AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 7 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18053/jctres.07.202104.001
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

3D Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary repair by absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible

Yen Pin Tan1* Cheryl Lim1 Sameer P Junnarkar1 Cheong Wei Terence Huey1 Vishalkumar G Shelat1,2
Show Less
1 Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore
Submitted: 14 March 2021 | Revised: 17 May 2021 | Accepted: 19 May 2021 | Published: 16 July 2021
© 2021 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is the most common treatment approach for common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, recent studies show that single-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is safe and feasible. Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy enhances depth perception and facilitates intracorporeal suturing. The application of 3D technology for LCBDE is emerging, and we report our case series of 3D LCBDE.
Methods: We audited the twenty-seven consecutive 3D LCBDE performed from July 2017 to January 2020. We have a liberal policy for Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with deranged liver function tests (LFT). All CBD explorations were done through choledochotomy with a 5mm flexible choledochoscope and primarily repaired with an absorbable barbed suture without a stent or T-tube.
Results: The mean age of patients was 68 (range 44 - 91) years, and 12 (44%) were male. The indications for surgery were choledocholithiasis 67% (n=18), cholangitis 22% (n=6) and gallstone pancreatitis 11% (n=3). 67% (n=18) had pre-operative ERCP. 37% (n=10) had pre-operative biliary stent. Preoperative MRCP was done in 74% (n=20), and the mean diameter of CBD was 14.5 mm (range 7-30). The median operative time was 160 (range 80 -265) minutes. The operative drain was inserted in 18 patients. One patient each (4%) had a bile leak and a retained stone. There was no open conversion, readmission, or mortality.
Conclusion: 3D LCBDE with primary repair by an absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible.
Relevance for patients: This paper emphasized that one stage LCBDE should be a treatment option which is comparable with 2 stage ERCP followed by LC to treat CBD stones. In addition, 3D technology and barbed sutures use in LCBDE is safe and useful.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References

[1] Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Management of Common Bile Duct Stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:612-9.

[2] Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M, et al. Guidelines on the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS). Gut 2008;57:1004-21.

[3] Campbell-Lloyd A J, Martin D J, Martin I J. Long Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration: A 5-Year Follow-up of 150 Consecutive Patients. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:492-4.

[4] Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D. Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. Ann Surg 2008;247:674-9.

[5] Taylor CJ, Kong J, Ghusn M, White S, Crampton N, Layani L. Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration: Results of 160 Consecutive Patients with 2-Year Follow-up. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:440-5.

[6] Shelat VG, Chia JM, Low JK. Common Bile Duct Exploration in an Elderly Asian Population. Int Surg 2015;100:261-7.

[7] Macadam RC, Goodall RJ. Long-term Symptoms Following Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones. Surg Endosc 2004;18:363-6.

[8] Koc B, Bircan HY, Adas G, Kemik O, Akcakaya A, Yavuz A, et al. Complications Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Minimal Invasive Surgical Recommendations. PLoS One 2014;26:e113073.

[9] Shelat VG, Chan CY, Liau KH, Ho CK. Laparoscopic Exploration can Salvage Failed Endoscopic Bile Duct Stone Extraction. Singapore Med J 2012;53:313-7.

[10] Buchs N C, Morel P. Three-dimensional Laparoscopy: A New Tool in the Surgeon’s Armamentarium. Surg Technol Int 2013;23:19-22.

[11] Sahu D, Mathew MJ, Reddy PK. 3D Laparoscopy Help or Hype; Initial Experience of a Tertiary Health Centre. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:NC01-3.

[12] Wang ZK, Ahmed S, Shelat VG. Acute Cholangitis. In: Sartelli M, Bassetti M, Martin-Loeches I, editors. Abdominal Sepsis. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Cham: Springer; 2018.

[13] Kiat TT, Gunasekaran SK, Junnarkar SP, Low JK, Woon W, Shelat VG. Are Traditional Scoring Systems for Severity Stratification of Acute Pancreatitis Sufficient? Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2018;22:105-15.

[14] Yu HY, Chan EE, Lingam P, Lee J, Woon WW, Low JK, et al. Index Admission Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Restores Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) Score. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2018;22:58-65.

[15] Amirthalingam V, Low JK, Woon W, Low JK, Shelat VG. Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too Restrictive and Patients with Moderate and Severe Acute Cholecystitis can be Managed by Early Cholecystectomy too. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2892-900.

[16] Liau KH, Aung KT, Chua N, Ho CK, Chan CY, Kow A, et al. Outcome of a Strategy to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary-care Hospital. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2010;11:151-9.

[17] Sartelli M, Labricciosa F M, Barbadoro P, Pagani L, Ansaloni L, Brink AJ, et al. The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery: Defining a Model for Antimicrobial Stewardship results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey. World J Emerg Surg 2017;12:34.

[18] Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Catena F. The Management of Intra-abdominal Infections from a Global Perspective: 2017 WSES Guidelines for Management of Intraabdominal Infections. World J Emerg Surg 2017;12:29.

[19] Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, et al. Bile Leakage after Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: A Definition and Grading of Severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011;149:680-8.

[20] Wenzi R, Pateisky N, Husslein P. First Use of a 3D Videoendoscope in Gynaecology. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1993;53:776-8.

[21] Shelat VG, Serin K, Samim M, Besselink MG, Al Saati H, Di Gioia P, et al. Outcomes of Repeat Laparoscopic Liver Resection Compared to the Primary Resection. World J Surg 2014;38:3175-80.

[22] Tan KK, Shelat VG, Liau KH, Chan CY, Ho CK. Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: Our First 50 Cases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010;39:136-42.

[23] Agrusa A, Di Buono G, Buscemi S, Cucinella G, Romano G, Gulotta G. 3D Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Oncotarget 2018;9:17325-33.

[24] Bo X, Wang J, Nan L, Xin Y, Gao Z, Wang C, et al. 3D Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus 2D in Choledocholithiasis Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis. Surg Endoscopy 2021;35:819-25.

[25] Schreurs WH, Juttmann JR, Stuifbergen WN, Oostvogel HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ. Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Selective Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy: Short and Long-Term Results. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1068-72.

[26] Topal B, Vromman K, Aerts R, Verslype C, Van Steenbergen W, Penninckx F. Hospital Cost Categories of One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Management of Common Bile Duct Stones. Surg Endosc 2010;24:413-6.

[27] Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Two-Stage Versus SingleStage Management of Patients with Gallstone Disease and Common Bile Duct Stones. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1986-9.

[28] Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, et al. Single Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy Versus Two Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patients with Concomitant Gallbladder Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Surg Endosc 2014;28:875-85.

[29] Gilsdorf D, Henrichsen J, Liljestrand K, Staheli A, Olsen G, Narayanan P, et al. Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis: Analysis of Practice Patterns of Intermountain Healthcare. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:1160-5.

[30] Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, et al. Surgical Versus Endoscopic Treatment of Bile Duct Stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:CD003327.

[31] Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD. Laparoscopic Exploration of Common Bile Duct with Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Surg Res 2009;157:e1-5.

[32] Edil BH, Cooper MA, Makary MA. Laparoscopic Pancreaticojejunostomy Using a Barbed Suture: A Novel Technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2014;24:887-91.

[33] Karatepe O, Yazici P, Battal M. The Utility of V-Loc Suture Device for Pancreaticojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Pancreas (Online) 2018;19:190-6.

[34] Tay WM, Toh YJ, Shelat VG, Huey CW, Junnarkar SP, Woon W, et al. Subtotal Cholecystectomy: Early and Longterm Outcomes. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4536-42.

[35] Koo JG, Chan YH, Shelat VG. Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Reconstituting and Fenestrating Techniques. Surg Endosc 2021;35:1014-24.

[36] Fernandez LC, Toriz A, Hernandez J, Sanchez N, Linares E, Zenteno M, et al. Knotless Choledochorrhaphy with Barbed Suture, Safe and Feasible. Surg Endosc 2016;30:3630-5.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing