Prevalence, morphological variation and ossification of sesamoid bones of the forefoot: a retrospective radiographic study of 8,716 Chinese subjects
Background and Aim: Previous studies provided evidence of a genetic basis for the occurrence of sesamoids bone in the foot among different ethnic populations. However, information for the Chinese population has not been previously reported. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine the distribution, morphological variation and ossification timeline of sesamoid bones of the forefoot in a large sample of the Chinese population.
Methods: Antero-posterior (AP) and oblique radiographs of 4,417 left and 4,299 right feet obtained from 8,716 patients in the Hebei province of Northern China, and retrospectively examined for the presence of sesamoid bones, identified as a small oval bone plantar to each metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and the first interphalangeal (IP) joint.
Results and Conclusion: The prevalence rate of a sesamoid bone associated with the first to fifth MTP joints and the first IP joint was 99.96%, 3.08%, 0.39%, 0.69%, 8.94%, and 59.22%, respectively. Moreover, a morphological variation in hallucal sesamoids was identified in 12.09% of feet, with variations classified into three distinct types according to bone size and the number of ossification centers. Ossification begins in the hallucal MTP and IP joints at approximately 8 years of age, with the final ossification center being evidence for the sesamoid bone of the fourth MTP joint at 28 years of age.
Relevance for patients: Our study provides important anatomical data regarding the prevalence of sesamoid bones in the forefoot of a large population of Chinese adult and pediatric patients for use in clinical practice and research in forensic science and anthropology.
[1] Coskun N, Yuksel M, Cevener M, Arican RY, Ozdemir H, Bircan O, Sindel T, Ilgi S, Sindel M. Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat 2009, 31: 19-24.
[2] Tsuruta T, Shiokawa Y, Kato A, Matsumoto T, Yamazoe Y, Oike T, Sugiyama T, Saito M. Radiological study of the ac cessory skeletal elements in the foot and ankle (author's transl). Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1981, 55: 357-370.
[3] Yammine K. The sesamoids of the feet in humans: a systemat ic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int 2015, 90: 144-160.
[4] Nwawka OK, Hayashi D, Diaz LE, Goud AR, Iii WFA, Roe mer FW, Malguria N, Guermazi A. Sesamoids and accessoryossicles of the foot: anatomical variability and related pathol ogy. Insights Imaging 2013, 4: 581-593.
[5] Chinese Official Population Clock (updated daily) iCCocRM, 2012.
[6] Dharap AS, Al-Hashimi H, Kassab S, Abu-Hijleh MF. Inci dence and ossification of sesamoid bones in the hands and feet: A radiographic study in an Arab population. Clin Anat 2007, 20: 416–423.
[7] Zinsmeister BJ, Edelman R. Congenital absence of the tibial sesamoid: a report of two cases. J Foot Surg 1985, 24: 266-268.
[8] Kiter E, Akkaya S, Kiliç BA, Demirkan F. Distribution of the metatarsophalangeal sesamoids in Turkish subjects. J Am Po diatr Med Assoc 2006, 96: 437-441.
[9] Williams TH, Pasapula C, Robinson AH. Complete sesamoid agenesis: a rare cause of first ray metatarsalgia. Foot Ankle Int 2009, 30: 465-467.
[10] Msamati BC, Igbigbi PS. Radiographic appearance of sesa moid bones in the hands and feet of Malawian subjects. Clin Anat 2001, 14: 248-253.
[11] Rowe SM, Lee KB, Park YB, Bae BH, Kang KD. Sesamoids and accessory bones of the forefoot in normal Korean adults. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc 2005, 9: 20-25
[12] Bizarro AH. On sesamoid and supernumerary bones of the limbs. J Anat 1921, 55: 256-268.
[13] Shtofmakher G, Afesllari E, Rozenstrauch A, DeLauro TM, Cohen RE. Congenital missing tibial sesamoid in a marathon runner: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014, 104: 550- 553.
[14] Day F, Jones PC, Gilbert CL. Congenital absence of the tibial sesamoid. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002, 92: 153-154.
[15] Masaki T. An anatomical study of the interphalangeal sesa moid bone of the hallux. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1984, 58: 419-427.
[16] Wuelker N, Wirth CJ. The great toe sesamoids. Foot Ankle Surg 1996, 2: 167–174.
[17] Scranton PE Jr, Rutkowski R. Anatomic variations in the first ray: Part II. Disorders of the sesamoids. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 151: 256-264.
[18] Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvadó E, Camins A, Danús M, Saurí A. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003, 13: L164-L177.
[19] Karadaglis D, Grace D. Morphology of the hallux sesamoids. Foot Ankle Surg 2003, 9: 165-167.
[20] Munuera PV, Domínguez G, Reina M, Trujillo P. Bipartite hallucal sesamoid bones: relationship with hallux valgus and metatarsal index. Skeletal Radiol 2007, 36: 1043-1050.
[21] Davies MB, Dalal S. Gross anatomy of the interphalangeal joint of the great toe: Implications for excision of plantar cap sular accessory ossicles. Clin Anat 2005, 18: 239–244.
[22] Jahss MH. The sesamoids of the hallux. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981, 7: 88-97.
[23] Davies MB, Abdlslam K, Gibson RJ. Interphalangeal sesa moid bones of the great toe: an anatomic variant demanding careful scrutiny of radiographs. Clin Anat 2003, 16: 520-521.
[24] Pfitzner (1892) Morphologischearbeiten de Schwalbe. Cited from Bizarro (1921).
[25] Cardoso HFV, Severino RSS. The chronology of epiphyseal union in the hand and foot from dry bone observations. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2010, 20: 737–746.