Renewal of industrial space in Hong Kong and Shanghai: Policy review and comparison
Industrial space renewal is a strategic planning choice for cities undergoing de-/post-industrialization against the backdrop of land resource constraints. This study reviewed industrial space renewal policies in Hong Kong and Shanghai from a political economy perspective. With the analytical framework of political economy, the study reveals that, in the power flow of industrial space renewal (stressed on ownership), Hong Kong’s private sectors are active, and Shanghai is dominated by public power. In the political and economic environment, differences in government and market forces lead to different planning models and outcomes. Industrial building renewal in Hong Kong is mostly progressive due to diversified developmental forces, whereas industrial land renewal in Shanghai is mostly comprehensive and rational, assisted by blueprint-based planning. Pros and cons are rooted in both cities. Thus, an in-depth examination is of great significance for better decision-making in the future.
Andres, L., & Gresillon, B. (2013). Cultural brownfields in European cities: A new mainstream object for cultural and urban policies. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19: 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2011.625416
Bernt, M. (2009). Partnerships for demolition: The governance of urban renewal in East Germany’s shrinking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33: 754-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00856.x
Chan, R. C. K., & Li, L. (2017). Entrepreneurial city and the restructuring of urban space in shanghai expo. Urban Geography, 38: 666-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1139909
Ding, F., & Wu, J. (2017). The evolution of the concept of urban regeneration and the practical connotation in today’s society. Urban Planning Forum, 6: 87-95. (in Chinese)
Doucet, B. (2013). Variations of the entrepreneurial city: Goals, roles and visions in Rotterdam’s Kop Van Zuid and the Glasgow Harbour megaprojects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 2035-2051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01182.x
Feng, L., & Tang, Z. (2013). The renewal of allocated industrial land in the perspective of property right system: The case of Hongkou district, Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum, 5: 23-29. (in Chinese)
Golland, A., & Watkins, C. (2002). Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development. Oxford: Blackwell. Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space1. European Planning Studies, 14: 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500420792
Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52: 313-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016567
Kantor, P. (1996). The Dependent City Revisited: The Political Economy of Urban Development and Social Policy. Colorado: Westview Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Li, J., & Chiu, L. H. R. (2017). Urban investment and development corporations, new town development and China’s local state restructuring-the case of Songjiang new town, Shanghai. Urban Geography, 39: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1382308
Li, L., & Chan, R. C. K. (2017a). Contesting China’s Engagement with neoliberal urbanism: An overview of the evolving policy and mismatches in urban China. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6: 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2016-0021
Li, L., & Chan, R. C. K. (2017b). Contesting China’s engagement with neoliberal urbanism: An overview of the evolving policy and mismatches in urban China. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6: 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2016-0021
Li, L., Xian, S., & Qi, Z. (2022). Planning for eco-city in china: Policy mobility in path creation of Eco-Zhuhai. Sustainable Development Research, 4: 27. https://doi.org/10.30560/sdr.v4n2p27
Liao, H. F., & Chan, R. C. K. (2011). Industrial relocation of Hong Kong manufacturing firms: Towards an expanding industrial space beyond the Pearl River Delta. GeoJournal, 76: 623-639. 10.1007/s10708-009-9316-3
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Marshall, R. (2014). Waterfronts in Post-industrial Cities. New York: Routledge.
Ng, M. K. (1999). Political economy and urban planning: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. Progress in Planning, 51: 1-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(98)00027-0
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34: 380-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00247
Shen, J. (2000). The urban political economics and urban governance. City Planning Reivew, 24: 8-11. (in Chinese). Smith, N. (1992). Geography, Difference and the Politics of Scale. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Taylor, N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory Since 1945. United States: SAGE Publications.
Xian, S., & Chen, H. (2015). Revitalisation of industrial buildings in Hong Kong: New measures, new constraints? Habitat International, 47: 298-306. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.02.004
Yeh, A. G. O., & Xu, J. (2008). Regional cooperation in the Pan-Pearl River Delta: A formulaic aspiration or a new imagination? Built Environment, 34: 408-426. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.34.4.408
Zhang, J., & Chen, H. (2016). Understanding Chinese urban planning in the growth-first politics: Based on a review of planning for growth: Urban and regional planning in China. Urban Planning International, 31: 16-20. (in Chinese)