AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Volume 4 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2020.44540
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Two Different Antibody Clones of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) with Immunohistochemical Method on Various Tumors

Fatma Tokat1
Show Less
1 Department of Pathology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Faculty of Medicine, Pathology Maslak Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
EJMO 2020, 4(4), 299–303; https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2020.44540
Received: 23 August 2020 | Accepted: 2 October 2020 | Published online: 1 December 2020
© 2020 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Objectives: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the most important immune checkpoint protein in immune defense against tumors. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are considered an option in cancer treatments. The evaluation of PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining is used as a biomarker to determine the decision and response of the use ofthese inhibitory drugs. There is a wide variety of clones and platforms for the PD-L1 antibody, and each pathology department uses different clones and platforms which causes confusion. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the immunohistochemical staining of different clones in the same tumor.

Methods: Overall, 90 cases comprising 47 lung, 11 breast, 9 colon, 6 stomach, and 7 pancreatic carcinomas and 10 other tumors were included in the study. Of these, 43 specimens were obtained by resection, 40 by tru-cut biopsy, and 7 by endoscopic biopsy. Sections prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were evaluated immunohistochemically with SP142 and SP263 clones.

Results: In this study, we observed positive staining in 48.8% (n=44) and negative staining in 51.2% (n=46) among all cancers with SP263 clone, and positive staining in 33.3% (n=30) and negative staining in 66.7% with SP142 clone as well. This study also showed that compared to SP263, SP142 clone stained tumor cells less in lung, colon, stomach, pancreatic, and other carcinomas.

Conclusion: In this study, we found different staining percentages for SP263 and SP142 in the same tumor. Pathologists conducting immunohistochemical studies for PD-L1 should indicate the staining percentages of tumors and the antibody clone they used in the reports. Meanwhile, oncologists should keep in mind which clone was stained, and that selecting SP142 is less positive to correct patients who can receive appropriate immunotherapy.

Keywords
Cancer
immunohistochemistry
staining
stomach
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References

1.Gong J, Chehrazi-Raffle A, Reddi S, Salgia R. Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive rewiew of registration trials and future considerrations. J Immunother Cancer 2018;6:8.

2. Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol 2007;8:239–45.

3. Parra ER, Villalobos P, Mino B, Rodriguez-Canales J. Comparison of different antibody clones for immunohistochemistry detection of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2018;26:83–93.

4. Fujimoto D, Sato Y, Uehara K, Ishida K, Fukuoka J, Morimoto T, et al. Predictive performance of four programmed cell death ligand 1 assay systems on nivolumab response in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017;13:377–86

5. Sznol M, Chen L. Antagonist antibodies to PD-1 and B7-H1 (PD-L1) in the treatment of advanced human cancer-response. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:1021–34.

6. Scheel AH, Dietel M, Heukamp LC, Jöhrens K, Kirchner T, Reu S, et al. Harmonized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for pulmoner squamous-cell and adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 2016;29:1165–72.

7. Hirsch FR, McElhinny A, Stanforth D, Ranger-Moore J, Jansson M, Kulangara K, et al. PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry assays for lung cancer: results from phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 IHC Assay Comparison Project. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:208–22.

8. Brunnström H, Johansson A, Westbom-Fremer S, Backman M, Djureinovic D, Patthey A, et al. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in clinical diagnostic of lung cancer: inter-pathologist variability is higher than assay variability. Modern Pathology 2017;30:1411–21.

9. Buttner R, Gosney JR, Skov BG, Adam J, Motoi N, Bloom KJ, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry testing: a review of analytical assays and clinical implementation in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3687–876.

10. Tsao MS, Kerr K, Kockx M, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Botling J, et al. PD-L1 immunohistochmistry comparability study in real-life clinical samples: results of blueprint phase 2 project. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1302–11.

11. Ratcliffe MJ, Sharpe A, Midha A, Barker C, Scott M, Scorer P, et al. Agreement between programmed cell death ligand-1 diagnostic assay across multiple protein expression cutoffs in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:3581–91.

12. Rimm DL, Han G, Taube JM, Yi ES, Bridge JA, Flieder DB, et al. A prospective, multi-institutional, pathologist-based assessment of 4 immunohistochemistry assays for PD-L1 expression in non-small lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1051–8.

13. Adam J, Rouquette I, Damotte D, Badoual C, Danel C, Damiola F, et al. PL04a.04: Multicentric French harmonization study for PD-L1 IHC testing in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:11–2.

Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing