Jagannathan R, Patel SA, Ali MK, et al., 2019, Global updates on cardiovascular disease mortality trends and attribution of traditional risk factors. Curr Diab Rep, 19: 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1161-2

Matthews S, Buttery A, O’Neil A, et al., 2022, Sex differences in mortality after first time, isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, Online ahead of print: zvac028. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac028

Laschke MW, Menger MD, 2012, Vascularization in tissue engineering: Angiogenesis versus inosculation. Eur Surg Res, 48: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336876

Lopes SV, Collins MN, Reis RL, et al., 2021, Vascularization approaches in tissue engineering: Recent developments on evaluation tests and modulation. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 4: 2941–2956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00051

Datta SK, Tumilowicz JJ, Trentin JJ, 1993, Lysis of human arterial smooth muscle cells infected with herpesviridae by peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Implications for atherosclerosis. Viral Immunol, 6: 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.1993.6.153

Wang D, Xu Y, Li Q, et al., 2020, Artificial small-diameter blood vessels: Materials, fabrication, surface modification, mechanical properties, and bioactive functionalities. J Mater Chem B, 8: 1801–1822. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb01849b

Kaplan J, Wagner R, White LE, et al., 2021, Recurrent brachial artery aneurysm repair in a child managed with Gore-Tex conduit reinforcement. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech, 7: 295–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.12.023

Ferrari G, Balasubramanian P, Tubaldi E, et al., 2019, Experiments on dynamic behaviour of a Dacron aortic graft in a mock circulatory loop. J Biomech, 86: 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.053

Careddu L, Petridis FD, Angeli E, et al., 2019, Dacron conduit for extracardiac total cavopulmonary anastomosis: A word of caution. Heart Lung Circ, 28:1872–1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.11.005

Zhang F, Xie Y, Celik H, et al., 2019, Engineering small-caliber vascular grafts from collagen filaments and nanofibers with comparable mechanical properties to native vessels. Biofabrication, 11: 035020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab15ce

Biazar E, Najafi SM, Heidari KS, et al., 2018, 3D bio-printing technology for body tissues and organs regeneration. J Med Eng Technol, 42: 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2018.1457094

Fukunishi T, Best CA, Sugiura T, et al., 2017, Preclinical study of patient-specific cell-free nanofiber tissue-engineered vascular grafts using 3-dimensional printing in a sheep model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 153: 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.066

Habib MA, Khoda B, 2022, Rheological analysis of bio-ink for 3D bio-printing processes. J Manuf Process, 76: 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.048

Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M, et al., 2020, Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev, 120: 11028–11055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084

GhavamiNejad A, Ashammakhi N, Wu XY, et al., 2020, Crosslinking strategies for 3D bioprinting of polymeric hydrogels. Small, 16: e2002931. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002931

Olayanju A, Miller AF, Ansari T, et al., 2021, Self-assembling Peptide Hydrogels-Peptigels® as a Platform for Hepatic Organoid Culture. bioRxiv, preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.433333

Wang Y, Li J, Li Y, et al., 2021, Biomimetic bioinks of nanofibrillar polymeric hydrogels for 3D bioprinting. Nano Today, 39: 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101180

Jia J, Richards DJ, Pollard S, et al., 2014, Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10: 4323–4331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034

Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, et al., 2016, Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by Vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. Acta Biomater, 33: 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013

Lee H, Han W, Kim H, et al., 2017, Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules, 18: 1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908

Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, et al., 2020, Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: Elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication, 12: 035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707

Kuang H, Wang Y, Shi Y, et al., 2020, Construction and performance evaluation of Hep/silk-PLCL composite nanofiber small-caliber artificial blood vessel graft. Biomaterials, 259: 120288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120288

Wei LN, Chee KC, Shen YF, et al., 2019, Print me an organ! Why we are not there yet. Pro Polym Sci, 97: 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145

Syedain ZH, Prunty A, Li J, et al., 2021, Evaluation of the probe burst test as a measure of strength for a biologically-engineered vascular graft. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 119: 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104527

Konig G, McAllister TN, Dusserre N, et al., 2009, Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery. Biomaterials, 30: 1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011

Matthew JM, Richard PT, Yang NJ, et al., 2022, Bioengineering artificial blood vessels from natural materials. Trends Biotechnol, 40: 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.11.003

Zandi N, Sani ES, Mostafavi E, et al., 2021, Nanoengineered shear-thinning and bioprintable hydrogel as a versatile platform for biomedical applications. Biomaterials, 267: 120476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120476

Yoneyama T, Ito M, Sugihara K, et al., 2000, Small diameter vascular prosthesis with a nonthrombogenic phospholipid polymer surface: Preliminary study of a new concept for functioning in the absence of pseudo-or neointima formation. Artif Organs, 24: 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06433.x

Garcia-Cruz MR, Postma A, Frith JE, et al., 2021, Printability and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated xanthan-gelatin composite bioink. Biofabrication, 13: 035023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abec2d

Amorim PA, D’Ávila MA, Anand R, et al., 2021, Insights on shear rheology of inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting, 22: e00129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00129

Bae M, Hwang DW, Ko MK, et al. 2021, Neural stem cell delivery using brain-derived tissue-specific bioink for recovering from traumatic brain injury. Biofabrication, 13: 044110. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac293f

Diamantides N, Dugopolski C, Blahut E, et al., 2019, High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks. Biofabrication, 11: 045016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524

Xu C, Zhang M, Huang Y, et al., 2014, Study of droplet formation process during drop-on-demand inkjetting of living cell-laden bioink. Langmuir, 30: 9130–9138. https://doi.org/10.1021/la501430x

Gao T, Gillispie GJ, Copus JS, et al., 2018, Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: A systematic approach. Biofabrication, 10: 034106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7

Zhang S, Li G, Man J, et al., 2020, Fabrication of microspheres from high-viscosity bioink using a novel microfluidic-based 3D bioprinting nozzle. Micromachines (Basel), 11: 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070681

Skardal A, Zhang J, Prestwich GD, 2010, Bioprinting vessel-like constructs using hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates. Biomaterials, 31: 6173–6181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.045

Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, et al., 2017, Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 1601451. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451

Lim W, Kim GJ, Kim HW, et al., 2020, Kappa-carrageenan-based dual crosslinkable bioink for extrusion type bioprinting. Polymers (Basel), 12: 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102377

Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low‐viscosity bioink. Adv Mater, 28: 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310

Zhou K, Sun Y, Yang J, et al., 2022, Hydrogels for 3D embedded bioprinting: A focused review on bioinks and support baths. J Mater Chem B, 10: 1897–1907. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02554f

Hoch E, Tovar GE, Borchers K, 2014, Bioprinting of artificial blood vessels: current approaches towards a demanding goal. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 46: 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu242

Xing HA, Yz A, Ms A, et al., 2021, A highly biocompatible bio-ink for 3D hydrogel scaffolds fabrication in the presence of living cells by two-photon polymerization. Eur Polym, 153: 110505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110505

Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al., 2014, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials, 35: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078

Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al., 2018, Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10: 26859–26869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b06607

Deo KA, Singh KA, Peak CW, et al. 2020, Bioprinting 101: Design, fabrication, and evaluation of cell-laden 3D bioprinted scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26: 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0298

Wu J, Hu C, Tang Z, et al., 2018, Tissue-engineered vascular grafts: Balance of the four major requirements. Colloid Interface Sci Commun, 23: 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2018.01.005

Sarkar S, Salacinski HJ, Hamilton G, et al., 2006, The mechanical properties of infrainguinal vascular bypass grafts: Their role in influencing patency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 31: 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.01.006

Zhang Y, Yu Y, Ozbolat IT, 2013, Direct bioprinting of vessel-like tubular microfluidic channels. J Nanotechnol Eng Med, 4: 020902. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024398

Liu Y, Li Z, Li J, et al., 2020, Stiffness-mediated mesenchymal stem cell fate decision in 3D-bioprinted hydrogels. Burns Trauma, 8: tkaa029. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa029

Lin CH, Su JJ, Lee SY, et al. 2018, Stiffness modification of photopolymerizable gelatin-methacrylate hydrogels influences endothelial differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 12: 2099–2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2745

Ogle ME, Doron G, Levy MJ, et al., 2020, Hydrogel culture surface stiffness modulates mesenchymal stromal cell secretome and alters senescence. Tissue Eng Part A, 26: 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0030

Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al., 2006, Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 126: 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044

Yi B, Shen Y, Tang H, et al., 2020, Stiffness of the aligned fibers affects structural and functional integrity of the oriented endothelial cells. Acta Biomater, 108: 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.022

Liu P, Tu J, Wang W, et al., 2022, Effects of mechanical stress stimulation on function and expression mechanism of osteoblasts. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 830722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.830722

Matthews BD, Overby DR, Mannix R, et al., 2006, Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: Role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. J Cell Sci, 119: 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02760

Yang Y, Beqaj S, Kemp P, et al., 2000, Stretch-induced alternative splicing of serum response factor promotes bronchial myogenesis and is defective in lung hypoplasia. J Clin Invest, 106: 1321–1330. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci8893

Sonam S, Sathe SR, Yim EK, et al., 2016, Cell contractility arising from topography and shear flow determines human mesenchymal stem cell fate. Sci Rep, 6: 20415. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20415

Liang Y, Zhen X, Wang K, et al., 2017, Folic acid attenuates cobalt chloride-induced pge2 production in huvecs via the no/hif-1alpha/cox-2 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 490: 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.079

Ogura Y, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA, 2006, The inflammasome: First line of the immune response to cell stress. Cell, 126: 659–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.002

Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, et al., 2009, Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell, 5: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016

Young AT, White OC, Daniele MA, 2020, Rheological properties of coordinated physical gelation and chemical crosslinking in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Macromol Biosci, 20: e2000183. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000183

Marga F, Jakab K, Khatiwala C, et al., 2012, Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication, 4: 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/2/022001

Gentile C, Lim KS, Vozzi G, 2021, Editorial: 3D bioprinting of vascularized tissues for in vitro and in vivo applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9: 754124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.754124

Shinohara S, Kihara T, Sakai S, et al., 2013, Fabrication of in vitro three-dimensional multilayered blood vessel model using human endothelial and smooth muscle cells and high-strength PEG hydrogel. J Biosci Bioeng, 116: 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.02.013

Moore KH, Murphy HA, George EM, 2021, The glycocalyx: A central regulator of vascular function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 320: R508–R518. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00340.2020

Xu Y, Hu Y, Liu C, et al., 2018, A novel strategy for creating tissue-engineered biomimetic blood vessels using 3D bioprinting technology. Materials (Basel), 11: 1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091581

Stanton M, Samitier J, Sanchez SJ, 2015, Bioprinting of 3D hydrogels. Lab Chip, 15: 3111–3115. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC90069G

Rees A, Powell LC, Chinga-Carrasco G, et al., 2015, 3D Bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. Biomed Res Int, 2015: 925757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925757

Sakai T, Matsunaga T, Yamamoto Y, et al., 2008, Design and fabrication of a high-strength hydrogel with ideally homogeneous network structure from tetrahedron-like macromonomers. Macromolecules, 41: 5379–5384. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma800476x

Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, et al., 2018, An introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and future aspects. Materials (Basel), 11: 2199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112199

Kim P, Yuan A, Nam KH, et al., 2014, Fabrication of poly(ethylene glycol): gelatin methacrylate composite nanostructures with tunable stiffness and degradation for vascular tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 6: 024112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024112

Li X, Liu X, Josey B, et al., 2014, Short laminin peptide for improved neural stem cell growth. Stem Cell Transl Med, 3: 662–670. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2013-0015

Yamaoka T, Tabata Y, Ikada Y, 1994, Distribution and tissue uptake of poly(ethylene glycol) with different molecular weights after intravenous administration to mice. J Pharm Sci, 83: 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600830432

Peak CW, Singh KA, Adlouni M, et al, 2019, Printing therapeutic proteins in 3D using nanoengineered bioink to control and direct cell migration. Adv Healthc Mater, 8: e1801553. https://doi.org10.1002/adhm.201801553

Choi YJ, Park H, Ha DH, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of in vitro models using hydrogel-based bioinks. Polymers (Basel), 13: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030366

Thanh TN, Laowattanatham N, Ratanavaraporn J, et al., 2022, Hyaluronic acid crosslinked with alginate hydrogel: A versatile and biocompatible bioink platform for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J, 166: 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111027

Lafuente-Merchan M, Ruiz-Alonso S, Espona-Noguera A, et al., 2021, Development, characterization and sterilisation of nanocellulose-alginate-(hyaluronic acid)-bioinks and 3D bioprinted scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 126: 112160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112160

Zhang T, Zhao W, Xiahou Z, et al., 2021, Bioink design for extrusion-based bioprinting. Appl Mater Today, 25: 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101227

Petta D, D’Amora U, Ambrosio L, et al. 2020, Hyaluronic acid as a bioink for extrusion-based 3D printing. Biofabrication, 12: 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8752

Oliveira H, Médina C, Stachowicz ML, et al., 2021, Extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived bioinks designed to foster vasculogenesis and neurite outgrowth: Characterization and bioprinting. Bioprinting, 22: e00134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00134

Noh I, Kim N, Tran HN, et al., 2019, 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res, 23: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0152-8

Xu L, Varkey M, Jorgensen A, et al., 2020, Bioprinting small diameter blood vessel constructs with an endothelial and smooth muscle cell bilayer in a single step. Biofabrication, 12: 045012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2b6

Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al., 2017, Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124: 106–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042

Zhao L, Lee VK, Yoo SS, et al., 2012, The integration of 3-D cell printing and mesoscopic fluorescence molecular tomography of vascular constructs within thick hydrogel scaffolds. Biomaterials, 33: 5325–5332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.004

Thomas A, Orellano I, Lam T, et al., 2020, Vascular bioprinting with enzymatically degradable bioinks via multi-material projection-based stereolithography. Acta Biomater, 117: 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.033

Lu D, Zeng Z, Geng Z, et al., 2022, Macroporous methacrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel with different pore sizes for in vitro and in vivo evaluation of vascularization. Biomed Mater, 17: 025006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac494b

Lee J, Lee SH, Kim BS, et al., 2018, Development and evaluation of hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bio-ink for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 15: 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0144-8

Kesti M, Müller M, Becher J, et al. 2015, A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomater, 11: 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033

Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, De Ruijter M, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One, 12: e0177628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628

Ouyang L, Armstrong JPK, Lin Y, et al., 2020, Expanding and optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary network bioinks. Sci Adv, 6: 035045. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc5529

Petta D, Armiento AR, Grijpma D, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic-and visible light-crosslinking. Biofabrication, 10: 044104. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aadf58

Thakur A, Jaiswal MK, Peak, CW, et al., 2016, Injectable shear-thinning nanoengineered hydrogels for stem cell delivery. Nanoscale, 8: 12362–12372. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR02299E

Li C, Han X, Ma Z, et al., 2022, Engineered customizable microvessels for progressive vascularization in large regenerative implants. Adv Healthc Mater, 11: e2101836. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202101836

Zhu J, 2010, Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 31: 4639–4656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044

Aisenbrey EA, Bryant S, 2016, Mechanical loading inhibits hypertrophy in chondrogenically differentiating hmscs within a biomimetic hydrogel. J Mater Chem B, 4: 3562–3574. https://doi.org.10.1039/C6TB00006A

Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA, 2015, Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27: 5075–5079. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501234

Rodell CB, Kaminski AL, Burdick JA, 2013, Rational design of network properties in guest-host assembled and shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 14: 4125–4134. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm401280z

Jlab C, Yza B, Jeabd E, et al., 2021, Bioactive nanoparticle reinforced alginate/gelatin bioink for the maintenance of stem cell stemness. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 126: 112193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112193

Rodell CB, MacArthur JW, Dorsey SM, et al., 2015, Shear-thinning supramolecular hydrogels with secondary autonomous covalent crosslinking to modulate viscoelastic properties in vivo. Adv Funct Mater, 25: 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201403550

Loebel C, Rodell CB, Chen MH, et al., 2017, Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing. Nat Protoc, 12: 1521–1541. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.053

Maxson EL, Young MD, Noble C, et al., 2019, In vivo remodeling of a 3D-Bioprinted tissue engineered heart valve scaffold. Bioprinting, 16: e00059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00059

Alexander B, Daulton TL, Genin GM, et al., 2012, The nanometre-scale physiology of bone: Steric modelling and scanning transmission electron microscopy of collagen-mineral structure. J R Soc Interface, 9: 1774–1786. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0880

Włodarczyk-Biegun MK, Del Campo A, 2017, 3D bioprinting of structural proteins. Biomaterials, 134: 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.019

Gaudet ID, Shreiber DI, 2012, Characterization of methacrylated Type-I collagen as a dynamic, photoactive hydrogel. Biointerphases, 7: 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13758-012-0025-y

Ryan AJ, Gleeson JP, Matsiko A, et al., 2015, Effect of different hydroxyapatite incorporation methods on the structural and biological properties of porous collagen scaffolds for bone repair. J Anat, 227: 732–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12262

Murphy CM, Matsiko A, Haugh MG, et al., 2012, Mesenchymal stem cell fate is regulated by the composition and mechanical properties of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 11: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.11.009

Muthusamy S, Kannan S, Lee M, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting and microscale organization of vascularized tissue constructs using collagen-based bioink. Biotechnol Bioeng, 118: 3150–3163. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27838

Hsu S, Jamieson AM, 1993, Viscoelastic behaviour at the thermal sol-gel transition of gelatin. Polymer, 34: 2602–2608. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(93)90596-3

Zhang J, Qiao C, Ma X, et al., 2017, Effect of salts on the thermal stability of physically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels. Polym Korea, 41: 702–708. https://doi.org/10.7317/pk.2017.41.4.702

Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, et al., 2000, Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 1: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm990017d

Loessner D, Meinert C, Kaemmerer E, et al., 2016, Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl-based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms. Nat Protoc, 11: 727–746. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.037

Wang Z, Jin X, Dai R, et al., 2016, An ultrafast hydrogel photocrosslinking method for direct laser bioprinting. RSC Adv, 6: 21099–21104. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA24910D

Sk MM, Das P, Panwar A, et al., 2021, Synthesis and characterization of site selective photo-crosslinkable glycidyl methacrylate functionalized gelatin-based 3D hydrogel scaffold for liver tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 123: 111694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111694

Fedorovich NE, Oudshoorn MH, van Geemen D, et al., 2009, The effect of photopolymerization on stem cells embedded in hydrogels. Biomaterials, 30: 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.037

Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF, 2002, Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 54: 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00240-x

Rouillard AD, Berglund CM, Lee JY, et al., 2011, Methods for photocrosslinking alginate hydrogel scaffolds with high cell viability. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 17: 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0582

Camci-Unal G, Cuttica D, Annabi N, et al., 2013, Synthesis and characterization of hybrid hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 14: 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm3019856

Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday LA, et al., 2014, Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater, 10: 1836–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.005

Fan Y, Yue Z, Lucarelli E, et al., 2020, Hybrid printing using cellulose nanocrystals reinforced GelMA/HAMA hydrogels for improved structural integration. Adv Healthc Mater, 9: e2001410. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001410

Mouser VH, Levato R, Mensinga A, et al., 2020, Bio-ink development for three-dimensional bioprinting of hetero-cellular cartilage constructs. Connect Tissue Res, 61: 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2018.1553960

Nguyen AK, Goering PL, Elespuru RK, et al., 2020, The photoinitiator lithium phenyl (2,4,6-Trimethylbenzoyl) phosphinate with exposure to 405 nm light is cytotoxic to mammalian cells but not mutagenic in bacterial reverse mutation assays. Polymer (Basel), 12: 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071489

Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10: 6849–6857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16059

Kirsch M, Birnstein L, Pepelanova I, et al., 2019, Gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) formulated with human platelet lysate supports mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation and enhances the hydrogel’s mechanical properties. Bioengineering (Basel), 6: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030076

Wüst S, Godla ME, Müller R, et al., 2014, Tunable hydrogel composite with two-step processing in combination with innovative hardware upgrade for cell-based three-dimensional bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10: 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.016

Jin Q, Jin G, Ju J, et al., 2022, Bioprinting small-diameter vascular vessel with endothelium and smooth muscle by the approach of two-step crosslinking process. Biotechnol Bioeng, 119: 1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28075

Bupphathong S, Quiroz, C, Huang, W, et al., 2022, Gelatin methacrylate hydrogel for tissue engineering applications-a review on material modifications. Pharmaceuticals, 15: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15020171

Cui H, Zhu W, Huang Y, et al., 2019, In vitro and in vivo evaluation of 3D bioprinted small-diameter vasculature with smooth muscle and endothelium. Biofabrication, 12: 015004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab402c

Ruther F, Distler T, Boccaccini AR, et al., 2018, Biofabrication of vessel-like structures with alginate di-aldehyde-gelatin (ADA-GEL) bioink. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30: 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6205-7

Zhuang P, Ng WL, An J, et al., 2019, Layer-by-layer ultraviolet assisted extrusion-based (UAE) bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with high aspect ratio for soft tissue engineering applications. PLoS One, 12: e0216776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216776

Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF, 2011, An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials, 32: 3233–3243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057

Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, et al., 2018, Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: A game changer for bioink manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol, 36: 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003

Li C, Zheng Z, Jia J, et al., 2022, Preparation and characterization of photocurable composite extracellular matrix-methacrylated hyaluronic acid bioink. J Mater Chem B, 10: 4242–4253. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb00548d

Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al., 2014, Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun, 5: 3935. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935

Wolf MT, Daly KA, Brennan-Pierce EP, et al., 2012, A hydrogel derived from decellularized dermal extracellular matrix. Biomaterials, 33: 7028–7038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.051

Bilozur ME, Hay ED, 1988, Neural crest migration in 3D extracellular matrix utilizes laminin, fibronectin, or collagen. Dev Biol, 125: 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(88)90055-3

Asakura A, Komaki M, Rudnicki M, 2001, Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation, 68: 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680412.x

Czyz J, Wobus A, 2001, Embryonic stem cell differentiation: the role of extracellular factors. Differentiation, 68: 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680404.x

Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W, et al., 2019, Bioprinting of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models. Biofabrication, 11: 025003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aafc49

Schmidt SK, Schmid R, Arkudas A, et al., 2019, Tumor cells develop defined cellular phenotypes after 3D-bioprinting in different bioinks. Cells, 8: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/cels8101295l

Shin YJ, Shafranek RT, Tsui JH, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac decellularized extracellular matrix. Acta Biomaterialia, 119: 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.006

Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, et al., 2012, Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication, 4: 035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005

Budharaju H, Zennifer A, Sethuraman S, et al., 2022, Designer DNA biomolecules as a defined biomaterial for 3D bioprinting applications. Mater Horiz, 9: 1141–1166. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1mh01632f

Nagahara S, Matsuda TJ, 1996, Hydrogel formation via hybridization of oligonucleotides derivatized in water-soluble vinyl polymers. Polym Gels Netw, 4: 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-7822(96)00001-9

Gelinsky M, 2018, Biopolymer Hydrogel Bioinks. Netherlands: Elsevier. p.125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101103-4.00008-9

Wu Y, Li C, Boldt F, et al., 2014, Programmable protein- DNA hybrid hydrogels for the immobilization and release of functional proteins. Chem Commun (Camb), 50: 14620–1462. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc07144a

Li C, Faulkner-Jones A, Dun AR, et al., 2015, Rapid formation of a supramolecular polypeptide-DNA hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 54: 3957–3961. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201411383

Yang L, Dun AR, Martin KJ, et al., 2012, Secretory vesicles are preferentially targeted to areas of low molecular SNARE density. PLoS One, 7: e49514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049514

Pérez-Ortín JE, Tordera V, Chávez S, 2019, Homeostasis in the Central Dogma of molecular biology: The importance of mRNA instability. RNA Biol, 16: 1659–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2019.1655352

Park N, Kahn JS, Rice EJ, et al., 2009, High-yield cell-free protein production from P-gel. Nat Protoc, 4: 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.174

De Melo BA, Jodat YA, Cruz EM, et al., 2020, Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues. Acta Biomater, 117: 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.024

Zhao N, Suzuki A, Zhang X, et al., 2019, Dual aptamer-functionalized in situ injectable fibrin hydrogel for promotion of angiogenesis via codelivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11: 18123–18132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b02462

Murphy KC, Whitehead J, Zhou D, et al., 2017, Engineering fibrin hydrogels to promote the wound healing potential of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids. Acta Biomater, 64: 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.007

Freeman S, Ramos R, Alexis Chando P, et al., 2019, A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs. Acta Biomater, 95: 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.052

Li L, Qin S, Peng J, et al., 2020, Engineering gelatin-based alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D printing of vessel constructs. Int J Biol Macromol, 145: 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.174

Hickson TG, Polson A, 1968, Some physical characteristics of the agarose molecule. Biochim Biophys Acta, 165: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(68)90186-4

Gadjanski I, Yodmuang S, Spiller K, et al., 2013, Supplementation of exogenous adenosine 5’-triphosphate enhances mechanical properties of 3D cell-agarose constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 19: 2188–2200. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0352

López-Marcial GR, Zeng AY, Osuna C, et al., 2018, Agarose-based hydrogels as suitable bioprinting materials for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 4: 3610–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00903

Forget A, Derme T, Mitterberger D, et al., 2019, Architecture-inspired paradigm for 3D bioprinting of vessel-like structures using extrudable carboxylated agarose hydrogels. Emerg Mater, 2: 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-019-00045-5

Sharma C, Bhardwaj NK, 2019, Bacterial nanocellulose: Present status, biomedical applications and future perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 104: 109963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109963

Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, et al., 2011, Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 50: 5438–5466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273

Da Gama FM, Dourado F, 2018, Bacterial nanocellulose: What future? Bioimpacts, 8: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.15171/bi.2018.01

Di Biase M, De Leonardis P, Castelletto V, et al., 2011, Photopolymerization of pluronic F127 diacrylate: A colloid-templated polymerization. Soft Matter, 7: 4928–4937. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SM05095H

Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater, 25: 5011–5028. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042

Bohorquez M, Koch C, Trygstad T, et al., 1999, A study of the temperature-dependent micellization of pluronic F127. J Colloid Interface Sci, 216:34–40. doi.org/10.1006/ jcis.1999.6273

Liu Y, Zhang Y, Jiang W, et al., 2019, A novel biodegradable multilayered bioengineered vascular construct with a curved structure and multi-branches. Micromachines (Basel), 10: 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10040275

O’Connell CD, Konate S, Onofrillo C, et al., 2020, Free-form co-axial bioprinting of a gelatin methacryloyl bio-ink by direct in situ photo-crosslinking during extrusion. Bioprinting, 19: e00087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00087

Chen Y, Xiong X, Liu X, et al., 2020, 3d bioprinting of shear-thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based gels. J Mater Chem B, 8: 5500–5514. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB00060D

Müller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, et al., 2015, Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 7: 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006

Millik SC, Dostie AM, Karis DG, et al., 2019, 3D printed coaxial nozzles for the extrusion of hydrogel tubes toward modeling vascular endothelium. Biofabrication, 11: 045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab2b4d

Selmi TA, Verdonk P, Chambat P, et al., 2008, Autologous chondrocyte implantation in a novel alginate-agarose hydrogel: Outcome at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90: 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b5.20360

Remminghorst U, Rehm BH, 2006, Bacterial alginates: From biosynthesis to applications. Biotechnol Lett, 28: 1701–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9156-x

Kang SM, Lee JH, Huh YS, et al., 2021, Alginate microencapsulation for three-dimensional in vitro cell culture. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 7: 2864–2879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00457

Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater, 28: 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310

Gao Q, Liu Z, Lin Z, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting of vessel-like structures with multilevel fluidic channels. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 3: 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00643

Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials, 106: 58–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038

Zhang Y, Yu Y, Akkouch A, et al., 2015, In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomater Sci, 3: 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4bm00234b

Jang EH, Kim JH, Lee JH, et al., 2020, Enhanced biocompatibility of multi-layered, 3D bio-printed artificial vessels composed of autologous mesenchymal stem cells. Polymers (Basel), 12: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030538

Karen D, Yuki H, Kazuomori KL, et al., 2016, Dual-stage crosslinking of a gel-phase bioink improves cell viability and homogeneity for 3D bioprintin. Adv Healthcare Mater, 5: 2488–2492. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600636

Tao J, Jose GM, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 6: 011310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393

Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting: From benches to translational applications. Small, 15: e1805510. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805510

Kalyani S, Kawal R, 2022, Could 3D extrusion bioprinting serve to be a real alternative to organ transplantation in the future? Ann 3D Print Med, 7: 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100066

Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, et al., 2009, Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials, 30: 5910–5917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034

Park SJ, Lee J, Jae WC, et al., 2021, Additive manufacturing of the core template for the fabrication of an artificial blood vessel: The relationship between the extruded deposition diameter and the filament/nozzle transition ratio. Mater Sci Eng C, 118: 111406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111406

Trujillo S, Seow M, Lueckgen A, et al., 2021, Dynamic mechanical control of alginate-fibronectin hydrogels with dual crosslinking: Covalent and ionic. Polymers (Basel), 13: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030433

Li XD, Liu BX, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120: 10793–10833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008

Bogala MR, 2022, Three-dimensional (3D) printing of hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds: A review. Bioprinting, 28: e00244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00244

Arai K, Iwanaga S, Toda H, et al., 2011, Three-dimensional inkjet biofabrication based on designed images. Biofabrication, 3: 034113. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034113

Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2021, Controlling droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: Key factors to achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8: 424. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424

Lee JM, Zhou MM, Chen YW, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization-based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12: 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034

Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent advances in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat polymerization-based 3D printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 9: e2000156. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156

Joanna I, Marina V, Alessia P, et al., 2021, Alginate-based tissue-specific bioinks for multi-material 3D-bioprinting of pancreatic islets and blood vessels: A step towards vascularized pancreas grafts. Bioprinting, 24: e00163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00163

Costa PF, Hugo JA, John EAL, et al., 2017, Mimicking arterial thrombosis in a 3D-printed microfluidic in vitro vascular model based on computed tomography angiography data. Lab Chip, 17: 2785–2792. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC00202E

Han X, Courseaus J, Khamassi J, et al., 2018, Optimized vascular network by stereolithography for tissue engineered skin. Int J Bioprint, 4: 134. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v4i2.134

Bhatia SK, Sharma S, 2014, 3D-printed prosthetics roll off the presses. Chem Eng Prog, 110: 28–33.

Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis JA, 2011, Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv Mater, 23: H178–H183. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004625

Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, et al., 2015, Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv, 1: e1500758. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758

Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science, 365: 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051