AccScience Publishing / AN / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AN025060010
Submit to AN
Cite this article
5
Download
51
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative visual pathway analysis in competitive sports: A cross-sectional visual evoked potential study

Palash Pramanik1 ,  Puneet Bhattacharya1 ,  Kallol Ghosh1 ,  Aijul Mallick2 ,  Sridip Chatterjee1*
Show Less
1 Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Arts, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Faculty of Science, West Bengal State University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Advanced Neurology, 025060010 https://doi.org/10.36922/AN025060010
Received: 8 February 2025 | Revised: 14 May 2025 | Accepted: 13 June 2025 | Published online: 1 August 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Central visual conduction ability is crucial to human perception and visual skills. In sports, for instance, it enables athletes to gather information, predict movements, make quick decisions, and perform precise motor actions. In the present study, modern electrophysiological tools, such as visual evoked potentials (VEPs), were employed to assess central visual transmission. The goal was to analyze three VEP waveforms (N75, P100, and N145) in male athletes (n = 100) from cricket, yogasana, karate, and gymnastics, together with a control group of physically active boys without specific training in these disciplines. For the P100 waveform, yogasana and karateka practitioners showed significantly shorter latencies compared to all other groups (p<0.05), followed by cricketers, who had latencies similar to gymnasts. The N75 waveform for yogasana and karate practitioners showed significantly faster transmission times than the cricket and control groups (p˂0.05). Furthermore, the N75 waveform for the left eye in gymnasts had shorter latency compared to cricketers and controls. The N145 wave for the right eye in yogasana and karate practitioners had shorter latencies compared to those of other athletes (p<0.05). Meanwhile, karatekas showed higher amplitudes than those practicing yogasana and the controls, indicating that training experience might be a key factor. This study provides valuable insights into the unique visual processing demands and capabilities of athletes in various disciplines. Yogasana and karate, being gaze-oriented practices that integrate mind–body control, showed shorter latency across all groups, followed by ocularly dominant cricketers, visually trained gymnasts, and controls.

Keywords
Central visual transmission
Sports players
Visual processing demands
Gaze-oriented activity
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Rezaee M, Ghasemi A, Momeni M. Visual and athletic skills training enhance sport performance. Eur J Exp Bio. 2012;2(6):2243-2250.

 

  1. Berge S, Krueger E. Definition of Sports and Performance Vision. Dissertation. St. Catherine University; 2018.

 

  1. Du Toit PJ, Janse van Vuuren P, Le Roux S, et al. The effect of sport specific exercises on the visual skills of rugby players. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2012;71:2029-2203.

 

  1. Erickson GB. Topical review: Visual performance assessments for sport. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(7):672-680. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001731

 

  1. Fogt JS, Fogt N. Studies of vision in cricket-A narrative review. Vision (Basel). 2023;7(3):57. doi: 10.3390/vision7030057

 

  1. Raghuraj P, Telles S. Muscle power, dexterity skill and visual perception in community home girls trained in yoga or sports and in regular school girls. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997;41(4):409-415.

 

  1. Kim HS, Petrakis E. Visuoperceptual speed of karate practitioners at three levels of skill. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;87(1):96-98. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.96

 

  1. Potgieter K, Ferreira JT. The effects of visual skills on Rhythmic Gymnastics. Afr Vis Eye Health. 2009;68(3):137-154.

 

  1. McLeod P. Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games. Perception. 1987;16(1):49-59. doi: 10.1068/p160049

 

  1. Dane S, Hazar F, Tan U. Correlations between eye-hand reaction time and power of various muscles in badminton players. Int J Neurosci. 2008;118(3):349-354. doi: 10.1080/00207450701593079

 

  1. Thomas NG, Harden LM, Rogers GG. Visual evoked potentials, reaction times and eye dominance in cricketers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45(3):428-433.

 

  1. Creel DJ. Visually evoked potentials. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:501-522. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00034-5

 

  1. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol. 2010;120(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s10633-009-9195-4

 

  1. Shete AN, Garkal KD, Afroz S. Effects of exercise on visual evoked potentials. Int J Appl Exerc Physiol. 2019;8:18-23.

 

  1. Walsh P, Kane N, Butler S. The clinical role of evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(2):16-22. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.068130

 

  1. Sharma R, Joshi S, Singh KD, Kumar A. Visual evoked potentials: Normative values and gender differences. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):CC12-CC15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12764.6181

 

  1. Tandon OP. Average evoked potentials--clinical applications of short latency responses. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998;42(2):172-188.

 

  1. Ozmerdivenli R, Bulut S, Bayar H, et al. Effects of exercise on visual evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci. 2005;115(7):1043-1050. doi: 10.1080/00207450590898481

 

  1. Zwierko T, Lubiński W, Lubkowska A, Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Czepita D. The effect of progressively increased physical efforts on visual evoked potentials in volleyball players and non-athletes. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(14):1563-1572. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.605166

 

  1. Delpont E, Dolisi C, Suisse G, Bodino G, Gastaud M. Visual evoked potentials: Differences related to physical activity. Int J Sports Med. 1991;12(3):293-298. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024684

 

  1. Lesiakowski P, Lubiński W, Zwierko T. Analysis of the relationship between training experience and visual sensory functions in athletes from different sports. Polish J Sport Tour. 2017;24(2):110-114.

 

  1. Bhattacharya P, Chatterjee S, Mondal S, Hait K. Effect of karate training on visual evoked potential: An observational study. J Sci Sport Exercise. 2023;1:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s42978-023-00247-8

 

  1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146

 

  1. National Ethical Guidelines for Bio-Medical Research Involving Children. Available from: https://www.icmr.nic.in [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 26].

 

  1. Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants; 2006. Available from: https://www.icmr.nic.in/ ethical_guidelines.pdf [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 26].

 

  1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 9B: Guidelines on visual evoked potentials. Am J Electroneurodiagn Technol. 2006;46(3):254-274. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200604000-00011

 

  1. Kantorová E, Ziak P, Kurča E, et al. Visual evoked potential and magnetic resonance imaging are more effective markers of multiple sclerosis progression than laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00010

 

  1. Burris K, Vittetoe K, Ramger B, et al. Sensorimotor abilities predict on-field performance in professional baseball. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18565-7

 

  1. Maunsell JHR. Neuronal mechanisms of visual attention. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015;1:373-391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035431

 

  1. McMains S, Kastner S. Interactions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in human visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2011;31(2):587-597. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3766-10.2011

 

  1. McMains SA, Kastner S. Defining the units of competition: Influences of perceptual organization on competitive interactions in human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010;22(11):2417-2426. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21391

 

  1. Piras A. The role of the peripheral target in stimulating eye movements. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025;76:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102744

 

  1. Myers MH, Kalyanakumar N, Harris P. Visual evoked potential effects on magnocellular and parvocellular pathways from athletes after mild traumatic brain injuries. Neurosci Insights. 2024;19:26331055241303165. doi: 10.1177/26331055241303165

 

  1. Modjtahedi B, Kundavaram C, Khaderi SK. The relationship between athletic participation and magnocellular function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(13):4122.

 

  1. Khanal S. Impact of visual skills training on sports performance: Current and future perspectives. Adv Ophthalmol Visual Syst. 2015;2(1):26-28.

 

  1. Memmert D. Pay attention! A review of visual attentional expertise in sport. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;2(2):119-138.

 

  1. Sushma S, Dixit UK. The effect of trataka yoga kriya on visual evoked potential in myopes. Int J Physiol. 2021;9(2):49-52. doi: 10.37506/ijop.v9i2.2923

 

  1. Heravian J, Ehyaei A, Shoeibi N, et al. Pattern visual evoked potentials in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012;7(3):225-230.

 

  1. Trakroo M, Bhavanani AB, Pal GK, Udupa K, Krishnamurthy N. A comparative study of the effects of asan, pranayama and asan-pranayama training on neurological and neuromuscular functions of Pondicherry police trainees. Int J Yoga. 2013;6(2):96-103. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.113398

 

  1. Del Percio C, Brancucci A, Vecchio F, et al. Visual event-related potentials in elite and amateur athletes. Brain Res Bull. 2007;74(1-3):104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.05.011

 

  1. Zhao JG, Zhu YZ, Lan YS. Visual evoked potentials differences between the students of physical and non-physical education. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2007;11(13):2534-2536.

 

  1. Zhang W, Zheng R, Zhang B, Yu W, Shen X. An observationon flash evoked cortical potentials and Qigong meditation. Am J Chin Med. 1993;21(3-4):243-249. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X93000285

 

  1. Birren JE, editor. Encyclopedia of Gerontology. Kidlington, UK: Elsevier; 1996.

 

  1. Misra UK, Kalita J, editors. Clinical Neurophysiology. Delhi, India: Elsevier; 2006.

 

  1. Bhattacharya P. A Comparative Study on Neurocognitive Variables between Regular Karate and Yoga Practitioners. Doctor’s thesis. Visva Bharti University; 2024. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10603/553054

 

  1. Muktibodhananda S. Hatha Yoga Pradipika. Munger: Yoga Publications Trust; 2012.

 

  1. Swathi PS, Bhat R, Saoji AA. Effect of trataka (yogic visual concentration) on the performance in the corsi-block tapping task: A repeated measures study. Front Psychol. 2021;12:773049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773049

 

  1. Khan AZ, Crawford JD. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Res. 2001;41(14):1743-1748. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00079-7

 

  1. Portal JM, Romano PE. Major review: Ocular sighting dominance: A review and a study of athletic proficiency and eye-hand dominance in a collegiate baseball team. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1998;13(2):125-132.

 

  1. Somers M, Shields LS, Boks MP, Kahn RS, Sommer IE. Cognitive benefits of right-handedness: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;51:48-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.003

 

  1. Nakamoto H, Mori S. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players. Brain Res. 2008;1189:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096

 

  1. Guo Z, Li A, Yu L. “Neural efficiency” of athletes’ brain during visuo-spatial task: An fMRI Study on table tennis players. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:72. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00072

 

  1. Guo Y, Yuan T, Peng J, Deng L, Chen C. Impact of sports vision training on visuomotor skills and shooting performance in elite skeet shooters. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1476649. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1476649

 

  1. Ramyarangsi P, Bennett SJ, Siripornpanich V, et al. Distinct visual processing patterns in female elite athletes: A comparative study of gymnastics, soccer, and esports using visual P300 event-related potentials. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024;17(5):1595-1604. doi: 10.70252/INCC1951

 

  1. Clark VP, Hillyard SA. Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996;8(5):387-402. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.387

 

  1. Lochhead L, Feng J, Laby DM, Appelbaum LG. Training vision in athletes to improve sports performance: A systematic review of the literature. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2024;18(3):234–256. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2024.2437385

 

  1. Wimshurst ZL, Sowden PT. Developing and testing a structured visual skills screening tool for use in sports vision training: An exploratory study with field hockey participants. Asian J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2025;5:10-17.
Next article in this issue
Share
Back to top
Advanced Neurology, Electronic ISSN: 2810-9619 Print ISSN: 3060-8589, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept