[1] Mudd RD. Dr. Mudd and the death of Lincoln. JAMA. 1927;88:119.

[2]Earp JR. The need for reporting negative results. JAMA. 1927;88:119.

[3]Editor. News from the field. Am J Public Health. 1937;27:755–758.

[4] Baker M. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature. 2016;533:452– 454.

[5]Earp BD, Trafimow D. Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–11.

[6] Nosek BA, Errington TM. Making sense of replications. eLife. 2017;6:e23383.

[7]Pashler H, Wagenmakers E. Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:528–530.

[8]John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychol Sci. 2012;23:524–532.

 [9]Kerr NL. HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2:196–217. 

[10] Head ML, Holman L, Lanfear R, Kahn AT, Jennions MD. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLOS Biol. 2015;13:e1002106.

[11] Trafimow D, Earp BD. Null hypothesis significance testing and Type I error: the domain problem. New Ideas in Psychology. 2017;45:19-27. 

[12] Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M. Scientific utopia II: restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:615–631.

[13] Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Sert NP du, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers E, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JPA. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:1–9.

[14] Everett JAC, Earp BD. A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–4.

[15] Earp BD. The unbearable asymmetry of bullshit. Health Watch. 2016;Spring(101):4–5.

[16] Yong E. Replication studies: bad copy. Nat News. 2012;485:298–300.

[17] Earp BD. What did the OSC replication initiative reveal about the crisis in psychology? BMC Psychol. 2016;4:1–19.

[18] Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124.

[19] Chambers C. The changing face of psychology. The Guardian. 2014 Jan 24 https://www.theguardian.com/science/head- quarters/2014/ jan/24/the-changing-face-of-psychology

[20] LeBel EP, Vanpaemel W, McCarthy RJ, Earp BD, Elson M. A unified framework to quantify the trustworthiness of empirical research. PsyArXiv. 2017; https://osf.io/preprints/ psyarxiv/uwmr8

[21] Engber D. Cancer research is broken. Slate. 2016 Apr 19. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/future_tense/201 6/04/biomedicine_facing_a_worse_replication_crisis_than_the_one _plaguing_psychology.html

[22] Collins FS, Tabak LA. NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature. 2014;505:612–613.

[23] Lose G and Klarskov N. Why published research is untrustworthy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; in press.

[24] Elms AC. The crisis of confidence in social psychology. Am Psychol. 1975;30:967–976.

[25] Greenwald AG. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1975;82:1–20.

[26] Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet. 1991;337:867–872.

[27] Francis G. Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias. J Math Psychol. 2013;57:153–69.

[28] Bakker M, van Dijk A, Wicherts JM. The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:543–554.

[29] Earp BD, Wilkinson D. The publication symmetry test: a simple editorial heuristic to combat publication bias. J Clin Transl Res. 2017; 3: in press.

[30] Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:638–41.

[31] Pautasso M. Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases. Scientometrics. 2010;85:193–202.

[32] Heger M. Editor’s inaugural issue foreword: perspectives on translational and clinical research. J Clin Transl Res. 2015;1: 1– 5.

[33] Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. The Lancet. 2014;383: 267–276.

[34] Earp BD, Everett JAC. How to fix psychology’s replication crisis. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2015 Oct 25. http://www. chronicle.com/article/How-to-Fix- psychologys/233857