[1] Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for  its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263:1385–1389. 

[2] Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, Matthews DR. Publication  bias in clinical research. The Lancet. 1991;337:867–872. 

[3] Francis G. Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias.  J Math Psychol. 2013;57:153–69. 

[4] Anderson G. Why publish your negative results?. On Medicine.  2012. https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2012/08/28/ why-publish-your-negative-results-2/

[5] Earp BD, Trafimow D. Replication, falsification, and the crisis of  confidence in social psychology. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–11. 

[6] Earp BD, Everett JAC, Madva EN, Hamlin JK. Out, damned spot:  Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated? Basic Appl Soc Psychol.  2014;36:91–98. 

[7] Trafimow D. Editorial. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2014;36:1–2. 

[8] Mahoney MJ. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of  confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cogn Ther Res.  1977;1:161–175. 

[9] Firestein S. Failure: Why Science Is So Successful. Oxford: Oxford  University Press; 2015. 305 p. 

[10] Heger M. Editor’s inaugural issue foreword: perspectives on  translational and clinical research. J Clin Transl Res. 2015;1:1–5.

[11] Earp JR. The need for reporting negative results. JAMA. 1927;88:119.

[12] Earp BD. The need for reporting negative results – a 90 year update.  J Clin Transl Res. 2017;3:1–4. 

[13] Kepes S, Banks GC, Oh I-S. Avoiding bias in publication bias  research: the value of “null” findings. J Bus Psychol. 2014;29:183– 203. 

[14] Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false.  PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. 

[15] Greenwald AG. Consequences of prejudice against the null  hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1975;82:1–20. 

[16] Ioannidis JPA. Journals should publish all “null” results and should  sparingly publish “positive” results. Cancer Epidemiol Prev  Biomark. 2006;15:186–186. 

[17] Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.  Psychol Bull. 1979;86:638–641. 

[18] Franco A, Malhotra N, Simonovits G. Publication bias in the social  sciences: unlocking the file drawer. Science. 2014;345:1502–1505. 

[19] Starbuck WH. How much better are the most-prestigious journals?The statistics of academic publication. Organ Sci. 2005;16:180– 200. 

[20] Chambers C, Munafo M. Trust in science would be improved by  study pre-registration. The Guardian. 2013 Jun 5; http://www. theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/jun/05/trust-in-science-study-pr e-registration

[21] Lash TL, Vandenbroucke JP. Should preregistration of epidemiologic study protocols become compulsory? Reflections and a  counterproposal. Epidemiology. 2012;23:184–188. 

[22] Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial  publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional  analysis. PLOS Med. 2009;6:e1000144. 

[23] Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C,  Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I. Dissemination and publication of  research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health  Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–93. 

[24] AllTrials. Half of all clinical trials have never reported results  AllTrials. 2015. http://www.alltrials.net/news/half-of-all-trialsunreported/

[25] Alvarez RM. The pros and cons of research preregistration.  OUPblog. 2014 https://blog.oup.com/2014/09/pro-con-researchpreregistration/

[26] Lash TL. Preregistration of study protocols is unlikely to improve  the yield from our science, but other strategies might.  Epidemiology. 2010;21:612–613.

[27] Scott S. Pre-registration would put science in chains. Times Higher  Education. 2013. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/ opinion/pre-registration-would-put-science-in-chains/2005954.artic le

[28] Trafimow D, Earp BD. Null hypothesis significance testing and  Type I error: the domain problem. New Ideas Psychol.  2017;45:19–27.

[29] Locascio J. Results blind science publishing. Basic Appl Soc  Psychol. In press; 

[30] Hanson R. Conclusion-blind review. Overcoming Bias. 2007.  http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/01/conclusionblind.html

[31] Findley MG, Jensen NM, Malesky EJ, Pepinsky TB. Can  results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and  implications of a pilot study. Comp Polit Stud. 2016;49:1667–1703. 

[32] Teixeira da Silva JA. Does the removal of results from a submitted  paper reduce publication bias? Pac Sci Rev B Humanit Soc Sci.  2016;2:29–30. 

[33] Bostrom N, Ord T. The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in  applied ethics. Ethics. 2006;116:656–79. 

[34] Everett JAC, Earp BD. A tragedy of the (academic) commons:  interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma  for early-career researchers. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–4. 

[35] LeBel EP, Vanpaemel W, McCarthy RJ, Earp BD, Elson M. A  unified framework to quantify the trustworthiness of empirical  research. PsyArXiv. 2017. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/uwmr8