AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 5 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-2008-5_3_09
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water Conservation for Livelihoods and Labour Constraints: A Case Study from Nepal

S. Brown1* J. Merz2 B. Shrestha3 S. von Westarp4
Show Less
1 University of British Columbia, Canada
2 Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Nepal
3 International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, Nepal
4 World Food Program, Madagascar
AJWEP 2008, 5(3), 57–67; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2008-5_3_09
Submitted: 22 May 2007 | Accepted: 15 January 2008 | Published: 1 January 2008
© 2008 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Cash crop production, increased demand for water and high workloads are raising concerns about the sustainability of intensive farming systems in Nepal. Water conservation technologies are seen as a potential option for producing off-season cash crops, and reducing water demand and labour for water collection. Their appropriateness was evaluated from biophysical and social perspectives by combining hydrometric monitoring, gender and water use surveys and field trials of drip irrigation systems. Results demonstrated domestic and irrigation water shortages prevalent from March to June, and an increased demand for water as farmers move towards market-based production. Women’s workloads were high, 13.5 hours per day, necessitating labour reduction as a condition for small-scale water projects. Low cost drip irrigation trials quantified high water use efficiency under a deficit water regime, and capital costs could be paid off in the first crop. Labour was a significant component of variable costs making efficient technologies attractive as demonstrated by the 100+ systems adopted in the watershed since the trials in
2001.

Keywords
Drip irrigation
Nepal
gender
workloads
water balance
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Blennerhassett, N. (1999). From staying alive to taking control: Gender and water resources management in the Bhal, Gujarat, India. M.A. Thesis, University of British Columbia, 170 pp.

Brown, S. and G. Kennedy (2005). A case study of cash cropping in Nepal: Poverty alleviation or inequity. Agriculture and Human Values, 22: 105-116.

Brown, S. and B. Shrestha (2000). Market driven land use dynamics in the Middle Mountains of Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 59: 217-225.

Brown, S. (2003). Spatial analysis of socio-economic issues: Gender and GIS in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 23(4): 338-344.

Chambers, R. (1988). Managing canal irrigation. Cambridge University Press, p. 279.

FAO, Aquastat (2004). http://www.fao.org/ag/Agl/AGLW/ aquastat/water_use April 2007.

Gleick, P. (2004). The World’s Water 2006-2007. Pacific Institute, Island Press, Chicago, p. 368.

Gleick, P. (1996). Basic water requirements for human activities: Meeting basic needs. Water International, 21: 83-92.

Merz, J. (2003). Water balances, floods and sediment transport in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas. PhD Thesis, Institute of Geography, University of Bern Switzerland, p. 476.

Merz, J., Nakarmi, G., Shrestha, S.K., Dahal, B.M., Dongol, B.S., Schaffner, M., Shakya, S., Sharma, S. and R. Weingartner (2004). Public water sources in rural catchments of Nepal’s Middle Mountains – Issues and constraints. Environmental Management, 34(1): 26-37.

Merz, J., Nakarmi, G., Shrestha, S.K., Dahal, B.M., Dangol, P.M., Dhakal, N.P., Dongol, B.S., Sharma, S., Shah P.B. and R. Weingartner (2003a). Water: A scarce resource in rural watersheds of Nepal’s Middle Mountains. Mountain Research and Development, 23(1): 41-49.

Merz, J., Nakarmi G. and R. Weingartner (2003b). Potential solutions to water scarcity in the rural watersheds of Nepal’s Middle Mountains. Mountain Research and Development
23(1): 14-18.

Niamir-Fuller, M. (1994). Women livestock managers in the third world: Focus on technical issues related to gender roles in livestock production. IFAD Rome, Staff Working Paper 18, http://www.ifad.org/gender/thematic/livestock/ live_toc.htm June 2007.

Rosegrant, M., Ximing, C. and S. Cline (2002). World water and food to 2025. IWMI, IFPRI, p. 322.

Schaffner, M. (2003). Drinking Water Quality Assessment and Improvement in the Jhikhu Khola Catchment, Nepal. Department of Geography, University of Bern, Publikation Gewaesserkunde No. 281.

Smith, L. (2004). Assessment of the contribution of irrigation to poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods. J. Water Resources Development, 20: 243-257.

UNESCO-WWAP (2003). Water for people, water for life. United Nations World Water Development Report, Berghahn Books, New York, p. 576.

von Braun, J. (1995). Agricultural commercialization: Impacts on income and nutrition and implications for policy. Food Policy, 20: 187-202.

von Westarp, S., Chieng, S. and H. Schreier (2004). A comparison between low-cost drip irrigation, conventional drip irrigation and hand watering in Nepal. Agricultural Water Management, 64: 143-160.

WHO (1997). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization, Geneva.

WHO (2003). Domestic water quantity, service level and health. World Health Organization, Geneva.

Wolfe, A., Kramer, A., Carius A. and G. Dabelko (2005). Managing water conflict and cooperation. In: State of the World 2005: Redefining global security. World Watch Institute, Washington DC, pp 80-95.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing