AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP026100058
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interpretation of environmental protection in legal acts

Yevhen Leheza1†* Maksym Korniienko2† Maksym Maksimentsev3 Valeriia Tuliantseva4 Volodymyr Ihnatenko5
Show Less
1 Research Laboratory on Current Problems of Jurisprudence and Psychology, Scientific and Research Institute, Dnipro Humanitarian University, Dnipro, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine
2 Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Odesa Oblast, Ukraine
3 Department of Criminal Law and Process, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, State Tax University, Irpin, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine
4 Department of Civil, Commercial and Environmental Law, Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine
5 Department of Civil Law Disciplines, Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Kropyvnytskyi, Kirovohrad Oblast, Ukraine
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 4 March 2026 | Revised: 26 March 2026 | Accepted: 1 April 2026 | Published online: 8 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Environmental regulation in Ukraine is currently undergoing a significant transformation, resulting in increased complexity in interpreting environmental norms across scholarly analysis and practical application. The article presents a comprehensive theoretical and legal study of the challenges in interpreting environmental regulations in the context of the transformation of Ukrainian environmental legislation and its harmonization with European Union (EU) law. It is substantiated that interpretative activity in this area is of increased complexity due to the interdisciplinary nature of environmental regulation, the prevalence of evaluative concepts, and the framework character of many legal provisions and principles (including sustainable development, prevention, the “polluter pays” principle, and the priority of environmental protection). The methodological basis of the study comprised general scientific and special legal methods of cognition. In particular, the formal legal method was used to analyze the content of legal acts in environmental protection, while the systemic and structural method was used to determine the relationship between environmental norms. The main methods of interpreting environmental regulations—grammatical, systemic, teleological, and historical—were analyzed, and their specific application in law-enforcement activities of public authorities and courts was determined. Particular attention was paid to the role of judicial practice in forming a unity of approaches to understanding and applying environmental law, and to the influence of international treaties and EU law on national interpretative practice. Effective interpretation of environmental legislation should be based on a combination of formal-legal and purposive approaches, with a primary focus on ensuring environmental human rights and environmental safety. Proposals were formulated to improve the methodology for interpreting environmental legislation, particularly by systematizing legislation, unifying terminology, and generalizing judicial practice.

Keywords
Interpretation of law
Legal acts
Environmental law
Environmental protection
Environmental principles
Judicial practice
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Bennion FAR, Goodall K, Morris G. Bennion on Statutory Interpretation: A Code. 5th ed. 2008.

 

  1. Law of Ukraine “About Lawmaking Activities” of August 24, 2023, No. 3354-IX. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/3354-20#Text [Last accessed on August 24, 2023].

 

  1. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available from: https://zakononline.ua/documents/ show/210257___210322#google_vignette [Last accessed on December 7, 2000].

 

  1. Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. BVerfGE 7, 198 – Lüth-Urteil (1958) [Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. BVerfGE 7, 198 – Lüth judgment]. Accessed . Available from: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/ EN/Home/home_node.html [Last accessed on January 15, 1958].

 

  1. Committee of Ministers. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 June 2007 at the 999bis meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). Available from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc. jsp?id=1155877&Site=CM [Last accessed on June 20, 2007].

 

  1. Georgescu LP, Fortea C, Antohi VM, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Zlati ML, Barbuta-Misu N. Economic, technological and environmental drivers of the circular economy in the European Union: a panel data analysis. Environ Sci Eur. 2025;37(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12302-025-01119-4

 

  1. Davydenko V, Korniienko M, Radchuk A, Babiak A, Leheza Y. International cooperation in operational and search activities: A comparative analysis of foreign experience. Cadernos de Dereito Actual. 2025;(28):83- 102. http://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/ cadernos/article/view/1362 [Last accessed on October 10, 2025].

 

  1. Karageorgou V. The environmental integration principle in EU law: Normative content and functions also in light of new developments, such as the European Green Deal. European Papers. 2023;8(1):159-189. doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/645

 

  1. Avtonomov A. Activities of the European Ombudsman under the charter of fundamental rights: Promoting good administration through human rights compliance. Laws. 2021;10(3):51. doi: 10.3390/laws10030051

 

  1. Edgar A, Stack KM. The Authority and Interpretation of Regulations. Mod Law Rev. 2019;82(6):1009-1033. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12458

 

  1. Ferreira C. The Europeanization of Law. In: Oliveira JC, Cardinal P, eds. One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders - Perspectives of Evolution. Springer; 2009:171-190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68572-2_9

 

  1. Filatov V, Zuieva O, Yefimova I, Pylypenko A, Leheza Y. Problems of legal protection of civilian persons deprived of personal liberty as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Dixi. 2024;27(1):1-13. doi: 10.16925/2357-5891.2025.01.04

 

  1. Lombardi F, Tognetti R, Marchetti M. The “climate” decree: new opportunities for forests of high conservation value. J Silvic For Ecol. 2019;16(6):83-85. doi: 10.3832/efor0064-016

 

  1. Ghincea M, Pleșca L. From transformation to demarcation: Explaining the EU’s shifting motivations of the enlargement policy. J Eur Public Policy. 2025;32(12):2999-3033. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2025.2498033

 

  1. Bytyak YP, Pohorilko VF, Yushchenko OI. Administrative Law of Ukraine: Textbook. Yurinkom Inter; 2021:640.

 

  1. Krupytskyi O, Dikhtiievskyi P, Krylov D, Balamush M, Leheza Y. Standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial: applicability with respect to administrative-law matters of civil service. REDES. 2024;12(3):1-12. doi: 10.18316/redes.v12i3.11977

 

  1. Law of Ukraine “On the Permit System in Economic Activity” of September 6, 2005, No. 2806-IV. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2806-15#Text [Last accessed on September 6, 2005].

 

  1. Kozlovskyi S, Bilenko D, Dluhopolskyi O, Vitvitskyi S, Bondarenko O, Korniichuk O. Determinants of COVID-19 Death Rate in Europe: Empirical Analysis. Probl Ekorozwoju. 2021;16(1):17-28. doi: 10.35784/pe.2021.1.02

 

  1. Nnawulezi U, Olujobi OJ, Agboola YH, Kabano J. Local communities in era of climate change: addressing challenges through the lens of Sustainable Development Goals 2015. J Sustain Dev Law Policy. 2026;17(1):246-275. doi: 10.4314/jsdlp.v17i1.9

 

  1. Kiziloglu M, Dluhopolskyi O, Koziuk V, Vitvitskyi S, Kozlovskyi S. Dark personality traits and job performance of employees: The mediating role of perfectionism, stress, and social media addiction. Probl Perspect Manag. 2021;19(3):533-544. doi: 10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.43

 

  1. Leheza Y, Kulinich O, Zhuravlova T, Khainatskyi Y, Sainchyn S. Combating corruption offenses: Foreign experience, theoretical, practical, legal regulations, and improvement. J Huk Islam. 2025;23(1):304-334. doi: 10.28918/jhi.v23i1.10

 

  1. Vitvitskiy SS, Kurakin ON, Pokataev PS, Skriabin OM, Sanakoiev DB. Peculiarities of cybercrime investigation in the banking sector of Ukraine: review and analysis. Banks Bank Syst. 2021;16(1):69-80. doi: 10.21511/bbs.16(1).2021.07

 

  1. Leheza Y, Pisotska K, Dubenko O, Dakhno O, Sotskyi A. The essence of the principles of Ukrainian law in modern jurisprudence. Rev Port Jurid. 2022;32:342-363. doi: 10.34625/issn.2183-2705(32)2022.ic-15

 

  1. Shablystyi VV, Kosiachenko KE, Berezniak VS, Katorkin RA, Konopelskyi VY. Activities of international medical and humanitarian NGOs in Ukraine under martial law. Christ J Glob Health. 2023;10(1):33-42. doi: 10.15566/cjgh.v10i1.749

 

  1. Leheza Y, Kuzmenko A, Pashchenko O, Tulyantseva V, Leheza Y. Sources of environmental law: National legislation of Ukraine and international legal documents. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2025;22(3):153.doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025160118

 

  1. Leshchenko O, Krahlevych V, Borysenko A, Leheza Y, Riabchynska O. Legal definition of the cryptocurrency in Ukraine in international comparison. Intersections. 2026;11(2):226-242. doi: 10.17356/ieejsp.v11i2.1311

 

  1. Nalyvaiko L, Pryputen D, Verba I, Lebedieva Y, Chepik- Trehubenko O. The European convention on human rights and the practice of the ECtHR in the field of gestational surrogacy. Access Justice East Eur. 2023;6(2):206-219. doi: 10.33327/AJEE-18-6.2-n000203

 

  1. Shevchenko S, Yunin O, Bobrishova L, Katorkin R, Tsyhulskyi S. Sources of criminal law on domestic violence prevention. Pak J Criminol. 2024;16(2):157-168. doi: 10.62271/pjc.16.2.157.168

 

  1. Decree of the President of Ukraine “On Measures to Implement the Concept of Administrative Reform in Ukraine” of July 22, 1998, No. 810/98. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/810/98#Text [Last accessed on July 22, 1998].

 

  1. Shkuta O, Karbovskyi D, Pushkina O, Potip M, Varhuliak O. Object and subject of state control in the sphere of legal turnover of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors in Ukraine: Administrative, criminal and civil-legal aspect. J Drug Alcohol Res. 2023;12(7). doi: 10.4303/JDAR/236255

 

  1. Bashynska I, Sokhatska O, Stepanova T, Malanchuk M, Rybianets S, Sobol O. Modelling the risks of international trade contracts. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng. 2019;8(11):2815-2820. doi: 10.35940/ijitee.K2313.0981119

 

  1. Beschastnyi V, Shkliar S, Fomenko A, Obushenko N, Nalyvaiko L. Place of Court Precedent in the System of Law of the European Union and in the System of Law of Ukraine. J Legal Ethical Regul Issues. 2019;22(6):1-6. Available from: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/place-of-court-precedent-in-the-system-of-law-of-the-european-union-and-in-the-system-of-law-of-ukraine-8893.html [Last accessed on December 10, 2019].

 

  1. Yaroshenko OM, Vitvitskyi SS, Nesterovych OS, Sereda OH, Yakovlyev OA. Legal Protection of Employee Privacy in the Workplace. J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr. 2025;17(2). doi: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1202

 

  1. Yunin O, Nikolaichuk S, Brusakova O, Kravchenko I, Kolesnikova M. Administrative and legal status of district administrative courts in the administrative justice system. J Legal Ethical Regul Issues. 2021;24(6). Available from: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/administrative-and-legal-status-of-district-administrative-courts-in-the-administrative-justice-system-11439.html [Last accessed on December 12, 2021].

 

  1. Yunin O, Dal A, Polovnikov V, Shumska N, Koteliukh M. The administrative-legal and criminal aspect of prosecuting persons for offenses in the field of illegal drug trafficking. J Drug Alcohol Res. 2024;13(9). doi: 10.4303/JDAR/236407

 

  1. Law of Ukraine “On Environmental Protection” of June 25, 1991, No. 1264-XII. Available from: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12#Text [Last accessed on June 25, 1991].

 

  1. Law of Ukraine “On Atmospheric Air Protection” of October 16, 1992, No. 2707-XII. Available from: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/2707-12#Text [Last accessed on October 16, 1992].

 

  1. Law of Ukraine “Water Code of Ukraine” of June 6, 1995, No. 213/95-ВР. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/213/95-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [Last accessed on June 6, 1995].

 

  1. Liu G, Cheng MLH, Lyu R, Tsui MTK. Review on mercury transformations and trophic transfer in upland forest ecosystems. Chemosphere. 2026;401:144911. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2026.144911

 

  1. Council Directive 91/676/EEC “Concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources” of December 12, 1991. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1991/676/oj/eng [Last accessed on December 12, 1991].

 

  1. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council “Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy” of October 23, 2000. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_962#Text [Last accessed on October 23, 2000].

 

  1. Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides. Adopted November 24, 2009. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/128/oj/eng [Last accessed on November 24, 2009].

 

  1. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/43/ oj/eng [Last accessed on July 22, 1992].

 

  1. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council “On the conservation of wild birds” of November 30, 2009. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/984_001-09#Text [Last accessed on November 30, 2009].
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing