AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO026080091
Cite this article
2
Download
18
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Analysis of risk factors after three-dimensional brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A real-world study

Haonan Han1,2† Dongmin Liu3† Chengwu Zhang4 Yuan Dong1,2 Pan Qi1,2 Siyang Zhang1,2 Liming Xu3,5* Xiaofeng Yao1,2*
Show Less
1 Department of Plastic Surgery, Xiangyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiangyang Hospital affiliated to Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, China
2 Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Integrative Medicine in Cancer Green Therapy, Xiangyang, Hubei, China
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
4 Plastic Surgery Department, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 20 February 2026 | Revised: 29 April 2026 | Accepted: 3 June 2026 | Published online: 22 June 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a common malignancy of the female reproductive system. This study retrospectively analyzed cervical cancer patients treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy (3D-BT) to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy dose, treatment fractions, and combined therapeutic modalities on prognosis.

Objectives: To identify prognostic factors associated with treatment efficacy and provide evidence for individualized treatment strategies.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data from cervical cancer patients treated with 3D-BT at Tianjin Cancer Hospital and Xiangyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were collected. Variables included radiotherapy dose, treatment fractions, and combined treatment modalities. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed using R and SPSS to identify prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes.

Results: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy plus hyperthermia, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, immunotherapy plus hyperthermia, and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (all p < 0.001). Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.436, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.227–0.839, p = 0.013) and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.106, 95% CI: 0.013–0.837, p = 0.033) were associated with reduced overall survival (OS) risk. A total brachytherapy dose > 2,800 cGy (HR: 0.177, 95% CI: 0.041–0.771, p = 0.021) and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy (HR: 0.186, 95% CI: 0.055–0.630, p = 0.007) were independently associated with improved PFS. More than four brachytherapy fractions were also associated with better PFS.

Conclusion: Higher brachytherapy doses (>2,800 cGy) and certain combination strategies, particularly concurrent chemoradiotherapy with hyperthermia, were associated with improved PFS and OS. However, the absence of key prognostic variables limits interpretation, and prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords
Cervical cancer
Three-dimensional brachytherapy
Radiotherapy
Prognostic correlates
Treatment modalities
Funding
This study is funded by Demonstration Project 2025 for Reform and High-Quality Development of National Public Hospitals (Informal Letter for Public Hospital Reform and Department of Institutional Reform, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China [2025] No. 3).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Ngu SF, Cheung ANY, Jong KK, et al. 2024 Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guidelines for cervical cancer prevention and screening. Hong Kong Med J. 2024; doi: 10.12809/hkmj2411547

 

  1. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Arend R, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2023;21(12):1224-1233. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062

 

  1. Vu M, Yu J, Awolude OA, Chuang L. Cervical cancer worldwide. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42(5):457-465. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.06.003

 

  1. Grce M, Musa J, Achenbach CJ, et al. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924

 

  1. Lei J, Ploner A, Elfström KM, et al. HPV Vaccination and the Risk of Invasive Cervical Cancer. New Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1340-1348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917338

 

  1. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;2(1). doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-35

 

  1. Vieira-Serna S, Viveros-Carreño D, Rodríguez J, et al. Preoperative brachytherapy for early-stage cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;169:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.009

 

  1. Castelnau-Marchand P, Chargari C, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R. Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: recent advances and perspectives. Curr Opin Oncol. 2016;28(5):419-428. doi: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000309

 

  1. Li F, Lu S, Zhao H, Mu X, Mao Z. Three-dimensional image-guided combined intracavitary and interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer: A systematic review. Brachytherapy. 2021;20(1):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.007

 

  1. Mendez LC, Weiss Y, D’Souza D, Ravi A, Barbera L, Leung E. Three-dimensional-guided perineal-based interstitial brachytherapy in cervical cancer: A systematic review of technique, local control and toxicities. Radiother Oncol. 2017;123(2):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.03.005

 

  1. Suzumura EA, Gama LM, Jahn B, Campolina AG, Carvalho HdA, de Soárez PC. Effects of 3D image-guided brachytherapy compared to 2D conventional brachytherapy on clinical outcomes in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Brachytherapy. 2021;20(4):710-737. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.004

 

  1. Tang X, Mu X, Zhao Z, Zhao H, Mao Z. Dose–effect response in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Brachytherapy. 2020;19(4):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.02.012

 

  1. Horeweg N, Mittal P, Gradowska PL, Boere I, Chopra S, Nout RA. Adjuvant Systemic Therapy after Chemoradiation and Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 2021;13(8):1880. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081880

 

  1. Kilic C, Kimyon Comert G, Cakir C, et al. Recurrence pattern and prognostic factors for survival in cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(6):2175-2184. doi: 10.1111/jog.14762

 

  1. Gadducci A, Cosio S. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Review of the Literature and Perspectives of Clinical Research. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(9):4819-4828. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14485

 

  1. Ferrall L, Lin KY, Roden RBS, Hung C-F, Wu TC. Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(18):4953-4973. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-20-2833

 

  1. Van Der Zee J, Van Rhoon GC. Cervical cancer: Radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009;22(3):229-234. doi: 10.1080/02656730600722578

 

  1. Han H, Hou H, Qiu L, et al. Evaluating the impact of brachytherapy duration on therapeutic outcomes in patients with cervical cancer. ARNM. 2024;2(4):4310. doi: 10.36922/arnm.4310

 

  1. Tanderup K, Nesvacil N, Kirchheiner K, et al. Evidence- Based Dose Planning Aims and Dose Prescription in Image- Guided Brachytherapy Combined With Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020;30(4):311-327. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.05.008

 

  1. Sturdza AE, Knoth J. Image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer including fractionation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):273-280. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003056

 

  1. Schmid MP, Lindegaard JC, Mahantshetty U, et al. Risk Factors for Local Failure Following Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(10):1933-1942. doi: 10.1200/jco.22.01096

 

  1. Kim Y, Modrick JM, Pennington EC, Kim Y. Commissioning of a 3D image‐based treatment planning system for high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(2):405-426. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5818

 

  1. Goyal MK, Rai DV, Kehwar TS, et al. Anatomy‐based definition of point A utilizing three‐dimensional volumetric imaging approach for high‐dose‐rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy dose prescription when treating cervical cancer using limited resources. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(6):69-77. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6029

 

  1. Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Limbergen EV, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy—3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78(1):67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014

 

  1. Delgado D, Figueiredo A, Mendonça V, Jorge M, Abdulrehman M, de Pina M. Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2019;11(5):417- 422. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2019.88116

 

  1. Jiang P, Wei S, Bai Y, et al. The Efficacy of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Combined With Chemotherapy, Brachytherapy, and Local Hyperthermia on Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023;22. doi: 10.1177/15330338231185013

 

  1. Saito T, Murakami M, Sumiya T, et al. Multimodal treatment with chemoradiotherapy, regional hyperthermia and interstitial brachytherapy for a huge locally advanced cervical cancer: A case report. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2023;28:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100222

 

  1. Kunnummal M, Angelin M, Das AV. PIWI proteins and piRNAs in cervical cancer: a propitious dart in cancer stem cell-targeted therapy. Human Cell. 2021;34(6):1629-1641. doi: 10.1007/s13577-021-00590-4

 

  1. Ghosh S, Jayaram P, Kabekkodu SP, Satyamoorthy K. Targeted drug delivery in cervical cancer: Current perspectives. Eur J Pharmacol. 2022;917:174751. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174751

 

  1. Ye H, Chu X, Cao Z, et al. A Novel Targeted Therapy System for Cervical Cancer: Co-Delivery System of Antisense LncRNA of MDC1 and Oxaliplatin Magnetic Thermosensitive Cationic Liposome Drug Carrier. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:1051-1066. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S258316

 

  1. Monk BJ, Enomoto T, Kast WM, et al. Integration of immunotherapy into treatment of cervical cancer: Recent data and ongoing trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;106:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102385

 

  1. Yu L, Lanqing G, Huang Z, et al. T cell immunotherapy for cervical cancer: challenges and opportunities. Front Immunol. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1105265

 

  1. Gutiérrez-Hoya A, Soto-Cruz I. NK Cell Regulation in Cervical Cancer and Strategies for Immunotherapy. Cells. 2021;10(11):3104. doi: 10.3390/cells10113104

 

  1. Feng CH, Mell LK, Sharabi AB, McHale M, Mayadev JS. Immunotherapy With Radiotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020;30(4):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.05.003

 

  1. Yao S, Zhao L, Chen S, et al. Cervical cancer immune infiltration microenvironment identification, construction of immune scores, assisting patient prognosis and immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1135657

 

  1. Sherer MV, Kotha NV, Williamson C, Mayadev J. Advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer: recent developments and future directions. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):281- 287. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002492
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing