AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 23 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.36922/AJWEP026210151
Submit to AJWEP
Cite this article
7
Download
452
Views
Supplementary Material
article_ajwep026210151_supplement_ea9cb0.pdf
Related Info Links
Google Scholar
More by Authors Links
Boran Wu
Dongdong Ge
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Insights into development trends for photocatalytic degradation of PFAS: A bibliometric time-series perspective

Huan Zhang1 ,  Yuxin Du2 ,  Zewei Liu2 ,  Boran Wu1,3* ,  Dongdong Ge4,5*
Show Less
1 State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
2 Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
3 Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai, China
4 School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
5 Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recovery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
AJWEP 2026, 23(4), 026210151 https://doi.org/10.36922/AJWEP026210151
Received: 18 May 2026 | Revised: 25 May 2026 | Accepted: 28 May 2026 | Published online: 1 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
XML
Cite
Abstract

Photocatalytic degradation has attracted increasing attention for the remediation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) because of its mild operating conditions, high treatment efficiency and relatively low energy demand. Based on literature indexed in the Web of Science from 1999 to 2025, this study used CiteSpace to analyze research output, collaboration networks, high impact journals and keyword evolution, and to identify the scientific contributions of countries, regions, institutions and leading researchers. The analysis shows the development pattern and major hotspots of photocatalytic degradation of PFAS. The field has gone from slow growth before 2010 to rapid expansion since 2020. Both China and the United States lead the global output in publications, with Chinese institutions at the collaboration core, although isolated nodes still limit full integration. Keyword analysis indicates research hotspots in catalyst design, reaction mechanisms and combined processes with other technologies. The field is shifting from studies on single target compounds to system-scale remediation of contaminant classes, and from mainly oxidative pathways to reductive and synergistic mechanisms. These trends emphasize process integration and practical application, while also pointing to frontier topics, knowledge gaps and directions for future research.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Photocatalytic degradation
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
Bibliometric analysis
CiteSpace
Defluorination mechanism
Water treatment
Funding
This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number 52270137, 52570173] and Shanghai Oriental Talent Program [Grant number QNCX2024034].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be viewed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
  1. Higgins CP, Field JA, Criddle CS, Luthy RG. Quantitative determination of perfluorochemicals in sediments and domestic sludge. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(11):3946-3956. doi: 10.1021/es048245p
  2. Kim SK, Kannan K. Perfluorinated acids in air, rain, snow, surface runoff, and lakes: relative importance of pathways to contamination of urban lakes. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(24):8328-8334. doi: 10.1021/es072107t
  3. Sun H, Li F, Zhang T, et al. Perfluorinated compounds in surface waters and WWTPs in Shenyang, China: mass flows and source analysis. Water Res. 2011;45(15):4483-4490. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.036
  4. Houtz EF, Higgins CP, Field JA, Sedlak DL. Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(15):8187-8195. doi: 10.1021/es4018877
  5. Kotthoff M, Müller J, Jürling H, Schlummer M, Fiedler D. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in consumer products. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(19):14546-14559. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4202-7
  6. Lewis RC, Johns LE, Meeker JD. Serum biomarkers of exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances in relation to serum testosterone and measures of thyroid function among adults and adolescents from NHANES 2011-2012. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6098-6114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120606098
  7. Giesy JP, Kannan K. Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35(7):1339-1342. doi: 10.1021/es001834k
  8. Neuwald IJ, Hübner D, Wiegand HL, et al. Ultra-short-chain PFASs in the sources of German drinking water: prevalent, overlooked, difficult to remove, and unregulated. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56(10):6380-6390. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07949
  9. Yan H, Cousins IT, Zhang C, Zhou Q. Perfluoroalkyl acids in municipal landfill leachates from China: occurrence, fate during leachate treatment and potential impact on groundwater. Sci Total Environ. 2015;524-525:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.111
  10. Na S, Hai R, Wang X, Li N. Trends and levels of perfluorinated compounds in soil and sediment surrounding a cluster of metal plating industries. Soil Sediment Contam. 2021;30(4):423-435. doi: 10.1080/15320383.2020.1863908
  11. Yadav S, Ibrar I, Al-Juboori RA, et al. Updated review on emerging technologies for PFAS contaminated water treatment. Chem Eng Res Des. 2022;182:667-700. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.04.009
  12. Arvaniti OS, Stasinakis AS, Barceló D. Review on the occurrence, fate and removal of perfluorinated compounds during wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2015;524-525:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.023
  13. Cordner A, Goldenman G, Birnbaum LS, et al. The true cost of PFAS and the benefits of acting now. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(14):9630-9633. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03565
  14. Dolbier WR Jr. Fluorine chemistry at the millennium. J Fluor Chem. 2005;126(2):157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.09.033
  15. Deng S, Yu Q, Huang J, Yu G. Removal of perfluorooctane sulfonate from wastewater by anion exchange resins: effects of resin properties and solution chemistry. Water Res. 2010;44(18):5188-5195. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.038
  16. Klamerth N, Malato S, Agüera A, Fernández-Alba AR. Photo-Fenton and modified photo-Fenton at neutral pH for the treatment of emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents: a comparison. Water Res. 2013;47(2):833-840. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.008
  17. Huang J, Wang X, Pan Z, Li X, Ling Y, Li L. Efficient degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by photocatalytic ozonation. Chem Eng J. 2016;296:329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.116
  18. Qu Y, Zhang C, Li F, Chen J, Zhou Q. Photo-reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid in water. Water Res. 2010;44(9):2939-2947. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.019
  19. Huang S, Jaffé PR. Defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by Acidimicrobium sp. strain A6. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(19):11410-11419. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04047
  20. Yang B, Han Y, Yu G, et al. Efficient removal of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation using iron electrode. Chem Eng J. 2016;303:384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.011
  21. Niu J, Wang C, Shang E. Removal of perfluorinated compounds from wastewaters by electrochemical methods: a general review. Sci Sin Technol. 2017;47(12):1233-1255. doi: 10.1360/N092017-00116
  22. Tonks L, Langmuir I. Oscillations in ionized gases. Phys Rev. 1929;33(2):195-210. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.33.195
  23. Hori H, Nagaoka Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Efficient decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorochemicals using zerovalent iron in subcritical water. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(3):1049-1054. doi: 10.1021/es0517419
  24. Liu X, Wei W, Xu J, Wang D, Song L, Ni BJ. Photochemical decomposition of perfluorochemicals in contaminated water. Water Res. 2020;186:116311. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116311
  25. Gao Y, Ge L, Shi S, et al. Global trends and future prospects of e-waste research: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(17):17809-17820. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05071-8
  26. Chen P, Li J, Wang HY, Zheng RL, Sun GX. Evaluation of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on arsenic remediation in soil through biovolatilization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(27):21739-21749. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9816-5
  27. Xia M, Chen B, Fan G, et al. The shifting research landscape for PAH bioremediation in water environment: a bibliometric analysis on three decades of development. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(27):69711-69726. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27404-4
  28. Zhang L, Thijs B, Glänzel W. What does scientometrics share with other “metrics” sciences? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64(7):1515-1518. doi: 10.1002/asi.22834
  29. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2009;57(1):13-18. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5
  30. Peritz BC, Bar-Ilan J. The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics. 2002;54(2):269-284. doi: 10.1023/a:1016018013096
  31. Moral-Muñoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Santisteban-Espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. Prof Inf. 2020;29(1): e290103. doi: 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  32. Lyu P, Liu X, Yao T. A bibliometric analysis of literature on bibliometrics in recent half-century. J Inf Sci. 2026;52(2):324-344. doi: 10.1177/01655515231191233
  33. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  34. Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2016;106(1):213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
  35. Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, Delgado López-Cózar E. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J Informetr. 2018;12(4):1160-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
  36. Zhu J, Liu W. A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics. 2020;123(1):321-335. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
  37. Clemente DH, Hsuan J, de Carvalho MM. The intersection between business model and modularity: an overview of the literature. Braz J Oper Prod Manag. 2019;16(3):387-397. doi: 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n3.a3
  38. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In: Decker R, Lenz HJ, eds. Advances in Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer; 2007:299-306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34
  39. Rabbani MRA, Bashar A, Atif M, Jreisat A, Zulfikar Z, Naseem Y. Text mining and visual analytics in research: exploring the innovative tools. In: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA). IEEE; 2021:1087-1091. doi: 10.1109/DASA53625.2021.9682360
  40. AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J Vis Exp. 2019;(152):58494. doi: 10.3791/58494
  41. Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E, Delgado López-Cózar E. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics. 2021;126(1):871-906. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
  42. Li C, Huang G, Cheng G, Zheng M, Zhou N. Nanomaterials in the environment: research hotspots and trends. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):5138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245138
  43. Li Y, Xu Z, Wang X, Wang X. A bibliometric analysis on deep learning during 2007-2019. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2020;11(12):2807-2826. doi: 10.1007/s13042-020-01152-0
  44. Zhu JJ, Dressel W, Pacion K, Ren ZJ. ES&T in the 21st century: a data-driven analysis of research topics, interconnections, and trends in the past 20 years. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(6):3453-3464. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07551
  45. Nohara K, Toma M, Kutsuna S, Takeuchi K, Ibusuki T. Photocatalytic degradation of some methyl perfluoroalkyl ethers on TiO2 particles in air: the dependence on the dark-adsorption, the products, and the implication for a possible tropospheric sink. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33(7):1071-1076. doi: 10.1021/es980370b
  46. US Environmental Protection Agency. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates; significant new use rule. Fed Regist. 2002;67(236):72854-72867. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/12/09/02-31011/perfluoroalkyl-sulfonates-significant-new-use-rule [Last accessed on May 28, 2026].
  47. Paul AG, Jones KC, Sweetman AJ. A first global production, emission, and environmental inventory for perfluorooctane sulfonate. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(2):386-392. doi: 10.1021/es802216n
  48. Chen K, Berg N, Gschwind R, König B. Selective single C(sp3)–F bond cleavage in trifluoromethylarenes: Merging visible-light catalysis with Lewis acid activation. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(51):18444-18447. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10755
  49. Bao Y, Deng S, Jiang X, et al. Degradation of PFOA substitute: GenX (HFPO-DA ammonium salt): oxidation with UV/persulfate or reduction with UV/sulfite? Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(20):11728-11734. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02172
  50. Trojanowicz M, Bojanowska-Czajka A, Bartosiewicz I, Kulisa K. Advanced oxidation/reduction processes treatment for aqueous perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): a review of recent advances. Chem Eng J. 2018;336:170-199. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.153
  51. Liu K, Liang J, Zhang N, et al. Global perspectives for biochar application in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil: a bibliometric analysis over the past three decades. Int J Phytoremediation. 2023;25(8):1052-1066. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2022.2128038
  52. Fonseca BPFE, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MVA, Zicker F. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5
  53. Morel CM, Serruya SJ, Penna GO, Guimarães R. Co-authorship network analysis: a powerful tool for strategic planning of research, development and capacity building programs on neglected diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(8):e501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000501
  54. Higaki A, Uetani T, Ikeda S, Yamaguchi O. Co-authorship network analysis in cardiovascular research utilizing machine learning (2009-2019). Int J Med Inform. 2020;143:104274. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104274
  55. Li Z, Zhang P, Li J, Shao T, Jin L. Synthesis of In2O3-graphene composites and their photocatalytic performance towards perfluorooctanoic acid decomposition. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2013;271:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.08.012
  56. Wang Y, Zhang P. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by TiO2 in the presence of oxalic acid. J Hazard Mater. 2011;192(3):1869-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.026
  57. Yang P, Luo S, Liu Q, et al. Rape straw biochar-assisted preparation of flower-like BiOCl with enriched oxygen vacancies for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction and pollutants degradation. J Phys Chem Solids. 2025;196:112400. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112400
  58. Li H, Luo R, Zhong J, et al. In-situ construction of h-BN/BiOCl heterojunctions with rich oxygen vacancies for rapid photocatalytic removal of typical contaminants. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2023;659:130756. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130756
  59. Barata-Vallejo S, Bonesi SM, Postigo A. Photocatalytic fluoroalkylation reactions of organic compounds. Org Biomol Chem. 2015;13(46):11153-11183. doi: 10.1039/c5ob01486g
  60. Torviso MR, Mansilla DS, Garcia S, et al. Late-stage electron-catalyzed perfluoroalkylation of coumarin derivatives: thermal fluoroalkyl radical production from sodium perfluoroalkyl sulfinate salts. J Fluor Chem. 2017;197:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2017.03.005
  61. Su Y, Kuijpers KPL, König NJ, Shang M, Hessel V, Noël T. A mechanistic investigation of the visible-light photocatalytic trifluoromethylation of heterocycles using CF3I in flow. Chem Eur J. 2016;22(35):12295-12300. doi: 10.1002/chem.201602596
  62. Straathof NJW, Gemoets HPL, Wang X, Schouten JC, Hessel V, Noël T. Rapid trifluoromethylation and perfluoroalkylation of five-membered heterocycles by photoredox catalysis in continuous flow. Chem Sus Chem. 2014;7(6):1612-1617. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201301282
  63. Davtalab M, Byčenkienė S, Uogintė I. Global research hotspots and trends on microplastics: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(49):107403-107418. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27647-1
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept