A bibliometric analysis of natural gas transportation research: From risk analysis to route optimization
Under the transition toward low-carbon energy systems, natural gas transportation has attracted increasing attention with respect to transportation safety, operational coordination, and intelligent decision-making. Based on 1,687 publications retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database between 2008 and 2025, we conducted a bibliometric and knowledge graph analysis of natural gas transportation research using CiteSpace. Keyword co-occurrence analysis, cluster analysis, and temporal evolution analysis were employed to examine the knowledge structure, research hotspots, and evolutionary characteristics of the field. The results indicate that natural gas transportation research has gradually evolved into three major research streams: transportation risk analysis, coordinated operation and scheduling, and intelligent optimization. Early studies mainly focused on engineering-oriented safety analysis, while recent research has increasingly emphasized integrated energy coordination, uncertainty-aware decision-making, and intelligent transportation optimization under complex energy environments. Risk-related research has expanded from traditional accident investigation to quantitative risk assessment and risk propagation analysis. Coordinated operation research increasingly focuses on integrated energy systems and operational scheduling under uncertainty. Intelligent optimization research has developed rapidly in routing optimization, intelligent algorithms, and dynamic decision-making methods. Despite the rapid growth of these research streams, their integration remains limited. In particular, the interaction between transportation risk analysis and intelligent optimization has not been sufficiently incorporated into existing transportation decision-making frameworks. Future research should further integrate risk analysis, intelligent optimization, and real-time transportation decision-making to support the low-carbon energy transition.
- Liu F, Wang Y, Lang X, et al. Fundamentals and economic analysis of hydrate-based carbon dioxide sequestration. Carb Neutrality. 2025;4(1). doi: 10.1007/s43979-025-00134-x
- Jordaan SM, Ruttinger AW, Surana K, et al. Global mitigation opportunities for the life cycle of natural gas-fired power. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12(11):1059-1067. doi: 10.1038/s41558-022-01503-5
- Yuan J, Shi X, He J. LNG market liberalization and LNG transportation: Evaluation based on fleet size and composition model. Appl Energy. 2024;358:122657. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122657
- Li M, Liu J, Xia Y. Risk Prediction of Gas Hydrate Formation in the Wellbore and Subsea Gathering System of Deep- Water Turbidite Reservoirs: Case Analysis from the South China Sea. Reserv Sci. 2025;1(1):52-72. doi: 10.62762/rs.2025.567907
- Zhou X, Yang F, Chen Z, et al. Mechanistic Insights and Engineering Strategies for Wellbore Integrity Control in Polar Permafrost Reservoirs. Reserv Sci. 2026;2(2):126-150. doi: 10.62762/rs.2025.816374
- Brantson ET, Obeng SDA, Ocran D, et al. Evaluating Enthalpy Production in Geothermal Reservoirs: Insights from Response Surface Methodology and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques. Reserv Sci. 2026;2(2):151- 171. doi: 10.62762/rs.2026.366192
- Hoseinzadeh S, Pourfayaz F. Comparative techno‐economic analysis of using multisource renewable energy with flexible storage systems for various environments. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2025;44(2). doi: 10.1002/ep.14544
- Xu Y, Peng P, Xie X, et al. Structural analysis and robustness assessment of global LNG transport network from 2013 to 2023. Ocean Coast Manag. 2025;263:107619. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107619
- Wu J, Bai Y, Zhao H, et al. A quantitative LNG risk assessment model based on integrated Bayesian-Catastrophe-EPE method. Saf Sci. 2021;137:105184. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105184
- Tian AQ, Wang XY, Xu H, et al. Multi-objective optimization model for railway heavy-haul traffic: Addressing carbon emissions reduction and transport efficiency improvement. Energy. 2024;294:130927. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130927
- Park C, Han C. Case Study on Optimization of Send-out Operation in Liquefied Natural Gas Receiving Terminal. Korean Chem Eng Res. 2015;53(2):150-155. doi: 10.9713/kcer.2015.53.2.150
- Ho YS. Comments on Yang and Meng (2020) “The evolution and research framework of carbon footprint: Based on the perspective of knowledge mapping” [Ecol. Indic., 112, 106125]. Ecol Indic. 2021;129:107978. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107978
- Lo HW, Lin SW. A hybrid Bayesian BWM-machine learning framework for university digital transformation assessment: Integrating expert clustering and predictive validation. Technol Soc. 2026;85:103170. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103170
- Stathakis KG, Papageorgiou G, Tjortjis C. Identifying Methodological Language in Psychology Abstracts: A Machine Learning Approach Using NLP and Embedding- Based Clustering. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2025;9(9):224. doi: 10.3390/bdcc9090224
- Lu H, Xiao C, Jiao L, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution analysis of the impact of smart transportation policies on urban carbon emissions. Sustain Cities Soc. 2024;101:105177. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105177
- Chaugule PV. Modulo Search Trees (Plain and Z-Overlapped). IOSR J Comput Eng. 2014;16(3):47-51. doi: 10.9790/0661-16384751
- Zhang G, Wang L, Chen T. Complexity analysis of network-based dynamical systems. J Syst Sci Complex. 2011;24(3):413- 432. doi: 10.1007/s11424-011-8173-6
- Gao Y, Luo Z, Bi A, et al. A New Method for Evaluating Natural Gas Pipelines Based on ICEEMDAN-LMS: A View of Noise Reduction in Defective Pipelines. Appl Sci. 2023;13(17):9670. doi: 10.3390/app13179670
- Fan H, Enshaei H, Jayasinghe SG. Formation of Dataset for Fuzzy Quantitative Risk Assessment of LNG Bunkering SIMOPs. Data. 2022;7(5):60. doi: 10.3390/data7050060
- Chen Y, Zhou X, Chen S, et al. LNG Freight Rate and LNG Price, Carbon Price, Geopolitical Risk: A Dynamic Connectedness Analysis. SSRN. Preprint posted 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4678229
- Zafar K, Baig AR. Optimization of route planning and exploration using multi agent system. Multimed Tools Appl. 2012;56(2):245-265. doi: 10.1007/s11042-010-0585-0
- Zhang L. A comprehensive analysis of natural gas reserve policies: Global comparison, quantitative analysis, and strategic insights. Energy. 2025;320:135253. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135253
- Javeed MA, Li D, Ashraf MA. Urban city data delivery optimization in VNDN using a route-based caching approach with content-type awareness in intelligent transportation system. J Supercomput. 2025;81(6). doi: 10.1007/s11227-025-07250-6
- Yangin VB, Yalcin Y, Akalin O. A tunable explicit nonlinear MPC for a vehicle considering improved path tracking performance and computational efficiency. J Mech Sci Technol. 2025;39(5):2877-2888. doi: 10.1007/s12206-025-0446-4
- Woo C, Chung Y, Chun D, et al. The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;47:367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.070
- Zhu D, Han Z, Du X, et al. Hybrid Model Integrating Fuzzy Systems and Convolutional Factorization Machine for Delivery Time Prediction in Intelligent Logistics. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2025;33(1):406-417. doi: 10.1109/tfuzz.2024.3472043
- Qu K, Fan X, Xu X, et al. Improving transportation network redundancy under uncertain disruptions via retrofitting critical components. Transp Res B Methodol. 2025;194:103174.doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2025.103174
- Chiou SW. A learning optimization for resilience enhancement of risk-informed traffic control system with hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2024;252:110425. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110425
