AccScience Publishing / IJPS / Volume 1 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18063/IJPS.2015.01.003
Cite this article
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
News and Announcements
View All

Concordance and discordance between objectively and subjectively measured successful aging and their linkages with mortality

Danan Gu1*
Show Less
1 1 Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, US
© Invalid date by the Authors. Licensee AccScience Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( )

Successful aging has extended from the biomedical-oriented model to the biomedi-cal-and-psychosocial mixed model. However, few studies have investigated the subtypes of the joint classification between subjective (psychosocial-oriented) (SSA) and objective (biomedi-cal-oriented) (OSA) measures to identify and distinguish different risk groups. This study aims to examine how concordance and discordance between SSA and OSA are associated with sub-sequent mortality based on five waves of a nationwide longitudinal survey in China from 2000 to 2011 with 30,948 sampled persons aged 65 and older. SSA was measured by absence of poor life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, and psychological distress, while OSA was measured by absence of disability, cognitive impairment, and chronic diseases. We then defined a variable with four subtypes of concordance and discordance from these two dichotomous variables: Type I (not-OSA & not-SSA), Type II (not-OSA & SSA), Type III (OSA & not-SSA) and Type IV (OSA & SSA). Types I and IV are concordance types, while Types II and III are discordance types. The results showed that a negative association between Type IV (SSA & OSA) and risk of mortality was universal over age groups and sexes. Compared to Type I (not-SSA & not-OSA), Type IV (SSA & OSA) has a 25–71% lower risk of mortality, depending on age group and sex, after controlling for a rich set of confounders. Concordance and discordance between OSA and SSA provide added power in predicting subsequent mortality. Public health programs should target those more vulnerable subtypes to promote successful aging.

successful aging
subjective successful aging
objective successful aging

Baltes P B, and Baltes M M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selec-tive optimization with compensation. In Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences, P B Baltes and M M Baltes (Eds.), (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.


Blazer D G. (2006). Successful aging. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(1): 2–5.


Bowling A, and Dieppe P. (2005). What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ, 331: 1548–1551.


Bowling A, and Iliffe S. (2006). Which model of successful aging should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of aging. Age and Aging, 35(6): 607–614.


Brown D S, Thompson W W, Zack M M, et al. (2015). Associations between health-related quality of life and mortality in older adults. Prevention Science, 16(1): 21–30.


Carr A J, Gibson B, and Robinson P G. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? BMJ, 322: 1240–1243.


Cernin P A, Lysack C, and Lichtenberg P A. (2011). A comparison of self-rated and objectively measured successful aging constructs in an urban sample of African American older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 34: 89–102.


Cosco T D, Prino A M, Perales J, et al. (2014). Operational definitions of successful aging: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(3): 373–381.


Depp C A, Glatt S J, and Jeste D V. (2007). Recent advances in research on successful or healthy aging. Current Psychiatry Reports, 9(1): 7–13.


Depp C A, and Jeste D V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4(1): 6–20.


Diener E, and Chan M Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 3(1): 1–43.


Feng Q, Son J, and Zeng Y. (2015). Prevalence and correlates of successful ageing: A comparative study between China and South Korea. European Journal of Ageing, 12(2): 83–94.


Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3): 189–198.


Gu D. (2008). General data assessment of the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey in 2002. In Y Zeng, D Poston, D A Vlosky, and D Gu (Eds.), Healthy Longevity in China: Demographic, Socioe-conomic, and Psychological Dimensions (pp. 39–59). Dordrecht: Springer.


Gu D. (2014). Cardiovascular diseases, associated factors and links with mortality among older Chinese. Presented at the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Research on Long-term Care and Healthy Aging. April 28–29, 2014. Duke University, Durham, NC.


Gu D, and Dupre M E. (2008). Assessment of reliability of mortality and morbidity in the 1998–2002 CLHLS waves. In Y Zeng, D Poston, D A Vlosky, and D Gu (Eds.), Healthy Longevity in China: Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Psychological Dimensions (pp. 99–116). Dordrecht: Springer.


Jeste D V, Savla G N, Thompson W K, et al. (2013). Association between older age and more successful aging: Critical role of resilience and depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(2): 188–196.


Lewis J P. (2011). Successful aging through the eyes of Alaska Native elders: What it means to be an elder in Bristol Bay, AK. The Gerontologist, 51(4): 540–549.


Matsubayashi K, Ishine M, Wada T, et al. (2006). Older adults’ views of “successful aging”: Comparison of older Japanese and Americans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(1): 184–187.


Montross L P, Depp C, Daly J, et al. (2006). Correlates of self-rated successful aging among communi-ty-dwelling older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(1): 43–51.

Back to top
International Journal of Population Studies, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8606 Print ISSN: 2424-8150, Published by AccScience Publishing