Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Services: A Case  of Darjeeling, India

Pravesh Tamang; Sebak Kumar Jana

doi:10.3233/AJW-170015

Abstract

This paper uses a Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice (DBDC) Contingent Valuation (CV) method to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) for improved water services in the hill town of Darjeeling in India. The findings of the bivariate probit model reveal that gender of the head of the family, age of the head, total time taken to collect water, water treatment, water source and distance were among the significant and the major determinants of WTP for improved water services. The WTP estimated using the delta method was about INR 494.00 (USD 1 ~ INR 60.00 as of March 2014) per month, which is about 12 times the amount they currently pay. A major policy implication is that there is a huge potential for investment in water projects in the town because of the high WTP and the households’ preference for local water body or any organised service provider over the private water vendors.

Keywords

Contingent valuation

willingness to pay

bivariate probit; double bound dichotomous choice (DBDC)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

Assessment, I. (2002). Water Supply and Sanitation, A WHO-UNICEF Sponsored Study. New Delhi, India: Planning Commission, Government of India.

Bogale, A. and B. Urgessa (2012). Households’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Rural Water Service Provision: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Human Ecology. Retrieved from http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JHE/JHE-38-0-000-12-Web/JHE-38-2-000-12-Abst-PDF/JHE-38-2-145-12-2315-Bogale-A/JHE-38-2-145-154-12-2315-Bogale-A-Tx[7].pdf

Cummings, R.G., Harrison, G.W. and L.L. Osborne (1995). Can the bias of contingent valuation surveys be reduced? Evidence from the Laboratory. College of Business Administration, University of South Carolina.

Habb, T. and K.E. McConnell (2002). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non Market Valuation (1st ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., USA.

Jeanty, P.W., Haab, T. and F. Hitzhusen (2007). Willingness to pay for biodiesel in diesel engines: A stochastic double bounded contingent valuation survey. Presented at Association Annual Meeting. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Timothy_Haab/publication/23772235_Willingness_to_Pay_for_Biodiesel_in_Diesel_Engines_A_Stochastic_Double_Bounded_Contingent_Valuation_Survey/links/00b7d52b3211b52b68000000.pdf

Jones, A. (2011). Applied Econometrics for Health Economists: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). Radcliffe Publishing Ltd., United Kingdom.

List, J.A. (2001). Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Eliciting Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sports Cars. The American Economic Review.

Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012). Introduction to Contingent Valuation using Stata (No. 41018).

McKenzie and Ray (2009). Urban water supply in India: Status, reform options and possible lessons.

Mitchell, R. and R. Carson (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future: Washington DC.

Mofatt, B., Motlaleng, G.R. and A. Thukuza (2011). Households Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality and Reliability in Supply in Chobe Ward, Maun. Bostwana Journal of Economics, 8(12).

Oca, G. and I.J. Bateman (2006). Scope sensitivity in households’ willingness to pay for maintained and improved water supplies in a developing world urban area: Investigating the influence of baseline supply quality and income distribution upon stated preferences in Mexico City. Water Resources Research, 42(7): doi:10.1029/2005WR003981.

Olanrewaju, E.C. and B.T. Omonona (2012). Determinants of Households Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Services in Kosofe Local Government Area of Lagos State. Continental Journal of Sustainable Development, 20-31.

Tussupova, K., Berndtsson, R., Bramryd, T. and R. Beisenova (2015). Investigating Willingness to Pay to Improve Water Supply Services: Application of Contingent Valuation Method. Water, 7(6): 3024-3039. doi: 10.3390/w7063024.

Vásquez, W. (2011). Municipal water services in Guatemala: Exploring official perceptions. Water Policy, 13(3): 362. doi: 10.2166/wp.2010.211.

Whittington, D., Yang, S.K., Yang, J.-C. and B.K. Kumar (2002). Household demand for improved piped water services: Evidence from Kathmandu, Nepal. Water Policy, 4: 531-556. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002443.

Previous article in this issue

Next article in this issue