AccScience Publishing / CP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/CP025480081
Cite this article
6
Download
236
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Real-world risk assessment of drug-induced cytokine release syndrome: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

Qiong Guo1 Weipeng Li1 Huafeng Li1 Niuniu Bai1 Yayu Huo1 Hongxia Zhao1*
Show Less
1 Department of Pharmaceutical, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
Received: 24 November 2025 | Revised: 25 June 2026 | Accepted: 10 July 2026 | Published online: 22 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a potentially life-threatening systemic inflammatory reaction associated with immunotherapies and other medications, yet its risk profile across marketed drugs remains poorly characterized. This study aims to evaluate the risk of drug-induced CRS using real-world data, thereby providing valuable insights for clinical medication safety assessment. We employed reporting odds ratios to assess the disproportionality in reports of drug-induced CRS from January 2004 to December 2024. Using univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate regression analyses, we explored drugs associated with CRS, and the area under the curve was used to evaluate model performance. We collected a total of 13,499 reports. According to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents were associated with the highest number of drug-related CRS cases (n = 12,759). Drug signal detection revealed that axicabtagene ciloleucel was linked to most CRS events (n = 3,389). Furthermore, among the top 50 drugs implicated in CRS, the prescribing information for 38 of them did not mention any association with CRS. Our findings demonstrate that antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents are the main drugs associated with CRS. A total of 18 drugs were identified as independent risk factors for drug-induced CRS. Alarmingly, most high-risk drugs lack relevant CRS warnings in their package leaflets. Clinicians should strengthen clinical monitoring for these medications, especially within one month after administration. Updated safety labeling and further relevant research are also required to ensure the safety of clinical medications.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Cytokine release syndrome
Immunotherapy
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell
Adverse events
Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
Funding
This work was funded by the research project of Shanxi Provincial Drug Regulatory Science Research Association (No. JYJY-2025-ZD-015).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity that has a financial interest in, or financial conflict with, the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
References
  1. Zhu L, Zhu J, Wang Q, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of 34 cancer groups across 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1660125. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1660125
  2. Zafar A, Khatoon S, Khan MJ, Abu J, Naeem A. Advancements and limitations in traditional anti-cancer therapies: a comprehensive review of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy. Discov Oncol. 2025;16(1):607. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02198-8
  3. Helmberger T. The evolution of interventional oncology in the 21st century. Br J Radiol. Sep 1 2020;93(1113):20200112. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200112
  4. Tan S, Li D, Zhu X. Cancer immunotherapy: Pros, cons and beyond. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;124:109821. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109821
  5. Nakajima F, Khanna A, Xu G, et al. Immunotherapy with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies and recombinant interleukin 2: stimulation of molecular programs of cytotoxic killer cells and induction of tumor regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(17):7889-7893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7889
  6. Wang J, Arora K, de Lima M. Cytokine release syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide: current understanding and management. Front Immunol. 2026;17:1642583. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1642583
  7. Arvanitis P, Tziotis A, Papadimatos S, Farmakiotis D. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients with Cancer: Focus on Infectious Disease Considerations. Curr Oncol. 2025;32(4):198. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040198
  8. Xi X, Yan X, Chen Y, et al. Cytokine release syndrome associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study based on spontaneous reports in FAERS. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2025;24(7):839-846. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2385489
  9. Ozaki T, Yumita S, Ogasawara S, et al. Cytokine release syndrome following durvalumab and tremelimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report with cytokine and damage-associated molecular pattern analysis. Hepatol Res. 2024;55(2):291-297. doi: 10.1111/hepr.14088
  10. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124(2):188-195. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729
  11. Santomasso BD, Nastoupil LJ, Adkins S, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3978-3992. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.01992
  12. Liu D, Zhao J. Cytokine release syndrome: grading, modeling, and new therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0653-x
  13. Radtke KK, Bender BC, Li Z, et al. Clinical Pharmacology of Cytokine Release Syndrome with T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies: Current Insights and Drug Development Strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2025;31(2):245-257. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-24-2247
  14. Chen P, Tang Y, He W, et al. Potential Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Cytokine Release Syndrome. Mediators Inflamm. 2022;2022:1-17. doi: 10.1155/2022/7137900
  15. Salem JE, Manouchehri A, Moey M, et al. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1579-1589. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30608-9
  16. Liu H, Yang Q, Li Z, Yan S, Ming S. Systematic analysis of sugammadex-related adverse drug reaction signals using FAERS database. Int J Surg. 2024;111(2):1988-1994. doi: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002194
  17. Liu H, Li X, Sun Y, et al. Eosinophilia-related adverse events reporting associated with medications: a disproportionality and regression analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Int J Clin Pharm. 2026. doi: 10.1007/s11096-026-02109-z
  18. Ayuketang FA, Jäger U. Management of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and HLH. In: The EBMT/EHA CAR-T Cell Handbook. Springer International Publishing; 2022:135-139. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94353-0_26
  19. Li J, Wang Y, Yang X, Zhu H, Jiang Z. Drug-induced hypoglycemia: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024;23(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2278700
  20. Lakhan SE. Early Evaluation of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS): An Analysis of Over 32 Million Pharmacovigilance Reports. Cureus. 2026;18(4):e106259. doi: 10.7759/cureus.106259
  21. Duggirala HJ, Tonning JM, Smith E, et al. Use of data mining at the Food and Drug Administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(2):428-434. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv063
  22. Böhm R, Bulin C, Waetzig V, Cascorbi I, Klein HJ, Herdegen T. Pharmacovigilance-based drug repurposing: The search for inverse signals via OpenVigil identifies putative drugs against viral respiratory infections. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(11):4421-4431. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14868
  23. Li Z, Zhu N, Liu Y, et al. A disproportionality analysis of real-world events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for Atezolizumab. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025;26(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00879-2
  24. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999;20(2):109-117. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002
  25. Bate A, Evans SJ. Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):427-436. doi: 10.1002/pds.1742
  26. Caster O, Aoki Y, Gattepaille LM, Grundmark B. Disproportionality Analysis for Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection in Small Databases or Subsets: Recommendations for Limiting False-Positive Associations. Drug Saf. 2020;43(5):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00911-w
  27. Ooba N, Kubota K. Selected control events and reporting odds ratio in signal detection methodology. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(11):1159-1165. doi: 10.1002/pds.2014
  28. Liang Q, Liao X, Wu H, Huang Y, Liang T, Li H. Real-world study of adverse events associated with gepant use in migraine treatment based on the VigiAccess and U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s adverse event reporting system databases. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1431562. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1431562
  29. Li Z, Zhou Z, Zhang N, et al. Hepatitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations of other therapies: A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024;74(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00262-024-03858-4
  30. Cobb DA, Lee DW. Cytokine Release Syndrome Biology and Management. Cancer J. 2021;27(2):119-125. doi: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000515
  31. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763
  32. Rodet N, Zahed H, Colombet M, Bray F, McCormack V. Understanding age and sex differentials in cancer incidence and mortality: An international population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2026;158(8):2102-2110. doi: 10.1002/ijc.70244
  33. Chan AC, Martyn GD, Carter PJ. Publisher Correction: Fifty years of monoclonals: the past, present and future of antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41577-025-01261-3
  34. Strohl WR. Structure and function of therapeutic antibodies approved by the US FDA in 2023. Antib Ther. 2024;7(2):132-156. doi: 10.1093/abt/tbae007
  35. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. Interleukin (IL-6) Immunotherapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Aug 1 2018;10(8):a028456. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028456
  36. Martín-Antonio B. Editorial: Understanding the Cytokine Release Syndrome: Toward Improving Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:666703. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.666703
  37. Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Kim JH. Historical perspectives on tumor necrosis factor and its superfamily: 25 years later, a golden journey. Blood. 2012;119(3):651-665. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-325225
  38. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Gödel P, Subklewe M, et al. Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0343-9
  39. Liu Y, Jia YX, Li TT. Zhong liu mian yi zhi liao suo zhi xi bao yin zi shi fang zong he zheng de yan jiu jin zhan [Research progress on cytokine release syndrome due to tumor immunotherapy]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment. 2022;14(05):575-580. [In Chinese]
  40. Gkrinia EMM, Belančić A, Janković SM. Putting FAERS data into perspective: cautionary considerations for comparative safety assessment. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2026. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2026-005052
Share
Back to top
Cancer Plus, Electronic ISSN: 2661-3840 Print ISSN: 2661-3832, Published by AccScience Publishing