Clinicopathological characteristics and survival by BRCA status in ovarian cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
Introduction: Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations are implicated in ovarian cancer biology and may influence tumor phenotype, treatment response, and prognosis.
Objective: To compare clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between BRCA-mutated and BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer patients in a multicenter cohort.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included ovarian cancer patients who underwent BRCA1/2 testing at three hospitals in China from January 2018 to December 2024. Clinicopathological variables were compared between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: Among 316 patients, 117 (37.0%) had BRCA mutations and 199 (63.0%) were BRCA wild-type. BRCA-mutated patients had a higher proportion with serous histology (94.9% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.032) and a more frequent use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (47.9% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.001). They also had lower crude recurrence (49.6% vs. 73.4%, p < 0.001) and mortality rates (28.2% vs. 44.2%, p = 0.006). After adjustment, BRCA mutation status was not independently associated with DFS or OS. Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bilateral tumors, and residual disease > 1 cm were independently associated with shorter DFS, whereas use of a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor was associated with longer DFS. Advanced FIGO stage was associated with worse OS, while PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy was associated with longer OS.
Conclusion: BRCA-mutated patients showed better crude outcomes, but the survival difference was attenuated after multivariable Cox adjustment. BRCA testing remains valuable for guiding individualized maintenance therapy.
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
- Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2
- Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(4):733-747. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.011
- Lord CJ, Ashworth A. BRCAness revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(2):110-120. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2015.21
- Yoshida R. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis. Breast Cancer. 2021;28(6):1167-1180. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2
- Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434(7035):917-921. doi: 10.1038/nature03445
- Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005;434(7035):913-917. doi: 10.1038/nature03443
- Konstantinopoulos PA, Norquist B, Lacchetti C, et al. Germline and somatic tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(11):1222- 1245. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02960
- Vergote I, González-Martín A, Ray-Coquard I, et al. European experts consensus: BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency testing in first-line ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(3):276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.013
- Norquist BM, Brady MF, Harrell MI, et al. Mutations in homologous recombination genes and outcomes in ovarian carcinoma patients in GOG 218: an NRG Oncology/ Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(4):777-783. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1327
- Bolton KL, Chenevix-Trench G, Goh C, et al. Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2012;307(4):382-390. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.20
- Wang Y, Li N, Ren Y, Zhao J. Association of BRCA1/2 mutations with prognosis and surgical cytoreduction outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48(9):2270-2284. doi: 10.1111/jog.15326
- Marchetti C, Ataseven B, Perrone AM, et al. Clinical characteristics and survival outcome of early-stage, high-grade, serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma according to BRCA mutational status. Gynecol Oncol. 2024;187:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.008
- du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harter P, Ray- Coquard I, Pfisterer J. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of three prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials. Cancer. 2009;115(6):1234-1244. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24149
- Chang SJ, Bristow RE. Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: redefining optimal residual disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(2):483- 492. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.024
- Horowitz NS, Miller A, Rungruang B, et al. Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(8):937-943. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3106
- Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2495-2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858
- DiSilvestro P, Banerjee S, Colombo N, et al. Overall survival with maintenance olaparib at a 7-year follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation: the SOLO1/GOG 3004 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(3):609-617. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01549
- Ray-Coquard I, Pautier P, Pignata S, et al. Olaparib plus bevacizumab as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2416-2428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911361
- González-Martín A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, et al. Niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2391-2402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910962
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474(7353):609-615. doi: 10.1038/nature10166
- Denkert C, Romey M, Swedlund B, et al. Homologous Recombination Deficiency as an Ovarian Cancer Biomarker in a Real-World Cohort: Validation of Decentralized Genomic Profiling. J Mol Diagn. 2022;24(12):1254-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.09.004
- Kim SI, Lee M, Kim HS, et al. Effect of BRCA mutational status on survival outcome in advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0511-7
- Glajzer J, Castillo-Tong DC, Richter R, et al. Impact of BRCA Mutation Status on Tumor Dissemination Pattern, Surgical Outcome and Patient Survival in Primary and Recurrent High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study by the Ovarian Cancer Therapy- Innovative Models Prolong Survival (OCTIPS) Consortium. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(1):35-45.doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12459-3
- Trifanescu OG, Mitrica RI, Gales LN, et al. Validation of a New Prognostic Score in Patients with Ovarian Adenocarcinoma. Medicina. 2023;59(2):229. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020229
- Coleman RL, Fleming GF, Brady MF, et al. Veliparib with first-line chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2403-2415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909707
- Monk BJ, Parkinson C, Lim MC, et al. A randomized, phase III trial to evaluate rucaparib monotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(34):3952-3964. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01003
- Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(5):391-400. doi: 10.1038/nrd1381
- Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(26):2473-2483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104390
- Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(26):2484-2496. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103799
- Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):943-953. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806
- Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: CHORUS trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249- 257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
- Dion L, Carton I, Jaillard S, et al. The landscape and therapeutic implications of molecular profiles in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):2239. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072239
- Grisham RN, Slomovitz BM, Andrews N, et al. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(9):1331-1344. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004610
- Vineyard MA, Daniels MS, Urbauer DL, et al. Is low-grade serous ovarian cancer part of the tumor spectrum of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(2):229-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.033
