AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-180035
RESEARCH ARTICLE

WSIOC: The Water Sustainability Index for Office Complexes

Gaurav Chandra1* Manjari Chakraborty2 A.K. Sinha3
Show Less
1 Department of Architecture, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology for Handicapped, Kanpur 208024, India
2 Department of Architecture, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, Jharkhand, India
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, Jharkhand, India
AJWEP 2018, 15(2), 223–238; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-180035
Submitted: 31 May 2017 | Revised: 28 March 2018 | Accepted: 28 March 2018 | Published: 11 May 2018
© 2018 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Water as a natural resource although covering almost two-third part of the universe, a fifth of the  global population is facing acute water scarcity and unavailability of fresh drinking water due to the increasing  anthropogenic pressure worldwide. In the Indian sub-continent ~23% of the total population is classified as under  the class of absolute water scarcity, and ~54% people are facing high water stress condition. In spite of alluvial  aquifers of the Indo-Gangetic plains water table has declined in the northern region of the country, which may lead  to a disaster. Water sustainability so should be our priority. This study aims to assess the building water management  systems with a relative importance of certain associated attributes. Thus, a water sustainability index (WSIOC) is  developed for office complexes (e.g., 26 sampled buildings) of major cities of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) India, based  on the framework of water sustainability attributes comprising water supply, consumption and financial aspects. 

The framework attributes were determined using Delphi technique followed by AHP and linear regression  method. The (WSIOC)absolute value ranges from 31 to 74, which represents the building water management  performance as moderate and high, respectively. In order to revive the menacing scenario related to the water  efficiency in buildings, a need for priority action is evaluated accordingly. Certainly, the developed WSIOC will act  as a guiding tool for the water policy makers, consultants and architects to formulate their ideas for sustainable  urban environment.

Keywords
Water scarcity
water sustainability index (WSI)
office buildings
WSIOC
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References

Beecher, J. (2002). Survey of state water agency water loss reporting practices. AWWA – American Water Works Association, Denver.

Dixit, S. and S. Tiwari (2008). Impact assessment of heavy metal pollution of Shahpura Lake, Bhopal, India. Int. J. Environ. Res., 2(1): 37-42.

Environmental Protection Agency, Water Sense (2009). Efficiency in the commercial and institutional sector. Consideration for a water sense program.

Feyen, J., Shannon, K. and M. Neville (Eds.) (2009). Water and urban development paradigms towards an integration of engineering, design and management approaches. London: CRC Press.

Godfrey, L. and C. Todd (2001). Defining thresholds for freshwater sustainability indicators within the context of South African water resource management. Paper presented at the 2nd WARFA/Water net symposium: Integrated water resource management: Theory, Practice, Cases. Cape Town.

Hering, J.G. and K.M. Ingold (2012). Water resources management: What should be integrated? Science, 336(6086): 1234-1235.

Hoque, B.A., Hallman, K., Levy, J., Bouis, H., Ali,N., Khan, F., Khanam, S., Kabir, M., Hossain, S. and M.S. Alam (2006). Rural drinking water at supply and household levels: Quality and management. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 209(5): 451-460.

Joint Research Centre-European Commission (2005a). Tools for composite indicators buildings. Italy, EUR 21682 EN.

Joint Research Centre-European Commission (2005b) . Constructing consistent composite indicators: The issue of weights, Luxembourg, EUR 21834 EN.

Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (2012) . Sustainable insight, Water scarcity: A dive into global reporting trends, United Kingdom (U.K.), 121050.

Madungwe, E. and S. Sakuringwa (2007). Grey water reuse: A strategy for water demand management in Harare? Phys. Chem. Earth, 32(15): 1231-1236.

Mossalanejad, A. (2011). The role of economic policy and environment in sustainable development. Int. J. Environ. Res., 5(2): 395-402.

Real Property Association of Canada (2011) . Water Management: A Benchmark for Canadian office buildings. Version 1.01.

Seckler, D., Barker, R. and U. Amarasinghe (1999). Water scarcity in the twenty-first century. Int. J. Water Resour. D., 15(1-2): 29-42.

Seneviratne, M. (2007) . A practical approach to water conservation for commercial and industrial facilities. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

Shiao, T., Maddocks,A., Carson, C. and E. Loizeaux (2015). 3 Maps explain India’s growing water risks. WRI – World Resource Institute.

Singh, S.P., Deepa, P. and S. Rashmi (2002). Hydrobiological studies of two ponds of Satna (M.P.), India. Eco. Environ. Cons., 8(3): 289-292.

Suhag, R. (2016). Overview of ground water in India. PRS ‘Legislative Research’ .

The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2013). International decade for action “water for life” 2005-2015.

U.P. GroundWater Department (2016). Status of groundwater level and figures.

Warhurst,A. (2002). Sustainability indicators and sustainability performance management. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Warwick, England.

Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing