. An approach for mechanical property optimization of cell-laden alginate-gelatin composite bioink with bioactive glass nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(11):103. doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06440-3
  145. Fan Y, Fu C, Wang J, et al. Zinc-enhanced methacrylated collagen bioinks with dual crosslinking for high-resolution DLP bioprinting of personalized anti-aging skin therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;330(Pt 4):148163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148163
  146. Fu C, Liu G, Fan Y, Wang J, Tian X, Xiao J. Pro-angiogenic dual-crosslinked collagen bioinks for precise cell-laden DLP 3D printing and rapid vascularized diabetic wound repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026;343(Pt 2):150408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.150408
  147. Levato R, Jungst T, Scheuring RG, Blunk T, Groll J, Malda J. From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting. Adv Mater. 2020;32(12):e1906423. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906423
  148. Jin R, Cui Y, Chen H, et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of a full-thickness functional skin model using acellular dermal matrix and gelatin methacrylamide bioink. Acta Biomater. 2021;131:248-261. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.012
  149. Li W, Li J, Pan C, Lee JS, Kim BS, Gao G. Light-based 3D bioprinting techniques for illuminating the advances of vascular tissue engineering. Mater Today Bio. 2024;29:101286. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101286
  150. Maggiotto F, Dalla Valle E, Fietta A, Visentin LM, Giomo M, Cimetta E. 3D bioprinting of a perfusable skin-on-chip model suitable for drug testing and wound healing studies. Mater Today Bio. 2025;33:101974. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101974
  151. Wang K, Lan X, Chen J, et al. One-Step Coaxial 3D Printing of Pre-Vascularized Skin Organoid Models with ADSC Microspheres for Enhanced Wound Healing. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2026;13(9):e17409. doi: 10.1002/advs.202517409
  152. Andl T, Zhou L, Zhang Y. The dermal papilla dilemma and potential breakthroughs in bioengineering hair follicles. Cell Tissue Res. 2023;391(2):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00441-022-03730-w
  153. Abaci HE, Coffman A, Doucet Y, et al. Tissue engineering of human hair follicles using a biomimetic developmental approach. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5301. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07579-y
  154. Risueno I, Valencia L, Jorcano JL, Velasco D. Skin-on-a-chip models: General overview and future perspectives. APL Bioeng. 2021;5(3):030901. doi: 10.1063/5.0046376
  155. Zoio P, Oliva A. Skin-on-a-Chip Technology: Microengineering Physiologically Relevant In Vitro Skin Models. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(3):682. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030682
  156. Cho SW, Malick H, Kim SJ, Grattoni A. Advances in Skin-on-a-Chip Technologies for Dermatological Disease Modeling. J Invest Dermatol. 2024;144(8):1707-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.01.031
  157. Biggs LC, Kim CS, Miroshnikova YA, Wickstrom SA. Mechanical Forces in the Skin: Roles in Tissue Architecture, Stability, and Function. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(2):284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.06.137
  158. Kaiser K, Bendixen SM, Sorensen JA, Brewer JR. From static to dynamic: The influence of mechanotransduction on skin equivalents analyzed by bioimaging and RNAseq. Mater Today Bio. 2024;25:101010. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101010
  159. Tokuyama E, Nagai Y, Takahashi K, Kimata Y, Naruse K. Mechanical Stretch on Human Skin Equivalents Increases the Epidermal Thickness and Develops the Basement Membrane. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0141989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141989
  160. Quan Q, Weng D, Li X, et al. Analysis of drug efficacy for inflammatory skin on an organ-chip system. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:939629. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.939629
  161. Martinelli C, Bocconi A, Milone S, et al. A 3D millifluidic model of a dermal perivascular microenvironment on a chip. Lab Chip. 2025;25(3):423-439. doi: 10.1039/d4lc00898g
  162. Morrison AI, Sjoerds MJ, Vonk LA, Gibbs S, Koning JJ. In vitro immunity: an overview of immunocompetent organ-on-chip models. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1373186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1373186
  163. Sutterby E, Thurgood P, Baratchi S, Khoshmanesh K, Pirogova E. Microfluidic Skin-on-a-Chip Models: Toward Biomimetic Artificial Skin. Small. 2020;16(39):e2002515. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002515
  164. Mori N, Morimoto Y, Takeuchi S. Skin integrated with perfusable vascular channels on a chip. Biomaterials. 2017;116:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.031
  165. Sun S, Jin L, Zheng Y, Zhu J. Modeling human HSV infection via a vascularized immune-competent skin-on-chip platform. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5481. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33114-1
  166. Zhang J, Zhang Q, Fang X, Guo G, Wang X. Advances in skin-on-a-chip technology: Functional innovations and translational challenges. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2026;194:118500. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2025.118500
  167. Song HJ, Lim HY, Chun W, et al. Development of 3D skin-equivalent in a pump-less microfluidic chip. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;60:355-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.11.022
  168. Wang YI, Shuler ML. UniChip enables long-term recirculating unidirectional perfusion with gravity-driven flow for microphysiological systems. Lab Chip. 2018;18(17):2563-2574. doi: 10.1039/c8lc00394g
  169. Ismayilzada N, Tarar C, Dabbagh SR, et al. Skin-on-a-chip technologies towards clinical translation and commercialization. Biofabrication. 2024;16(4):042001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad5f55
  170. Zhang J, Chen Z, Zhang Y, et al. Construction of a high fidelity epidermis-on-a-chip for scalable in vitro irritation evaluation. Lab Chip. 2021;21(19):3804-3818. doi: 10.1039/d1lc00099c
  171. Tawade P, Mastrangeli M. Integrated Electrochemical and Optical Biosensing in Organs-on-Chip. Chembiochem. 2024;25(3):e202300560. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202300560
  172. Wikswo JP, Curtis EL, Eagleton ZE, et al. Scaling and systems biology for integrating multiple organs-on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 2013;13(18):3496-3511. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50243k
  173. Lee HR, Sung JH. Multiorgan-on-a-chip for realization of gut-skin axis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119(9):2590-2601. doi: 10.1002/bit.28164
  174. Ko B, Son J, In Won J, et al. Gut microbe-skin axis on a chip for reproducing the inflammatory crosstalk. Lab Chip. 2025;25(11):2609-2619. doi: 10.1039/d4lc01010h
  175. Tavares RSN, Tao TP, Maschmeyer I, et al. Toxicity of topically applied drugs beyond skin irritation: Static skin model vs. Two organs-on-a-chip. Int J Pharm. 2020;589:119788. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119788
  176. Lee JS, Kim J, Cui B, et al. Hybrid skin chips for toxicological evaluation of chemical drugs and cosmetic compounds. Lab Chip. 2022;22(2):343-353. doi: 10.1039/d1lc00550b
  177. Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Teles D, Yeager K, et al. A multi-organ chip with matured tissue niches linked by vascular flow. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(4):351-371. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00882-6
  178. Tomlinson L, Ramsden D, Leite SB, et al. Considerations from an International Regulatory and Pharmaceutical Industry (IQ MPS Affiliate) Workshop on the Standardization of Complex In Vitro Models in Drug Development. Adv Biol (Weinh). 2024;8(8):e2300131. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202300131
  179. Man Y, Liu Y, Chen Q, et al. Organoids-On-a-Chip for Personalized Precision Medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(30):e2401843. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401843
  180. Lee J, Bӧscke R, Tang PC, Hartman BH, Heller S, Koehler KR. Hair Follicle Development in Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Skin Organoids. Cell Rep. 2018;22(1):242-254. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.007
  181. Shafiee A, Sun J, Ahmed IA, et al. Development of Physiologically Relevant Skin Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Small. 2024;20(16):e2304879. doi: 10.1002/smll.202304879
  182. Zaulyanov L, Kirsner RS. A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(1):93-98. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2007.2.1.93
  183. US Food and Drug Administration. Premarket Approval (PMA): Apligraf (Graftskin), P950032. US Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P950032
  184. US Food and Drug Administration. Apligraf (Graftskin), PMA supplement P950032/S016. US Food and Drug Administration. 2000. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P950032S016
  185. Falanga V, Sabolinski M. A bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF) accelerates complete closure of hard-to-heal venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(4):201-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00201.x
  186. Gibson ALF, Holmes JHt, Shupp JW, et al. A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft(R) construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns. Burns. 2021;47(5):1024-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.021
  187. US Food and Drug Administration. STRATAGRAFT (allogeneic cultured keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts in murine collagen-dsat), prescribing information. US Food and Drug Administration. 2024. Accessed October 17, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/media/150129/download
  188. US Food and Drug Administration. Purple Book: StrataGraft, BLA 125730. FDA Purple Book. 2021. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://purplebooksearch.fda.gov/index.cfm?event=productdetails&blaNo=125730
  189. Mallinckrodt plc. Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2024 (Form 10-K). US Securities and Exchange Commission. 2025. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1567892/000156789225000010/mnk-20241227.htm
  190. US Food and Drug Administration. Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE): Epicel (cultured epidermal autografts), H990002. US Food and Drug Administration. 2007. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfhde/hde.cfm?id=H990002
  191. US Food and Drug Administration. Product classification: cultured epithelial autograft (Epicel), product code OCE. US Food and Drug Administration. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm?id=OCE
  192. Lo CH, Chong E, Akbarzadeh S, Brown WA, Cleland H. A systematic review: Current trends and take rates of cultured epithelial autografts in the treatment of patients with burn injuries. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(6):693-701. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12748
  193. US Food and Drug Administration. Premarket Approval (PMA): Dermagraft, P000036. US Food and Drug Administration. 2001. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P000036
  194. Hart CE, Loewen-Rodriguez A, Lessem J. Dermagraft: Use in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012;1(3):138-141. doi: 10.1089/wound.2011.0282
  195. Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, Pollak R, Dermagraft Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study G. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1701-1705. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701
  196. Organogenesis Holdings Inc. Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Form 10-Q). US Securities and Exchange Commission. 2026. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1661181/000119312526338049/orgo-20260630.htm
  197. Boyce ST, Lalley AL. Tissue engineering of skin and regenerative medicine for wound care. Burns Trauma. 2018;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0103-y
  198. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219-229. doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125
  199. Pastar I, Balukoff NC, Marjanovic J, Chen VY, Stone RC, Tomic-Canic M. Molecular Pathophysiology of Chronic Wounds: Current State and Future Directions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023;15(4):a041243. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041243
  200. Patiño MI, Restrepo LM, Becerra NY, van der Mei HC, van Kooten TG, Sharma PK. Nonviral Expression of LL-37 in a Human Skin Equivalent to Prevent Infection in Skin Wounds. Hum Gene Ther. 2021;32(19-20):1147-1157. doi: 10.1089/hum.2021.034
  201. Rahman MM, Arellano CL, Banakh I, et al. Bioengineered Skin from a Platelet-Derived Hydrogel Repairs Full Thickness Wounds in a Pre-Clinical Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(20):9988. doi: 10.3390/ijms26209988
  202. Miyazaki H, Tsunoi Y, Akagi T, Sato S, Akashi M, Saitoh D. A novel strategy to engineer pre-vascularized 3-dimensional skin substitutes to achieve efficient, functional engraftment. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44113-6
  203. Douglas A, Chen Y, Elloso M, Levschuk A, Jeschke MG. Bioprinting-By-Design of Hydrogel-Based Biomaterials for In Situ Skin Tissue Engineering. Gels. 2025;11(2):110. doi: 10.3390/gels11020110
  204. Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, et al. In Situ Bioprinting of Autologous Skin Cells Accelerates Wound Healing of Extensive Excisional Full-Thickness Wounds. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w
  205. Cheng RY, Eylert G, Gariepy JM, et al. Handheld instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):025002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6413
  206. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. EUR-Lex. 2009. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1223/oj
  207. Spielmann H, Hoffmann S, Liebsch M, et al. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Altern Lab Anim. 2007;35(6):559-601. doi: 10.1177/026119290703500614
  208. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin Absorption Studies. Online. OECD Publishing. 2004. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/9789264078796-en
  209. Schafer-Korting M, Bock U, Gamer A, et al. Reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: results of the German prevalidation study. Altern Lab Anim. 2006;34(3):283-294. doi: 10.1177/026119290603400312
  210. Catarino CM, do Nascimento Pedrosa T, Pennacchi PC, et al. Skin corrosion test: a comparison between reconstructed human epidermis and full thickness skin models. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;125:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.01.002
  211. Pfuhler S, Pirow R, Downs TR, et al. Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays. Mutagenesis. 2021;36(1):19-35. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geaa009
  212. Pfuhler S, Downs TR, Hewitt NJ, et al. Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin micronucleus (RSMN) assay: an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays. Mutagenesis. 2021;36(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geaa035
  213. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 442D: In vitro skin sensitisation: Assays addressing the adverse outcome pathway key event on keratinocyte activation. OECD Publishing. 2026. Accessed September 20, 2026. doi: 10.1787/9789264229822-en
  214. Cottrez F, Boitel E, Ourlin JC, et al. SENS-IS, a 3D reconstituted epidermis based model for quantifying chemical sensitization potency: Reproducibility and predictivity results from an inter-laboratory study. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;32:248-260. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.01.007
  215. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Work plan for the OECD Test Guidelines Programme (TGP). Online. OECD Publishing. 2026. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-sub-issues/testing-of-chemicals/work-plan-test-guidelines.pdf
  216. Salminen AT, Davis KJ, Felton RP, et al. Parallel evaluation of alternative skin barrier models and excised human skin for dermal absorption studies in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro. 2023;91:105630. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105630
  217. Hewitt NJ, Edwards RJ, Fritsche E, et al. Use of human in vitro skin models for accurate and ethical risk assessment: metabolic considerations. Toxicol Sci. 2013;133(2):209-217. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft080
  218. Gotz C, Pfeiffer R, Tigges J, et al. Xenobiotic metabolism capacities of human skin in comparison with a 3D epidermis model and keratinocyte-based cell culture as in vitro alternatives for chemical testing: activating enzymes (Phase I). Exp Dermatol. 2012;21(5):358-363. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01486.x
  219. Fitoussi R, Faure MO, Beauchef G, Achard S. Human skin responses to environmental pollutants: A review of current scientific models. Environ Pollut. 2022;306:119316. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119316
  220. Dickman RA, Aga DS. A review of recent studies on toxicity, sequestration, and degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). J Hazard Mater. 2022;436:129120. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129120
  221. Wang Z, Yuan G, Sun M, et al. Decorative cosmetics and skin care products contribute significantly to short-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylates exposure. J Hazard Mater. 2025;495:138846. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138846
  222. Han JS, Jang S, Son HY, et al. Subacute dermal toxicity of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids: comparison with different carbon-chain lengths in human skin equivalents and systemic effects of perfluoroheptanoic acid in Sprague Dawley rats. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94(2):523-539. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02634-z
  223. Magnani ND, Muresan XM, Belmonte G, et al. Skin Damage Mechanisms Related to Airborne Particulate Matter Exposure. Toxicol Sci. 2016;149(1):227-236. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv230
  224. Simpson A, DiColandrea T, Przyborski S. Assessing the impact of airborne particulate pollution on human skin utilizing a novel human skin equivalent containing MUTZ-3-derived Langerhans cells. Bioeng Transl Med. 2025;10(2):e10738. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10738
  225. Liao Z, Nie J, Sun P. The impact of particulate matter (PM2.5) on skin barrier revealed by transcriptome analysis: Focusing on cholesterol metabolism. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.11.014
  226. Song GB, Nam J, Ji S, et al. Deciphering the links: Fragmented polystyrene as a driver of skin inflammation. J Hazard Mater. 2024;480:135815. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135815
  227. Cavallero S, Neves Granito R, Stockholm D, Azzolin P, Martin MT, Fortunel NO. Exposure of Human Skin Organoids to Low Genotoxic Stress Can Promote Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Regenerating Keratinocyte Precursor Cells. Cells. 2020;9(8):1912. doi: 10.3390/cells9081912
  228. Briganti S, Camera E, Ciriza J, et al. Modeling aging in a culture dish: towards the development of more sophisticated in vitro models of human skin aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2026;118:103109. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2026.103109
  229. Yao Y, Zhang Z, Zhang J, et al. In vitro modelling of extracellular matrix changes during skin aging: from static 2D to 3D dynamic microphysiological systems. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2026;12:70. doi: 10.1038/s41378-026-01170-y
  230. Shakel Z, Costa Lima SA, Reis S. Strategies to make human skin models based on cellular senescence for ageing research. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;100:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102430
  231. Wu X, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Cao X, Zhao Y. Biomimetic gender-specific human skin model based on gonads/epidermis-on-a-chip. Bioact Mater. 2025;53:240-252. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.014
  232. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(4):244-253. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2537
  233. Pinto D, Ciardiello T, Franzoni M, Pasini F, Giuliani G, Rinaldi F. Effect of commonly used cosmetic preservatives on skin resident microflora dynamics. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88072-3
  234. Masri S, Fauzi MB, Rajab NF, Lee WH, Zainal Abidin DA, Siew EL. In vitro 3D skin culture and its sustainability in toxicology: a narrative review. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2024;52(1):476-499. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2024.2407617
  235. Ingber DE. Human organs-on-chips for disease modelling, drug development and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(8):467-491. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00466-9
  236. US Food and Drug Administration. Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies. Online. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Updated April 10, 2025. Accessed September 20, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/media/186092/download
  237. Stanton DN, Ganguli-Indra G, Indra AK, Karande P. Bioengineered Efficacy Models of Skin Disease: Advances in the Last 10 Years. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(2):319. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020319
  238. Rielland M, Bernerd F, Camman M, Tan X, Seyler N. Development of pathological skin models: from conventional techniques to 3D bioprinting. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1538774. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1538774
  239. Kamsteeg M, Bergers M, de Boer R, et al. Type 2 helper T-cell cytokines induce morphologic and molecular characteristics of atopic dermatitis in human skin equivalent. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(5):2091-2099. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.037
  240. Pouliot-Berube C, Zaniolo K, Guerin SL, Pouliot R. Tissue-engineered human psoriatic skin supplemented with cytokines as an in vitro model to study plaque psoriasis. Regen Med. 2016;11(6):545-557. doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0037
  241. Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):496-509. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804595
  242. Brunner PM, Guttman-Yassky E, Leung DY. The immunology of atopic dermatitis and its reversibility with broad-spectrum and targeted therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(4S):S65-S76. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.011
  243. Moon S, Kim DH, Shin JU. In Vitro Models Mimicking Immune Response in the Skin. Yonsei Med J. 2021;62(11):969-980. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.11.969
  244. van den Bogaard EH, Tjabringa GS, Joosten I, et al. Crosstalk between keratinocytes and T cells in a 3D microenvironment: a model to study inflammatory skin diseases. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(3):719-727. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.417
  245. Suhrkamp I, Fonfara M, Magdalena M, et al. Th2-Polarised CD4(+) T Cells Enhance Staphylococcus aureus Growth in a 3D Skin Model. Clin Exp Allergy. 2025;55(5):443-445. doi: 10.1111/cea.70019
  246. Vahav I, Thon M, Koning JJ, Gibbs S, Thiel A, Loyal L. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells contribute to psoriasis phenotype when integrated into human skin equivalents for drug testing. Front Immunol. 2026;17:1790531. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1790531
