AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCTR026290071
Cite this article
3
Download
157
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Large language models as integrative intelligence for multimodal cardiovascular decision support

Predrag Mitrovic1,2*
Show Less
1 Cardiology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade , Serbia
2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade , Serbia
Received: 18 July 2026 | Revised: 10 August 2026 | Accepted: 24 August 2026 | Published online: 15 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: In this narrative review, we examine large language models (LLMs) as an emerging component of cardiovascular artificial intelligence and propose the concept of integrative intelligence as a physician-supervised orchestration framework rather than a new model architecture. Current cardiovascular evidence remains heterogeneous and includes text-based LLMs, multimodal foundation or vision-language models, and dedicated modality-specific algorithms for electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and physiological signals. Accordingly, conventional text–based LLMs should not be assumed to interpret raw cardiovascular waveforms or images directly. Instead, their most plausible near-term role is to synthesize clinical text, structured electronic health record data, biomarkers, retrieved evidence, and validated outputs from specialized analytical systems. Methods: We reviewed applications in acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, arrhythmias, valvular disease, cardio-oncology, documentation, and decision support, while distinguishing clinically evaluated applications from proof-of-concept and proposed future uses. Results: Available randomized and prospective evidence is still limited, and reported benefits are task-dependent; improvements in diagnostic reasoning, workflow, or intermediate decision-support measures should not be interpreted as established reductions in major cardiovascular events, readmissions, or mortality. We therefore emphasize data acquisition and multimodal fusion, external and prospective validation, calibration, omission errors, hallucinations, prompt sensitivity, automation bias, model drift, subgroup and out-of-distribution performance, evidence provenance, retrieval-augmented generation failure modes, cybersecurity, regulation, governance, and professional accountability. Conclusion: Integrative intelligence is presented as a testable translational framework for combining specialized AI, multimodal models, evidence retrieval, and human clinical judgment. Its clinical value will depend on rigorous multicenter validation, transparent auditability, and preservation of physician responsibility. Relevance for Patients: This review clarifies the emerging role of LLMs in cardiovascular medicine and proposes a physician-supervised framework for safe multimodal clinical integration.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Large language models
Cardiovascular medicine
Artificial intelligence
Multimodal data integration
Clinical decision support
Electronic health records
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest related to this work.
References
  1. Boonstra MJ, Weissenbacher D, Moore JH, Gonzalez-Hernandez G, Asselbergs FW. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing cardiology with large language models. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(5):332-345. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad838
  2. Wehbe RM. Charting the future of cardiology with large language model artificial intelligence. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025;22:143-144. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01105-y
  3. Meng X, Yan X, Zhang K, et al. The application of large language models in medicine: a scoping review. iScience. 2024;27(5):109713. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109713
  4. Gendler M, Nadkarni GN, Sudri K, et al. Large language models in cardiology: systematic review. JMIR Cardio. 2026;10:e76734. doi: 10.2196/76734
  5. Agrawal M, Hegselmann S, Lang H, Kim Y, Sontag D. Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors. In: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2022:1998-2022. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.130
  6. Zakka C, Shad R, Chaurasia A, et al. Almanac-retrieval-augmented language models for clinical medicine. NEJM AI. 2024;1(2):AIoa2300068. doi: 10.1056/AIoa2300068
  7. O’Sullivan JW, Palepu A, Saab K, et al. A large language model for complex cardiology care. Nat Med. 2026;32(2):616-623. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-04190-9
  8. Ferreira Santos J, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Leite F, Dores H. Applications of large language models in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025;6(4):540-553. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf028
  9. Khera R, Oikonomou EK, Nadkarni GN, et al. Transforming cardiovascular care with artificial intelligence: from discovery to practice: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(1):97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.003
  10. Kodera S, Takeda N. From DNA to drug discovery: AI models for cardiovascular precision medicine. J Cardiol. 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2026.06.007
  11. Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(23):2668-2679. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.521
  12. Makimoto H, Kohro T. Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review. Hypertens Res. 2024;47(3):685-699. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01469-7
  13. Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;616(7956):259-265. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4
  14. Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, Ting DSW. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29(8):1930-1940. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8
  15. Omar M, Nadkarni GN, Klang E, Glicksberg BS. Large language models in medicine: a review of current clinical trials across healthcare applications. PLoS Digit Health. 2024;3(11):e0000662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000662
  16. Hager P, Jungmann F, Holland R, et al. Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making. Nat Med. 2024;30(9):2613-2622. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1
  17. McCoy LG, Manrai AK, Rodman A. Large language models and the degradation of the medical record. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(17):1561-1564. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2405999
  18. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
  19. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1233-1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184
  20. Yang XY, Li YM, Wang JY, Jia YH, Yi Z, Chen M. Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases. Precis Clin Med. 2025;8(3):pbaf016. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf016
  21. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233-271. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
  22. Voigt JU, Cvijic M. 2- and 3-dimensional myocardial strain in cardiac health and disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(9):1849-1863. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.044
  23. Li J, Li Y, Sun Z, et al. Exploring multimodal large language models on transthoracic echocardiogram tasks for cardiovascular decision support. J Biomed Inform. 2025;171:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104930
  24. Chao CJ, Banerjee I, Arsanjani R, et al. Evaluating large language models in echocardiography reporting: opportunities and challenges. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025;6(3):326-339. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae086
  25. Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019;25:70-74. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2
  26. Ribeiro AH, Ribeiro MH, Paixao GMM, et al. Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1760. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15432-4
  27. Lee H, Yoo S, Kim J, Cho Y, Suh D, Lee K. Comparative diagnostic performance of a multimodal large language model versus a dedicated electrocardiogram AI in detecting myocardial infarction from electrocardiogram images: comparative study. JMIR AI. 2025;4:e75910. doi: 10.2196/75910
  28. Rouhi AD, Menon SV, Ghanem YK, Han JJ. Concordance of large language model recommendations with multidisciplinary heart team decisions in coronary revascularization and aortic valve intervention: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Cardiol Ther. 2026. doi: 10.1007/s40119-026-00453-9
  29. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain. Circulation. 2021;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029
  30. Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2614-2662. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d44a8f
  31. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617
  32. Tsutsui H, Albert NM, Coats AJS, et al. Natriuretic Peptides: Role in the diagnosis and management of heart failure: A Scientific statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023;25(5):616-631. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2848
  33. Xu D, Cunningham JW. Harnessing large language models for chart review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14(7):e041581. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.041581
  34. Jain SS, Elias P, Poterucha TJ, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care-part 2: applications: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(24):2487-2496. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.03.401
  35. Ke YH, Jin L, Elangovan K, et al. Retrieval augmented generation for 10 large language models and its generalizability in assessing medical fitness. npj Digit Med. 2025;8(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01519-z.
  36. Templin T, Fort S, Padmanabham P, et al. Framework for bias evaluation in large language models in healthcare settings. npj Digit Med. 2025;8(1):414. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01786-w
  37. Radke RM, Diller GP, Reddy RG, Shivaram P, Danford DA, Kutty S. A multi-query, multimodal, receiver-augmented solution to extract contemporary cardiology guideline information using large language models. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf111
  38. Cheema B, Pandit J. AI and heart failure: present state and future with multimodal large language models. JACC Adv. 2024;3(9):101029. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101029
  39. Nolin-Lapalme A, et al. Maximising large language model utility in cardiovascular care: a practical guide. Can J Cardiol. 2024;40(10):1774-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.05.024
  40. Perpetua EM, Palmer R, Le VT, et al. JACC: Advances expert panel perspective: shared decision-making in multidisciplinary team-based cardiovascular care. JACC Adv. 2024;3(7):100981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100981
  41. Antiperovitch P, Liu I, Mokhtar AT, Tang A. Evaluating large language models in cardiovascular antithrombotic care: performance, accuracy, and implications for clinical practice. Can J Cardiol. 2025;41(8):1584-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.04.008
  42. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
  43. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195
  44. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
  45. Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1-e156. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193
  46. Lin C, Lan Y, Zeng Z, et al. Evaluation of large language models in percutaneous coronary intervention decision-making. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026;13:1690716. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1690716
  47. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
  48. Zhu W, Peng J, Yan Z, Chen Y, Xu J, Zhang L. Designing and evaluating large language model-enabled clinical decision support for heart failure: a modular and risk-tiered framework. Front Digit Health. 2026;8:1730457. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2026.1730457
  49. Lyon AR, Lopez-Fernandez T, Couch LS, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(41):4229-4361. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac244
  50. Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Armenian S, et al. Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society consensus statement. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(4):280-299. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab674
  51. Goh E, Gallo RJ, Strong E, et al. GPT-4 assistance for improvement of physician performance on patient care tasks: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2025;31(4):1233-1238. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03456-y
  52. Wang G, Zhang K, Jiang J, et al. Human-large language model collaboration in clinical medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digit Med. 2026;9(1):195. doi: 10.1038/s41746-026-02382-2
  53. Ong KT, Seo J, Kim H, et al. Success and failure of human-AI collaboration in clinical reasoning: an experimental study on challenging real-world cases. Int J Med Inform. 2026;211:106342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106342
  54. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  55. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: Guidance on Large Multi-Modal Models. World Health Organization; 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240084759
  56. Wu J, Wu X, Zheng Y, Yang J. Clinical pathway-aware large language models for reliable and transparent medical dialogue. J Biomed Inform. 2025;172:104942. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104942
  57. Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2016;11:114. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
  58. Jiang K, Adhikari J, Bernard GR. Interpreting ECG Images with Multimodal Large Language Models. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2026. doi: 10.3233/shti260321
  59. Jia YY, Pang LY, Bi MM, Yang XL, Song JP. Dependability of large language models in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025;39(12):3534-3540. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.07.026
  60. Mahajan A, Obermeyer Z, Daneshjou R, Lester J, Powell D. Cognitive bias in clinical large language models. npj Digit Med. 2025;8:428. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01790-0
  61. Yang Y, Liu X, Jin Q, Huang F, Lu Z, et al. Unmasking and quantifying racial bias of large language models in medical report generation. Commun Med. 2024;4:176. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00601-z
  62. Zhong X, Li S, Chen Z, Ge L, Yu D, Wang S, et al. Considerations for patient privacy of large language models in health care: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e76571. doi: 10.2196/76571
  63. Omar M, Sorin V, Collins JD, et al. Multi-model assurance analysis showing large language models are highly vulnerable to adversarial hallucination attacks during clinical decision support. Commun Med. 2025;5(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01021-3
  64. Asgari E, Montana-Brown N, Dubois M, et al. A framework to assess clinical safety and hallucination rates of LLMs for medical text summarisation. npj Digit Med. 2025;8(1):274. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01670-7
  65. Amugongo LM, Mascheroni P, Brooks S, Doering S, Seidel J. Retrieval augmented generation for large language models in healthcare: a systematic review. PLoS Digit Health. 2025;4(6):e0000877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000877
  66. Shool S, Adimi S, Saboori Amleshi R, Bitaraf E, Golpira R, Tara M. A systematic review of large language model evaluations in clinical medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02954-4
  67. Johri S, Jeong J, Tran BA, et al. An evaluation framework for clinical use of large language models in patient interaction tasks. Nat Med. 2025;31(1):77-86. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03328-5
  68. Bibbò L, Laganà F, Pullano SA, Angiulli G. Multimodal EEG–EMG and FEM-based adaptive control of passive upper-limb exoskeletons. Sensors. 2026;26(12):3924. doi: 10.3390/s26123924
  69. Qu C, Zhang X, Lu Y, Wang Y, Su C. MAF-Net: multimodal cross-attention-based fusion network for cardiovascular disease classification. PLoS ONE. 2026;21(4):e0345238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345238
  70. Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J, et al. Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(10):e2440969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969
  71. Wiens J, Saria S, Sendak M, et al. Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nat Med. 2019;25(9):1337-1340. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6
  72. Gallifant J, Afshar M, Ameen S, et al. The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models. Nat Med. 2025;31(1):60-69. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03425-5
  73. Kagiyama N, Tokodi M, Hathaway QA, et al. PRIME 2.0: proposed requirements for cardiovascular imaging-related multimodal-AI evaluation: an updated checklist. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2026;19(2):225-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.08.004
  74. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Off J Eur Union. 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj?locale=en
  75. Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. 2023;620(7972):172-180. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
  76. Ferreira Santos J, Dores H. Large language models in cardiovascular prevention: a narrative review and governance framework. Diagnostics. 2026;16(3):390. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics16030390
  77. Tran M, Balasooriya C, Jonnagaddala J, et al. Situating governance and regulatory concerns for generative artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education. npj Digit Med. 2025;8(1):315. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01721-z
Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing