AccScience Publishing / JCAU / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JCAU025100024
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Life cycle carbon-footprint calculation methods for detachable wooden cabins in the western Sichuan pastoral regions

Yuzhenru Sun1 Jun Qin1 Xiaoliang Wang1,2 Shuliang Li1,2 Li Yang1,2 Xianmin Mai1*
Show Less
1 Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
2 Department of Architecture, Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Research, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 025100024 https://doi.org/10.36922/JCAU025100024
Received: 9 March 2025 | Revised: 20 May 2025 | Accepted: 20 May 2025 | Published online: 23 June 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

As a critical building typology in the fragile ecosystem of the western Sichuan pastoral regions, detachable buildings generate substantial carbon emissions throughout their life cycle, yet standardized assessment frameworks remain lacking. This study focuses on the widely utilized detachable wooden cabins in these areas, developing an innovative carbon emission model based on a life cycle assessment methodology tailored to detachable building structures. The model encompasses four phases: materialization, operation, circulation, and demolition and recycling. It reveals spatiotemporal distribution patterns of carbon emissions in detachable buildings and identifies the primary contributing phases. The results indicate that the life cycle carbon emissions of the modular wooden cabins amount to 172 tons of CO2eq. Due to the building’s service lifespan and the impact of biomass energy combustion on the plateau, the operational phase contributes a predominant 81.68% of total emissions. The materialization phase, influenced by cross-altitude material transportation, accounts for 10.28%, while the demolition and recycling phases represent 5.67%. Compared to conventional buildings, the lightweight yet high-strength detachable structure exhibits a unique transportation phase contribution of merely 2.38%, demonstrating no significant impact on overall life cycle carbon intensity. The detachable wooden cabins showcase substantial carbon reduction potential through lightweight design, modular configuration, and photovoltaic-enhanced energy systems, providing methodological references and practical insights for low-carbon design and assessment of detachable buildings in ecologically sensitive regions.

Keywords
Life cycle assessment
Detachable wooden structures
Carbon emission calculation
Carbon footprint
Plateau sustainability
Funding
This work was supported by the Sichuan Provincial Youth Scientific and Technological Innovation Research Team on Ecological Adaptability of Plateau Architecture (Grant No. 2022JDTD0008) and the Graduate Innovative Research Project of Southwest Minzu University (Grant No. ZD2023018).
Conflict of interest
Xianmin Mai is an Executive Editor of this journal, but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this article, directly or indirectly. Separately, other authors declared that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this article.
References

Bayer, D. R., & Pruckner, M. (2024). Data-driven heat pump retrofit analysis in residential buildings: Carbon emission reductions and economic viability. Applied Energy, 373:123823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123823

 

Cai, B., Liang, S., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Cao, L., Qu, S., et al. (2018). China high resolution emission database (CHRED) with point emission sources, gridded emission data, and supplementary socioeconomic data. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 129:232-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.036  

 

Cai, Q., Li, B., He, W., & Guo, M. (2024). Energy consumption calculation of civil buildings in regional integrated energy systems: A review of characteristics, methods and application prospects. Sustainability, 16(13):5692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135692

 

Cai, Y., Wang, C., Zhou, Y., & Deng, D. (2024). Temporal and spatial characteristics of carbon storage and its response to land-use change in Chengdu, China. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 6(3):3069. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.3069

 

China, S. (2021). Working Guidance for Carbon Dioxide Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in Full and Faithful Implementation of the New Development Philosophy. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China Beijing.

 

Cucuzza, R., Aloisio, A., Rad, M. M., & Domaneschi, M. (2024). Constructability-based design approach for steel structures: From truss beams to real-world inspired industrial buildings. Automation in Construction, 166:105630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105630

 

Di Giulio, R., Coccagna, M., Van Den Brand, G., & Kiang, L. Q. (2005). IFD Buildings as Design and Delivery Innovation. Paper Presented at the 22 International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.

 

Ding, Z., Liu, S., Luo, L., & Liao, L. (2020). A building information modeling-based carbon emission measurement system for prefabricated residential buildings during the materialization phase. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264:121728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121728

 

Eggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K., editors. (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC web sites. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 25].

 

Fan, J. L., Liao, H., Liang, Q. M., Tatano, H., Liu, C. F., & Wei, Y. M. (2013). Residential carbon emission evolutions in urban-rural divided China: An end-use and behavior analysis. Applied Energy, 101:323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.020

 

Farhan, S. L., & Nasar, Z. A. (2021). Urban identity in the pilgrimage cities of Iraq: Analysis trends of architectural designers in the city of Karbala. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 14:210-222. https://doi.org/10.69554/ILBJ1476

 

Frischknecht, R., Stolz, P., Krebs, L., de Wild-Scholten, M., Sinha, P., & Heath, G. (2020). Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessments of photovoltaic systems: IEA PVPS Task 12: PV Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.2172/2308831.

 

Han, Y., Wang, X., Lu, L., & Mai, X. (2023). Adaptive thermal sensation evaluation model in tents for western sichuan plateau of China: A field study. Energy and Buildings, 286:112952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112952

 

Hao, J. L., & Ma, W. (2023). Evaluating carbon emissions of construction and demolition waste in building energy retrofit projects. Energy, 281:128201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128201

 

Hao, J. L., Cheng, B., Lu, W., Xu, J., Wang, J., Bu, W., & Guo, Z. (2020). Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach. Science of the Total Environment, 723:137870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870

 

Huang, Z., Zhou, H., Miao, Z., Tang, H., Lin, B., & Zhuang, W. (2024). Life-cycle carbon emissions (LCCE) of buildings: Implications, calculations, and reductions. Engineering, 35:115-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.08.019

 

Huo, T., Cao, R., Xia, N., Hu, X., Cai, W., & Liu, B. (2022). Spatial correlation network structure of China’s building carbon emissions and its driving factors: A social network analysis method. Journal of Environmental Management, 320:115808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115808

 

Islam, H., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., & Bhuiyan, M. A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of shipping container home: A sustainable construction. Energy and Buildings, 128:673-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.002

 

Jin, W., Wang, S., & Zhao, W. (2025). Urban-rural carbon emission differences in China’s urbanization: Spatial effects and influencing factors. Environmental Pollution, 366:125423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125423

 

Joensuu, T., Leino, R., Heinonen, J., & Saari, A. (2022). Developing buildings’ life cycle assessment in circular economy-comparing methods for assessing carbon footprint of reusable components. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77:103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103499

 

Joshi, P., & Gokhale-Welch, C. (2022). Fundamentals of Energy Storage [Slides]. https://doi.org/10.2172/1898896

 

Laurent, A. B., Van Der Meer, Y., & Villeneuve, C. (2018). Comparative life cycle carbon footprint of a non-residential steel and wooden building structures. Current Trends in Forest Research, 2(4):2638-0013.100028. https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-0013.100028

 

Li, Z., Lin, B., Zheng, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Dai, J. (2020). A Review of Operational Energy Consumption Calculation Method for Urban Buildings. Paper Presented at the Building Simulation.

 

Luo, W., Liu, W., Liu, W., Xia, L., Zheng, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). Analysis of influencing factors and carbon emission scenario prediction during building operation stage. Energy, 316:134401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134401

 

Mayer, F., Bhandari, R., & Gäth, S. A. (2021). Life cycle assessment on the treatment of organic waste streams by anaerobic digestion, hydrothermal carbonization and incineration. Waste Management, 130:93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.019

 

Mazur, Ł., & Olenchuk, A. (2023). Life cycle assessment and building information modeling integrated approach: Carbon footprint of masonry and timber-frame constructions in single-family houses. Sustainability, 15(21):15486. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115486

 

Mo, Z., Gao, T., Qu, J., Cai, G., Cao, Z., & Jiang, W. (2023). An empirical study of carbon emission calculation in the production and construction phase of a prefabricated office building from Zhejiang, China. Buildings, 13(1):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010053

 

Olumo, A., & Haas, C. (2024). Building material reuse: An optimization framework for sourcing new and reclaimed building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 479:143892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143892

 

Shi, L., Qi, X., Yang, Z., Tao, L., Li, Y., Qiu, J., et al. (2023). Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States. Journal of Building Engineering, 70:106396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106396

 

Tenório, M., Ferreira, R., Belafonte, V., Sousa, F., Meireis, C., Fontes, M., et al. (2024). Contemporary strategies for the structural design of multi-story modular timber buildings: A comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 14(8):3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083194

 

Tong, Y., Yang, H., Bao, L., Guo, B., Shi, Y., & Wang, C. (2022). Analysis of thermal insulation thickness for a container house in the yanqing zone of the beijing 2022 olympic and paralympic winter games. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24):16417. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416417

 

Wang, Y. (2017). Carbon Emission Model for Industrialized Prefabricated Buildings Throughout Their Life Cycle. Nanjing, China: Southeast University Press.

 

Xikai, M., Lixiong, W., Jiwei, L., Xiaoli, Q., & Tongyao, W. (2019). Comparison of regression models for estimation of carbon emissions during building’s lifecycle using designing factors: A case study of residential buildings in Tianjin, China. Energy and Buildings, 204:109519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109519

 

Yang, Y., & Chen, F. (2023). Research on energy-saving coupling correlation of new energy buildings based on carbon emission effect. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 56:103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103043

 

Zboinska, M. A., & Göbel, F. (2025). Digital tool integrations for architectural reuse of salvaged building materials. Automation in Construction, 170:105947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105947

 

Zhao, X., Guo, W., Lyu, N., Wang, R., Zhang, M., Shi, X., et al. (2025). Innovative carbon emission monitoring in urban mobility: A case study of Beijing. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 7:4859. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.4859

 

Zhu, S., Cai, B., Fang, S., Zhu, J., & Gao, Q. (2023). The development and influence of IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In Annual Report on Actions to Address Climate Change (2019) Climate Risk Prevention. Germany: Springer; p. 233-246.

 

Share
Back to top
Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, Electronic ISSN: 2717-5626 Published by AccScience Publishing