  247. Ouwehand K, Spiekstra SW, Waaijman T, Scheper RJ, de Gruijl TD, Gibbs S. Technical advance: Langerhans cells derived from a human cell line in a full-thickness skin equivalent undergo allergen-induced maturation and migration. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;90(5):1027-1033. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0610374
  248. Al B, Traidl S, Holzscheck N, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals 2D cytokine assay can model atopic dermatitis more accurately than immune-competent 3D setup. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33(5):e15077. doi: 10.1111/exd.15077
  249. Liang PP, Huang XZ, Yi JL, et al. A Trichophyton Rubrum Infection Model Based on the Reconstructed Human Epidermis - Episkin(R). Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(1):54-58. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.172573
  250. Haisma EM, Rietveld MH, de Breij A, van Dissel JT, El Ghalbzouri A, Nibbering PH. Inflammatory and antimicrobial responses to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro wound infection model. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e82800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082800
  251. Meloni M, de Rooij B, Janssen FW, Rescigno F, Lombardi B. Targeted Antibacterial Endolysin to Treat Infected Wounds on 3D Full-Thickness Skin Model: XZ.700 Efficacy. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(12):1539. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121539
  252. Ma J, Liu J, Gao D, et al. Establishment of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Skin Organoids Enabled Pathophysiological Model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(7):e2104192. doi: 10.1002/advs.202104192
  253. Li J, Ma J, Cao R, et al. A skin organoid-based infection platform identifies an inhibitor specific for HFMD. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):2513. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57610-2
  254. Liang L, Zhou J, Leng L. Skin organoid diversity and applications in biomedical research: A comprehensive review. Cell Biomater. 2026;2(6):100492. doi: 10.1016/j.celbio.2026.100492
  255. Wang Z, Liu J, Wechsberg O, et al. Variants in KLF4 affecting residue Asp441 cause an autosomal dominant syndromic ichthyosis. Br J Dermatol. 2025;193(1):136-146. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf062
  256. Nasrallah A, Rezvani HR, Kobaisi F, et al. Generation and characterization of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated XPC gene knockout in human skin cells. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81675-6
  257. Garriga-Cerda L, Pappalardo A, Lee CY, Kysar J, Myers K, Abaci HE. IPSC-derived organoid-sourced skin cells enable functional 3D skin modeling of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. J Tissue Eng. 2025;16:20417314251397594. doi: 10.1177/20417314251397594
  258. Apaydin DC, Sadhnani G, Carlaw T, et al. Lipid nanoparticle-based non-viral in situ gene editing of congenital ichthyosis-causing mutations in human skin models. Cell Stem Cell. 2026;33(2):233-252.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2026.01.001
  259. Liu D, Cao D, Han R. Recent advances in therapeutic gene-editing technologies. Mol Ther. 2025;33(6):2619-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.026
  260. Palamenghi M, De Luca M, De Rosa L. The steep uphill path leading to ex vivo gene therapy for genodermatoses. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022;323(3):C896-C906. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00117.2022
  261. Hirsch T, Rothoeft T, Teig N, et al. Regeneration of the entire human epidermis using transgenic stem cells. Nature. 2017;551(7680):327-332. doi: 10.1038/nature24487
  262. Mavilio F, Pellegrini G, Ferrari S, et al. Correction of junctional epidermolysis bullosa by transplantation of genetically modified epidermal stem cells. Nat Med. 2006;12(12):1397-1402. doi: 10.1038/nm1504
  263. Eichstadt S, Barriga M, Ponakala A, et al. Phase 1/2a clinical trial of gene-corrected autologous cell therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. JCI Insight. 2019;4(19):e130554. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.130554
  264. Izmiryan A, Ganier C, Bovolenta M, Schmitt A, Mavilio F, Hovnanian A. Ex Vivo COL7A1 Correction for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Using CRISPR/Cas9 and Homology-Directed Repair. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;12:554-567. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.06.008
  265. Anzalone AV, Koblan LW, Liu DR. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):824-844. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9
  266. Hong SA, Kim SE, Lee AY, et al. Therapeutic base editing and prime editing of COL7A1 mutations in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Mol Ther. 2022;30(8):2664-2679. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.005
  267. Fink S, Fischer M, Spange S, et al. Cold Atmospheric Plasma Exerts Antimicrobial Effects in a 3D Skin Model of Cutaneous Candidiasis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(5):933. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050933
  268. Fink S, Burmester A, Hipler UC, Neumeister C, Gotz MR, Wiegand C. Efficacy of antifungal agents against fungal spores: An in vitro study using microplate laser nephelometry and an artificially infected 3D skin model. Microbiologyopen. 2022;11(1):e1257. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1257
  269. Rioux G, Simard M, Morin S, Lorthois I, Guerin SL, Pouliot R. Development of a 3D psoriatic skin model optimized for infiltration of IL-17A producing T cells: Focus on the crosstalk between T cells and psoriatic keratinocytes. Acta Biomater. 2021;136:210-222. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.018
  270. Kim BS, Ahn M, Cho WW, Gao G, Jang J, Cho DW. Engineering of diseased human skin equivalent using 3D cell printing for representing pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes in vitro. Biomaterials. 2021;272:120776. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120776
  271. Li P, Pachis ST, Xu G, et al. Mpox virus infection and drug treatment modelled in human skin organoids. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(11):2067-2079. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01489-6
  272. Yue L, Liang Y, Zhong P, et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived skin organoids enabled pathophysiological model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):10831. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65848-z
  273. Zhai H, Jin X, Moghaddam AO, et al. 3D organotypic skin models recapitulate autoantibody-driven pemphigus pathomechanisms and targeted therapeutic response. Sci Adv. 2026;12(2):eadz5003. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adz5003
  274. Zhang Q, Sito L, Mao M, He J, Zhang YS, Zhao X. Current advances in skin-on-a-chip models for drug testing. Microphysiol Syst. 2018;2:4. doi: 10.21037/mps.2018.08.01
  275. Pamies D, Ekert J, Zurich MG, et al. Recommendations on fit-for-purpose criteria to establish quality management for microphysiological systems and for monitoring their reproducibility. Stem Cell Rep. 2024;19(5):604-617. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.03.009
  276. Varkey M, Visscher DO, van Zuijlen PPM, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Skin bioprinting: the future of burn wound reconstruction? Burns Trauma. 2019;7:4. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0142-7
  277. Lee S, Rim YA, Kim J, et al. Guidelines for Manufacturing and Application of Organoids: Skin. Int J Stem Cells. 2024;17(2):182-193. doi: 10.15283/ijsc24045
  278. Lovell-Badge R, Anthony E, Barker RA, et al. ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16(6):1398–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.012
  279. de Jongh D, Massey EK, the VANGUARD consortium, Bunnik EM. Organoids: a systematic review of ethical issues. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02950-9
  280. Zhu F, Nie G. Cell reprogramming: methods, mechanisms and applications. Cell Regen. 2025;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13619-025-00229-x
  281. Mostina M, Sun J, Sim SL, et al. Coordinated Development of Immune Cell Populations in Vascularized Skin Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(31):e02108. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202502108
  282. Guo JL, Januszyk M, Longaker MT. Machine Learning in Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2023;29(1-2):2-19. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2022.0128
  283. Maramraju S, Kowalczewski A, Kaza A, et al. AI-organoid integrated systems for biomedical studies and applications. Bioeng Transl Med. 2024;9(2):e10641. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10641
  284. Zamojski D, Gogler A, Scieglinska D, Marczyk M. EpidermaQuant: Unsupervised Detection and Quantification of Epidermal Differentiation Markers on H-DAB-Stained Images of Reconstructed Human Epidermis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(17):1904. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171904
  285. Sanchez MM, Orneles DN, Park BH, Morgan JT. Automated epidermal thickness quantification of in vitro human skin equivalents using optical coherence tomography. Biotechniques. 2022;72(5):194-200. doi: 10.2144/btn-2021-0123
Share
Back to top
Organoid Research, Electronic ISSN: 3082-8503 Published by AccScience Publishing