AccScience Publishing / JCTR / Volume 10 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/jctr.23.00091
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The effects of lumbar self-sustained natural apophyseal glides on lumbar spine range of motion and hip muscle flexibility in asymptomatic college students: a crossover study

Yuto Kikuchi1,2 Kiyokazu Akasaka1,3* Takahiro Otsudo4 Hiroshi Hattori1,3 Yuki Hasebe5 Yuji Hamada1,2 Toby Hall6
Show Less
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
2 Department of Rehabilitation, Kawagoe Clinic, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
3 School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Medical Care, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
4 Department of Rehabilitation, Major of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
5 Department of Rehabilitation, Saitama Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
6 School of Allied Health in Physiotherapy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
JCTR 2024, 10(2), 172–179; https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.23.00091
Submitted: 21 July 2023 | Accepted: 26 October 2023 | Published: 25 April 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Patients with low back pain (LBP) tend to have prolonged treatment periods, which increase the cost of medical care. Several studies have reported that lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) and hip muscle flexibility are factors in LBP. Sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) have reportedly improved the lumbar spine ROM and hip flexibility of LBP patients. Moreover, self- SNAGs can be performed by the patients themselves. 

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of self-SNAGs on lumbar spine ROM compared to a repeated movement procedure in asymptomatic college students.

Methods: A prospective crossover study was conducted on 14 asymptomatic male college students. The asymptomatic participants performed self-SNAGs or repeated movements (i.e., three sets per day, 6 times a day over 1 week), and the compliance rate for both exercises was recorded. The lumbar spine ROM (i.e., flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation) was measured using the back ROM instrument, and hip muscle flexibility was measured using the Thomas test, heel-buttock distance, finger-floor distance, and straight leg raise test (SLR). Measurements were taken before commencement, immediately after, and 1 week later.

Results: Left lateral bending and left SLR were excluded from the between-group comparison (self- SNAG and sham) due to a carryover effect (P < 0.05). A comparison between the self-SNAG and sham groups displayed no significant differences in the lumbar spine ROM and hip muscle flexibility (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study revealed that lumbar self-SNAGs had no significant effect on lumbar spine ROM or hip muscle flexibility in the short term, suggesting that such movements should be avoided when stretching to prevent LBP. However, this study did not include subjects with limited lumbar spine ROM and hip muscle flexibility due to pain, warranting further validation in future studies.

Relevance for Patients: The effects of lumbar self-SNAGs were similar to that of sham exercises in healthy individuals without joint ROM restrictions in the trunk or lower extremities due to LBP

Keywords
Manual therapy
Able-bodied person
Crossover study
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References

[1] Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, Controversy, Crisis: Low Back Pain and the Health of the Public. Annu Rev Public Health 1991;12:141-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001041

[2] Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Wood EM, Garg A, Moore JS, Kapellusch J, et al. Prevalence of Low Back Pain by Anatomic Location and Intensity in an Occupational Population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-283

[3] Boonen A, van den Heuvel R, van Tubergen A, Goossens M, Severens JL, van der Heijde D, et al. Large Differences in Cost of Illness and Wellbeing between Patients with Fibromyalgia, Chronic Low Back Pain, or Ankylosing Spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:396-402. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019711

[4] Hansson EK, Hansson TH. The Costs for Persons Sicklisted More than One Month Because of Low Back or Neck Problems. A Two-year Prospective Study of Swedish Patients. Eur Spine J 2005;14:337-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0731-3

[5] Kim HS, Choi JW, Chang SH, Lee KS, Oh JY. Treatment Duration and Cost of Work-related Low Back Pain in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:127-31. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.1.127

[6] Sung PS. A Kinematic analysis for Shoulder and Pelvis Coordination During Axial Trunk Rotation in Subjects with and Without Recurrent Low Back Pain. Gait Posture 2014;40:493-8.doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.001

[7] Corkery MB, O’Rourke B, Viola S, Yen SC, Rigby J, Singer K, et al. An Exploratory Examination of the Association between Altered Lumbar Motor Control, Joint Mobility and Low Back Pain in Athletes. Asian J Sports Med 2014;5:e24283. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.24283

[8] Hidalgo B, Gilliaux M, Poncin W, Detrembleur C. Reliability and Validity of a Kinematic Spine Model During Active Trunk Movement in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:756-63. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1015

[9] Roach SM, San Juan JG, Suprak DN, Lyda M, Bies AJ, Boydston CR. Passive Hip Range of Motion is Reduced in Active Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain Compared to Controls. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015;10:13-20.

[10] Kujala UM, Salminen JJ, Taimela S, Oksanen A, Jaakkola L. Subject Characteristics and Low Back Pain in Young Athletes and Nonathletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:627-32.

[11] Kemmochi M, Sasaki S, Ichimura S. Association between Reduced Trunk Flexibility in Children and Lumbar Stress Fractures. J Orthop 2018;15:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.014

[12] Arab AM, Soleimanifar M, Nourbakhsh MR. Relationship between Hip Extensor Strength and Back Extensor Length in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2019;42:125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.03.004

[13] Esola MA, McClure PW, Fitzgerald GK, Siegler S. Analysis of Lumbar Spine and Hip Motion During Forward Bending in Subjects with and Without a History of Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:71-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199601010-00017

[14] Chatzitheodorou D, Kabitsis C, Malliou P, Mougios V. A Pilot Study of the Effects of High-intensity Aerobic Exercise Versus Passive Interventions on Pain, Disability, Psychological Strain, and Serum Cortisol Concentrations in People with Chronic Low Back Pain. Phys Ther 2007;87:304-12. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060080

[15] Hing W, Hall T, Mulligan B. In: Hing W, editor. The Mulligan Concept of Manual Therapy-EBook: Textbook of Technique. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. 

[16] Vicenzino B, Hing W, Rivett DA, Hall T. In: Vicenzino B, editor. Mobilization with Movement: The Art and the Science. 1st ed. Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011.

[17] Moulson A, Watson T. A Preliminary Investigation into the Relationship between Cervical Snags and Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in the Upper Limbs of an Asymptomatic Population. Man Ther 2006;11:214-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.04.003

[18] Menek B, Tarakci D, Algun ZC. The Effect of Mulligan Mobilization on Pain and Life Quality of Patients with Rotator Cuff Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2019;32:171-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181230

[19] Hussien HM, Abdel-Raoof NA, Kattabei OM, Ahmed HH. Effect of Mulligan Concept Lumbar SNAG on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Chiropr Med 2017;16:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.003

[20] Ain SQ, Shakil Ur Rehman S, Maryam M, Kiani SK. Effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides with and Without Thoracic Posture Correction Techniques on Mechanical Back Pain: A Randomized Control Trial. J Pak Med Assoc 2019;69:1584-7. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.274875

[21] Konstantinou K, Foster N, Rushton A, Baxter D, Wright C, Breen A. Flexion Mobilizations with Movement Techniques: The Immediate Effects on Range of Movement and Pain in Subjects with Low Back Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.015

[22] Ali MN, Sethi K, Noohu MM. Comparison of Two Mobilization Techniques in Management of Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2019;23:918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.020

[23] Waqqar S, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S, Ahmad S. McKenzie Treatment Versus Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:476-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9127

[24] Moutzouri M, Perry J, Billis E. Investigation of the Effects of a Centrally Applied Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Mobilization on Lower Limb Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Asymptomatic Subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012;35:286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.016

[25] Moutzouri M, Billis E, Strimpakos N, Kottika P, Oldham JA. The Effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) Mobilisation in the Lumbar Flexion Range of Asymptomatic Subjects as Measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D Motion analysis System. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-131

[26] Madson TJ, Youdas JW, Suman VJ. Reproducibility of Lumbar Spine Range of Motion Measurements Using the Back Range of Motion Device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999;29:470-7. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.8.470

[27] Atya AM. The Validity of Spinal Mobility for Prediction of Functional Disability in Male Patients with Low Back Pain. J Adv Res 2013;4:43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.01.002

[28] Buran Çirak Y, Yurdaişik I, Elbaşi ND, Tütüneken YE, Köçe K, Çinar B. Effect of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Stiffness of Lumbar Stabilizer Muscles in Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021;44:445-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.06.005

[29] Sadler SG, Spink MJ, Ho A, De Jonge XJ, Chuter VH. Restriction in Lateral Bending Range of Motion, Lumbar Lordosis, and Hamstring Flexibility Predicts the Development of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:179. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1534-0

[30] Puentedura EJ, Landers MR, Hurt K, Meissner M, Mills J, Young D. Immediate Effects of Lumbar Spine Manipulation on the Resting and Contraction tHickness of Transversus Abdominis in Asymptomatic Individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:13-21. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3311

[31] Martins WR, Diniz LR, Blasczyk JC, Lagoa KF, Thomaz S, Rodrigues ME, et al. Immediate Changes in Electroencephalography Activity in Individuals with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain after Cranial Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;15:223. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0732-2

[32] Hatano G, Suzuki S, Matsuo S, Kataura S, Yokoi K, Fukaya T, et al. Hamstring Stiffness Returns More Rapidly after Static Stretching than Range of Motion, Stretch Tolerance, and Isometric Peak Torque. J Sport Rehabil 2019;28:325-31. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0203

[33] Cathcart E, McSweeney T, Johnston R, Young H, Edwards DJ. Immediate Biomechanical, Systemic, and Interoceptive Effects of Myofascial Release on the Thoracic Spine: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2019;23:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.10.006

[34] Childs JD, Fritz, JM, Wu SS, Flynn TW, Wainner RS, Robertson EK, et al. Implications of Early and Guideline Adherent Physical Therapy for Low Back Pain on Utilization and Costs. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3

[35] Nicolson PJ, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Stratford PW, Bennell KL. Self-reported Home Exercise Adherence: A Validity and Reliability Study Using Concealed Accelerometers. JOrthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48:943-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.8275

[36] Muzii VF, Rollo G, Rocca G, Erasmo R, Falzarano G, Liuzza F, et al. Radiographic and Functional Outcome of Complex Acetabular Fractures: Implications of Open Reduction in Spinopelvic Balance, Gait and Quality of Life. Med Glas (Zenica) 2021;18:273-9. doi: 10.17392/1300-21 

Share
Back to top
Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Electronic ISSN: 2424-810X Print ISSN: 2382-6533, Published by AccScience Publishing