AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 6 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18053/jctres.06.202002.004
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluating the results of resistance training using ultrasound or flexed arm circumference: A case for keeping it simple?

Paulo Gentil1 Emily Budzynski-Seymour2 Daniel Souza1 * James Steele2,3 James P. Fisher2 Martim Bottaro4
Show Less
1 College of Physical Education and Dance, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, GO, Brazil
2 School of Sport, Health, and Social Sciences, Solent University, Southampton, UK
3 Ukactive Research Institute, London, UK
4 College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil
Submitted: 5 May 2020 | Revised: 12 June 2020 | Accepted: 17 July 2020 | Published: 8 August 2020
© 2020 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to compare changes in muscle size when measured by ultrasound (MT, muscle thickness) and arm circumference (AC) using data from young men.

Methods: The investigation involved data from 3 previous studies involving a total 67 young men who performed resistance training (RT) for 10-12 weeks. Before and after the training period, elbow flexor MT was evaluated by ultrasound and AC was measured. We conducted two-stage individual patient data random effects meta-analyses using both Frequentist and Bayesian hypothesis testing. One-sample analyses examined the absence or presence of change in both MT and AC, and paired analyses examined whether these differed from one another or equivalent.

Results: One-sample analysis supported that both AC (+4.9%; t p = 0.0002; BF10 = 6,255,759,515) and MT (+3.9%; p < 0.0001; BF10 = 7,958,241,773) suggested that change in muscle size had occurred. Frequentist paired comparisons suggested that the estimates of change between both AC and MT measures did not significantly differ (p = 0.1092) but where not statistically equivalent. Bayesian paired comparisons however suggested that MT estimates where greater in magnitude than AC estimates for change in muscle size (BF10 = 16.39174).

Conclusion: Both MT and AC are able to detect RT induced changes in muscle size of the upper arm, but that the magnitude of changes may differ. Thus, care should be taken when comparing or combining estimates using either approach. Relevance for patients: The use of AC might be considered as a practical and low-cost alternative to detect changes in muscle size.

Keywords
hypertrophy
anthropometry
resistance training
muscles
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
References

[1] Wolfe RR. The Underappreciated Role of Muscle in Health and Disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:475-82.

[2] Zhang H, Lin S, Gao T, Zhong F, Cai J, Sun Y, et al. Association between Sarcopenia and Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-aged and Older Non-obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients 2018;10:364.

[3] Buch A, Carmeli E, Boker LK, Marcus Y, Shefer G, Kis O, et al. Muscle Function and Fat Content in Relation to Sarcopenia, Obesity and Frailty of Old Age-an Overview. Exp Gerontol 2016;76:25-32.

[4] McGlory C, Phillips SM. Exercise and the Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy. In: Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 1st ed., Vol. 135. Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2015. p. 153-73.

[5] Franchi MV, Longo S, Mallinson J, Quinlan JI, Taylor T, Greenhaff PL, et al. Muscle Thickness Correlates to Muscle Cross-sectional Area in the Assessment of Strength Training-induced Hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018;28:846-53.

[6] Loenneke JP, Dankel SJ, Bell ZW, Spitz RW, Abe T, Yasuda T. Ultrasound and MRI Measured Changes in Muscle Mass Gives Different Estimates but Similar Conclusions: A Bayesian Approach. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019;73:1-3.

[7] Bemben MG. Use of Diagnostic Ultrasound for Assessing Muscle Size. J Strength Cond Res 2002;16:103-8.

[8] Cureton KJ, Collins MA, Hill DW, McElhannon FM Jr. Muscle Hypertrophy in Men and Women. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1988;20:338-44.

[9] Argus CK, Gill N, Keogh J, Hopkins WG, Beaven CM. Effects of a Short-term Pre-season Training Programme on the Body Composition and Anaerobic Performance of Professional Rugby Union Players. J Sport Sci 2010;28:679-86.

[10] Yamanaka T, Farley RS, Caputo JL. Occlusion Training Increases Muscular Strength in Division IA Football Players. J Strength Cond Res 2012;26:2523-9.

[11] Barbalho M, Gentil P, Raiol R, Fisher J, Steele J, Coswig V. Influence of Adding Single-joint Exercise to a Multijoint Resistance Training Program in Untrained Young Women. J Strength Cond Res 2020;34:2214-9.

[12] Barbalho M, Coswig V, Raiol R, Steele J, Fisher J, Paoli A, et al. Effects of Adding Single Joint Exercises to a Resistance Training Programme in Trained Women. Sports 2018;6:160.

[13] de Franca HS, Branco PA, Guedes DP Jr., Gentil P, Steele J, Teixeira CV. The Effects of Adding Single-joint Exercises to a Multi-joint Exercise Resistance Training Program on Upper Body Muscle Strength and Size in Trained Men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015;40:822-6.

[14] Steele J, Coswig VS, Fisher JP, Raiol R, Paoli A, Gentil P, et al. Does The Addition of Single Joint Exercises to a Resistance Training Program Improve Changes in Performance and Anthropometric Measures in Untrained Men? Eur J Transl Myol 2018;28:7827.

[15] DeFreitas JM, Beck TW, Stock MS, Dillon MA, Sherk VD, Stout JR, et al. A Comparison of Techniques for Estimating Training-induced Changes in Muscle Cross-sectional Area. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:2383-9.

[16] Budzynski-Seymour E, Fisher J, Giessing J, Gentil P, Steele J. Relationships and Comparative Reliability of Ultrasound Derived Measures of Upper and Lower Limb Muscle Thickness, and Estimates of Muscle Area from Anthropometric Measures. SportRxiv; 2019.

[17] Gentil P, Arruda A, Souza D, Giessing J, Paoli A, Fisher J, et al. Is there any Practical Application of Meta-analytical Results in Strength Training? Front Physiol 2017;8:8-11.

[18] Gentil P, Fischer B, Martorelli AS, Lima RM, Bottaro M. Effects of Equal-volume Resistance Training Performed One or Two Times a Week in Upper Body Muscle Size and Strength of Untrained Young Men. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2015;55:144-9.

[19] Gentil P, Fisher J, Steele J, Campos MH, Silva MH, Paoli A, et al. Effects of Equal-volume Resistance Training with Different Training Frequencies in Muscle Size and Strength in Trained Men. PeerJ 2018;6:e5020.

[20] Gentil P, Soares SR, Pereira MC, Cunha RR, Martorelli SS, Martorelli AS, et al. Effect of Adding Single-joint Exercises to a Multi-joint Exercise Resistance-training Program on Strength and Hypertrophy in Untrained Subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2013;38:341-4.

[21] Gentil P, Bottaro M. Influence of Supervision Ratio on Muscle Adaptations to Resistance Training in Nontrained Subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:639-43.

[22] Gentil P, Bottaro M. Effects of Training Attendance on Muscle Strength of Young Men after 11 Weeks of Resistance Training. Asian J Sports Med 2013;4:101-6.

[23] Ogasawara R, Thiebaud RS, Loenneke JP, Loftin M, Abe T. Time Course for Arm and Chest Muscle Thickness Changes Following Bench Press Training. Interv Med Appl Sci 2012;4:217-20.

[24] Barbalho M, Coswig VS, Steele J, Fisher JP, Paoli A, Gentil P. Evidence for an Upper Threshold for Resistance Training Volume in Trained Women. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2019;51:515-22.

[25] Barbalho M, Coswig VS, Steele J, Fisher JP, Giessing J, Gentil P. Evidence of a Ceiling Effect for Training Volume in Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength in Trained Men-Less is More? Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020;15:268-77.

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing