Endoluminal vacuum therapy for rectal anastomosis is safe and does not increase risk of strictures in a swine model
Background: Endoluminal vacuum therapy has been experimentally used in patients with esophageal, rectal, and Roux-en-Y bypass surgery. Yorkshire pigs are good animal models for studying the safety and efficacy of endoluminal vacuum therapy and prior studies have employed these devices in rectal anastomotic defects, as rescue therapy for early anastomotic leaks, as well as prophylactic therapy as a means of protecting high risk anastomosis.
Aim: The objective of this study is to assess the effects of a prophylactic vacuum assist device on bowel tissue surrounding an intact anastomosis at 30 days post device removal.
Methods: A total of seven pigs underwent a rectal resection with primary anastomosis: five experimental pigs with a prophylactic endoluminal vacuum device in place for five days post surgery and two control pigs with no device. All animals were euthanized on the 35th post-operative day and subjected to a necropsy with a histopathological evaluation of the rectal anastomosis.
Results: No significant difference in inflammation or strictures was observed between the anastomosis of animals with the endoluminal vacuum devices and controls.
Conclusion: We therefore conclude that endoluminal vacuum therapy is safe for prophylactic use in pigs undergoing low anterior resection and does not cause significant strictures.
Relevance for patients: Anastomotic leak is a feared complication resulting in increased costs, length of stay, and emotional distress. Endoluminal negative pressure vacuum therapy is a new technology that has been used in experimental models in both animals and humans for prevention and treatment of anastomotic leak. In this series we demonstrate endoluminal vacuum therapy is safe in a porcine model and does not result in stricture or increased adhesion formation. We expect endoluminal vacuum therapy to become more widely used in the future in both prevention and treatment of anastomotic leaks.
[1] Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak Following Colorectal Surgery: A Case-control Study. Arch Surg 2010;145:371-6.
[2] Eberl T, Jagoditsch M, Klingler A, Tschmelitsch J. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Resection for Rectal Cancer. Am J Surg 2008;196:592-8.
[3] Migaly J, Bafford AC, Francone TD, Gaertner WB, Eskicioglu C, Bordeianou L, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Bowel Preparation in Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2019;62:3-8.
[4] Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Management of Low Colorectal Anastomotic Leak: Preserving the Anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2015;7:378.
[5] You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A, Poylin V, Francone TD, Davis K, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63:1191-222.
[6] Lee SW, Gregory D, Cool CL. Clinical and Economic Burden of Colorectal and Bariatric Anastomotic Leaks. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4374-81.
[7] Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Małczak P, Wysocki M, Witowski J, Torbicz G, et al. Defunctioning Ileostomy Reduces Leakage Rate in Rectal Cancer Surgery-systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018;9:20816.
[8] Stey AM, Brook RH, Keeler E, Harris MT, Heimann T, Steinhagen RM. Outcomes and Cost of Diverted Versus Undiverted Restorative Proctocolectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:995-1002.
[9] Rubicondo C, Lovece A, Pinelli D, Indriolo A, LucianettiA, Colledan M. Endoluminal Vacuum-assisted Closure (E-Vac) Therapy for Postoperative Esophageal Fistula: Successful Case Series and Literature Review. World J Surg Oncol 2020;18:1-7.
[10] Smallwood NR, Fleshman JW, Leeds SG, Burdick J. The Use of Endoluminal Vacuum (E-Vac) Therapy in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Leaks and Perforations. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2473-80.
[11] Bludau M, Hölscher A, Herbold T, Leers J, Gutschow C, Fuchs H, et al. Management of Upper Intestinal Leaks Using an Endoscopic Vacuum-assisted Closure System (E-VAC). Surg Endosc 2014;28:896-901.
[12] Sharp G, Steffens D, Koh CE. Evidence of Negative Pressure Therapy for Anastomotic Leak: A Systematic Review. ANZ J Surg 2021;91:537-45.
[13] Lehwald-Tywuschik NC, Alexander A, Alkhanji N, Flügen G, Fung S, Rehders A, et al. The “Impossible” Rectal Anastomosis: A Novel Use for Endoluminal Vacuumassisted Therapy. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:125-30.
[14] Mandarino F, Barchi A, Biamonte P, Esposito D, Azzolini F, Fanti L, et al. The Prophylactic Use of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Dehiscence after Rectal Anterior Resection: Is it Feasible for Redo Surgery? Tech Coloproctol 2022;26:319-20.
[15] Popivanov G, Mutafchiyski V, Cirocchi R, Chipeva S, Vasilev V, Kjossev KT, et al. Endoluminal Negative Pressure Therapy in Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks. Colorectal Dis 2020;22:243-53.