AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 8 / Issue 6 / DOI: 10.18053/jctres.08.202206.013
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Coronal T2-weighted imaging improves the measurement accuracy of the subarachnoid space in infants: A descriptive study

Lei Zhang1,2 Heng Liu3 Zhuanqin Ren4 Xiaohu Wang4 Xiaoli Meng4 Xiaocheng Wei1 Jian Yang1,5*
Show Less
1 Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi, P.R. China
2 Department of Radiology, Baoji Hi-Tech Hospital, Baoji 721013, Shaanxi, P.R. China
3 Medical Imaging Center of Guizhou Province, Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou, P.R. China
4 Department of Radiology, Baoji Center Hospital, Baoji 721008, Shaanxi, P.R. China
5 Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, P.R. China
Submitted: 3 August 2022 | Revised: 6 October 2022 | Accepted: 13 October 2022 | Published: 15 November 2022
© 2022 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: The subarachnoid space width (SASw) is part of crucial neuroimaging criteria for the diagnosis of subarachnoid space enlargement in infants. In addition to indicating the presence of these diseases, SASw can be used to assess their severity. Therefore, it is important to be able to measure the SASw accurately.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of measurements made from axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and to establish a consentaneous measurement scheme of SASw in infants.

Methods: A total of 63 infants (31 males and 32 females) aged 4 days to 24 months were enrolled in this study. The supratentorial subarachnoid space volume (SASv) and corrected SASv (cSASv) were used as the gold standard reference. The SASw (including interhemispheric width and bilateral frontal craniocortical width) was measured on axial and coronal T2WI. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility and agreement of the SASw were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. A paired t-test was used to compare SASw measured on axial and coronal images. The accuracy of SASw measurements made from axial and coronal T2WI was evaluated by the relationships between the SASw and supratentorial SASv and between the SASw and supratentorial cSASv, and the relationships were examined by multivariate linear regression.

Results: The intra- and interobserver ICC values of the three SASw measurements were greater on coronal T2WI than on axial T2WI. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that the SASw values measured on coronal T2WI had better intra- and interobserver agreement than axial T2WI. According to the multivariate linear regression results, model 4 (the SASw measured in coronal T2WI) was the best predictor of supratentorial cSASv (R2 = 0.755).

Conclusions: The SASw measured on coronal T2WI was more repeatable and accurate than axial T2WI and was more representative of the actual cerebrospinal fluid accumulation in the supratentorial subarachnoid space.

Relevance for patients: The SASw has been found to be a simple and essential substitution for supratentorial SASv, which can be measured on both axial T2WI passing through the bodies of the bilateral ventricles and coronal T2WI at the level of the foramen of Monro. The SASw measured on coronal T2WI was more beneficial to the diagnosis and severity assessment of subarachnoid space enlargement in infants.

Keywords
accuracy
infant
magnetic resonance imaging
subarachnoid space
Conflict of interest
None.
References

[1] Andersson J, Wikström J, Högberg U, Wester K, Thiblin I. External Hydrocephalus as a Cause of Infant Subdural Hematoma: Epidemiological and Radiological Investigations of Infants Suspected of Being Abused. Pediatr Neurol 2022;126:26-34.

[2] Fukuyama Y, Miyao M, Ishizu T, Maruyama H. Developmental Changes in Normal Cranial Measurements by Computed Tomography. Dev Med Child Neurol 1979;21:425-32.

[3] Lam WW, Ai VH, Wong V, Leong LL. Ultrasonographic Measurement of Subarachnoid Space in Normal Infants and Children. Pediatr Neurol 2001;25:380-4.

[4] Libicher M, Tröger J. US Measurement of the Subarachnoid Space in Infants: Normal Values. Radiology 1992;184: 749-51.

[5] Zahl SM, Egge A, Helseth E, Wester K. Benign External Hydrocephalus: AReview, with Emphasis on Management. Neurosurg Rev 2011;34:417-32.

[6] Watanabe Y, Abe S, Takagi K, Yamamoto T, Kato T. Evolution of Subarachnoid Space in Normal Fetuses using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Prenat Diagn 2005;25: 1217-22.

[7] Halevy A, Cohen R, Viner I, Diamond G, Shuper A. Development of Infants with Idiopathic External Hydrocephalus. J Child Neurol 2015;30:1044-7.

[8] Zahl SM, Egge A, Helseth E, Wester K. Clinical, Radiological and Demographic Details of Benign External Hydrocephalus: A Population-Based Study. Pediatr Neurol 2019;96:53-7.

[9] Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions using Cost Function Masking. NeuroImage 2001;14:486-500.

[10] Orrù E, Calloni SF, Tekes A, Huisman TA, Soares BP. The Child with Macrocephaly: Differential Diagnosis and Neuroimaging Findings. Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:848-59.

[11] Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation Exposure from CT Scans in Childhood and Subsequent Risk of Leukaemia and Brain Tumours: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet 2012;380:499-505.

[12] Paciorkowski AR, Greenstein RM. When is Enlargement of the Subarachnoid Spaces not Benign? A Genetic Perspective. Pediatr Neurol 2007;37:1-7.

[13] McArdle CB, Richardson CJ, Nicholas DA, MirfakhraeeM, Hayden CK, Amparo EG. Developmental Features of the Neonatal Brain: MR Imaging. Part II. Ventricular Size and Extracerebral Space. Radiology 1987;162:230-4.

[14] Leijser LM, Srinivasan L, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ, Allsop JM, Cowan FM. Structural Linear Measurements in the Newborn Brain Accuracy of Cranial Ultrasound Compared to MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:640-8.

[15] Tucker J, Choudhary AK, Piatt J. Macrocephaly in Infancy: Benign Enlargement of the Subarachnoid Spaces and Subdural Collections. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016;18:16-20.

[16] Wiig US, Zahl SM, Egge A, Helseth E, Wester K. Epidemiology of Benign External Hydrocephalus in Norway-A PopulationBased Study. Pediatr Neurol 2017;73:36-41.

[17] Hussain ZB, Hussain AB, Mitchell P. Extra-Axial Cerebrospinal Fluid Spaces in Children with Benign External Hydrocephalus: A Case-Control Study. Neuroradiol J 2017;30:410-7.

[18] Lancaster JL, Cykowski MD, McKay DR, KochunovPV, Fox PT, Rogers W, et al. Anatomical Global Spatial Normalization. Neuroinformatics 2010;8:171-82.

[19] Yeatman JD, Richie-Halford A, Smith JK, Keshavan A, Rokem A. A Browser-Based tool for Visualization and Analysis of Diffusion MRI Data. Nat Commun 2018;9:940.

[20] Chen X, Chen Y, Xu Y, Gao Q, Shen Z, Zheng W. Microstructural and Neurochemical Changes in the Rat Brain after Diffuse Axonal Injury. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:1069-77.

[21] Prassopoulos P, Cavouras D. CT Evaluation of Normal CSF Spaces in Children: Relationship to Age, Gender and Cranial Size. Eur J Radiol 1994;18:22-5.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing