Do cement pockets prevent fluid contamination of the undersurface of tibial baseplates?
Background: Aseptic loosening remains one of the most frequent causes of implant failure following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prior literature has established that these failures appear to occur at the implant-cement interface—likely secondary to lipid contamination. Implant manufacturers have incorporated cement pockets on the undersurface of tibial implants to improve fixation.
Aim: The study aimed to determine if cement pockets prevent lipid contamination of the implant-cement interface.
Methods: A contemporary total knee tibial baseplate has recently incorporated cement pockets on its implants. We modeled clear acrylic tibial baseplate molds of this implant with and without cementation pockets. We then simulated an experimental cementing process with the introduction of lipids at the implant-cement interface. The surface area contamination at this interface was quantified using ImageJ software and presented as a percentage of the total baseplate surface area available for fixation.
Results: For the predecessor implant design without cementation pockets, the average tibial baseplate lipid contamination was 42.82%. The average tibial baseplate lipid contamination was 30.36% for the contemporary implant design with cementation pockets. The addition of cement pockets was found to significantly reduce lipid contamination (p = 0.0265).
Conclusion: Lipid contamination of the implant-cement interface remains a primary mechanism of implant failure following primary TKA. We found that the addition of cement pockets decreased the surface area of implant contamination with fluid. Therefore, while it is unclear whether cement pockets improve implant fixation, they do appear to reduce fluid/lipid contamination and alternative undersurface geometries and techniques should be considered to help prevent lipid contamination.
Relevance for Patients: Cement pockets and other undersurface designs may help prevent aseptic loosening, which has become a leading cause of revision surgery for persistently painful and/or unstable TKA in patients.
[1] Shichman I, Askew N, Habibi A, Nherera L, Macaulay W, Seyler T, et al. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2040- 2060. Arthroplasty Today 2023;21:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101152
[2] Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr. Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 2020;35:S79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
[3] De Steiger RN, Muratoglu O, Lorimer M, Cuthbert AR, Graves SE. Lower Prosthesis-Specific 10-Year Revision Rate with Crosslinked than with Non-Crosslinked Polyethylene in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2015;86:721-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1065046
[4] Wilhelm SK, Henrichsen JL, Siljander M, Moore D, Karadsheh M. Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where Are We Now? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26:2309499018808356. doi: 10.1177/2309499018808356
[5] Martin JR, Otero JE, Mason JB, Fehring TK. Where Is the “Weak Link” of Fixation in Contemporary Cemented Total Knee Replacements? J Arthroplasty 2021;36:2497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.029
[6] Cox ZC, Green CC, Otero JE, Mason JB, Martin JR. Varus Collapse in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Fixation or Bone Fail First? J Arthroplasty 2022;37:162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.012
[7] Randall DJ, Anderson MB, Gililland JM, Peters CL, Pelt CE. A Potential Need for Surgeon Consensus: Cementation Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Orthopedic implant Manufacturers’ Guidelines Lack Consistency. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019;27:2309499019878258. doi: 10.1177/2309499019878258
[8] Martin JR, Archibeck MJ, Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Polkowski GG, Schwarzkopf R, et al. Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cementing Technique among Arthroplasty Surgeons-A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members. J Arthroplasty 2022;38:S233-8.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.034
[9] Martin JR, Wronski PT, Schilkowsky RM, Orfanos AV, Fehring TK, Mason JB, et al. Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Motion During Total Knee Cementing Significantly Decreases Tibial Implant Fixation Strength. J Arthroplasty 2022;37:S12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.091
[10] Karpiński R, Szabelski J, Krakowski P, Jonak J, Falkowicz K, Jojczuk M, et al. Effect of Various Admixtures on Selected Mechanical Properties of Medium Viscosity Bone Cements: Part 1 - α/β Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP). Compos Struct 2024;343:118306. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118306
[11] Karpiński R, Szabelski J, Krakowski P, Jonak J, Falkowicz K,Jojczuk M, et al. Effect of Various Admixtures on Selected Mechanical Properties of Medium Viscosity Bone Cements: Part 2 - Hydroxyapatite. Compos Struct 2024;343:118308. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118308
[12] Karpiński R, Szabelski J, Krakowski P, Jonak J, Falkowicz K, Jojczuk M, et al. Effect of Various Admixtures on Selected Mechanical Properties of Medium Viscosity Bone Cements: Part 3 - Glassy Carbon. Compos Struct 2024;343:118307. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118307
[13] Sun Y, Liu J, Jiang W, Gao C, Qiao Y, Qin Y, et al. Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Chinese Patients: A Retrospective Study in Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Med Sci Monit 2024;30:e943681. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943681
[14] Menken LG, Fleuriscar J, Weiner T, Berliner ZP, Rodriguez JA. Aseptic Tibial Implant Loosening after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Preventable? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021;29:326-30. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00452
[15] Sadauskas A, Engh C 3rd, Mehta M, Levine B. Implant Interface Debonding after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A New Cause for Concern? Arthroplast Today 2020;6:972-5. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.043
[16] Van Otten TJ, van Loon CJ. Early Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component at the Cement-Implant Interface in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Overview of Potentially Associated Factors. Acta Orthop Belg 2022;88:103-11. doi: 10.52628/88.1.13
[17] Bonutti PM, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Cole C, Gwam CU, Harwin SF, et al. Unusually High Rate of Early Failure of Tibial Component in ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System at Implant-Cement Interface. J Knee Surg 2017;30:435-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603756
[18] Keohane D, Sheridan GA, Masterson E. High Rate of Tibial Debonding and Failure in a Popular Knee Replacement. Bone Jt Open 2022;3:495-501. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.36.BJO-2022-0043.R1
[19] Hazelwood KJ, O’Rourke M, Stamos VP, McMillan RD, Beigler D, Robb WJ 3rd. Case Series Report: Early Cement-implant Interface Fixation Failure in Total Knee Replacement. Knee 2015;22:424-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.016
[20] Murphy JD, Braunlich PR, Judson Iv WR, Harker JN, Baumann PA. Early Aseptic Failure of the Tibial Component-Cement Interface in ATTUNE® Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of Three Cases. Cureus 2021;13:e20582. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20582
[21] Billi F, Kavanaugh A, Schmalzried H, Schmalzried TP. Techniques for Improving the Initial Strength of the Tibial Tray-Cement Interface Bond. Bone Joint J 2019;101- B:53-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0500.R1
[22] Mika A, Gilber W, Wilson J, Engstrom S, Polkowski G, Martin R. Do you Double Butter? A Cementation Technique that Significantly Reduces Lipid Contamination of the Tibial Baseplate in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Park City Hip and Knee Symposium Park City, UT, USA; 2023.
[23] Fokter SK, Gubeljak N, Punzón-Quijorna E, Pelicon P, Kelemen M, Vavpetič P, et al. Total Knee Replacement with an Uncemented Porous Tantalum Tibia Component: A Failure Analysis. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:2575. doi: 10.3390/ma15072575