AccScience Publishing / AJWEP / Volume 14 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.3233/AJW-170021
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment of Runoff and Sediment Yield in the Tilaya  Reservoir, India Using SWAT Model

Debobroto Dutta1 Rajib Das1* Asis Mazumdar1
Show Less
1 School of Water Resources Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata – 700032, India
AJWEP 2017, 14(3), 9–18; https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-170021
Submitted: 30 January 2017 | Revised: 3 May 2017 | Accepted: 3 May 2017 | Published: 5 July 2017
© 2017 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this paper the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to simulate the runoff and sediment  that is coming into the Tilaiya Reservoir, Jharkhand, India. In this twenty first century, it is widely accepted that  climate change would significantly affect many hydrologic systems which in turn would affect the water availability,  overland flow and the flow discharges in rivers. Surface runoff estimation in a catchment based on the rate of  storm precipitation and also discharge estimation at outlet is important in hydrologic studies. The research was  conducted using a 10-year historical stream-flow record from 1991-2000; the data from 1991 to 1995 was used  for calibration and the data from 1996 to 2000 was used for validation. From the sediment inflow data that we  obtained from the SWAT model output, the reservoir life was calculated i.e. the time required to fill the reservoir  up to its dead storage; in the study it was found out to be 89 years from the year 2000.

Keywords
Runoff
sediment
reservoir
SWAT
rivers
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
Abbaspour, K.C. (2005). Calibration of hydrologic models: When is a model calibrated? In: MODSIM 2005 Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation. A. Zerger and R.M. Argent (eds), Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. Canberra. Australia 〈http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/abbaspour.pdf

Abbaspour, K.C., Johnson, A. and M. Th. van Genuchten (2004). Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J., 3(4), 1340–1352.

Abbaspour, K.C., Yang, J., Reichert, P. and H. Yang (2008). Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J. Hydrol., 358(1–2), 1–23.

Arnold, J.G. and N. Fohrer (2005). SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol. Proc., 19, 563–572.

Arnold, J.G. and P.M. Allen (1996). Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. J. Hydrol., 176, 57–77.

Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, P., Muttiah, R.S. and J.R. Williams (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34, 73–89.

Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Ramanarayanan, T.S. and M. DiLuzio M. (1999). Water resources of the Texas Gulf Basin. Water Sci. Tech., 39(3), 121–133.

Arnold, J.G., Williams, J.R., Srinivasan, R. and K.W. King (1996). SWAT: Soil and Water Assessment Tool. User’s Manual USDA Agriculture Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, 808 East Blackland Road Temple. TX 76502.

Beasley, D.B., Huggins, L.F. and E.J. Monke (1980). ANSWERS: A model for watershed planning. Transactions of the ASAE, 23(4), 938–944.

Benaman, J. and C.A. Shoemaker (2005). An analysis of high-flow sediment event data for evaluating model performance. Hydrol. Proc., 19, 605–620.

Betrie, G.D., Mohamed, Y.A., Griensven, A. van. and R. Srinivasan (2011). Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT model. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci., 15, 807–818.

Beven, K. and J. Freer (2001). Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environment systems using the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.

Brune, G.M. (1953). Trap efficiency of reservoirs. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 34, 407–418.

Cao, W.Z., Bowden, W.B., Davie, T. and A. Fenemor (2006). Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability. Hydrol. Proc., 20, 1057–1073.

Easton, Z.M., Fuka, D.R., Walter, M.T., Cowan, D.M., Schneiderman, E.M. and T.S. Steenhuis (2008). Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas. J. Hydrol., 348, 279–291.

Gosain, A.K., Rao, S., Srinivasan, R. and N.G. Reddy (2005). Return-flow assessment for irrigation command in the Palleru river basin using SWAT model. Hydrol. Proc., 19, 673–682.

Kou, X.J., Ge, J.P., Wang, Y. and C.J. Zhang (2007). Validation of the weather generator CLIGEN with daily precipitation data from the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol., 347, 347–357.

Morris, G.L. and J. Fan (1998). Reservoir Sedimentation Handbook: Design and Management of Dams, Reservoirs, and Watersheds for Sustainable Use. McGraw Hill Professional.

Muttiah, R.S. and R.A. Wurbs (2002). Scale-dependent soil and climate variability effects on watershed water balance of the SWAT model. J. Hydrol., 256, 264–285.

Tolson, B.A. and C.A. Shoemaker (2007). Cannonsville reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. J. Hydrol., 337, 68–86.

Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K. and N.S. Raghuwanshi (2005). Development of effective management plan for critical subwatersheds using SWAT model. Hydrol. Proc., 19, 809–826.

Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K., Raghuwanshi, N.S. and R. Singh (2004). Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using generated rainfall in the soil and water assessment tool model. Hydrol. Proc., 18, 1811–1821.

Van Griensven, A. and T. Meixner (2006). Methods to quantify and identify the sources of uncertainty for river basin water quality models. Water Sci. Tech., 53(1), 51–59.

Van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Srinivasan, R. and S. Grunwals (2008). Fit-for-purpose analysis of uncertainty using split-sampling evaluations. Hydrol. Sci. J., 53(5), 1090–1103.

Van Liew, M.W. and J.D. Garbrecht (2003). Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita River Experiment Watershed using SWAT. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 413–426.

Wu, K.S. and C.A. Johnston (2007). Hydrologic response to climatic variability in a Great Lakes watershed: A case study with the SWAT model. J. Hydrol., 337, 187–199.

Xu, Z.X., Pang, J.P., Liu, C.M. and J.Y. Li (2009). Assessment of runoff and sediment yield in the Miyun Reservoir catchment by using SWAT model. J. Hydrol. Proc., 23, 3619–3630.

Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A. and D.D. Bosch (1989). AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil and Water Cons., 44(2), 168–173.
Share
Back to top
Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, Electronic ISSN: 1875-8568 Print ISSN: 0972-9860, Published by AccScience Publishing